[Dovecot] quick question about fs quota overhead in plugin

2007-11-28 Thread Adam McDougall
Last night I enabled imap_quota so dovecot could report usage reported
by disk quota.  I don't intend to actually use the quota plugin to place
any limits anytime soon though.  How much overhead does this add to 
normal operations that allocate disk space?  Ideally I'd like a situation
where the only overhead is incurred when the user uses the mail client to
specifically check their usage.  Is that possible, and/or is there a better
way to do this?  If it does cause general overhead on the NFS filer, I could
just accept it until/unless I feel it becomes a burden I cannot bear.

mail_plugins = acl fts fts_squat quota imap_quota
...
quota = fs
...


Re: [Dovecot] quick question about fs quota overhead in plugin

2007-11-28 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 09:26 -0500, Adam McDougall wrote:
 Last night I enabled imap_quota so dovecot could report usage reported
 by disk quota.  I don't intend to actually use the quota plugin to place
 any limits anytime soon though.  How much overhead does this add to 
 normal operations that allocate disk space?  Ideally I'd like a situation
 where the only overhead is incurred when the user uses the mail client to
 specifically check their usage.  Is that possible, and/or is there a better
 way to do this?  If it does cause general overhead on the NFS filer, I could
 just accept it until/unless I feel it becomes a burden I cannot bear.
 
 mail_plugins = acl fts fts_squat quota imap_quota
 ...
 quota = fs
 ...

http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot/rev/1d0521b7151d



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part