Re: dbox alternate storage and samba
Am 07.07.2014 12:07, schrieb Francesco: > Il giorno lun, 07/07/2014 alle 12.04 +0200, Reindl Harald ha scritto: >> >> Am 07.07.2014 12:01, schrieb Francesco: >>> i was just wondering if it's possible to use a samba share as an >>> alternate storage for dbox format >> >> mailstorage on samba? >> don't do that even if it would work in theory >> > > well, indeed i agree with you, but i was asked to check if it could be > done.. guess what.. orders from the above :( > > i think NFS would do? yes, better however, depending on the load a block-level storage over iSCSI would be preferred because it *really* works like a local disk but still over the network signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: dbox alternate storage and samba
Il giorno lun, 07/07/2014 alle 12.04 +0200, Reindl Harald ha scritto: > > Am 07.07.2014 12:01, schrieb Francesco: > > i was just wondering if it's possible to use a samba share as an > > alternate storage for dbox format > > mailstorage on samba? > don't do that even if it would work in theory > well, indeed i agree with you, but i was asked to check if it could be done.. guess what.. orders from the above :( i think NFS would do?
Re: dbox alternate storage and samba
Am 07.07.2014 12:01, schrieb Francesco: > i was just wondering if it's possible to use a samba share as an > alternate storage for dbox format mailstorage on samba? don't do that even if it would work in theory signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
