Re: [Drakelist] T-4X Stability: EPILOGUE

2011-11-29 Thread Gary Winblad
Nice work Eddy.

I do my tests a little differently, I look at "overall" stability by zero 
beating WWV.

Regardless, my early T-4X (5KHz markings) is also just about 1.2KHz.

But my slightly newer R-4A (13 tube, but 25KHz markings and vernier Preselector)
is worse at just about 1.5KHz.

IIRC, there is a drift spec. somewhere of...  1.5KHz, if so, WE are in spec  :)
And, like you, after a GOOD warmup, they are  pretty darn stable!!

I have also noted that the drift seems worse at the high end of the dial.

73,
Gary
WB6OGD


- Original Message -
From: Eddy Swynar 



Now---how about all those other T-4X rigs that are out there in general 
circulation...? Are the results of YOUR stability tests similar to mine here...?

~73~ de Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ

___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] T-4X Stability: EPILOGUE

2011-11-29 Thread Garey Barrell

Hi Eddy -

Would you be up for one more test run??

I wonder what would happen WITHOUT the fan.  Certainly the interior would warm up faster.  A 
trade-off would 'perhaps' be a larger delta t from transmit to receive.  Especially without an 
ambient air of 59F constantly being pulled through the cabinet.


As this is a T-4X, it is a bipolar PTO.  The T-4XB and C had a FET PTO, "for better stability".  The 
receiver PTOs switched from bipolar to FET early in the 'B' series.


73, Garey - K4OAH
Glen Allen, VA

Drake 2-B, 2-C/2-NT, 4-A, 4-B, C-Line
and TR-4/C Service Supplement CDs



Eddy Swynar wrote:

Hi All,

Before getting to the results, I should add here that the T-4X has a small 
cooling fan mounted above the amplifier cage, extracting air from inside it to 
the outside: it ran continuously whenever the rig was on during the course of 
both evaluations. Ambient room temperature in my basement was 59F, as before.


___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] T-4X Stability: EPILOGUE

2011-11-29 Thread Curt

Hi Eddy:

Excellent!  Now, you might also learn something worthwhile by doing the 
same test, but measuring the drift of actual output after mixing at say 
7 or 14Mhz.  If the crystal Osc goes the other direction, it might get 
somewhat better...then again if it goes the other way...well...!  :)


I'll see if I can measure  my B twins here but will not guarantee my 
room temp to start at 59..  It is usually about 62 upstairs in the AM now.


Curt
KU8L




On 11/29/2011 8:30 AM, Eddy Swynar wrote:

Hi All,

Well, this morning I essentially duplicated my previous stability tests with the Drake 
T-4X here, only with a minor change: as was suggested to me earlier, this time I let the 
"umpire" rig---my ICOM 751A transceiver---warm-up, alone, for a full hour...

Before getting to the results, I should add here that the T-4X has a small 
cooling fan mounted above the amplifier cage, extracting air from inside it to 
the outside: it ran continuously whenever the rig was on during the course of 
both evaluations. Ambient room temperature in my basement was 59F, as before. 
Again, I measured the frequency a total of SIX times, i.e. (1) immediately at 
the start of the test, (2) 3 minutes into the test, (3) 15 minutes into the 
test, (4) 30 minutes into the test, (5) 1 hour into the test, and finally (6) 
two hours into the test. The actual PTO frequency itself was monitored with the 
751A in general coverage mode...

Here are the results this time:

(1) 5455.0-KHz (cold start);

(2) 5454.8-KHz (downward drift of 200-Hz from cold start);

(3) 5454..4-KHz (downward drift of 600-Hz from cold start);

(4) 5454.0 KHz (downward drift of 1-KHz from cold start);

(5) 5453.7-KHz (downward drift of 1.3-KHz from cold start), and,

(6) 5453.7-KHz (unchanged).

The end result in terms of drift was actually 100-Hz MORE than was observed the 
first time, i.e. 1.2-KHz with both rigs running from cold starts, to 1.3-KHz 
with the ICOM warmed-up for an hour!

No matter---after an hour's warm-up the signal remains essentially unchanged, 
and I'm happy with that. I'm especially pleased to note that the warbble effect 
/ jumpiness previously afflicting my PTO has apparently disappeared, in the 
aftermath of all of my resistor swapping in it...and the dial correction that I 
have to do on the T-4X after the resistor swaps is pretty much in line with 
what I had to do before the re-build.

My conclusions after all this stuff? Well, #1, it was most interesting&  gratifying, both...and #2, 
if I take the quoted manual "warm-up" period time to be, in fact, one full hour minimum, then 
my transmitter actually EXCEEDS the quoted Drake specs for drift of ":...less than 100 cycles 
after warm up" considerably: in fact, mine doesn't drift at all after that time...!

And THAT, as Martha Stewart is wont to say, "...Is a GOOD thing." Hi Hi

Now---how about all those other T-4X rigs that are out there in general 
circulation...? Are the results of YOUR stability tests similar to mine here...?

~73~ de Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ





___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist




___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] T-4X Stability: EPILOGUE

2011-11-29 Thread Eddy Swynar
Hi Garey,

An EXCELLENT idea...!

I'm doing exactly that, even as I type this...

Stay tuned!

~73~ de Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ



**


On 2011-11-29, at 9:26 AM, Garey Barrell wrote:

> Hi Eddy -
> 
> Would you be up for one more test run??
> 
> I wonder what would happen WITHOUT the fan.  Certainly the interior would 
> warm up faster.  A trade-off would 'perhaps' be a larger delta t from 
> transmit to receive.  Especially without an ambient air of 59F constantly 
> being pulled through the cabinet.
> 
> As this is a T-4X, it is a bipolar PTO.  The T-4XB and C had a FET PTO, "for 
> better stability".  The receiver PTOs switched from bipolar to FET early in 
> the 'B' series.
> 
> 73, Garey - K4OAH
> Glen Allen, VA
> 
> Drake 2-B, 2-C/2-NT, 4-A, 4-B, C-Line
> and TR-4/C Service Supplement CDs
> 
> 
> 
> Eddy Swynar wrote:
>> Hi All,
>> 
>> Before getting to the results, I should add here that the T-4X has a small 
>> cooling fan mounted above the amplifier cage, extracting air from inside it 
>> to the outside: it ran continuously whenever the rig was on during the 
>> course of both evaluations. Ambient room temperature in my basement was 59F, 
>> as before.

___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] T-4X Stability: EPILOGUE

2011-11-29 Thread Eddy Swynar
Hi Curt,

A sort of an elaborate "...temperature-compensating-oscillator-heterodyning" 
scheme...! Hi Hi 

We could call it "The Rube Golberg" method of frequency stabilization!: >)

~73~ de Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ




**




On 2011-11-29, at 9:42 AM, Curt wrote:

> Now, you might also learn something worthwhile by doing the same test, but 
> measuring the drift of actual output after mixing at say 7 or 14Mhz.  If the 
> crystal Osc goes the other direction, it might get somewhat better...then 
> again if it goes the other way...well...!  :)
> 

___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] T-4X Stability: EPILOGUE

2011-11-29 Thread Steve Wedge


Which brings us to an interesting point: isn't the spec for the stability of the rig overall?  I don't have the manual with me, so I'm just asking.
Steve, W1ES/4
PS - nice work, Eddy!
-Original Message- From: Eddy Swynar Sent: Nov 29, 2011 10:57 AM To: Curt Cc: drakelist@zerobeat.net Subject: Re: [Drakelist] T-4X Stability: EPILOGUE Hi Curt,

A sort of an elaborate "...temperature-compensating-oscillator-heterodyning" scheme...! Hi Hi 

We could call it "The Rube Golberg" method of frequency stabilization!    : >)

~73~ de Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ




**





On 2011-11-29, at 9:42 AM, Curt wrote:

Now, you might also learn something worthwhile by doing the same test, but measuring the drift of actual output after mixing at say 7 or 14Mhz.  If the crystal Osc goes the other direction, it might get somewhat better...then again if it goes the other way...well...!  :)

___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] T-4X Stability: EPILOGUE

2011-11-29 Thread Garey Barrell
Yes it is for output or input frequency.  The other oscillator is crystal controlled, so not likely 
to move even 10 Hz over this restricted range.


73, Garey - K4OAH
Glen Allen, VA

Drake 2-B, 2-C/2-NT, 4-A, 4-B, C-Line
and TR-4/C Service Supplement CDs



Steve Wedge wrote:


Which brings us to an interesting point: isn't the spec for the stability of the rig overall?  I 
don't have the manual with me, so I'm just asking.


Steve, W1ES/4

PS - nice work, Eddy!

-Original Message-
From: Eddy Swynar
Sent: Nov 29, 2011 10:57 AM
To: Curt
Cc: drakelist@zerobeat.net
    Subject: Re: [Drakelist] T-4X Stability: EPILOGUE

*/Hi Curt,/*

A sort of an elaborate 
".../temperature-compensating-oscillator-heterodyning/" scheme...! Hi Hi

We could call it "*/The Rube Golberg/*" method of frequency stabilization! * : 
>)*

*/~73~ de Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ/*



___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] T-4X Stability: EPILOGUE (Almost!)

2011-11-29 Thread Garey Barrell

Eddy -

Great info.  Actually this confirms what I would expect to happen.  What you do with the fan is 
provide a constant temperature, whatever it is, much better for short-term stability.


The other oscillators involved in the output frequency are the Carrier Oscillator and the Band 
Oscillator.  Both are crystal controlled, and probably stay within 10 Hz or less over the limited 
temperature range involved.


One more run on 40M??  Transmitter keyed, minimum GAIN control.

73, Garey - K4OAH
Glen Allen, VA

Drake 2-B, 2-C/2-NT, 4-A, 4-B, C-Line
and TR-4/C Service Supplement CDs



Eddy Swynar wrote:

Hi Again All,

At the specific suggestion of Garey, I went ahead&  completed a 3rd stability 
test on my Drake T-4X transmitter PTO...

I essentially repeated everything that I did in the very first test, i.e. I used the ICOM 
751A as an umpire, both it and the T-4X were started at the same time (i.e. 
"cold"), and the ambient basement temperature was 59F---but this time I LEFT 
THE AIR EXTRACTING COOLING FAN ATOP THE FINAL AMPLIFIER OF THE T-4X CAGE TURNED OFF.

Again, I measured the frequency a total of SIX times, i.e. (1) immediately at 
the start of the test, (2) 3 minutes into the test, (3) 15 minutes into the 
test, (4) 30 minutes into the test, (5) 1 hour into the test, and finally (6) 
two hours into the test. The actual PTO frequency itself was monitored with the 
751A in general coverage mode...

The results with this third (and final---I promise!) test were most interesting 
(NOTE:  for comparative purposes, I have square-bracketed---[ ]---the changes 
observed at the very same time intervals in the FIRST test, at the end of each 
observation line). Here goes:

(1) 5455.0-KHz (cold start)---[0.0-Khz];

(2) 5455.0-KHz (unchanged)---[0.0-KHz];

(3) 5454.3-KHz (downward drift of 700-Hz from cold start)---[500-Hz];

(4) 5453.7 KHz (downward drift of 1.3-KHz from cold start)---[1.0-KHz];

(5) 5453.2-KHz (downward drift of 1.8-KHz from cold start)---[1.2-KHz], and,

(6) 5453.2-KHz (unchanged)---[0.0-KHz0

The end result in terms of PTO drift with the fan off was 1.8-KHz, versus 
1.2-KHz with the fan on. Interesting! That's a difference of 600-Hz, or HALF of 
the drift experienced with the fan running!

It's obvious that proponents of utilizing cooling fans for their Drake 
transmitters are on to something, alright---but the benefits are NOT restricted 
merely to prolonged tube life: PTO drift is reduced by one third, as well.

My guess is that the cooler environment afforded by the fan to the entire "works" of the 
transmitter hastens the PTO in achieving its "ambient operating temperature." Because its 
environment is more directly controlled with the fan, the PTO has less opportunity to diverge in as 
great a frequency swing as it normally might, as may be evidenced by the results when no fan is 
used.

Anyway, I'm still attempting to wrap my head around all of this, and I certainly do welcome any&  
all feedback&  comments from the readership. One final point that bears repeating, as was 
mentioned to me by no less than two subscribers to the Reflector: the Drake manual specs for 
stability are quoted for THE TRANSMITTER AS AN OPERATING WHOLE, and NOT just for the PTO alone. The 
final transmitted frequency is a mix of many different frequencies, from self-excited 
oscillators,&  from crystal control. As the TV advertisements state, "RESULTS AT HOME MAY 
VARY," Hi Hi.

This has all been a most interesting exercise, nonetheless---I only hope that 
my ramblings herein have NOT inspired readers to unsubscribe from the list..!

~73~ de Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ





___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] T-4X Stability: EPILOGUE (Almost!)

2011-11-29 Thread Robert Fish
" This has all been a most interesting exercise, nonetheless---I only 
hope that my ramblings herein have NOT inspired readers to unsubscribe 
from the list..! "


On the contrary, Eddy. I find this stuff fascinating. The most 
productive learning environments always have people who say things like, 
"I wonder what would happen if we.?"


I hope you keep sharing the results of your experiments with us.

73,

Bob  K6GGO


___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] T-4X Stability: EPILOGUE (Almost!)

2011-11-29 Thread john
I'll second that... it's epics like these that make this and other lists 
worth riding along with.


Thanks for taking the time, and thanks for the info. I always knew fans 
were a good idea :-)


John K5MO



At 01:47 PM 11/29/2011, Robert Fish wrote:
" This has all been a most interesting exercise, nonetheless---I only hope 
that my ramblings herein have NOT inspired readers to unsubscribe from the 
list..! "


On the contrary, Eddy. I find this stuff fascinating. The most productive 
learning environments always have people who say things like, "I wonder 
what would happen if we.?"


I hope you keep sharing the results of your experiments with us.

73,

Bob  K6GGO


___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist



___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] T-4X Stability: EPILOGUE (Almost!)

2011-11-29 Thread Steve Wedge
Absolutely - love reading these escapades!  Since I author a few of them 
myself, I happen to find those of others equally interesting.


73,

Steve Wedge, W1ES/4

I swear by my life, and my love of it, that I will never live for the sake 
of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine.

-Ayn Rand.

All my computers have my signature with various pearls of wisdom appended 
thereto.



--
From: "john" 
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 9:30 PM
To: "Robert Fish" ; 
Subject: Re: [Drakelist] T-4X Stability: EPILOGUE (Almost!)

I'll second that... it's epics like these that make this and other lists 
worth riding along with.


Thanks for taking the time, and thanks for the info. I always knew fans 
were a good idea :-)


John K5MO



At 01:47 PM 11/29/2011, Robert Fish wrote:
" This has all been a most interesting exercise, nonetheless---I only hope 
that my ramblings herein have NOT inspired readers to unsubscribe from the 
list..! "


On the contrary, Eddy. I find this stuff fascinating. The most productive 
learning environments always have people who say things like, "I wonder 
what would happen if we.?"


I hope you keep sharing the results of your experiments with us.

73,

Bob  K6GGO


___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist



___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist 



___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] T-4X Stability: EPILOGUE (Almost!)

2011-11-29 Thread Jim Shorney
On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 13:25:27 -0500, Eddy Swynar wrote:

>
>It's obvious that proponents of utilizing cooling fans for their Drake 
>transmitters are on to something, alright---but the benefits are NOT 
>restricted merely to prolonged tube life: PTO drift is reduced by one third, 
>as well. 


This, I have been saying  :)

73

-Jim
NU0C


--
Questionable management practices at the 146760.net web site?
http://radiojim.exofire.net/pages/Questions.html



___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist