Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot sieve support

2010-07-16 Thread Pascal Volk
On 07/17/2010 01:39 AM Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
> …
> Does Dovecot v2 need to be patched to use either of the Pigeonhole  
> sieve or managesieve?

No, there is no need to patch Dovecot v2.0. See also:
http://hg.rename-it.nl/dovecot-2.0-pigeonhole/file/tip/INSTALL

-- 
The trapper recommends today: cafebabe.1019...@localdomain.org


Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot sieve support

2010-07-16 Thread Bradley Giesbrecht


On Jul 16, 2010, at 4:37 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:


On 17.7.2010, at 0.31, Daniel L. Miller wrote:


or at this time is it going to remain an external patch?


No. It no longer requires patching.


I think I asked the wrong question.  Make that, "Is Managesieve  
going to be merged in to the main server source


No.


(at least the support for it),


Well .. Isn't the support good enough already?


or at this time is it going to remain an external patch?"


Patch is a wrong word. It's not a patch. But it's an external  
plugin, and it's going to stay that way. Dovecot's and Pigeonhole's  
developers are different and they have completely different release  
schedules. I don't think it would even be a good idea to merge them  
into same releases. Nowadays with v2.0 it's easy to compile  
Pigeonhole after installing Dovecot, so I don't even see it as a  
problem.


Daniel may be wanting to know if Dovecot v2 sources have to be patched  
to use managesieve as v1 sources do.


I believe I read that Dovecot v2 will not need to be patched to use  
Pigeonhole Managesieve.


Does Dovecot v2 need to be patched to use either of the Pigeonhole  
sieve or managesieve?



Thanks,
Bradley Giesbrecht


Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot sieve support

2010-07-16 Thread Timo Sirainen
On 17.7.2010, at 0.31, Daniel L. Miller wrote:

>>> or at this time is it going to remain an external patch?
>>> 
>> No. It no longer requires patching.
>> 
>>   
> I think I asked the wrong question.  Make that, "Is Managesieve going to be 
> merged in to the main server source

No.

> (at least the support for it),

Well .. Isn't the support good enough already?

> or at this time is it going to remain an external patch?"

Patch is a wrong word. It's not a patch. But it's an external plugin, and it's 
going to stay that way. Dovecot's and Pigeonhole's developers are different and 
they have completely different release schedules. I don't think it would even 
be a good idea to merge them into same releases. Nowadays with v2.0 it's easy 
to compile Pigeonhole after installing Dovecot, so I don't even see it as a 
problem.



Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot sieve support

2010-07-16 Thread Daniel L. Miller

On 7/15/2010 3:53 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:

On 15.7.2010, at 23.00, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
   

Is sieve going to be merged into the main server source,
 

No.

   

or at this time is it going to remain an external patch?
 

No. It no longer requires patching.

   
I think I asked the wrong question.  Make that, "Is Managesieve going to 
be merged in to the main server source (at least the support for it), or 
at this time is it going to remain an external patch?"


--
Daniel



Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot sieve support

2010-07-15 Thread Timo Sirainen
On 15.7.2010, at 23.00, Daniel L. Miller wrote:

> Is sieve going to be merged into the main server source,

No.

> or at this time is it going to remain an external patch?

No. It no longer requires patching.