Re: OT - Re: hunting the fatty

2015-11-11 Thread mancyb...@gmail.com
On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 10:20:07 -0600
Rick Romero  wrote:

>   Quoting mancyb...@gmail.com:
> 
> > On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 09:50:29 -0600
> > Rick Romero  wrote:
> >
> >> LOL.
> >>
> >> This is a horrible subject line.  I've been trying to resolve a DDOS
> >> issue, and ignoring a lot of email. 
> >>
> >> Here I had been thinking this was a sex-spam, and I just got around to
> >> wondering why the spam system isn't working quite right and they kept
> >> coming in.  :P
> >>
> >> Not sure if this was suggested, but use SSD's.  With a ton of mail
> >> combined with Maildir random reads/writes, SSD's are like night and day.
> >>
> >> Rick
> >
> > Very sorry about nasty subject ;)
> > Btw is it worth the offload on i/o by having some Dovecot index or cache
> > on an SSD ?
> 
> Lately I've separated the indexes onto another SSD-based volume, just to
> save read/writes, but I don't think it actually improved anything.
> 
> Rick

I'm going to try dm-cache and flashcache asap ..


Re: OT - Re: hunting the fatty

2015-11-11 Thread Rick Romero

 Quoting mancyb...@gmail.com:


On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 09:50:29 -0600
Rick Romero  wrote:


LOL.

This is a horrible subject line.  I've been trying to resolve a DDOS
issue, and ignoring a lot of email. 

Here I had been thinking this was a sex-spam, and I just got around to
wondering why the spam system isn't working quite right and they kept
coming in.  :P

Not sure if this was suggested, but use SSD's.  With a ton of mail
combined with Maildir random reads/writes, SSD's are like night and day.

Rick


Very sorry about nasty subject ;)
Btw is it worth the offload on i/o by having some Dovecot index or cache
on an SSD ?


Lately I've separated the indexes onto another SSD-based volume, just to
save read/writes, but I don't think it actually improved anything.

Rick


Re: OT - Re: hunting the fatty

2015-11-11 Thread mancyb...@gmail.com
On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 09:50:29 -0600
Rick Romero  wrote:

> LOL.
> 
> This is a horrible subject line.  I've been trying to resolve a DDOS
> issue, and ignoring a lot of email. 
> 
> Here I had been thinking this was a sex-spam, and I just got around to
> wondering why the spam system isn't working quite right and they kept
> coming in.  :P
> 
> Not sure if this was suggested, but use SSD's.  With a ton of mail
> combined with Maildir random reads/writes, SSD's are like night and day.
> 
> Rick

Very sorry about nasty subject ;)

Btw is it worth the offload on i/o by having some Dovecot index or cache on an 
SSD ?


OT - Re: hunting the fatty

2015-11-11 Thread Rick Romero

LOL.

This is a horrible subject line.  I've been trying to resolve a DDOS
issue, and ignoring a lot of email. 

Here I had been thinking this was a sex-spam, and I just got around to
wondering why the spam system isn't working quite right and they kept
coming in.  :P

Not sure if this was suggested, but use SSD's.  With a ton of mail
combined with Maildir random reads/writes, SSD's are like night and day.

Rick


Re: hunting the fatty

2015-11-11 Thread mancyb...@gmail.com
On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 16:34:33 +0100
Christian Kivalo  wrote:

> On 2015-11-11 03:44, mancyb...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 08:50:50 +0100
> > Christian Kivalo  wrote:
> > 
> >> Hi,
> >> 
> >> On 2015-11-10 01:44, mancyb...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> > Hello dear list,
> >> > I've recently discovered 'doveadm stats' and I'm trying to use
> >> > "doveadm stats dump user" and "doveadm stats dump session"
> >> > to understand the pop/imap users that put more stress on the hard
> >> > disks.
> >> >
> >> > My problem is that some users refuse to delete their emails from the
> >> > server,
> >> > so they keep 20GB of maildir files on the server, the webmail
> >> > (roundcube) takes forever to open the inbox,
> >> > the imap searches takes forever
> >> > and meanwhile all the users wait.
> >> > (already tried roundcube + memcache(d) but didn't help)
> >> 
> >> What is forever in your context?
> >> I'm using roundcube and a folder with about 78k mails opens in < 1 sec
> >> unsorted. A folder with about 37k messages from a mailinglist and 
> >> thread
> >> sort takes < 3 sec. My roundcube shows 200 messages per page by 
> >> default.
> >> On a side note, are you using an imap proxy for roundcube? It doesn't
> >> help you with your dovecot problem but it speeds up roundcube.
> >> 
> >> To speed up imap searches i can recommend to implement fts-solr with
> >> dovecot (or maybe fts-elasticsearch, am wanting to try that but solr
> >> works...). That will speed up your searches after mailboxes are 
> >> indexed.
> >> 
> >> > So my problem is not the storage usage itself:
> >> > I don't care if the user gets tons of emails with big attachments;
> >> > my problem is when the user opens / searches an imap folder with more
> >> > than 10K mails
> >> > and iostat util goes 100% for minutes.
> >> 
> >> Dovecot should be very quick to open even folders with a huge amount 
> >> of
> >> files due to its indexes.
> >> 
> >> I'm unable to reproduce any significant numbers in iostat when 
> >> accessing
> >> large mailfolders with roundcube.
> >> 
> >> Whats your configuration, filesystem, ...
> >> 
> >> > So I've enabled dovecot's stats and enjoying "doveadm stats top",
> >> > "stats-top.pl" and "doveadm stats dump user/session",
> >> > but talking about "doveadm stats dump user" and its output fields:
> >> >
> >> > user reset_timestamp last_update num_logins  num_cmds
> >> > user_cpusys_cpu min_faults  maj_faults  vol_cs  invol_cs 
> >> >disk_input  disk_output read_count  read_bytes  
> >> > write_count write_bytes mail_lookup_pathmail_lookup_attr 
> >> >mail_read_count mail_read_bytes mail_cache_hits
> >> >
> >> > I'm not sure which of those fields can help me
> >> > and I can't find any relevant documentation.
> >> >
> >> > So here are my questions:
> >> >
> >> > 1. is there a documentation for those 21 fields and for 'doveadm
> >> > stats' in general ?
> >> > 2. what's the difference between disk_output, read_bytes, read_count
> >> > and mail_read_bytes ?
> >> > 3. which field of those is, in your opinion, more representative for
> >> > expressing the workload that gives me problems ?
> >> > 4. which settings do I need to store 1 week worth of stats ?
> >> >
> >> > I'm currenty using the 'standard' values:
> >> >
> >> >   stats_refresh = 30 secs
> >> >   stats_track_cmds = yes
> >> >   stats_memory_limit = 16 M
> >> >   stats_command_min_time = 1 mins
> >> >   stats_domain_min_time = 12 hours
> >> >   stats_ip_min_time = 12 hours
> >> >   stats_session_min_time = 15 mins
> >> >   stats_user_min_time = 1 hours
> >> >
> >> > Can you please tell me the correct parameters to store 1 week of stats
> >> > ?
> >> 
> >> For stats somebody else has to jump in, i have only enabled the plugin
> >> to see what to get out of it but not made any use of it.
> >> 
> >> Please share your doveconf -n output
> >> 
> >> > Thank you,
> >> > Mike
> >> 
> >> regards
> >> christian
> > 
> > By 'forever' I mean more than 1 minute.
> 
> That is really long. This should not take that long.
> 
> > So there is no documentation / manual for 'doveadm stats' ?
> > Do I have to read the source to know which field does what ?
> 
> I don't know of more than whats on the dovecot wiki stats plugin page at 
> http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Statistics
> 
> > I mean the output fields of "doveadm stats dump user":
> > 
> > userreset_timestamp last_update num_logins  num_cmds
> > user_cpusys_cpu min_faults  maj_faults  vol_cs  invol_cs
> > disk_input  disk_output read_count  read_bytes  
> > write_count write_bytes mail_lookup_pathmail_lookup_attr
> > mail_read_count mail_read_bytes mail_cache_hits
> > 
> > what's the difference between disk_output, read_bytes, read_count and
> > mail_read_bytes ?
> 
>  From the wiki page:
> disk_output: Number of bytes written to disk -> i'd go for disk_input if 

Re: hunting the fatty

2015-11-11 Thread Christian Kivalo

On 2015-11-11 03:44, mancyb...@gmail.com wrote:

On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 08:50:50 +0100
Christian Kivalo  wrote:


Hi,

On 2015-11-10 01:44, mancyb...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hello dear list,
> I've recently discovered 'doveadm stats' and I'm trying to use
> "doveadm stats dump user" and "doveadm stats dump session"
> to understand the pop/imap users that put more stress on the hard
> disks.
>
> My problem is that some users refuse to delete their emails from the
> server,
> so they keep 20GB of maildir files on the server, the webmail
> (roundcube) takes forever to open the inbox,
> the imap searches takes forever
> and meanwhile all the users wait.
> (already tried roundcube + memcache(d) but didn't help)

What is forever in your context?
I'm using roundcube and a folder with about 78k mails opens in < 1 sec
unsorted. A folder with about 37k messages from a mailinglist and 
thread
sort takes < 3 sec. My roundcube shows 200 messages per page by 
default.

On a side note, are you using an imap proxy for roundcube? It doesn't
help you with your dovecot problem but it speeds up roundcube.

To speed up imap searches i can recommend to implement fts-solr with
dovecot (or maybe fts-elasticsearch, am wanting to try that but solr
works...). That will speed up your searches after mailboxes are 
indexed.


> So my problem is not the storage usage itself:
> I don't care if the user gets tons of emails with big attachments;
> my problem is when the user opens / searches an imap folder with more
> than 10K mails
> and iostat util goes 100% for minutes.

Dovecot should be very quick to open even folders with a huge amount 
of

files due to its indexes.

I'm unable to reproduce any significant numbers in iostat when 
accessing

large mailfolders with roundcube.

Whats your configuration, filesystem, ...

> So I've enabled dovecot's stats and enjoying "doveadm stats top",
> "stats-top.pl" and "doveadm stats dump user/session",
> but talking about "doveadm stats dump user" and its output fields:
>
> user   reset_timestamp last_update num_logins  num_cmds
user_cpusys_cpu min_faults  maj_faults  vol_cs  invol_cs
disk_input  disk_output read_count  read_bytes  write_count 
write_bytes mail_lookup_pathmail_lookup_attrmail_read_count 
mail_read_bytes mail_cache_hits
>
> I'm not sure which of those fields can help me
> and I can't find any relevant documentation.
>
> So here are my questions:
>
> 1. is there a documentation for those 21 fields and for 'doveadm
> stats' in general ?
> 2. what's the difference between disk_output, read_bytes, read_count
> and mail_read_bytes ?
> 3. which field of those is, in your opinion, more representative for
> expressing the workload that gives me problems ?
> 4. which settings do I need to store 1 week worth of stats ?
>
> I'm currenty using the 'standard' values:
>
>   stats_refresh = 30 secs
>   stats_track_cmds = yes
>   stats_memory_limit = 16 M
>   stats_command_min_time = 1 mins
>   stats_domain_min_time = 12 hours
>   stats_ip_min_time = 12 hours
>   stats_session_min_time = 15 mins
>   stats_user_min_time = 1 hours
>
> Can you please tell me the correct parameters to store 1 week of stats
> ?

For stats somebody else has to jump in, i have only enabled the plugin
to see what to get out of it but not made any use of it.

Please share your doveconf -n output

> Thank you,
> Mike

regards
christian


By 'forever' I mean more than 1 minute.


That is really long. This should not take that long.


So there is no documentation / manual for 'doveadm stats' ?
Do I have to read the source to know which field does what ?


I don't know of more than whats on the dovecot wiki stats plugin page at 
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Statistics



I mean the output fields of "doveadm stats dump user":

userreset_timestamp last_update num_logins  num_cmds
user_cpusys_cpu min_faults  maj_faults  vol_cs  invol_cs
disk_input  disk_output read_count  read_bytes  write_count 
write_bytes mail_lookup_pathmail_lookup_attrmail_read_count 
mail_read_bytes mail_cache_hits

what's the difference between disk_output, read_bytes, read_count and
mail_read_bytes ?


From the wiki page:
disk_output: Number of bytes written to disk -> i'd go for disk_input if 
your interested in reads

read_bytes: Number of bytes read using read() syscalls
read_count: Number of read() syscalls
mail_read_bytes: Number of message bytes read()

Not really much information but a base to start tests from.

Make yourself a testaccount and test. Thats the best way to figure stuff 
out by yourself.



(sorry to restate the same question, just making sure about it)

Thank you,
Mike


Regards
Christian


Re: hunting the fatty

2015-11-10 Thread mancyb...@gmail.com
On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 08:50:50 +0100
Christian Kivalo  wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On 2015-11-10 01:44, mancyb...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Hello dear list,
> > I've recently discovered 'doveadm stats' and I'm trying to use
> > "doveadm stats dump user" and "doveadm stats dump session"
> > to understand the pop/imap users that put more stress on the hard 
> > disks.
> > 
> > My problem is that some users refuse to delete their emails from the 
> > server,
> > so they keep 20GB of maildir files on the server, the webmail
> > (roundcube) takes forever to open the inbox,
> > the imap searches takes forever
> > and meanwhile all the users wait.
> > (already tried roundcube + memcache(d) but didn't help)
> 
> What is forever in your context?
> I'm using roundcube and a folder with about 78k mails opens in < 1 sec 
> unsorted. A folder with about 37k messages from a mailinglist and thread 
> sort takes < 3 sec. My roundcube shows 200 messages per page by default.
> On a side note, are you using an imap proxy for roundcube? It doesn't 
> help you with your dovecot problem but it speeds up roundcube.
> 
> To speed up imap searches i can recommend to implement fts-solr with 
> dovecot (or maybe fts-elasticsearch, am wanting to try that but solr 
> works...). That will speed up your searches after mailboxes are indexed.
> 
> > So my problem is not the storage usage itself:
> > I don't care if the user gets tons of emails with big attachments;
> > my problem is when the user opens / searches an imap folder with more
> > than 10K mails
> > and iostat util goes 100% for minutes.
> 
> Dovecot should be very quick to open even folders with a huge amount of 
> files due to its indexes.
> 
> I'm unable to reproduce any significant numbers in iostat when accessing 
> large mailfolders with roundcube.
> 
> Whats your configuration, filesystem, ...
> 
> > So I've enabled dovecot's stats and enjoying "doveadm stats top",
> > "stats-top.pl" and "doveadm stats dump user/session",
> > but talking about "doveadm stats dump user" and its output fields:
> > 
> > userreset_timestamp last_update num_logins  num_cmds
> > user_cpusys_cpu min_faults  maj_faults  vol_cs  invol_cs
> > disk_input  disk_output read_count  read_bytes  
> > write_count write_bytes mail_lookup_pathmail_lookup_attr
> > mail_read_count mail_read_bytes mail_cache_hits
> > 
> > I'm not sure which of those fields can help me
> > and I can't find any relevant documentation.
> > 
> > So here are my questions:
> > 
> > 1. is there a documentation for those 21 fields and for 'doveadm
> > stats' in general ?
> > 2. what's the difference between disk_output, read_bytes, read_count
> > and mail_read_bytes ?
> > 3. which field of those is, in your opinion, more representative for
> > expressing the workload that gives me problems ?
> > 4. which settings do I need to store 1 week worth of stats ?
> > 
> > I'm currenty using the 'standard' values:
> > 
> >   stats_refresh = 30 secs
> >   stats_track_cmds = yes
> >   stats_memory_limit = 16 M
> >   stats_command_min_time = 1 mins
> >   stats_domain_min_time = 12 hours
> >   stats_ip_min_time = 12 hours
> >   stats_session_min_time = 15 mins
> >   stats_user_min_time = 1 hours
> > 
> > Can you please tell me the correct parameters to store 1 week of stats 
> > ?
> 
> For stats somebody else has to jump in, i have only enabled the plugin 
> to see what to get out of it but not made any use of it.
> 
> Please share your doveconf -n output
> 
> > Thank you,
> > Mike
> 
> regards
> christian

By 'forever' I mean more than 1 minute.

So there is no documentation / manual for 'doveadm stats' ?
Do I have to read the source to know which field does what ?

I mean the output fields of "doveadm stats dump user":

userreset_timestamp last_update num_logins  num_cmds
user_cpusys_cpu min_faults  maj_faults  vol_cs  invol_cs
disk_input  disk_output read_count  read_bytes  write_count 
write_bytes mail_lookup_pathmail_lookup_attrmail_read_count 
mail_read_bytes mail_cache_hits

what's the difference between disk_output, read_bytes, read_count and 
mail_read_bytes ?

(sorry to restate the same question, just making sure about it)

Thank you,
Mike


Re: hunting the fatty

2015-11-10 Thread mancyb...@gmail.com
On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 08:50:50 +0100
Christian Kivalo  wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On 2015-11-10 01:44, mancyb...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Hello dear list,
> > I've recently discovered 'doveadm stats' and I'm trying to use
> > "doveadm stats dump user" and "doveadm stats dump session"
> > to understand the pop/imap users that put more stress on the hard 
> > disks.
> > 
> > My problem is that some users refuse to delete their emails from the 
> > server,
> > so they keep 20GB of maildir files on the server, the webmail
> > (roundcube) takes forever to open the inbox,
> > the imap searches takes forever
> > and meanwhile all the users wait.
> > (already tried roundcube + memcache(d) but didn't help)
> 
> What is forever in your context?
> I'm using roundcube and a folder with about 78k mails opens in < 1 sec 
> unsorted. A folder with about 37k messages from a mailinglist and thread 
> sort takes < 3 sec. My roundcube shows 200 messages per page by default.
> On a side note, are you using an imap proxy for roundcube? It doesn't 
> help you with your dovecot problem but it speeds up roundcube.
> 
> To speed up imap searches i can recommend to implement fts-solr with 
> dovecot (or maybe fts-elasticsearch, am wanting to try that but solr 
> works...). That will speed up your searches after mailboxes are indexed.
> 
> > So my problem is not the storage usage itself:
> > I don't care if the user gets tons of emails with big attachments;
> > my problem is when the user opens / searches an imap folder with more
> > than 10K mails
> > and iostat util goes 100% for minutes.
> 
> Dovecot should be very quick to open even folders with a huge amount of 
> files due to its indexes.
> 
> I'm unable to reproduce any significant numbers in iostat when accessing 
> large mailfolders with roundcube.
> 
> Whats your configuration, filesystem, ...
> 
> > So I've enabled dovecot's stats and enjoying "doveadm stats top",
> > "stats-top.pl" and "doveadm stats dump user/session",
> > but talking about "doveadm stats dump user" and its output fields:
> > 
> > userreset_timestamp last_update num_logins  num_cmds
> > user_cpusys_cpu min_faults  maj_faults  vol_cs  invol_cs
> > disk_input  disk_output read_count  read_bytes  
> > write_count write_bytes mail_lookup_pathmail_lookup_attr
> > mail_read_count mail_read_bytes mail_cache_hits
> > 
> > I'm not sure which of those fields can help me
> > and I can't find any relevant documentation.
> > 
> > So here are my questions:
> > 
> > 1. is there a documentation for those 21 fields and for 'doveadm
> > stats' in general ?
> > 2. what's the difference between disk_output, read_bytes, read_count
> > and mail_read_bytes ?
> > 3. which field of those is, in your opinion, more representative for
> > expressing the workload that gives me problems ?
> > 4. which settings do I need to store 1 week worth of stats ?
> > 
> > I'm currenty using the 'standard' values:
> > 
> >   stats_refresh = 30 secs
> >   stats_track_cmds = yes
> >   stats_memory_limit = 16 M
> >   stats_command_min_time = 1 mins
> >   stats_domain_min_time = 12 hours
> >   stats_ip_min_time = 12 hours
> >   stats_session_min_time = 15 mins
> >   stats_user_min_time = 1 hours
> > 
> > Can you please tell me the correct parameters to store 1 week of stats 
> > ?
> 
> For stats somebody else has to jump in, i have only enabled the plugin 
> to see what to get out of it but not made any use of it.
> 
> Please share your doveconf -n output
> 
> > Thank you,
> > Mike
> 
> regards
> christian

By 'forever' I mean more than 1 minute.

So there is no documentation / manual for 'doveadm stats' ?
Do I have to read the source to know which field does what ?

I mean the output fields of "doveadm stats dump user":

userreset_timestamp last_update num_logins  num_cmds
user_cpusys_cpu min_faults  maj_faults  vol_cs  invol_cs
disk_input  disk_output read_count  read_bytes  write_count 
write_bytes mail_lookup_pathmail_lookup_attrmail_read_count 
mail_read_bytes mail_cache_hits

what's the difference between disk_output, read_bytes, read_count and 
mail_read_bytes ?

(sorry to restate the same question, just making sure about it)

Thank you,
Mike


Re: hunting the fatty

2015-11-09 Thread Christian Kivalo

Hi,

On 2015-11-10 01:44, mancyb...@gmail.com wrote:

Hello dear list,
I've recently discovered 'doveadm stats' and I'm trying to use
"doveadm stats dump user" and "doveadm stats dump session"
to understand the pop/imap users that put more stress on the hard 
disks.


My problem is that some users refuse to delete their emails from the 
server,

so they keep 20GB of maildir files on the server, the webmail
(roundcube) takes forever to open the inbox,
the imap searches takes forever
and meanwhile all the users wait.
(already tried roundcube + memcache(d) but didn't help)


What is forever in your context?
I'm using roundcube and a folder with about 78k mails opens in < 1 sec 
unsorted. A folder with about 37k messages from a mailinglist and thread 
sort takes < 3 sec. My roundcube shows 200 messages per page by default.
On a side note, are you using an imap proxy for roundcube? It doesn't 
help you with your dovecot problem but it speeds up roundcube.


To speed up imap searches i can recommend to implement fts-solr with 
dovecot (or maybe fts-elasticsearch, am wanting to try that but solr 
works...). That will speed up your searches after mailboxes are indexed.



So my problem is not the storage usage itself:
I don't care if the user gets tons of emails with big attachments;
my problem is when the user opens / searches an imap folder with more
than 10K mails
and iostat util goes 100% for minutes.


Dovecot should be very quick to open even folders with a huge amount of 
files due to its indexes.


I'm unable to reproduce any significant numbers in iostat when accessing 
large mailfolders with roundcube.


Whats your configuration, filesystem, ...


So I've enabled dovecot's stats and enjoying "doveadm stats top",
"stats-top.pl" and "doveadm stats dump user/session",
but talking about "doveadm stats dump user" and its output fields:

userreset_timestamp last_update num_logins  num_cmds
user_cpusys_cpu min_faults  maj_faults  vol_cs  invol_cs
disk_input  disk_output read_count  read_bytes  write_count 
write_bytes mail_lookup_pathmail_lookup_attrmail_read_count 
mail_read_bytes mail_cache_hits

I'm not sure which of those fields can help me
and I can't find any relevant documentation.

So here are my questions:

1. is there a documentation for those 21 fields and for 'doveadm
stats' in general ?
2. what's the difference between disk_output, read_bytes, read_count
and mail_read_bytes ?
3. which field of those is, in your opinion, more representative for
expressing the workload that gives me problems ?
4. which settings do I need to store 1 week worth of stats ?

I'm currenty using the 'standard' values:

  stats_refresh = 30 secs
  stats_track_cmds = yes
  stats_memory_limit = 16 M
  stats_command_min_time = 1 mins
  stats_domain_min_time = 12 hours
  stats_ip_min_time = 12 hours
  stats_session_min_time = 15 mins
  stats_user_min_time = 1 hours

Can you please tell me the correct parameters to store 1 week of stats 
?


For stats somebody else has to jump in, i have only enabled the plugin 
to see what to get out of it but not made any use of it.


Please share your doveconf -n output


Thank you,
Mike


regards
christian