RE: [drakelist] Re: [Drake] Need Input on the MN-2700 Tuner

2005-01-10 Thread Tom S 

Tom S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> made an utterence to the drakelist gang
--
--- Jim DiMauro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> "Jim DiMauro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> made an utterence to
> the drakelist gang
>
> So for now I'll keep my MN-2000 and find another way
> to get on 160.  I have a pristine TenTec 238 that'll
> cover 160, but with its roller inductor it's
> such a pain to tune when compared with my MN-2000
> that I hate the thought of using it as my primary 
> tuner. KB8TQ had suggested that I try adding some
> external C to the MN-2000 to see if I could get it
> to do 160. I'm willing to try, but I wonder if the 
> inductor is up to the task.  Has anyone tried that?

Jim,

I'll be interested in your results. My grandfather
(WD4ANZ-SK, previously WA8PYR) replaced his MN2000
with an MN2700 and wasn't too happy with it; like you,
he found it wasn't as sturdy and reliable as the
MN2000.

I've often thought of replacing my MN2000 with a '2700
for the same reasons as you, but the comments I've
read and recalling my granddad's ire, I think I too
will stick with the MN2000.

I'm not too keen on replacing it with some piece of
comparatively flimsy modern stuff either

Tom WA8PYR




__ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Mail - now with 250MB free storage. Learn more.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
--
On Behalf of Tom S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Submissions:drakelist@www.zerobeat.net
Unsubscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist in body
Hopelessly Lost:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message
Zerobeat Web Page:  http://www.zerobeat.net
Brought to you courtesy of TLCHost.net  http://www.tlchost.net/
--

RE: [drakelist] Re: [Drake] Need Input on the MN-2700 Tuner

2005-01-09 Thread Jim DiMauro 

"Jim DiMauro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> made an utterence to the drakelist gang
--
Hi All:

Many thanks to all who responded to my call for information on the MN-2700.
After reading and considering all responses, I've come to the conclusion
that the '2700 would not necessarily be the best choice for me.  I had hoped
that the '2700 was cut from the same "bulletproof" cloth as the MN-2000, but
I've learned from several respondents that it's not.  My understanding is
that the '2700 is a good performer, but it's not up to the quality standards
of the '2000.  The tank-like construction and heavy-duty components that
were used in the '2000 would have been my primary attraction to the '2700,
but since that doesn't seem to be the case I see no compelling reason to
search for a '2700.  I might as well get something newer, that hasn't had 25
years of use with possibly worn switches that would be "unobtanium" and a
real pain to replace.

So for now I'll keep my MN-2000 and find another way to get on 160.  I have
a pristine TenTec 238 that'll cover 160, but with its roller inductor it's
such a pain to tune when compared with my MN-2000 that I hate the thought of
using it as my primary tuner.  KB8TQ had suggested that I try adding some
external C to the MN-2000 to see if I could get it to do 160.  I'm willing
to try, but I wonder if the inductor is up to the task.  Has anyone tried
that?

Tnx again for the many helpful responses.  Great group!

Jim
WA2MER

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Garey Barrell
Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2005 10:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Drakelist
Subject: [drakelist] Re: [Drake] Need Input on the MN-2700 Tuner



Garey Barrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> made an utterence to the drakelist gang
--
Jim -

Take a look at the "inside" photo's at



You'll see more similarities than differences.  The lever switches are
probably the weakest point, but you CAN burn up the rotary switch
contacts on the '2000 too, if you switch them "hot".

Watch out for the condition of the wafer switches in a "new" potential
acquisition.

The clear number scales do develop tiny cracks with age, but only a
visual problem.  I've never seen one "crumble".!  John Kriner "may"
still have some of these.  K8FFO had them and I believe he sold his
remaining stock to John.

The little round knobs on the lever switches are problematic.  They tend
to split.  Perhaps someone will come up with an aftermarket solution
after enough of them have fallen off, kind of like the 7 series end-caps!

73, Garey - K4OAH2
Atlanta


Jim DiMauro wrote:

>Hi All:
>
>I've been itching to get on 160 Meters, but my beloved MN-2000 won't get me
>there.  Before I put out a "Wanted To Buy" post for an MN-2700, I'd like
>some owners' impressions on how good a tuner it is.  My MN-2000 has been
the
>perfect tuner for me, except for the lack of 160 Meter capability.  Is the
>'2700 as easy to tune, and has it proven to be as reliable?  The MN-2000 is
>built like a tank; is the '2700 cut from the same cloth?  Is there anything
>to watch out for when buying a '2700?
>
>Thoughts, guidance and opinions would be appreciated.
>
>Thanx & 73,
>Jim
>WA2MER
>
>__
>Drake mailing list
>Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/drake
>Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
>Post: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
--
On Behalf of Garey Barrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Submissions:drakelist@www.zerobeat.net
Unsubscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist in
body
Hopelessly Lost:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message
Zerobeat Web Page:  http://www.zerobeat.net
Brought to you courtesy of TLCHost.net  http://www.tlchost.net/
--

--
On Behalf of "Jim DiMauro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Submissions:drakelist@www.zerobeat.net
Unsubscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist in body
Hopelessly Lost:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message
Zerobeat Web Page:  http://www.zerobeat.net
Brought to you courtesy of TLCHost.net  http://www.tlchost.net/
--