[Drakelist] TR-7 filters

2009-12-07 Thread Robert Spiva
I have been using a TR-7 line for about two months that sat on a shelf for 
quite a number of years.  It had been working wonderfully, but this weekend 
everything went quiet.  To get any receive signal through I have to have the 
pass band engaged.  When the other two A+B=C filter are engaged I get a very 
weak signal coming though.  This is the case in all modes AM, RTTY, CW, LSB  
USB.  Anyone have any ideas what's wrong?


Robert Spiva
W6SJN___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] TR-7 filters

2009-12-07 Thread Jim Shorney
On Mon, 7 Dec 2009 10:28:59 -0800, Robert Spiva wrote:

I have been using a TR-7 line for about two months that sat on a shelf for 
quite a number of years.  It had been working wonderfully, but this weekend 
everything went quiet.  To get any receive signal through I have to have the 
pass band engaged.  When the other two A+B=C filter are engaged I get a very 
weak signal coming though.  This is the case in all modes AM, RTTY, CW, LSB  
USB.  Anyone have any ideas what's wrong?


First idea, dirty/oxidized pins in the Molex connectors between the plugin
boards and the parent board. This is probably the most common ailment with
aging 7-line radios. The cure can be as simple as pulling all the boards and
reseating them, but a good cleaning and sparing application of DeOxit doesn't
hurt. When working with the aluminim card cage covers, DON'T overtighten the
screws. They can strip easily. They need to be snug, but not lug-nut tight.
Also check the various grounding tabs and fingers while you are in there.

73

-Jim

--

It's an Earth food. They are called Swedish meatballs! It's a strange thing, 
but every sentient race has its own version of these Swedish meatballs! I 
suspect it's one of those great universal mysteries which will either never be 
explained, or which would drive you mad if you ever learned the truth! - 
G'Kar, Babylon 5



___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


[Drakelist] TR4Cw band problem:

2009-12-07 Thread Luther Nallie

I just acquired a TR4C/w and everything works great except the only bands that 
work are 80m and 20m.  I don't get anything on the other bands and was 
wondering if somebody could give me a starting point to try to find my problem. 
 I know how to use a VOM and soldering iron and have worked on guitar 
amplifiers, etc. but not real sharp about radio gear.  I can read a schematic.  
Thanks for any advice.

 

Luke
  
_
Get gifts for them and cashback for you. Try Bing now.
http://www.bing.com/shopping/search?q=xbox+gamesscope=cashbackform=MSHYCBpubl=WLHMTAGcrea=TEXT_MSHYCB_Shopping_Giftsforthem_cashback_1x1___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] TR4Cw band problem:

2009-12-07 Thread Garey Barrell

Luke -

Sounds like the crystal BAND oscillator is not running.

Start by swapping out V1.  If no luck, that circuit is most likely where 
your problem lies.   Try exercising the BAND switch, DeoxiT on the 
associated switch wafers.


73, Garey - K4OAH
Glen Allen, VA

Drake 2-B, 4-B, C-Line  TR-4/C Service Supplement CDs
www.k4oah.com


Luther Nallie wrote:
I just acquired a TR4C/w and everything works great except the only 
bands that work are 80m and 20m.  I don't get anything on the other 
bands and was wondering if somebody could give me a starting point to 
try to find my problem.  I know how to use a VOM and soldering iron 
and have worked on guitar amplifiers, etc. but not real sharp about 
radio gear.  I can read a schematic.  Thanks for any advice.


Luke



___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] TR4Cw band problem:

2009-12-07 Thread Ron
Luke,
Fairly sure that the TRany (I know the TR3 did) use the VFO and IF to create 
the 80 and 20 meter bands (aka 9Mhz - 5Mhz = 80 meters, 9Mhz + 4 Mhz = 20 
meters).  The other bands are gotten by adding a crystal oscillator to the mix. 
 Use another RX to see if you hear the band crystal note when you have it on 
other bands. 

So look at the schematic and find the tube or transistor that is the xtal band 
osc. Drake's manual is pretty good on generally what is doing what and the 
theory of operation. Put a loop of insulated wire around the osc active device 
and into the antenna input of your receiver you are using to check the osc.  
You should hear a note on the frequency listed on the xtal give or take a 
little bit.

It really sounds like you band osc is not osc, or the mixer is not mixing.  But 
check the osc first.

73,
Ron WD8SBB

--- On Mon, 12/7/09, Luther Nallie lanal...@hotmail.com wrote:

 From: Luther Nallie lanal...@hotmail.com
 Subject: [Drakelist] TR4Cw band problem:
 To: drakelist@zerobeat.net
 Date: Monday, December 7, 2009, 3:35 PM
 
 
 
 
  
 I just acquired a TR4C/w and everything works great
 except the only bands that work are 80m and 20m.  I
 don't get anything on the other bands and was wondering
 if somebody could give me a starting point to try to find my
 problem.  I know how to use a VOM and soldering iron
 and have worked on guitar amplifiers, etc. but not real
 sharp about radio gear.  I can read a schematic. 
 Thanks for any advice.
 
  
 
 Luke
 
 Get gifts for them and cashback for
 you. Try
 Bing now. 
 
 -Inline Attachment Follows-
 
 ___
 Drakelist mailing list
 Drakelist@zerobeat.net
 http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist
 


  

___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


[Drakelist] R-4A working

2009-12-07 Thread Karl Henrik Laache
Hi all

 

I promised to let you know
what happened to my R-4A
(13-tube).  I made the pcb for
the xtal oscillator that was
missing  (fiberglass, not
phenolic , I'm not religious),
collected the parts including
a 2N3904 as a replacement for
the 2N3394.  After some
experimenting, I ended up
making the L4 on a toroid
core.  I tried the resistor
approach, but it wouldn't
oscillate on all bands.  The
toroid works fine.  I removed
the L4 from a R-4B, and
measured it to ca 1.3 uH  on
the primary winding with my
AADE meter.

Now I will do a complete
adjustment, and possibly
change some of the tubes.  I
probably will have to change
the 100kc calibrator crystal,
as it does not work at all. 

So now my T-4X have a
companion.  Thanks for all
help!

 

73s de Karl LA1CU

la...@nrrl.no 

---

No trees were harmed in the
sending of this message, but a
lot of electrons were terribly
inconvinienced

 

Do not print this message
unnecessarily!

 

___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] R-4A working

2009-12-07 Thread Garey Barrell

Karl -

Thanks for the info! Makes me wonder if the form that Drake used had a 
ferrite core of some sort. I'd never had occasion to measure one, so 
didn't question it. Good information for the data bank!


If you haven't already, check the power supply for the calibrator. 
That's all it does. Also see if it's working at 100 kHz and the RTL 
dividers are dead. Let us know!


73, Garey - K4OAH
Glen Allen, VA

Drake 2-B, 4-B, C-Line  TR-4/C Service Supplement CDs
www.k4oah.com


Karl Henrik Laache wrote:


Hi all

I promised to let you know what happened to my R-4A (13-tube). I made 
the pcb for the xtal oscillator that was missing (fiberglass, not 
phenolic , I’m not religious), collected the parts including a 2N3904 
as a replacement for the 2N3394. After some experimenting, I ended up 
making the L4 on a toroid core. I tried the resistor approach, but it 
wouldn’t oscillate on all bands. The toroid works fine. I removed the 
L4 from a R-4B, and measured it to ca 1.3 uH on the primary winding 
with my AADE meter.


Now I will do a complete adjustment, and possibly change some of the 
tubes. I probably will have to change the 100kc calibrator crystal, as 
it does not work at all.


So now my T-4X have a companion. Thanks for all help!

73s de Karl LA1CU

la...@nrrl.no




___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] TR-7 filters

2009-12-07 Thread Mark Nace
I agree Jim.  My TR-7 was over 25 years old, and I pulled the boards, deoxited 
the pins (and all other connectors), band switch, and all my audio, digital 
readout, and low receive problems just went away.  
73
Mark
N5KAE

 


- Original Message 
 From: Jim Shorney jshor...@inebraska.com
 To: drakel...@.zerobeat.net drakelist@zerobeat.net
 Sent: Mon, December 7, 2009 12:44:31 PM
 Subject: Re: [Drakelist] TR-7 filters
 
 On Mon, 7 Dec 2009 10:28:59 -0800, Robert Spiva wrote:
 
 I have been using a TR-7 line for about two months that sat on a shelf for 
 quite a number of years.  It had been working wonderfully, but this weekend 
 everything went quiet.  To get any receive signal through I have to have the 
 pass band engaged.  When the other two A+B=C filter are engaged I get a very 
 weak signal coming though.  This is the case in all modes AM, RTTY, CW, LSB  
 USB.  Anyone have any ideas what's wrong?
 
 
 First idea, dirty/oxidized pins in the Molex connectors between the plugin
 boards and the parent board. This is probably the most common ailment with
 aging 7-line radios. The cure can be as simple as pulling all the boards and
 reseating them, but a good cleaning and sparing application of DeOxit doesn't
 hurt. When working with the aluminim card cage covers, DON'T overtighten the
 screws. They can strip easily. They need to be snug, but not lug-nut tight.
 Also check the various grounding tabs and fingers while you are in there.
 
 73
 
 -Jim
 
 --
 
 It's an Earth food. They are called Swedish meatballs! It's a strange thing, 
 but every sentient race has its own version of these Swedish meatballs! I 
 suspect it's one of those great universal mysteries which will either never 
 be 
 explained, or which would drive you mad if you ever learned the truth! - 
 G'Kar, 
 Babylon 5
 
 
 
 ___
 Drakelist mailing list
 Drakelist@zerobeat.net
 http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


[Drakelist] TR7 questions

2009-12-07 Thread gypsymt34
Hello to the group.
Have a TR7 ...mid range serial number.
Without tearing a bunch of stuff apart.
 
also have a TR5 and a TR4c,  the question ...is the pto action on the 7 
 stiffer than the other two.  The 5 is like silk and the 4c feels just a 
tad  stiffer than the 5.
Per the archives  ..the 7 pto is the same as the 4c, is the 5 the  same? 
 
Next was a recent  write up on an R7 that said there was a mechanical  
lever to release the gear  on the pto to enable a mechanical alignment on  the 
dial.  Is that the same on the TR7?
 
73s  Carl wd8nhk
 
___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] Caps installed, still having RX problem w R4C

2009-12-07 Thread Garey Barrell


IF there IS a shorting plug inserted, there are a set of switch contacts 
and a bit of wiring that could give the same results,  Yet another 
possibility is that the center contact of the chassis mount jack is 
spread out where it's not making contact.  Last but not least, is your 
shorting plug REALLY shorted??  :-)


73, Garey - K4OAH
Glen Allen, VA

Drake 2-B, 4-B, C-Line  TR-4/C Service Supplement CDs
www.k4oah.com


Jim Shorney wrote:

On Mon, 7 Dec 2009 16:53:09 -0800 (PST), Brett Forehand wrote:

   

Hello everyone!  Received my cap kit from Hayseed Hamfest (my tech sends his compliments on the 
completeness of the kit).  Caps are installed, but still having problems with the receiver going to 
a 20+ signal on the S meter when switched to ext. mute and nb.  He said 
even w/disconnecting the noise blanker board, it still puts a 20+ signal on the S meter in either 
of these positions.  Any suggestions as to what the problem might be?
 


Is there a shorting plug in the EXT MUTE jack on the back? ISTR this as normal
behavior with no shorting plug or T-4any present.


   


___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


[Drakelist] 2B vs. Hammarlund?

2009-12-07 Thread Darrell Bellerive
Anyone own both a Drake 2B and an Hammarlund HQ-145 and can describe how 
the two compare.


While obviously made with different purposes in mind, I am curious as to 
how the two compare at receiving signals.


The 2B really impresses me on CW, but I find the bandwidth a bit narrow 
for AM. I suspect the Hammerlund would be much better for AM, but wonder 
how it does on CW. Is it as stable or as selective.


I do have the 2BQ Q-Multiplier and find it is wonderful for CW.

--
Darrell Bellerive
Amateur Radio Station VA7TO
Grand Forks BC Canada

___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] TR7 questions

2009-12-07 Thread Garey Barrell

Carl -

Dunno about the '5, never got my hands on one.  I suspect it is 
different, may even be synthesized and using an optical encoder.  Much 
better stability spec.


The lever is on the '7 also, but it is not easy to get to.  Like most 
everything else, it's UNDER the DR-7 board.


For your 'C, it may suffer from the lubed nylon gears syndrome.  Or 
the rear bearing may just be tightened too much.  See:


http://www.wb4hfn.com/DRAKE/DrakeArticles/PTO/Drake_PTO.htm


73, Garey - K4OAH
Glen Allen, VA

Drake 2-B, 4-B, C-Line  TR-4/C Service Supplement CDs
www.k4oah.com


gypsym...@aol.com wrote:

Hello to the group.
Have a TR7 ...mid range serial number.
Without tearing a bunch of stuff apart.
also have a TR5 and a TR4c,  the question ...is the pto action on 
the 7 stiffer than the other two.  The 5 is like silk and the 4c feels 
just a tad stiffer than the 5.

Per the archives  ..the 7 pto is the same as the 4c, is the 5 the same?
Next was a recent  write up on an R7 that said there was a mechanical 
lever to release the gear  on the pto to enable a mechanical alignment 
on the dial.  Is that the same on the TR7?

73s  Carl wd8nhk



___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] 2B vs. Hammarlund?

2009-12-07 Thread Garey Barrell

Darrell -

That's kinda like comparing apples and horses..!

The 2-B is optimized as a CW and SSB receiver, and has a suitable IF 
shape for those modes.  It is ultra stable, both temperature and 
mechanical.  You can pick it up with one hand.  Very sensitive, and 
relatively overload capable for the time.


The HQ-145 is a terrific receiver for AM signals on an uncrowded band.  
It has a nice wide IF, and the Q-Multiplier does help when you need a 
little more selectivity.  It is not particularly stable, either 
temperature or mechanical.  You would have difficulty picking it up with 
both hands!  Very sensitive, not quite as overload capable as the 2-B.


The '145 was about the pinnacle of Hammarlund technology, it was 
downhill from there to the '170.  I bought a '170A in 1961 and used it 
for about three days before taking it in and trading it for a 2-B.   
Best trade I ever made.  The way it was drifting, in spite of the 
always on VFO tube, it's probably a microwave receiver today.!


For outstanding AM, take a look at an HQ-129X or HQ-140.

The 2-B was what the pundits call a paradigm shift, when ham receivers 
changed from bigger, heavier, built like a battleship to better, 
smaller, and a lot lighter.  We used to demo the 2-B by tuning in a CW 
or SSB signal, then tilting the front of the receiver up until it was 
about three inches off the table and then dropping it.  You might hear a 
little waver at impact, but then right back on frequency.  Try that with 
any of the Hammarlund (or Hallicrafters) receivers of the day and you'd 
be lucky to be able to FIND the signal again.


73, Garey - K4OAH
Glen Allen, VA

Drake 2-B, 4-B, C-Line  TR-4/C Service Supplement CDs
www.k4oah.com


Darrell Bellerive wrote:
Anyone own both a Drake 2B and an Hammarlund HQ-145 and can describe 
how the two compare.


While obviously made with different purposes in mind, I am curious as 
to how the two compare at receiving signals.


The 2B really impresses me on CW, but I find the bandwidth a bit 
narrow for AM. I suspect the Hammerlund would be much better for AM, 
but wonder how it does on CW. Is it as stable or as selective.


I do have the 2BQ Q-Multiplier and find it is wonderful for CW.



___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


[Drakelist] R-4A calibrator

2009-12-07 Thread Karl Henrik Laache
Hi all

 

My R-4A  I was telling you
about has the old type
calibrator, with a 12BA6.
That was one of the changes to
the B, the introduction of
integrated circuits in the
calibrator. As I said, there
is no signal at all, I have
resoldered, changed the tube
and the trimmer cap and still
there is no life.  The next
step is to try another crystal
from a TR-4 or R-4B, and see
if it works.  

Ill keep you posted.

 

 

73s de Karl LA1CU

la...@nrrl.no 

---

No trees were harmed in the
sending of this message, but a
lot of electrons were terribly
inconvinienced

 

Do not print this message
unnecessarily!

 

___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


[Drakelist] T4XB

2009-12-07 Thread Michael C. Marx
Anyone have any junker T4XB's they want to sell?  Or better yet, just the 
filters and IF xfmrs?

73,
Mike WB0SND

___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] 2B vs. Hammarlund?

2009-12-07 Thread W4AWM
Then there was the infamous Hallicrafters Boinngg!
 
73,  
 
John,  W4AWM
___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist