Re: [Dovecot] [debian] Etch Packages Available for v1.0.10
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 01:44:35PM +0100, Frank Kintrup may have written: > > Has anyone already made debian packages for one of the > 1.1.x releases of Dovecot? I would recommend grabbing my source package, grabbing the tarball of the version you want, and copying the debian directory from the source into the untarred 1.1 source. You can then build a binary package with dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -b If the compile or install fails, it might be because some file names have moved around between 1.0 and 1.1. Timo might be able to chime in on major differences to look out for when packaging. - -- http://www.delink.net/ If others want to walk around wearing sandy underpants, fretting over what they cannot avoid doing and scolding others for buying produce shipped from Brazil instead of buying local, they’re welcome to it. Everyone needs a purpose in life. -- James Lileks, The Bleat 2007-12-04 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHho40Fy/L+4MovqIRAhVkAKCmZZMmsivJYK+5ZeJYQ0jykhR+KgCfe2/6 fTUdcnX4+seI2W+pZVDp9k8= =kWFO -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [Dovecot] Please help me resolve why mail isn't being delivered to virtual users
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 10:26:05AM -0700, Andrew Falanga may have written: > > In an ideal world, perhaps, no one would setup a mail server unless they > knew how to. The trouble is, this position doesn't take into account that > we *DON'T* live in an ideal world. In our world, to know how to do > something means you've got to set it up. But to set it up, you've got to be > familiar with it, but to be familiar with it, you've got to set it up. I think that is what testing and lab enviroments are meant to accomplish. The Dovecot Wiki is for information about dovecot. It isn't for people to paste the results of Google searches you think would be helpful. Is it really that foreign of a concept to encounter a term you are not familiar with, copy it into your clipboard, and paste it into Google? I thought that was half of being successful at IT? - -- http://www.delink.net/ Very few industries are as big as you imagine them to be. There's a reason why so many people meet the same folk every now and again - there are only about 100 people who work in IT in the whole world, the rest of them are just MCSEs who pretend to. - Seen in the monastery -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHhmXTFy/L+4MovqIRAuj0AJ9kOMbcA5/hfbumsQUb5P1gJzUlJgCgq2Bc rLKt+R5U1km/EBQbDGKs+H0= =v/Rz -END PGP SIGNATURE-
[Dovecot] [debian] Etch Packages Available for v1.0.10
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Compiled only for i386 with source package available. deb http://debian.delink.net/ etch-delink main deb-src http://debian.delink.net/ etch-delink main Cheers, - -- Brian T Glenn http://www.delink.net/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHfcGYFy/L+4MovqIRAgJUAJ4/fcaLb/Cyeo8s42EnAOu5MZr4CgCdGgBK 2RuF/zkrGBsQzElZSBJBCaI= =dGHp -END PGP SIGNATURE-
[Dovecot] [packages] Debian Etch Packages for v1.0.8
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 deb http://debian.delink.net/ etch-delink main Packages: dovecot-common, dovecot-imapd, and dovecot-pop3d Repository is signed by the following key. It can be found at hkp://pgpkeys.mit.edu/ pub 1024D/E88EB53D 2007-12-01 Key fingerprint = 842B BC47 E158 4DF1 A385 AA52 EAFD 7923 E88E B53D uid delink.net Internet Services (Debian Signing Key) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sub 2048g/0CAB6F5C 2007-12-01 Thanks, - -- Brian T Glenn http://www.delink.net/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHU13hFy/L+4MovqIRAnpHAKClw07vODWo1Qwojntx9SUx/W7fQwCgon5Y 7TP6c4J9E9WgtXNJ836EUmc= =SBh8 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
[Dovecot] [Debian] Sarge packages for dovecot 1.0.5 available
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 07:21:26AM +0300, Timo Sirainen may have written: > http://dovecot.org/releases/1.0/dovecot-1.0.5.tar.gz > http://dovecot.org/releases/1.0/dovecot-1.0.5.tar.gz.sig Packages dovecot-common, dovecot-pop3d, and dovecot-imapd are available from the delink.net repository. Add the following line to /etc/apt/sources.list: deb http://debian.delink.net/ sarge-delink main Any problems with the package should be reported to me offlist. Just remove the tag from the left hand side of my email address above. Thanks, Brian - -- http://www.delink.net/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFG5w5vFy/L+4MovqIRApgfAKCSbqHNTZYHArAJNhRb9ZIc0fXm1ACfZLJ9 QNA9XIqzFEGi8tpxCX9mNjU= =APhD -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [Dovecot] Debian packages for Dovecot 1.0.1xx (sarge)
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 06:05:59PM +0200, Moritz Mertinkat may have written: > Hi there, > > i'm looking for Debian sarge dovecot packages (yes, still running sarge). > Anyone here that has a backported package? I will likely be building one soon. It will be in the same location as I put in the mailing list previously. I will let the list know when I finish it. -- http://www.delink.net/ If you want a language that doesn't believe in type checking at all, except when it does, try Python. Don't just toss it casually aside for the bizarre indentation-based syntax when there's so much else broken about it. - Peter Corlett in the monastery
[Dovecot] [Debian] Packages available for 1.0.0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 They aren't thoroughly tested, but I've been running on them for a little while and they seem stable. This is based on the latest RC from backports.org and is built for sarge. deb http://debian.delink.net/ sarge-delink main Enjoy, - -- http://www.delink.net/ Ok, so he's got a cellphone in one hand and latte in the other, I know what he's using to steer, but what is that soccer mom using, a strap-on? - Brian Kantor in the monastery -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGZdGMFy/L+4MovqIRApa7AJ4s3jU0La4dCijm08iOpa7m9dSaowCeN1eW 6he6hZFEzREtzZ/iA4mvEms= =Ln6h -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [Dovecot] Version numbering
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 03:46:40AM +0300, Timo Sirainen may have written: > > b) Odd-even numbering: 1.1.x (unstable) -> 1.2.0 (stable) I'd really prefer using type b versioning as then there is no ambiguity when attempting to build packages for dovecot. There are many examples in the Debian repository where exceptions to the versioning numbers had to be made in order to accomodate non-numeric versioning. I think this can be made very clear on the website. If someone messes it up anyway, perhaps they should learn to read documentation before installing. -- http://www.delink.net/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
