Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot and Lustre FS
Hi Gregoire, [..] with ~1 mailboxes located on a Lustre file system. So far so good. This may be a bit off topic but... I thought that a lustre filesystem was not designed to store a lot of small files (e.g: due to MDS inodes) Can you tell us more about your experience ? Thomas
Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot and Lustre FS
On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 09:59 +0100, Christian Gregoire wrote: > Right now, I'm using Exim and a customized version of an old (10 years > old) Atmail POP3 server written in Perl, with ~1 mailboxes located > on a Lustre file system. So far so good. > > Though, I plan to migrate from Atmail to Dovecot, to provide our > customers with IMAP support. Has anyone any experience with Dovecot on > Lustre FS ? If there's just one Dovecot server accessing mails, there shouldn't be any problems. If there are more, you should read http://wiki2.dovecot.org/MailLocation/SharedDisk and stress test the same mailbox at the same time from 2+ servers using http://imapwiki.org/ImapTest
[Dovecot] Dovecot and Lustre FS
Hello, Right now, I'm using Exim and a customized version of an old (10 years old) Atmail POP3 server written in Perl, with ~1 mailboxes located on a Lustre file system. So far so good. Though, I plan to migrate from Atmail to Dovecot, to provide our customers with IMAP support. Has anyone any experience with Dovecot on Lustre FS ? Thanks Christian