Re: [Drakelist] Collins, Drake etc.

2011-06-21 Thread Ed Berbari
I enjoyed the conversation about the Collins, Drakes, etc.  The cost issues 
certainly ring true for me.  I had just received my General in the Spring of 
1965 during my sophomore year of high school.  Later that summer I saw a 
fancy Cadillac being driven in my small Ohio town with ham plates (WB6RER) 
from California.  I asked the woman driving the car if she was a ham and she 
replied that her husband was the ham.  I informed her that our club was 
meeting that evening and invited him to attend.  She said that they would be 
coming back to the hotel at 6 PM and I could ask him myself.  I waited in 
the parking lot that evening and her husband turned out to be Andy Devine, 
the western movie character actor.  They were in town doing summer stock 
theater.  He had a KWM-2 in the Cadillac!  We talked ham radio for almost an 
hour.  It was a great experience, but I concluded that you had to be movie 
star rich to have a mobile KWM-2.


Ed, W9EJB

- Original Message - 
From: kc9...@aol.com

To: k4...@mindspring.com; drakelist@zerobeat.net
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 10:33 AM
Subject: Re: [Drakelist] Collins, Drake etc.



Interesting conversation!

Well, I have here today the Collins KWM-2 and S3 line, a 'B' line, a 'C' 
line (Full Sherwood). Hallicrafters SX-117/HT-44, and 
SX-115/HT-32Balong with my only modern riga TT Orion II.


I could not afford any of this in my early days (1964) of hamming. Used 
Knight Kit/Heathkit  very used older stuff (HRO-7 etc)


I actually use all of this on a regular basis.

Here is my rundown:

1) Collins = nice to operate, very reliable, great for SSB, not for CW, 
looks cool, easy to maintain. and I like the 6146's
2) Drake = superb in every way, PBT is a real +, needs very little 
maintenance, very stablehas nearly as good of contest/weak DX 
performance as TT Orion
3) Halli's...just fun to use and performance is really goos as 
well...better than most may think/remember
4) TT OII, really a superb TXCVR in all wayssuper easy to use, no 
multi=level menus, top notch rcvr. no tune, nice big knobs , manual never 
needed


The vintage stuff is just more fun!
I like working on the stuff if neededit's the technology I understand 
and can work on.


73,
Lee, KC9CDT



-Original Message-
From: Garey Barrell k4...@mindspring.com
To: drakelist drakelist@zerobeat.net
Sent: Fri, Jun 17, 2011 9:33 am
Subject: Re: [Drakelist] Collins, Drake etc.


Richard Knoppow wrote:




___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] Collins, Drake etc.

2011-06-17 Thread Garey Barrell


Richard Knoppow wrote:


- Original Message - From: Paul Christensen w...@arrl.net
To: drakelist@zerobeat.net
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 7:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Drakelist] Collins, Drake etc.


So, truth be told, while Collins gear was clearly the high priced spread, even Drakes were still 
out of reach for us average joes who made do with Heathkits...


Toward the end of its life, the R-4B + T-4XB was right at $1K.  I can't imagine spending that 
during my teenage years in the mid 1970s.  To me, it was like a car purchase.  By 1975, what was 
the street price of the S-Line combo?  I imagine Collins offered little in the way of discounts.  
I make this assumption based on the back pages of QSTs I've been reading from the late '50s.  For 
example, every single dealer who supplied the KWM-1 advertised it for exactly $820 in 1958.  It 
sure seems like Collins had strict terms and conditions on just how much a dealer could discount, 
if any at all -- much the same way other high-end products are sold today in order to retain an 
elite branding image.  I imagine this was less of an issue with Drake.


Paul, W9AC


   Its hard to know what actual discounts might have been offered. At the time strict fair trade 
price control by manufacturers was still legal, dealers had to abide by their agreements, at leas 
for advertised prices. What is not clear is how much effective discounting went on in the form of 
trade-ins or extras supplied free when equipment was bought.  I suspect a lot of price 
competition went on under the table. OTOH, I don't know how much mark up there was on ham gear, 
maybe not a lot. Most commercial electronics had enough so that a 40% discount over list price 
could be offered. There may have been more on consumer gear. Ham gear may not have had enough 
volume to allow this.



Richard -

I worked part time for a Ham distributor in the 60s.  At that time, the distributor paid 75% of list 
price.  Several of the manufacturers had a program where a salesperson could purchase ONE of any or 
all items at 50%, for their own use.  This is how I got my first 4-Line.  There was little 
discounting over 10%, usually in the form of 'increased' trade-in value.  Most Collins gear that I 
sold was at list price, I suppose those who could afford it didn't care what it cost!  :-)


73, Garey - K4OAH
Glen Allen, VA


___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] Collins, Drake etc.

2011-06-17 Thread kc9cdt

Interesting conversation!

Well, I have here today the Collins KWM-2 and S3 line, a 'B' line, a 
'C' line (Full Sherwood). Hallicrafters SX-117/HT-44, and 
SX-115/HT-32Balong with my only modern riga TT Orion II.


I could not afford any of this in my early days (1964) of hamming. Used 
Knight Kit/Heathkit  very used older stuff (HRO-7 etc)


I actually use all of this on a regular basis.

Here is my rundown:

1) Collins = nice to operate, very reliable, great for SSB, not for CW, 
looks cool, easy to maintain. and I like the 6146's
2) Drake = superb in every way, PBT is a real +, needs very little 
maintenance, very stablehas nearly as good of contest/weak DX 
performance as TT Orion
3) Halli's...just fun to use and performance is really goos as 
well...better than most may think/remember
4) TT OII, really a superb TXCVR in all wayssuper easy to use, no 
multi=level menus, top notch rcvr. no tune, nice big knobs , manual 
never needed


The vintage stuff is just more fun!
I like working on the stuff if neededit's the technology I 
understand and can work on.


73,
Lee, KC9CDT



-Original Message-
From: Garey Barrell k4...@mindspring.com
To: drakelist drakelist@zerobeat.net
Sent: Fri, Jun 17, 2011 9:33 am
Subject: Re: [Drakelist] Collins, Drake etc.


Richard Knoppow wrote:


- Original Message - From: Paul Christensen w...@arrl.net
To: drakelist@zerobeat.net
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 7:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Drakelist] Collins, Drake etc.


So, truth be told, while Collins gear was clearly the high priced 

spread,
even Drakes were still

out of reach for us average joes who made do with Heathkits...


Toward the end of its life, the R-4B + T-4XB was right at $1K.  I 

can't
imagine spending that
during my teenage years in the mid 1970s.  To me, it was like a car 

purchase.
By 1975, what was
the street price of the S-Line combo?  I imagine Collins offered 

little in
the way of discounts.
I make this assumption based on the back pages of QSTs I've been 

reading from
the late '50s.  For
example, every single dealer who supplied the KWM-1 advertised it 

for exactly
$820 in 1958.  It
sure seems like Collins had strict terms and conditions on just how 

much a
dealer could discount,
if any at all -- much the same way other high-end products are sold 

today in
order to retain an
elite branding image.  I imagine this was less of an issue with 

Drake.


Paul, W9AC


   Its hard to know what actual discounts might have been offered. At 

the time
strict fair trade
price control by manufacturers was still legal, dealers had to abide 

by their
agreements, at leas
for advertised prices. What is not clear is how much effective 

discounting
went on in the form of
trade-ins or extras supplied free when equipment was bought.  I 

suspect a
lot of price
competition went on under the table. OTOH, I don't know how much mark 

up there
was on ham gear,
maybe not a lot. Most commercial electronics had enough so that a 40% 

discount
over list price
could be offered. There may have been more on consumer gear. Ham gear 

may not
have had enough

volume to allow this.


Richard -

I worked part time for a Ham distributor in the 60s.  At that time, the
distributor paid 75% of list
price.  Several of the manufacturers had a program where a salesperson 
could

purchase ONE of any or
all items at 50%, for their own use.  This is how I got my first 
4-Line.  There

was little
discounting over 10%, usually in the form of 'increased' trade-in 
value.  Most

Collins gear that I
sold was at list price, I suppose those who could afford it didn't care 
what it

cost!  :-)

73, Garey - K4OAH
Glen Allen, VA


___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] Collins, Drake etc.

2011-06-17 Thread Darrell Bellerive
My first receiver was a used Hallicrafters SX-140. I did not have a
manual with it, and it was many, many years after I sold it that I
realized it had a regenerative detector.

My recollections of it were of very poor selectivity. Perhaps this is
just due to my not knowing how to adjust the regenerative knob properly.
It was labeled Selectivity/BFO so I always figured straight up for CW, a
bit left for LSB and a bit to the right for USB. Funny thinking about it
know, but I was 15 years old and studying for my licence at the time.
Once I got my licence I upgraded to an Heathkit SB-101.

A couple of times now I have almost bought another SX-140 just to try it
out with the proper use of that selectivity/BFO control and see if it
really was as bad as I remember or if it was just me.

73,
Darrell Bellerive
Amateur Radio Station VA7TO

On 06/17/11 07:33, kc9...@aol.com wrote:
 Interesting conversation!
 3) Halli's...just fun to use and performance is really goos as
 well...better than most may think/remember
 73,
 Lee, KC9CDT

___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


[Drakelist] Collins, Drake etc.

2011-06-16 Thread w2cdo
Well, I first saw the S/Line in the early 60s when W2KOY (SK), the local MD, 
had the full setup and I was a drooling kid whose OM was a dedicated 
homebrewer. Unrequited technolust. 
Went off to college a few years later and talked the Student Government into 
buying an S/Line for the startup Ham Radio Club. TH-7 on rooftop tower on top 
floor of dorm. Loved the gear but it wasn't much better on CW than my OM's 
homebrew rig. 
About 6 years later and 1500 miles further west I was introduced to Drake gear 
(full 4B-line) at W0LJF (SK) and ran contests most successfully from his 
station, especially SS. My own rig at that time was a TA-33jr and an HW-101. 
Subsequently bought a 2B+2BQ to enhance CW operations at my home QTH. 
So, truth be told, while Collins gear was clearly the high priced spread, even 
Drakes were still out of reach for us average joes who made do with Heathkits, 
surplus and used older gear. 
Peter
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] Collins, Drake etc.

2011-06-16 Thread Paul Christensen
So, truth be told, while Collins gear was clearly the high priced spread, 
even Drakes were still out of reach for us average joes who made do with 
Heathkits...


Toward the end of its life, the R-4B + T-4XB was right at $1K.  I can't 
imagine spending that during my teenage years in the mid 1970s.  To me, it 
was like a car purchase.  By 1975, what was the street price of the S-Line 
combo?  I imagine Collins offered little in the way of discounts.  I make 
this assumption based on the back pages of QSTs I've been reading from the 
late '50s.  For example, every single dealer who supplied the KWM-1 
advertised it for exactly $820 in 1958.  It sure seems like Collins had 
strict terms and conditions on just how much a dealer could discount, if any 
at all -- much the same way other high-end products are sold today in order 
to retain an elite branding image.  I imagine this was less of an issue with 
Drake.


Paul, W9AC 



___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] Collins, Drake etc.

2011-06-16 Thread Garey Barrell



Paul Christensen wrote:
So, truth be told, while Collins gear was clearly the high priced spread, even Drakes were still 
out of reach for us average joes who made do with Heathkits...


Toward the end of its life, the R-4B + T-4XB was right at $1K.  I can't imagine spending that 
during my teenage years in the mid 1970s.  To me, it was like a car purchase.  By 1975, what was 
the street price of the S-Line combo?  I imagine Collins offered little in the way of discounts.  
I make this assumption based on the back pages of QSTs I've been reading from the late '50s.  For 
example, every single dealer who supplied the KWM-1 advertised it for exactly $820 in 1958.  It 
sure seems like Collins had strict terms and conditions on just how much a dealer could discount, 
if any at all -- much the same way other high-end products are sold today in order to retain an 
elite branding image.  I imagine this was less of an issue with Drake.


Paul, W9AC


Paul -

In 1971, the S-Line prices were as follows

KWM-2 - $1150.00
516F-2 -  $ 153.00

75S-3B - $795.00 + $250.00 for three mechanical filters
75S-3C - $850.00 (includes accy xtal deck) + $250.00 for three mechanical 
filters

32S-3   - $865.00
32S-3A - $1065.00 (includes accy xtal deck)
516F-2  - $ 153.00

So $2775.00 for the basic rx/tx pair plus power supply

IF you wanted the extra crystal deck(s) for expanded coverage plus speaker, add 
another $290.00

By 1977, the prices had increased considerably, as Collins became Rockwell Collins and much less 
concerned about the Ham market.


KWM-2A - $3533.00

75S-3C  -  $2504.00

32S-3A -  $2957.00
516F-2  -  $ 440.00

312B-3 -  $   80.00 (speaker)

Now only $11,375.00 !!


By comparison, the C-Line was

R-4C - $599.00 + $200 for 4 filters

T-4XC - $599.00

AC-4  -  $120.00

MS-4 -  $ 25.00

Total of $1543.00

73, Garey - K4OAH
Glen Allen, VA



___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] Collins, Drake etc.

2011-06-16 Thread Richard Knoppow


- Original Message - 
From: Paul Christensen w...@arrl.net

To: drakelist@zerobeat.net
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 7:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Drakelist] Collins, Drake etc.


So, truth be told, while Collins gear was clearly the 
high priced spread, even Drakes were still out of reach 
for us average joes who made do with Heathkits...


Toward the end of its life, the R-4B + T-4XB was right at 
$1K.  I can't imagine spending that during my teenage 
years in the mid 1970s.  To me, it was like a car 
purchase.  By 1975, what was the street price of the 
S-Line combo?  I imagine Collins offered little in the way 
of discounts.  I make this assumption based on the back 
pages of QSTs I've been reading from the late '50s.  For 
example, every single dealer who supplied the KWM-1 
advertised it for exactly $820 in 1958.  It sure seems 
like Collins had strict terms and conditions on just how 
much a dealer could discount, if any at all -- much the 
same way other high-end products are sold today in order 
to retain an elite branding image.  I imagine this was 
less of an issue with Drake.


Paul, W9AC


   Its hard to know what actual discounts might have been 
offered. At the time strict fair trade price control by 
manufacturers was still legal, dealers had to abide by their 
agreements, at leas for advertised prices. What is not clear 
is how much effective discounting went on in the form of 
trade-ins or extras supplied free when equipment was 
bought.  I suspect a lot of price competition went on under 
the table. OTOH, I don't know how much mark up there was on 
ham gear, maybe not a lot. Most commercial electronics had 
enough so that a 40% discount over list price could be 
offered. There may have been more on consumer gear. Ham gear 
may not have had enough volume to allow this.
Speaking of old ham magazines, I was just looking at 
the December 1946 edition of QST. This one has the 
announcement for the Hallicrafters SX-42 in it. Eight full 
pages of advertising from Hallicrafters (four double trucks 
in a row) plus about eighty ads by individual dealers 
featuring the SX-42, probably co-operative with 
Hallicrafters, having exactly the same cut of the receiver 
and the same price. Some other dealers also advertised the 
receiver but did not feature it exclusively. This was a very 
heavy weight campaign. I think the SX-42 was Hallicrafters 
first really new receiver after the war and was obviously a 
prestige item for them.



--
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles
WB6KBL
dickb...@ix.netcom.com 



___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist