Re: [Drakelist] What would you do?

2011-09-05 Thread Curt
Hello Steve,

How well a rig functions is more important to me than how it looks.  After all, 
the only people that see my shack besides me are non-hams who think even the 
beautiful stuff looks like junk.  Whether the copper chassis is pristine is 
less important than how well the AVC functions.  I own a T-4X with nice copper, 
service tag, clean front panel, no bruises.  But, it's operation is poorer than 
my T-4XB which operates perfectly, but has blemishes on the chassis and some 
worn lettering on the front panel.  I would just use the R-4B as-is.

I know how frustrating it would be to purchase a rig only to find it to be 
modified extensively.  Have never understood the modification urge, am sure 
that the designers were way smarter than me, but it is just another aspect of 
the hobby.  I've been fortunate to avoid that with the single exception of a 
DX-40 whose modifications were all toward improved safety, but still detracted 
from the appearance of the rig.  Sold it "for parts" with full disclosure, but 
mainly because it had some operational issues also.  Unfortunately, that is 
probably where you would be with your R-4B.

GL & 73 Curt

  - Original Message - 
  From: Steve Wedge 
  To: drakelist@zerobeat.net 
  Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 8:39 PM
  Subject: [Drakelist] What would you do?


  Fellow Drakesters - 

  I bought an R-4B a few weeks ago, sort of sight-unseen, on the assurance that 
it was an "8" (I assumed out of 10, but I won't go there right now...)

  The receiver works very well and pulls in the signals as good as anything 
ever made.  It transceives well with both my T-4X's.  The audio sounds like 
some component values were tweaked, as it has a rich sound with more lows than 
I'm used to hearing.

  Here's the ugly part, and I know there are some of us who are more "purists" 
than others.  I've been tending toward looking for rigs that haven't had a 
heavy hand taken to them - which this one has.  The previous owner moved the 
INJ jack over to one of the SPARE locations (why? Don't know!) - shortening the 
shielded cable to the jack i the process.  He drilled through the "target" that 
the factory provided on the front panel where the headphone jack used to be and 
put a pot with a Drake knob.  This pot is used to vary that AGC delay.  There 
is no longer a headphone jack on the side.  He replaced all the RCA jacks with 
high-quality jacks.  Unfortunately, it appears he used some sort of "tuner 
cleaner" on the bandswitch, but nothing seems to be broken.  There are other 
changes that will be easier to undo - such as going back to the factory panel 
and cabinet screws.

  I'm looking for consensus from our ranks: would you try to put things back, 
leave it but clean it up, or leave it as is?  I'm leaning toward selling it, as 
I found a better one at the hamfest.

  Moral of the story: when buying these on the ham websites - demand pictures 
of front, back and interior as a minimum, unless it's either ridiculously cheap 
or you know the seller!

  73,

  Steve Wedge, W1ES/4

  "I can't complain, but sometimes I still do."
  - Joe Walsh

  If the above message appears, it came from Steve's Son of Laptop!


--


  ___
  Drakelist mailing list
  Drakelist@zerobeat.net
  http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist
___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] What would you do?

2011-09-05 Thread Don Cunningham
Steve,
This one of those questions where you will probably end up split 50/50 and just 
have to make the decision yourself BUT you asked, so I'll take it on.  You have 
to first decide what your goal is, do you want a "pristine collectable" that 
may or may not be worth "squat" later, OR do you want to operate with a nice 
sounding, well working old tube rig???  Answer that and you'll know which way 
to go.  If eye candy is critical, by all means sell it well represented to 
someone that wants one that works and cares less about appearance.

I can say this, as I had to decide the very same thing myself and the working 
rig won out.  I've just spent a VERY pleasurable Labor Day afternoon working 
guys on 20m with my resurected TR4C that is okay, but NOT a shelf queen and NOT 
a prime example of a TR4C.  It DOES work very well, output is nice, and 
everyone LOVES the audio on transmit.  What more can I ask for???  I must admit 
that the 4 element quad at 73' out back doesn't hurt a bit, hi hi.

At the same time, when I set out to find my C Line this time, I demanded the 
highest serial numbers and wanted "pristine" examples, so I have both and enjoy 
both.  I have a shack FULL of Drakes, Collins, Heathkits, Johnson, etc, but I 
prefer some of the ugliest units for rag chewing, hi.  

Whatever you choose, just enjoy them, Steve.  Operate often and use the one 
that sounds the best.
73,
Don, WB5HAK___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


[Drakelist] What would you do?

2011-09-05 Thread Steve Wedge
Fellow Drakesters - 

I bought an R-4B a few weeks ago, sort of sight-unseen, on the assurance that 
it was an "8" (I assumed out of 10, but I won't go there right now...)

The receiver works very well and pulls in the signals as good as anything ever 
made.  It transceives well with both my T-4X's.  The audio sounds like some 
component values were tweaked, as it has a rich sound with more lows than I'm 
used to hearing.

Here's the ugly part, and I know there are some of us who are more "purists" 
than others.  I've been tending toward looking for rigs that haven't had a 
heavy hand taken to them - which this one has.  The previous owner moved the 
INJ jack over to one of the SPARE locations (why? Don't know!) - shortening the 
shielded cable to the jack i the process.  He drilled through the "target" that 
the factory provided on the front panel where the headphone jack used to be and 
put a pot with a Drake knob.  This pot is used to vary that AGC delay.  There 
is no longer a headphone jack on the side.  He replaced all the RCA jacks with 
high-quality jacks.  Unfortunately, it appears he used some sort of "tuner 
cleaner" on the bandswitch, but nothing seems to be broken.  There are other 
changes that will be easier to undo - such as going back to the factory panel 
and cabinet screws.

I'm looking for consensus from our ranks: would you try to put things back, 
leave it but clean it up, or leave it as is?  I'm leaning toward selling it, as 
I found a better one at the hamfest.

Moral of the story: when buying these on the ham websites - demand pictures of 
front, back and interior as a minimum, unless it's either ridiculously cheap or 
you know the seller!

73,

Steve Wedge, W1ES/4

"I can't complain, but sometimes I still do."
- Joe Walsh

If the above message appears, it came from Steve's Son of Laptop!___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist