Re: [Dovecot] Adding ", S=size" to new message files when using "dirsize"

2007-03-21 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 11:52 -0700, Rich, Whidbey Telecom wrote:
> 
> > Dirsize was never meant to be used with maildir. Why do you want
> to  
> > use it instead of maildir++ quota?
> 
> We'd like to use maildir++ in the future, but haven't tested it yet  
> with our MTA (which uses "dirsize"-like summing).  We realize  
> "dirsize is a really bad idea with maildirs" so don't prefer it, but  
> it's been working OK in the meantime.  If it could just enable  
> tagging appended files too, it might at least be an option for
> maildir?

I just fear that if I do that, some people would actually use maildir
+dirsize combination without realizing how horribly slow it is..


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [Dovecot] Adding ", S=size" to new message files when using "dirsize"

2007-03-20 Thread Rich, Whidbey Telecom

On Mar 19, 2007, at 4:46 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:


On 20.3.2007, at 1.37, Rich, Whidbey Telecom wrote:

However, Dovecot only seems to do that when the "maildir" quota  
plugin is specified (from "quota-maildir.c"):


Yep.

Shouldn't "save_size_in_filename" be included in "quota- 
dirsize.c", since "dirsize" is the one that actually needs "S="?


Dirsize was never meant to be used with maildir. Why do you want to  
use it instead of maildir++ quota?


We'd like to use maildir++ in the future, but haven't tested it yet  
with our MTA (which uses "dirsize"-like summing).  We realize  
"dirsize is a really bad idea with maildirs" so don't prefer it, but  
it's been working OK in the meantime.  If it could just enable  
tagging appended files too, it might at least be an option for maildir?


Rich



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Re: [Dovecot] Adding ", S=size" to new message files when using "dirsize"

2007-03-19 Thread Timo Sirainen

On 20.3.2007, at 1.37, Rich, Whidbey Telecom wrote:

However, Dovecot only seems to do that when the "maildir" quota  
plugin is specified (from "quota-maildir.c"):


Yep.

Shouldn't "save_size_in_filename" be included in "quota-dirsize.c",  
since "dirsize" is the one that actually needs "S="?


Dirsize was never meant to be used with maildir. Why do you want to  
use it instead of maildir++ quota?





PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part