Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] Add dp PHY dt-bindings

2024-05-13 Thread


Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] Add write DP phyd register from parse dts

2024-05-13 Thread


Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] Add write DP phyd register from parse dts

2024-05-13 Thread


Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] Add dp PHY dt-bindings

2024-05-13 Thread


Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] Add dp PHY dt-bindings

2024-05-13 Thread


Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Add PHY-dp bindings

2024-05-13 Thread


Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] Support YUV422 for DPTX.

2024-05-13 Thread


Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] Fix get efuse issue for MT8188 DPTX

2024-05-12 Thread


Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] drm/mediatek/dp: The register is written with the parsed DTS SSC value.

2024-04-11 Thread


Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] drm/mediatek/dp: The register is written with the parsed DTS SSC value.

2024-04-11 Thread
On Wed, 2024-04-03 at 16:56 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
Dear Krzysztof:

The dp_phy device has already been registered through the mtk_dp_register_phy 
function in the mtk_dp.c file,
so it cannot be redefined in the dts. Avoid using of_get_child_by_name for this 
purpose.

 To find the node name, utilize of_find_node_by_name since it has already been 
registered.

Best regards,
Liankun Yang

External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until you have 
verified the sender or the content.

On 03/04/2024 08:41, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

> On 03/04/2024 06:05, Liankun Yang wrote:

>> [Description]

>> Severe screen flickering has been observed on the external display

>> when the DP projection function is used with the market expansion dock.

>>

>

>> +if (!strcmp(mode_name, RG_XTP_GLB_TXPLL_SSC_DELTA_RBR)) {

>> +regmap_update_bits(dp_phy->regs, ssc_reg_offset,

>> +   XTP_GLB_TXPLL_SSC_DELTA_RBR_DEFAULT, read_value);

>> +} else if (!strcmp(mode_name, RG_XTP_GLB_TXPLL_SSC_DELTA_HBR)) {

>> +read_value = read_value << 16 | 0x;

>> +regmap_update_bits(dp_phy->regs, ssc_reg_offset,

>> +   XTP_GLB_TXPLL_SSC_DELTA_HBR_DEFAULT, read_value);

>> +}

>> +

>> +return 0;

>> +}

>> +

>> +static struct device_node *mtk_dp_get_ssc_node(struct phy *phy, struct 
>> mtk_dp_phy *dp_phy)

>> +{

>> +struct device_node *mode_node = NULL;

>> +

>> +mode_node = of_find_node_by_name(dp_phy->dev->of_node, SSC_SETTING);

>

> ?!?!

> You have the node, why do you try to find it?

>


Wait, that was brainfuck from my side or -ENOCOFFEE. Ignore.


I still have a question though, where did you document new ABI:

dependency on the node name here?


Also, why you are not going through direct children -

of_get_child_by_name()?


Best regards,

Krzysztof