Re: [DRBD-user] 8.4 Centos 7.4 support

2017-09-15 Thread Roland Kammerer
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 06:04:38PM -0400, Ken Bass wrote:
> I have seen a few messages in the archive suggestion that people with simple
> 2 node pacemaker configurations that already work have no need to transition
> to 9.0. While the latest 9.0.9-1 release compile for the Centos/RHEL 7.4
> kernel, the 8.4 source has not been updated.
> 
> /opt/rpmbuild/BUILD/drbd-8.4.10-1/obj/default/drbd_bitmap.c:1049:3: error:
> too few arguments to function 'submit_bio'
> 
> Maybe the same COMPAT_NEED_BI_OPF_AND_SUBMIT_BIO_COMPAT_DEFINES could be
> ported to get 8.4 working too? Is this something linbit intends to update so
> 8.4 can continue to be used on the newer kernels?
> 
> I have started upgrading my 2 nodes to 9.0, but then saw a common theme in
> many messages about sticking with 8.4, so I thought I would report / ask.

Thanks, that was already fixed, but so far not pushed public, here we
go:
https://git.linbit.com/drbd-8.4.git

Regards, rck
___
drbd-user mailing list
drbd-user@lists.linbit.com
http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user


[DRBD-user] drbd cluster initialize

2017-09-15 Thread Tsirkas Georgios

Hello,

Ι have a question about drbd cluster intialization.
How i could check if the cluster is initialized? I read that during the 
initialization drbd creates control volumes drbd0 and drbd1.


The node which initialize the cluster always is the  Primary node?

___
drbd-user mailing list
drbd-user@lists.linbit.com
http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user


Re: [DRBD-user] drbd cluster initialize

2017-09-15 Thread Robert Altnoeder
On 09/15/2017 03:01 PM, Tsirkas Georgios wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Ι have a question about drbd cluster intialization.
> How i could check if the cluster is initialized?
One possibility is to run
drbdmanage nodes
on all nodes and check the output.

> I read that during the initialization drbd creates control volumes
> drbd0 and drbd1.
On the first node, leader/potential leader nodes, but not on any
satellite nodes that are added.
> The node which initialize the cluster always is the  Primary node?
Directly after initialization it is, but when drbdmanage is restarted,
another node that has the control volumes may become the Primary node
(the one that updates the control volumes).

Checking the status of the DRBD control resource (.drbdctrl) and its two
control volumes (.drbdctrl/0 and .drbdctrl/1) is also a good idea, just
to make sure all nodes are connected, and all volumes are attached.
This can be achieved by running any of
drbdsetup status
drbdmon
drbdtop (if it has been installed, as it is not included in drbd-utils)
drbd-overview (which has been deprecated and is being replaced by the
other utilities)

br,
-- 
Robert Altnoeder
+43 1 817 82 92 0
robert.altnoe...@linbit.com

LINBIT | Keeping The Digital World Running
DRBD - Corosync - Pacemaker
f /  t /  in /  g+

DRBD® and LINBIT® are registered trademarks of LINBIT, Austria.
___
drbd-user mailing list
drbd-user@lists.linbit.com
http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user


Re: [DRBD-user] drbd cluster initialize

2017-09-15 Thread Roland Kammerer
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 04:01:04PM +0300, Tsirkas Georgios wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Ι have a question about drbd cluster intialization.
> How i could check if the cluster is initialized?

If "drbdmanage nodes" shows your initial node than it is ready.

> I read that during the
> initialization drbd creates control volumes drbd0 and drbd1.

Yes. And every node that is not created with "--satellite" also has
drbd0/drbd1 and a redundant copy of the control volume.

> The node which initialize the cluster always is the  Primary node?

No. On startup (if the control volume is not set manually to Primary)
one is randomly selected as leader. If the leader fails, another is
selected as leader. The leader is the one that holds the control volume
open for writing (== Primary).

Regards, rck
___
drbd-user mailing list
drbd-user@lists.linbit.com
http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user


Re: [DRBD-user] 8.4 Centos 7.4 support

2017-09-15 Thread Ken Bass

On 9/15/2017 3:17 AM, Roland Kammerer wrote:

Thanks, that was already fixed, but so far not pushed public, here we
go:
https://git.linbit.com/drbd-8.4.git


Is there an ETA for it to show up as a tar ball at 
https://www.linbit.com/en/drbd-community/drbd-download for third party 
repos to use? The last tgz there is from 8.4.10-1 from June. Thanks.


___
drbd-user mailing list
drbd-user@lists.linbit.com
http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user


Re: [DRBD-user] 8.4 Centos 7.4 support

2017-09-15 Thread Roland Kammerer
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 09:59:54AM -0400, Ken Bass wrote:
> On 9/15/2017 3:17 AM, Roland Kammerer wrote:
> >Thanks, that was already fixed, but so far not pushed public, here we
> >go:
> >https://git.linbit.com/drbd-8.4.git
> 
> Is there an ETA for it to show up as a tar ball at
> https://www.linbit.com/en/drbd-community/drbd-download for third party repos
> to use? The last tgz there is from 8.4.10-1 from June. Thanks.

Not really, but when we merge back the latest compat fixes for latest
linux upstream (which already happened for drbd9) to 8.4, then I guess
there will be a "propper" new release including tar-balls.

Regards, rck
___
drbd-user mailing list
drbd-user@lists.linbit.com
http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user


Re: [DRBD-user] DRBD over ZFS - or the other way around?

2017-09-15 Thread David Bruzos
Hi Danti,
The behavior you are experiencing is normal.  As I pointed out previously, 
I've been using this setup for many years and I've seen the same thing.  You 
will encounter that when the filesystem is written on the DRBD device without 
the use of a partition table.
As a side note, I've had some nasty stability issues with the DRBD version 
in the kernel (4.4/4.9 kernels) when running on ZFS, but DRBD 8.4.10 and ZFS 
0.6.5.11 seem to be running great.  I also run the storage as part of dom0, 
which many admins don't recommend, but generally it works alright.  The 
stability issues were typically rare and happened under high I/O loads and were 
DRBD related deadlock type crashes.  Again, those problems seem to be resolve 
in the latest DRBD 8 RELEASE.

David

-- 
David Bruzos (Systems Administrator)
Jacksonville Port Authority
2831 Talleyrand Ave.
Jacksonville, FL  32206
Cell: (904) 625-0969
Office: (904) 357-3069
Email: david.bru...@jaxport.com

On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 03:56:35PM +0200, Gionatan Danti wrote:
> On 06/09/2017 15:31, Yannis Milios wrote:
> > If your topology is like the following:  HDD -> ZFS (ZVOL) -> DRBD -> 
> > XFS then I believe it should make sense to always mount at the DRBD 
> > level and not at the ZVOL level which happens to be the underlying 
> > blockdev for DRBD.
> Sure! Directly mounting the DRBD-backing ZVOL would, at the bare 
> minumum, ruin the replication with the peer.
> 
> I was speaking about mounting ZVOLs *snapshots* to access previous data 
> version.
> 
> Regards.
> 
> -- 
> Danti Gionatan
> Supporto Tecnico
> Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it
> email: g.da...@assyoma.it - i...@assyoma.it
> GPG public key ID: FF5F32A8
> ___
> drbd-user mailing list
> drbd-user@lists.linbit.com
> http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user

-- 


Please note that under Florida's public records law (F.S. 668.6076), most 
written communications 
to or from the Jacksonville Port Authority are public records, available to 
the public and media 
upon request. Your email communications may therefore be subject to public 
disclosure. If you have 
received this email in error, please notify the sender by return email and 
delete immediately 
without forwarding to others.
___
drbd-user mailing list
drbd-user@lists.linbit.com
http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user


Re: [DRBD-user] drbd cluster initialize

2017-09-15 Thread Tsirkas Georgios

Thank you very much for your answer.
Another question is about Proxmox 5 and drbd9 module.
I load drbd9 module with drbd-dkms package. But seems that it doesnt work.
Someone have answered to me that drbd module for proxmox 5 is in to-do list,
so i am looking for an alternative solution to work with drbd9 with 
proxmox 5.


Have someone try it? If yes which drbd-module version?


On 09/15/2017 04:16 PM, Roland Kammerer wrote:

On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 04:01:04PM +0300, Tsirkas Georgios wrote:

Hello,

Ι have a question about drbd cluster intialization.
How i could check if the cluster is initialized?

If "drbdmanage nodes" shows your initial node than it is ready.


I read that during the
initialization drbd creates control volumes drbd0 and drbd1.

Yes. And every node that is not created with "--satellite" also has
drbd0/drbd1 and a redundant copy of the control volume.


The node which initialize the cluster always is the  Primary node?

No. On startup (if the control volume is not set manually to Primary)
one is randomly selected as leader. If the leader fails, another is
selected as leader. The leader is the one that holds the control volume
open for writing (== Primary).

Regards, rck
___
drbd-user mailing list
drbd-user@lists.linbit.com
http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user


___
drbd-user mailing list
drbd-user@lists.linbit.com
http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user


Re: [DRBD-user] drbd cluster initialize

2017-09-15 Thread Roberto Resoli
Il 15 settembre 2017 18:56:02 CEST, Tsirkas Georgios  ha 
scritto:
>Thank you very much for your answer.
>Another question is about Proxmox 5 and drbd9 module.
>I load drbd9 module with drbd-dkms package. But seems that it doesnt
>work.

What are the symptoms ? I have  recently upgraded to pve 5 my pve4 +  drbd9 and 
it works quite well.

>Someone have answered to me that drbd module for proxmox 5 is in to-do
>list,

This is the drbd9 proxmox plugin, which was far from complete even in pve4, but 
is still working under pve5. 

>so i am looking for an alternative solution to work with drbd9 with 
>proxmox 5.

Linbit repo for 4 is still working in my setup, even with some quirks.

>Have someone try it? If yes which drbd-module version?

I recommend latest from the pve4 linbit repo: drbd kernel module (via dkms) 
9.0.9 , with Drbd utils 9.1.1 .

I am still using the default drbd9 proxmox configuration with lvm-thin backend. 
But with a little modification in drbdmanage to avoid faulty free space 
calculation . See this lists for the details ... (or ask).

Bye,
rob


___
drbd-user mailing list
drbd-user@lists.linbit.com
http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/drbd-user