Re: [Dovecot] IMAP ANNOTATE Extension RFC5257
On 01/23/2014 07:11 PM, Michael M Slusarz wrote: > IIRC, No. Kolab uses the mailbox-level METADATA extension instead (RFC > 5464). RFC5257 is for message annotations (not folder/mailbox annotations), so it is a different thing. Kolab does not use it. Anyway there are not many servers supporting RFC5257. -- Aleksander 'A.L.E.C' Machniak LAN Management System Developer [http://lms.org.pl] Roundcube Webmail Developer [http://roundcube.net] --- PGP: 19359DC1 @@ GG: 2275252 @@ WWW: http://alec.pl
Re: [Dovecot] IMAP ANNOTATE Extension RFC5257
Quoting Ed W : Hi And FWIW, that RFC is classified as Experimental. Hasn't been a bunch of momentum behind it, at least in terms of adoption/implementations. Mailbox metadata seems to be the more interesting development at this time (RFC 5464). michael Yes, I know, but for groupware collaboration on mails, it is an useful feature. Especially in companies, where an extreme group based workflow is used. Is this the extension necessary to make Kolab work correctly? IIRC, No. Kolab uses the mailbox-level METADATA extension instead (RFC 5464). michael
Re: [Dovecot] IMAP ANNOTATE Extension RFC5257
Hi And FWIW, that RFC is classified as Experimental. Hasn't been a bunch of momentum behind it, at least in terms of adoption/implementations. Mailbox metadata seems to be the more interesting development at this time (RFC 5464). michael Yes, I know, but for groupware collaboration on mails, it is an useful feature. Especially in companies, where an extreme group based workflow is used. Is this the extension necessary to make Kolab work correctly? I would be interested to see further implementation on that? I think Kolab has the most "legs" at the moment for me to use to extend our services with extra groupware features (I think I would prefer to implement filesystem based storage of DAV files, but apart from that it looks good and seems to be heading in the right direction) Anyone want to pitch in fund development in this area? Cheers Ed W
Re: [Dovecot] IMAP ANNOTATE Extension RFC5257
On Mi, 2014-01-22 at 14:14 -0700, Michael M Slusarz wrote: > Quoting Robert Schetterer : > > > Am 21.01.2014 20:31, schrieb Sebastian Schlatow: > >> Hello, > >> > >> Does Dovecot support the IMAP ANNOTATE Extension RFC5257 > >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5257? If not, are there any plans to > >> implement the extension? If not, why there is no plan to implement this > >> feature? > >> > >> Regards > >> Sebastian > >> > > > > not sure about how up2date these are, and whats allready done > > > > http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2013-February/088305.html > > http://www.imapwiki.org/Specs > > http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Roadmap > > http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-metadata-plugin > > And FWIW, that RFC is classified as Experimental. Hasn't been a bunch > of momentum behind it, at least in terms of adoption/implementations. > Mailbox metadata seems to be the more interesting development at this > time (RFC 5464). > > michael > Yes, I know, but for groupware collaboration on mails, it is an useful feature. Especially in companies, where an extreme group based workflow is used.
Re: [Dovecot] IMAP ANNOTATE Extension RFC5257
Quoting Robert Schetterer : Am 21.01.2014 20:31, schrieb Sebastian Schlatow: Hello, Does Dovecot support the IMAP ANNOTATE Extension RFC5257 http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5257? If not, are there any plans to implement the extension? If not, why there is no plan to implement this feature? Regards Sebastian not sure about how up2date these are, and whats allready done http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2013-February/088305.html http://www.imapwiki.org/Specs http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Roadmap http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-metadata-plugin And FWIW, that RFC is classified as Experimental. Hasn't been a bunch of momentum behind it, at least in terms of adoption/implementations. Mailbox metadata seems to be the more interesting development at this time (RFC 5464). michael
Re: [Dovecot] IMAP ANNOTATE Extension RFC5257
Am 21.01.2014 20:31, schrieb Sebastian Schlatow: > Hello, > > Does Dovecot support the IMAP ANNOTATE Extension RFC5257 > http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5257? If not, are there any plans to > implement the extension? If not, why there is no plan to implement this > feature? > > Regards > Sebastian > not sure about how up2date these are, and whats allready done http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2013-February/088305.html http://www.imapwiki.org/Specs http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Roadmap http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-metadata-plugin Best Regards MfG Robert Schetterer -- [*] sys4 AG http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64 Franziskanerstraße 15, 81669 München Sitz der Gesellschaft: München, Amtsgericht München: HRB 199263 Vorstand: Patrick Ben Koetter, Marc Schiffbauer Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Florian Kirstein
[Dovecot] IMAP ANNOTATE Extension RFC5257
Hello, Does Dovecot support the IMAP ANNOTATE Extension RFC5257 http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5257? If not, are there any plans to implement the extension? If not, why there is no plan to implement this feature? Regards Sebastian
