Re: RFC: HTTP based storage API
On 08 Feb 2016, at 11:01, Nagy, Attila wrote: > Nearly every popular programming language has an LMTP/POP/IMAP > implementation, most of them suck in many different ways. > I don't know any server or library which provides a well-established, > compatible protocol frontend with an open backend API, which could be > used to easily make a custom storage backend for the LMTP/POP/IMAP > frontend in any language, in any programming paradigm, irregardless > of the frontend implementation. Sorry to come in late, but as a curl lover I'd like to know what is wrong with their implementation of pop3 and imap (project homepage curl.haxx.se). Thanks, David
Re: Newbie why is dovecot classified diff then sendmail or courier
Enlightenment succeeded! Thanks, David
Newbie why is dovecot classified diff then sendmail or courier
Hello, this is probably a dumb question, but I can't for the life of me figure out why sendmail and courier are classified universally as network-mail-mta whereas dovecot is in places like network-mail-general or some such place. I've used several Linux distros and have noted this keenly (they also normally classify photorec, the HD recovery tool as hardware-photography,so this may just be a mistake). I'm concerned that I'm looking into the wrong software for an mail transport/delivery agent. Thanks, David
