Re: dovecot username with domain
On 19-09-2023 22:36, Dave McGuire wrote: On 9/19/23 16:34, Michael Grant wrote: Thanks, I was hoping for something less complicated. I found auth_username_format %n which drops the domain if supplied. Unfortunately my imap username isn't 'mgrant'. Probably i could make this work if there was no other way. This forces me to have my IMAP password the same as my unix password. I probably should move to virtual users for everyone on my box but that's not so easy. I was hoping there was some way i could translate individual users which would make this transition easier. You could have virtual users with any username (matching the required format for 'New Outlook') and password in an SQL passdb + userdb, and a second backend for the system users (PAM probably) as a fallback. The docs describe this precise scenario at: https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/authentication/multiple_authentication_databases/ Regards, Tom ___ dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
Re: dovecot username with domain
On 9/19/23 16:34, Michael Grant wrote:
Heya mgrant, been a long time!
Very! Will hit you off-list.
:-)
If you're using a database for authentication, you can do this sort of
translation past using stored functions in MySQL. Queries look something
like this:
password_query = SELECT userid AS username, domain, password FROM mail_users
WHERE userid = addr_to_uname('%u') AND domain =
addr_to_domain_or_default('%u', 'domain.com')
...
Thanks, I was hoping for something less complicated. I found
auth_username_format %n
which drops the domain if supplied. Unfortunately my imap username
isn't 'mgrant'. Probably i could make this work if there was no other
way. This forces me to have my IMAP password the same as my unix
password.
I probably should move to virtual users for everyone on my box but
that's not so easy. I was hoping there was some way i could translate
individual users which would make this transition easier.
You can use that technique, though, to implement any sort of
translation table that you could build into an SQL query. Just a
suggestion.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
Re: dovecot username with domain
> Heya mgrant, been a long time!
Very! Will hit you off-list.
> If you're using a database for authentication, you can do this sort of
> translation past using stored functions in MySQL. Queries look something
> like this:
>
> password_query = SELECT userid AS username, domain, password FROM mail_users
> WHERE userid = addr_to_uname('%u') AND domain =
> addr_to_domain_or_default('%u', 'domain.com')
...
Thanks, I was hoping for something less complicated. I found
auth_username_format %n
which drops the domain if supplied. Unfortunately my imap username
isn't 'mgrant'. Probably i could make this work if there was no other
way. This forces me to have my IMAP password the same as my unix
password.
I probably should move to virtual users for everyone on my box but
that's not so easy. I was hoping there was some way i could translate
individual users which would make this transition easier.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
Re: dovecot username with domain
On 9/19/23 15:51, Michael Grant via dovecot wrote:
I've been using dovecot using system usernames (my unix uname as my
IMAP username). But today I tried New Outlook which requires the imap
username match my email address.
Is there some way to tell dovecot that username@host is the same as uname?
(where username@host is an email address and uname is a unix login
which might be completely different).
Heya mgrant, been a long time!
If you're using a database for authentication, you can do this sort
of translation past using stored functions in MySQL. Queries look
something like this:
password_query = SELECT userid AS username, domain, password FROM
mail_users WHERE userid = addr_to_uname('%u') AND domain =
addr_to_domain_or_default('%u', 'domain.com')
One of the functions is something like this:
DELIMITER ?
CREATE FUNCTION addr_to_domain_or_default (userid VARCHAR(255),
default_domain VARCHAR(255)) RETURNS VARCHAR(255) DETERMINISTIC
BEGIN
DECLARE at_pos INT;
DECLARE addr_out VARCHAR(255);
SELECT LOCATE('@', userid) INTO at_pos;
IF at_pos = 0 THEN
CASE userid
WHEN 'user1' THEN SET addr_out = 'domain1.com';
WHEN 'user2' THEN SET addr_out = 'domain2.com';
ELSE SET addr_out = default_domain;
END CASE;
ELSE
SELECT SUBSTRING(userid, at_pos + 1) INTO addr_out;
END IF;
RETURN addr_out;
END ?
DELIMITER ;
--
This isn't exactly the functionality you want, but it illustrates the
kinds of translations that can easy be done on the database side. I've
been using a scheme like this for many years with great results.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
dovecot username with domain
I've been using dovecot using system usernames (my unix uname as my IMAP username). But today I tried New Outlook which requires the imap username match my email address. Is there some way to tell dovecot that username@host is the same as uname? (where username@host is an email address and uname is a unix login which might be completely different). Michael Grant signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
Re: New Dovecot release?
Hi After running from backports the issue still seems to be there unfortunately for me. If it is a kernel issue we are running this on Xen Paravirtualized VM. 6.1.0-0.deb11.11-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Debian 6.1.38-4~bpo11+1 (2023-08-08) x86_64 GNU/Linux Taavi Ansper taavi.ans...@cyber.ee On 19.09.23 17:12, Elisamuel Resto wrote: Hello, I had reported it a while back in April on this list and Aki is correct — it is due to recent kernels. The change that was committed to Git resolved the issue for me with kernel version 6.1.12 on Gentoo. For reference, Aki had stated it was fixed in main and provided this: https://github.com/dovecot/core/compare/f359c6ee179aad5e077711c188fc8422106cbead%5E..d93c31d51b05d43eaa6eeef9cdc0f7a4157f7d0e.patch Regards, Elisamuel Resto On Sep 19, 2023, at 02:54, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote: On 19/09/2023 10:33 EEST Taavi Ansper via dovecot wrote: Hi When will there be a new dovecot release. The 2.3.21 version borked our users with large amount of folders (i think over 255 folders) doveadm(REDACTED_USER): Error: /proc/self/status is larger than expected I can't find the debian bug report (or was it mentioned in this same mailing list), but somebody else has mentioned the same issue. I hope this gets fixed in the next version. -- Taavi Ansper taavi.ans...@cyber.ee Hi! This is actually caused by very recent kernels, if I remember correctly. Can you let me known the distro & kernel you are using and source of your packages? This is actually fixed for 2.4 already in https://github.com/dovecot/core/commit/218a79a48bb0e5d2be44bb46c51836fd406b0c50.patch Aki ___ dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org ___ dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org ___ dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
Re: New Dovecot release?
Hello, I had reported it a while back in April on this list and Aki is correct — it is due to recent kernels. The change that was committed to Git resolved the issue for me with kernel version 6.1.12 on Gentoo. For reference, Aki had stated it was fixed in main and provided this: https://github.com/dovecot/core/compare/f359c6ee179aad5e077711c188fc8422106cbead%5E..d93c31d51b05d43eaa6eeef9cdc0f7a4157f7d0e.patch Regards, Elisamuel Resto > On Sep 19, 2023, at 02:54, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote: > >> >> On 19/09/2023 10:33 EEST Taavi Ansper via dovecot >> wrote: >> >> >> Hi >> >> When will there be a new dovecot release. The 2.3.21 version borked our >> users with large amount of folders (i think over 255 folders) >> >> doveadm(REDACTED_USER): Error: /proc/self/status is larger than expected >> >> I can't find the debian bug report (or was it mentioned in this same mailing >> list), but somebody else has mentioned the same issue. >> >> I hope this gets fixed in the next version. >> >> -- >> Taavi Ansper >> taavi.ans...@cyber.ee > > Hi! > > This is actually caused by very recent kernels, if I remember correctly. Can > you let me known the distro & kernel you are using and source of your > packages? This is actually fixed for 2.4 already in > > https://github.com/dovecot/core/commit/218a79a48bb0e5d2be44bb46c51836fd406b0c50.patch > > Aki > ___ > dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org > To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org ___ dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
Re: How to use http api doveadm to manage acl permissions
> On 19/09/2023 15:30 EEST cyril.lecl...@mantiq.com wrote:
>
>
> hi,
>
> yes i alredy executed but nothing with "acl" name or "permissions" so how i
> can find the good command ?
>
> thank you
Maybe you did something wrong, because I was able to get these.
Aki
{"command":"aclGet", "parameters":[
{"name":"allUsers","type":"boolean"},
{"name":"socketPath","type":"string"},
{"name":"user","type":"string"},
{"name":"transFlags","type":"integer"},
{"name":"userFile","type":"string"},
{"name":"matchMe","type":"boolean"},
{"name":"mailbox","type":"string"}
]},
{"command":"aclRights", "parameters":[
{"name":"allUsers","type":"boolean"},
{"name":"socketPath","type":"string"},
{"name":"user","type":"string"},
{"name":"transFlags","type":"integer"},
{"name":"userFile","type":"string"},
{"name":"mailbox","type":"string"}
]},
{"command":"aclSet", "parameters":[
{"name":"allUsers","type":"boolean"},
{"name":"socketPath","type":"string"},
{"name":"user","type":"string"},
{"name":"transFlags","type":"integer"},
{"name":"userFile","type":"string"},
{"name":"mailbox","type":"string"},
{"name":"id","type":"string"},
{"name":"right","type":"array"}
]},
{"command":"aclAdd", "parameters":[
{"name":"allUsers","type":"boolean"},
{"name":"socketPath","type":"string"},
{"name":"user","type":"string"},
{"name":"transFlags","type":"integer"},
{"name":"userFile","type":"string"},
{"name":"mailbox","type":"string"},
{"name":"id","type":"string"},
{"name":"right","type":"array"}
]},
{"command":"aclRemove", "parameters":[
{"name":"allUsers","type":"boolean"},
{"name":"socketPath","type":"string"},
{"name":"user","type":"string"},
{"name":"transFlags","type":"integer"},
{"name":"userFile","type":"string"},
{"name":"mailbox","type":"string"},
{"name":"id","type":"string"},
{"name":"right","type":"array"}
]},
{"command":"aclDelete", "parameters":[
{"name":"allUsers","type":"boolean"},
{"name":"socketPath","type":"string"},
{"name":"user","type":"string"},
{"name":"transFlags","type":"integer"},
{"name":"userFile","type":"string"},
{"name":"mailbox","type":"string"},
{"name":"id","type":"string"}
]},
{"command":"aclRecalc", "parameters":[
{"name":"allUsers","type":"boolean"},
{"name":"socketPath","type":"string"},
{"name":"user","type":"string"},
{"name":"transFlags","type":"integer"},
{"name":"userFile","type":"string"}
]},
{"command":"aclDebug", "parameters":[
{"name":"allUsers","type":"boolean"},
{"name":"socketPath","type":"string"},
{"name":"user","type":"string"},
{"name":"transFlags","type":"integer"},
{"name":"userFile","type":"string"},
{"name":"mailbox","type":"string"}
]}
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
Re: How to use http api doveadm to manage acl permissions
hi, yes i alredy executed but nothing with "acl" name or "permissions" so how i can find the good command ? thank you ___ dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
Re: New Dovecot release?
Hi I am using: 5.10.0-25-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 5.10.191-1 (2023-08-16) x86_64 on Debian 11 Bullseye ii debian-dovecot-auto-keyring2010.01.30 all GnuPG archive keys of the Automatic Dovecot Debian repository ii dovecot-core 2:2.3.21-1+debian11 amd64 secure POP3/IMAP server - core files ii dovecot-dev2:2.3.21-1+debian11 amd64 secure POP3/IMAP server - header files ii dovecot-imapd 2:2.3.21-1+debian11 amd64 secure POP3/IMAP server - IMAP daemon ii dovecot-lmtpd 2:2.3.21-1+debian11 amd64 secure POP3/IMAP server - LMTP server ii dovecot-managesieved 2:2.3.21-1+debian11 amd64 secure POP3/IMAP server - ManageSieve server ii dovecot-sieve 2:2.3.21-1+debian11 amd64 secure POP3/IMAP server - Sieve filters support Taavi Ansper taavi.ans...@cyber.ee +372 5905 2861 On 19.09.23 10:49, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote: On 19/09/2023 10:33 EEST Taavi Ansper via dovecot wrote: Hi When will there be a new dovecot release. The 2.3.21 version borked our users with large amount of folders (i think over 255 folders) doveadm(REDACTED_USER): Error: /proc/self/status is larger than expected I can't find the debian bug report (or was it mentioned in this same mailing list), but somebody else has mentioned the same issue. I hope this gets fixed in the next version. -- Taavi Ansper taavi.ans...@cyber.ee Hi! This is actually caused by very recent kernels, if I remember correctly. Can you let me known the distro & kernel you are using and source of your packages? This is actually fixed for 2.4 already in https://github.com/dovecot/core/commit/218a79a48bb0e5d2be44bb46c51836fd406b0c50.patch Aki ___ dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org ___ dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
Re: New Dovecot release?
> On 19/09/2023 10:33 EEST Taavi Ansper via dovecot wrote: > > > Hi > > When will there be a new dovecot release. The 2.3.21 version borked our users > with large amount of folders (i think over 255 folders) > > doveadm(REDACTED_USER): Error: /proc/self/status is larger than expected > > I can't find the debian bug report (or was it mentioned in this same mailing > list), but somebody else has mentioned the same issue. > > I hope this gets fixed in the next version. > > -- > Taavi Ansper > taavi.ans...@cyber.ee Hi! This is actually caused by very recent kernels, if I remember correctly. Can you let me known the distro & kernel you are using and source of your packages? This is actually fixed for 2.4 already in https://github.com/dovecot/core/commit/218a79a48bb0e5d2be44bb46c51836fd406b0c50.patch Aki ___ dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
