Re: [ext] What is the state of SMTPUTF8 support?
> On 15 Mar 2021, at 14:17, Sylvhem wrote: > > Le dimanche 14 mars 2021 à 21:13 +0100, Benny Pedersen a écrit : >> On 2021-03-14 17:29, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: >>> * Ralf Hildebrandt : > I didn’t get any answer. Does somebody know if there was any > progress > in implementing the RFC 6531? http://www.postfix.org/SMTPUTF8_README.html >>> >>> Sorry, I was on the wrong list. >> >> is there hope to see dns server support rfc 6531 ? >> >> how should dovecot and postfix handle both idn and eai maps, postfix >> is >> not ready yet there, its does not matter aslong dns have yet to >> support >> eai aswell > > I’m sorry, but I’m a bit puzzled by your answer. > What is the relation between RFC 6531 and the DNS? I’m clearly no > expert, but I thought that RFC only specified an SMTP extension. How > are DNS servers concerned by that? > Anyway, Postfix already implemented SMTPUTF8. Having Dovecot do as well > would allow for mail-stack that rely on both Postfix and Dovecot to > send e-mail using addresses containing non-ASCII characters. That would > be a big progress for people who wish to use internationalized e-mail > addresses. > And the last time I asked questions about it here, people said to me it > was being worked on. Hence my question. > > -- > Sylvhem Hi there Any update on this? I am running latest Dovecot 2.3.19, but lmtp still doesn't seem to support SMTPUTF8. In my mail.log I am getting the following bounces, while using `smtputf8_enable = yes` (which nowadays is the default) in Postfix: status=bounced (SMTPUTF8 is required, but was not offered by host mail.example.com[/var/run/dovecot/lmtp]) (Dovecot running on the same server, mail.example.com = localhost, in this example) Cheers, Philip
Re: [ext] Re: What is the state of SMTPUTF8 support?
Le dimanche 14 mars 2021 à 21:13 +0100, Benny Pedersen a écrit : > On 2021-03-14 17:29, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > > * Ralf Hildebrandt : > > > > I didn’t get any answer. Does somebody know if there was any > > > > progress > > > > in implementing the RFC 6531? > > > > > > http://www.postfix.org/SMTPUTF8_README.html > > > > Sorry, I was on the wrong list. > > is there hope to see dns server support rfc 6531 ? > > how should dovecot and postfix handle both idn and eai maps, postfix > is > not ready yet there, its does not matter aslong dns have yet to > support > eai aswell I’m sorry, but I’m a bit puzzled by your answer. What is the relation between RFC 6531 and the DNS? I’m clearly no expert, but I thought that RFC only specified an SMTP extension. How are DNS servers concerned by that? Anyway, Postfix already implemented SMTPUTF8. Having Dovecot do as well would allow for mail-stack that rely on both Postfix and Dovecot to send e-mail using addresses containing non-ASCII characters. That would be a big progress for people who wish to use internationalized e-mail addresses. And the last time I asked questions about it here, people said to me it was being worked on. Hence my question. -- Sylvhem
Re: [ext] Re: What is the state of SMTPUTF8 support?
On 2021-03-14 17:29, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: * Ralf Hildebrandt : > I didn’t get any answer. Does somebody know if there was any progress > in implementing the RFC 6531? http://www.postfix.org/SMTPUTF8_README.html Sorry, I was on the wrong list. is there hope to see dns server support rfc 6531 ? how should dovecot and postfix handle both idn and eai maps, postfix is not ready yet there, its does not matter aslong dns have yet to support eai aswell
Re: What is the state of SMTPUTF8 support?
On 2021-03-14 17:26, Sylvhem wrote: Le mardi 23 février 2021 à 13:50 +0100, Sylvhem a écrit : It’s been some time since I last saw a mention of SMTPUTF8 here. Last time I heard about it, it was worked on. Does anybody have news about that? I didn’t get any answer. Does somebody know if there was any progress in implementing the RFC 6531? dns servers only support idn, not yet eai, waiting to see the ice break
Re: [ext] Re: What is the state of SMTPUTF8 support?
* Ralf Hildebrandt : > > > It’s been some time since I last saw a mention of SMTPUTF8 here. Last > > > time I heard about it, it was worked on. > > > Does anybody have news about that? > > > > > > > I didn’t get any answer. Does somebody know if there was any progress > > in implementing the RFC 6531? > > http://www.postfix.org/SMTPUTF8_README.html Sorry, I was on the wrong list. -- Ralf Hildebrandt Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin Campus Benjamin Franklin Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203 Berlin Tel. +49 30 450 570 155 | Fax: +49 30 450 570 962 ralf.hildebra...@charite.de | https://www.charite.de
Re: [ext] Re: What is the state of SMTPUTF8 support?
> > It’s been some time since I last saw a mention of SMTPUTF8 here. Last > > time I heard about it, it was worked on. > > Does anybody have news about that? > > > > I didn’t get any answer. Does somebody know if there was any progress > in implementing the RFC 6531? http://www.postfix.org/SMTPUTF8_README.html -- Ralf Hildebrandt Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin Campus Benjamin Franklin Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203 Berlin Tel. +49 30 450 570 155 | Fax: +49 30 450 570 962 ralf.hildebra...@charite.de | https://www.charite.de
Re: What is the state of SMTPUTF8 support?
Le mardi 23 février 2021 à 13:50 +0100, Sylvhem a écrit : > Hi! > > It’s been some time since I last saw a mention of SMTPUTF8 here. Last > time I heard about it, it was worked on. > Does anybody have news about that? > I didn’t get any answer. Does somebody know if there was any progress in implementing the RFC 6531? -- Sylvhem
RE: What is the state of SMTPUTF8 support?
sendmail is (also) still lacking this. > -Original Message- > From: dovecot On Behalf Of Sylvhem > Sent: 23 February 2021 13:50 > To: dovecot@dovecot.org > Subject: What is the state of SMTPUTF8 support? > > Hi! > > It’s been some time since I last saw a mention of SMTPUTF8 here. Last > time I heard about it, it was worked on. > Does anybody have news about that? > > -- > Sylvhem
What is the state of SMTPUTF8 support?
Hi! It’s been some time since I last saw a mention of SMTPUTF8 here. Last time I heard about it, it was worked on. Does anybody have news about that? -- Sylvhem