Re: [Drakelist] Sign on

2011-09-13 Thread Tom Evans, AG9X
Dave,

At   http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist
it says Once a month, your password will be emailed to you as a reminder.

Ask your friend to search his email for an email with this Subject:
zerobeat.net mailing list memberships reminder

The last one was sent on Sept 1, 2011

If your friend doesn't find an email like that, he can always sign up for
the list again at the link above.


73, Tom, AG9X



On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Dave Loewer wb2...@msn.com wrote:

   Hi Gang :  I have a friend that wants to sign on and ask for help.
 Drakelist asked for his name and pass word and he can’t
 remember it. What can he do ? I don’t know what to tell him
 Thanks a lot
 Dave  W2GBY

 ___
 Drakelist mailing list
 Drakelist@zerobeat.net
 http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] FS: TR-3, now $90

2011-09-13 Thread Al Parker

Hi folks,
	I listed this abt 3 wks ago, not a lot of interest.  Any now at a 
reduced price?  $90 vs $125 b4

===
I spent many hours resurrecting this dead on arrival TR-3 for a 
fellow who then ran into finance shortcomings.  He said to sell it.

 It does not have a power supply.  It's working reasonably well.
  It gets approx. 200w out on 3.8, 7.25, 14.25 mc, 100+ on 21.25, 
approx. 90 on 28.3.  Receives well.  I've demo'd it on 3.8.
Chassis is fairly clean, it's bright plated, not copper like later 
rigs.  Case could use a repaint.


The following is a quick summary of what was done.   TR-3 s/n 60001

1.  AC switch is bad, replacements are very hard to find.  It’s “ON”, so 
use a “power strip”
2.  Replaced final cathode resistors with 15 ohm 1-watters, screen res. 
with 68 ohm 1-watters, all were out of spec.  Plate dropping res. for 
the driver was high, 695 vs 470, now repl with a 3-watter.
3. C-135, -145, electrolytics, all had high ESR.  Replaced with discrete 
components under the chassis, disconnected the original cans.
4. C-129, at the 9mc osc., broken.  Replaced with a similar one, mounted 
above chassis (not “proper” but serves the purpose).
5.  Re-calibrated the plate current meter, it was indicating about 2/3 
of actual.
6.  Someone had modified the neutralization ckt to make it close to what 
is used in later TR-4’s, but didn’t do one thing properly.  Now have it 
working reasonably well.  S-meter has quit to stay, coil is open. 
Neutralization is OK on low bands, poor on 15  10 meters, I advise not 
using those bands, or it can be adjusted to use those bands and not the 
lower ones.  New finals might be OK.
I will ship at actual Fedex cost, plus $5 for packing and my trip 
to the terminal.  Pers. ck OK with short waiting period, USPS or bank 
M.O. no wait, if PayPal, add $5 to cover fees.

IIRC about 25 lbs, from zip 28560, you can ck Fedex.com for est.
73,

Al, W8UT
New Bern, NC
www.boatanchors.org
www.hammarlund.info

There is nothing -- absolutely nothing -- half so much
worth doing as simply messing about in boats
Ratty, to Mole

___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


[Drakelist] FS-4

2011-09-13 Thread Hunter Ellington
FWIW,

I purchased an ebay FS-4 several years ago and love it.  It has really made my 
R4-C shine.  Rock solid.  Enjoy.


 
K0GFY R. Hunter Ellington
303-454-0543/720-560-8139
P.O. Box 44
Larkspur, CO 80118___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] FS-4

2011-09-13 Thread K9sqg
I have owned several FS-4s over the years but do not have any now.  The FS-4 
can be considered as stable as a crystal BUT it does not add anything to 
overall stability to the R4C, for example.  Why?  The main part that 
contributes to drift is the PTO so whether one uses and FS-4 or plug in 
crystal, the stability is basically unchanged.  The FS-4 is handy for SWLing, 
WARC, etc. but at today's prices, only the rich can afford them...





-Original Message-
From: Hunter Ellington wb9...@yahoo.com
To: Drakelist Drakelist@zerobeat.net
Sent: Tue, Sep 13, 2011 9:05 am
Subject: [Drakelist] FS-4



FWIW,


I purchased an ebay FS-4 several years ago and love it.  It has really made my 
R4-C shine.  Rock solid.  Enjoy.


 
K0GFY R. Hunter Ellington
303-454-0543/720-560-8139
P.O. Box 44
Larkspur, CO 80118

 
___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist

 
___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] Well, it looks like both PTO's DO have issues.

2011-09-13 Thread Garey Barrell


I finally got a chance to take a look at Steve's PTO.  As I suspected the frequency jumping is 
caused by the large (main) tubular cap.  I don't know of anything special about that cap, it's 
marked as an NP0, so I just stuck a Dur-Mica in it's place.   I'm sure Drake had a reason for using 
that type of cap, but darned if I can figure out what it was.  Maybe purchasing got a good buy on a 
box of them!  :-)I measured the cap I removed as 92.2 pF, the schematic specifies 82 pF, and the 
color code reads 93 pF, so who knows  I selected the Dur-Mica from a bunch of 90 pF ones, and 
got a 92.3 to replace the original, so hopefully it won't destroy the linearity.  Considering that 
Drake later went to a pair of 45 pF caps and then a 45 and 35 pF pair, the 'good buy' idea gains 
credence!!   I haven't made any checks of linearity yet, and I assume the select at test caps in 
parallel are used to 'fine tune' for the particular coil.


A steady 2.2 V p-p output into a 1M counter input.

Anyway, it's been sitting on the bench in a Pana-Vise all afternoon and has stayed within 100 Hz, 
UNTIL the A/C kicks on and blows cool air at it!  It's right in the stream of cold air, and so I 
consider that as STABLE.  Of course I don't have a Rubidium standard oscillator to calibrate my 
counter against, so it could really be anywhere!!  :-)


The next step is to fashion some sort of reference pointer so I can do at least a rough check of 
linearity


73, Garey - K4OAH
Glen Allen, VA

Drake 2-B, 2-C/2-NT, 4-A, 4-B, C-Line and
TR-4/C Service Supplement CDs
www.k4oah.com



Steve Wedge wrote:


I am with Garey, though, in that I'm still finding it hard to believe that there are problems with 
both.  That would be like getting struck by lightning twice.


I'm still having a hard time thinking it's the supply, as that 0B2 should regulate its output at - 
what is it? - 108V?  That gets dropped through the big WW resistor and ends up as approximately 10 
- 12V, which gets dropped by the Zener inside the PTO.  To my thinking, even if the 108V were to 
sag a little, as long as the voltage is above the Zener point, it shouldn't matter as long as 
there's sufficient current.


Both PTO assemblies - when in the R-4A - seem to be very touchy.

W1ES

-Original Message-
From: Bill Frost
Sent: Aug 25, 2011 10:06 AM
To: Steve Wedge
Cc: Garey Barrell
Subject: Re: [Drakelist] Well, it looks like both PTO's DO have issues.

Hello Steve,

OK, Great, it will be interesting to see what Garey finds.

73, Bill



*From:* Steve Wedge w1es1...@earthlink.net
*To:* Bill Frost wd8...@yahoo.com
*Cc:* Garey Barrell k4...@mindspring.com
*Sent:* Thursday, August 25, 2011 9:55 AM
*Subject:* Re: [Drakelist] Well, it looks like both PTO's DO have issues.

Cover was on each during the tests.  Tried running it with cover off to try 
and poke at
components to provoke them ;-)  Of course, I'd have to rig up some way of 
holding the yoke down.
I'm actually going to send the older one to Garey tomorrow to get a fresh 
set of eyes (and a
better-stocked parts bin) on it.
73
W1ES

-Original Message-
From: Bill Frost
Sent: Aug 25, 2011 8:21 AM
To: Steve Wedge
Cc: Garey Barrell
Subject: Re: [Drakelist] Well, it looks like both PTO's DO have issues.

Hello Steve,

If you preformed the tests with the PTO cover removed, not a good test, 
you must have the
PTO yoke spring pulled and clipped to the back of the coil form or ???  
Allowing the
yoke/slider bar to ride free is not a good test as the PTO will always 
chirp or drift
around without tension on the yoke/slider bar.  It's best to leave the 
cover on and spring
engaged during any test of the PTO assembly.

73, Bill



*From:* Steve Wedge w1es1...@earthlink.net
*To:* drakelist@zerobeat.net
*Sent:* Wednesday, August 24, 2011 9:16 PM
*Subject:* [Drakelist] Well, it looks like both PTO's DO have issues.

UUT #1: PTO from T-4XB, mounted in R-4A.  R-4A when using its own PTO 
gets chirpy/unstable
signals after warm-up.
UUT #2: Original PTO from R-4A, out of the rig.
Power:
Internal receiver power
Station power supply (30A linear), turned down to 11.1V
monitor: Elecraft K3 tuned to 4917 kHz (approx) with series 10 dB pad 
and x10 scope probe.
Test setup #1:
UUT #1 connected to power buss from 0B2 and normal chassis ground.  
Signal output open
except for test equipment.  Connected to monitor.  Warmed up 
approximately 25 minutes,
signal became unstable.  Turned R-4A OFF and immediately connected 

Re: [Drakelist] Well, it looks like both PTO's DO have issues.

2011-09-13 Thread Garey Barrell


Steve -

OK.  I fashioned a 'sorta' fiducial out of a piece of wire and an alligator clip to the gearbox. 
Allowing for parallax, lighting, reflections, 'reading' glasses, and just plain poor close-up 
vision, it looks to be within a few hundred Hz at each 100 kHz marker, and about 1.5 kHz from end to 
end.  Well within original specs.  Of course, with no Rubidium standard I don't 'really' know where 
it is, but I think it's 'CEAPP' or 'Close Enough for All Practical Purposes'.!


I'm sure the tubular cap had some 'secret' specification that we'll never know, but the little 
Dur-Mica seems to be holding up just fine.  Nothing else has been changed, and aside from about a 
115 Hz swing from A/C breeze soak to room temp soak doesn't seem excessive to me.  I suspect nicely 
bolted down to a chassis inside a nice warm receiver or transmitter it will be just fine.


73, Garey - K4OAH
Glen Allen, VA

Drake 2-B, 2-C/2-NT, 4-A, 4-B, C-Line and
TR-4/C Service Supplement CDs
www.k4oah.com



Steve Wedge wrote:


I am with Garey, though, in that I'm still finding it hard to believe that 
there are problems with
both.  That would be like getting struck by lightning twice.

I'm still having a hard time thinking it's the supply, as that 0B2 should 
regulate its output at -
what is it? - 108V?  That gets dropped through the big WW resistor and ends up 
as approximately 10
- 12V, which gets dropped by the Zener inside the PTO.  To my thinking, even if 
the 108V were to
sag a little, as long as the voltage is above the Zener point, it shouldn't 
matter as long as
there's sufficient current.

Both PTO assemblies - when in the R-4A - seem to be very touchy.

W1ES

-Original Message-
From: Bill Frost
Sent: Aug 25, 2011 10:06 AM
To: Steve Wedge
Cc: Garey Barrell
Subject: Re: [Drakelist] Well, it looks like both PTO's DO have issues.

Hello Steve,

OK, Great, it will be interesting to see what Garey finds.

73, Bill



*From:* Steve Wedge w1es1...@earthlink.net
*To:* Bill Frost wd8...@yahoo.com
*Cc:* Garey Barrell k4...@mindspring.com
*Sent:* Thursday, August 25, 2011 9:55 AM
*Subject:* Re: [Drakelist] Well, it looks like both PTO's DO have issues.

Cover was on each during the tests.  Tried running it with cover off to try 
and poke at
components to provoke them ;-)  Of course, I'd have to rig up some way of 
holding the yoke down.
I'm actually going to send the older one to Garey tomorrow to get a fresh 
set of eyes (and a
better-stocked parts bin) on it.
73
W1ES

-Original Message-
From: Bill Frost
Sent: Aug 25, 2011 8:21 AM
To: Steve Wedge
Cc: Garey Barrell
Subject: Re: [Drakelist] Well, it looks like both PTO's DO have issues.

Hello Steve,

If you preformed the tests with the PTO cover removed, not a good test, 
you must have the
PTO yoke spring pulled and clipped to the back of the coil form or ???  
Allowing the
yoke/slider bar to ride free is not a good test as the PTO will always 
chirp or drift
around without tension on the yoke/slider bar.  It's best to leave the 
cover on and spring
engaged during any test of the PTO assembly.

73, Bill



*From:* Steve Wedge w1es1...@earthlink.net
*To:* drakelist@zerobeat.net
*Sent:* Wednesday, August 24, 2011 9:16 PM
*Subject:* [Drakelist] Well, it looks like both PTO's DO have issues.

UUT #1: PTO from T-4XB, mounted in R-4A.  R-4A when using its own PTO 
gets chirpy/unstable
signals after warm-up.
UUT #2: Original PTO from R-4A, out of the rig.
Power:
Internal receiver power
Station power supply (30A linear), turned down to 11.1V
monitor: Elecraft K3 tuned to 4917 kHz (approx) with series 10 dB pad 
and x10 scope probe.
Test setup #1:
UUT #1 connected to power buss from 0B2 and normal chassis ground.  
Signal output open
except for test equipment.  Connected to monitor.  Warmed up 
approximately 25 minutes,
signal became unstable.  Turned R-4A OFF and immediately connected 
station supply.
Instability would not immediately resume.  Long-term, frequency would 
jump and
occasionally chirp.
Disconnected remainder of the 11V buss in the receiver from the PTO so 
that station supply
was powering only PTO.  After a period of time, instability returned.  
receiver was off.
Conclusion: UUT#1 (the T-4XB FET PTO) is the source of the unstable 
signals.
Test setup #2:
UUT #2 connected to station power supply and monitor same as #1.  After 
about 30 minutes,
signal was shifting but not as bad as #1.
   

Re: [Drakelist] FS-4

2011-09-13 Thread Kurt Cramer

I seem to remember a QST article about using an Elecraft K2 as a VFO for a 
Drake, but I can't find it by searching the ARRL site. Or maybe I dreamed it!
Kurt, W7QHD

From: n...@comcast.net
To: k9...@aol.com; wb9...@yahoo.com; Drakelist@zerobeat.net
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 17:52:15 -0400
Subject: Re: [Drakelist] FS-4



The handiest thing for that remains the ‘Huff and Puff’ stabilizer which can 
lock down most PTO/VFOs. http://www.holmea.demon.co.uk/Stab/Stab.htm  
http://www.antiqueradios.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=145530  
http://www.cumbriadesigns.co.uk/x-lock.htm  I have the Xlock 2.0 VFO Stabiliser 
from Cumbria Designs mentioned just above-which I plan to add to my SN XXX3 
Drake R7 (it was the 3rd production-prototype. Ed Tanton
 
website: http://www.n4xy.com 
 
All emails IN  OUT checked by 
Norton AntiVirus with AutoProtect 

--
Wag more / Bark less
-- From: 
drakelist-boun...@zerobeat.net [mailto:drakelist-boun...@zerobeat.net] On 
Behalf Of K9sqg
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 2:00 PM
To: wb9...@yahoo.com; Drakelist@zerobeat.net
Subject: Re: [Drakelist] FS-4 I have owned several FS-4s over the years but do 
not have any now.  The FS-4 can be considered as stable as a crystal BUT it 
does not add anything to overall stability to the R4C, for example.  Why?  The 
main part that contributes to drift is the PTO so whether one uses and FS-4 or 
plug in crystal, the stability is basically unchanged.  The FS-4 is handy for 
SWLing, WARC, etc. but at today's prices, only the rich can afford them...  
///snip
___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist  
  ___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] Well, it looks like both PTO's DO have issues.

2011-09-13 Thread Richard Knoppow


- Original Message - 
From: Garey Barrell k4...@mindspring.com

To: Steve Wedge w1es1...@earthlink.net
Cc: drakelist Drakelist@zerobeat.net
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 2:39 PM
Subject: Re: [Drakelist] Well, it looks like both PTO's DO 
have issues.





Steve -

OK.  I fashioned a 'sorta' fiducial out of a piece of wire 
and an alligator clip to the gearbox. Allowing for 
parallax, lighting, reflections, 'reading' glasses, and 
just plain poor close-up vision, it looks to be within a 
few hundred Hz at each 100 kHz marker, and about 1.5 kHz 
from end to end.  Well within original specs.  Of course, 
with no Rubidium standard I don't 'really' know where it 
is, but I think it's 'CEAPP' or 'Close Enough for All 
Practical Purposes'.!


I'm sure the tubular cap had some 'secret' specification 
that we'll never know, but the little Dur-Mica seems to be 
holding up just fine.  Nothing else has been changed, and 
aside from about a 115 Hz swing from A/C breeze soak to 
room temp soak doesn't seem excessive to me.  I suspect 
nicely bolted down to a chassis inside a nice warm 
receiver or transmitter it will be just fine.


73, Garey - K4OAH
Glen Allen, VA

Drake 2-B, 2-C/2-NT, 4-A, 4-B, C-Line and
TR-4/C Service Supplement CDs
www.k4oah.com

   I wonder if the NPO characteristic is the key.  The TC 
of silver-mica caps varies but is around +50PPM. This is 
quite low but I think an NPO cap is still less. NP0 AKA C0G 
ceramic caps have very good dielectric properties but 
relatively low dielectric constant (K) which makes them 
physically large. Now, large is a relative term, while a C0G 
cap may be large compared to some other dielectric for 
surface mount purposes its small compared to an equivalent 
paper or plastic cap. I think the bad reputation that 
ceramic caps have in some circles is due to a confusion of 
the characteristics of high-K types with NP0/C0G caps. The 
high-K kind do have problems with stability, voltage 
coefficient of capacitance, etc., and are used because they 
can be very small and are quite suitable for some uses. For 
boatanchor stuff the C0G type is best if you can find the 
right values.
   Silvered mica caps have a well deserved reputation for 
performance and reliability, modern ones probably do not 
have some of the problems of older ones such as silver 
migration. BTW, I found a paper on this topic in the Bell 
System Technical Journal for sometime in the 1950! I will 
have to find it again.



--
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles
WB6KBL
dickb...@ix.netcom.com



___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


[Drakelist] PS-7, 12 Volt power supply disassembly ideas needed

2011-09-13 Thread Ron
Looking for ideas on how best to get the PCB on the back panel of the PS-7 off 
for access to the component side.  The voltage switches are pop-riveted to the 
chassis and soldered to the board.  The RCA jacks are not much better, but 
looks like I can unsolder then w/o a lot of hassle.  

Does anyone have a slick way to get the PCB loose?  

Since this was a fairly abused PS-7, I first thought the transformer primary 
had a high resistance short to the chassis.  I still have excessive AC on the 
chassis even with the wires disconnected from the PCB.

TNX es 73,
Ron WD8SBB


___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


[Drakelist] Drake tube txs

2011-09-13 Thread Neil M Califano
Drake tube receivers sound different from solid state but do voice and cw 
transmissions from tube transmitters sound different on the receiving side? 

___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] Drake tube txs

2011-09-13 Thread Chris Kepus
A Drake tube transmitter will definitely sound warmer and less edgy on a
tube receiver than if received on a solid state receiver..but a solid
state transmitter will not sound warm on a Drake tube receiver but will have
a real edge (maybe contest winning) if received on a solid state receiver.  

73,
Chris 
W7JPG

OhhhOuch! How do you relieve a tongue cramp after being jammed in the
cheek?

-Original Message-
From: drakelist-boun...@zerobeat.net [mailto:drakelist-boun...@zerobeat.net]
On Behalf Of Neil M Califano
Subject: [Drakelist] Drake tube txs

Drake tube receivers sound different from solid state but do voice and cw
transmissions from tube transmitters sound different on the receiving side? 

___


___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] Drake tube txs

2011-09-13 Thread Jim Shorney

The electrons know. They are happier flying through a vacuum than they are
being forced to traverse a silicon crystal lattice. Wouldn't you be?

73

-Jim


On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 20:39:49 -0700, Chris Kepus wrote:

A Drake tube transmitter will definitely sound warmer and less edgy on a
tube receiver than if received on a solid state receiver..but a solid
state transmitter will not sound warm on a Drake tube receiver but will have
a real edge (maybe contest winning) if received on a solid state receiver.  

73,
Chris 
W7JPG

OhhhOuch! How do you relieve a tongue cramp after being jammed in the
cheek?

-Original Message-
From: drakelist-boun...@zerobeat.net [mailto:drakelist-boun...@zerobeat.net]
On Behalf Of Neil M Califano
Subject: [Drakelist] Drake tube txs

Drake tube receivers sound different from solid state but do voice and cw
transmissions from tube transmitters sound different on the receiving side? 

___


___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


--
Ham Radio NU0C
Lincoln, Nebraska, U.S.S.A.
TR7/RV7/R7A/L7, TR6/RV6, T4XC/R4C/L4B, NCL2000, SB104A, R390A, GT550A/RV550A, 
HyGain 3750, IBM PS/2 - all vintage, all the time!

Give a man a URL, and he will learn for an hour; teach him to Google, and he 
will learn for a lifetime.

HyGain 3750 User's Group - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/HyGain_3750/
http://incolor.inetnebr.com/jshorney
http://www.nebraskaghosts.org



___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist