Re: [Dovecot] why not install utils (idxview logview ...) with dovecot in bin/sbin dir?
On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 10:26, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 10:23 +1000, Noel Butler wrote: > > On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 10:19, Timo Sirainen wrote: > > > > > > > But I am considering on moving dovecot-lda (ex. deliver) to bin/. > > > > Move? Maybe a soft symlink be better? > > For backwards compatibility or why? Yes, for backwards compatibility.
Re: [Dovecot] why not install utils (idxview logview ...) with dovecot in bin/sbin dir?
On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 10:23 +1000, Noel Butler wrote: > On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 10:19, Timo Sirainen wrote: > > > > But I am considering on moving dovecot-lda (ex. deliver) to bin/. > > Move? Maybe a soft symlink be better? For backwards compatibility or why? signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Dovecot] why not install utils (idxview logview ...) with dovecot in bin/sbin dir?
On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 10:19, Timo Sirainen wrote: > But I am considering on moving dovecot-lda (ex. deliver) to bin/. Move? Maybe a soft symlink be better?
Re: [Dovecot] why not install utils (idxview logview ...) with dovecot in bin/sbin dir?
On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 10:37 +0800, Xueron Nee wrote: > Hi, > > I just found these useful tools :) they were installed in libexec dir :) If they were installed to bin/ or sbin/, they would have to be renamed so people would know they're part of Dovecot. I don't think it's really worth the effort. What do you use them for anyway? For me they're mainly for debugging what went wrong. But I am considering on moving dovecot-lda (ex. deliver) to bin/. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
[Dovecot] why not install utils (idxview logview ...) with dovecot in bin/sbin dir?
Hi, I just found these useful tools :) they were installed in libexec dir :) -- Xueron Nee http://www.xueron.com
