Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Fix a memory leak with reused mmap_offset

2023-01-18 Thread Mirsad Goran Todorovac
On 18. 01. 2023. 11:39, Das, Nirmoy wrote:
>>>
>>> Copying Mirsad who reported the issue in case he is still happy to give it 
>>> a quick test. Mirsad, I don't know if you are subscribed to one of the two 
>>> mailing lists where series was posted. In case not, you can grab both 
>>> patches from https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/112952/.
>>>
>>> Nirmoy - we also have an IGT written by Chuansheng - 
>>> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/515720/?series=101035&rev=4. A more 
>>> generic one could be placed in gem_mmap_offset test but this one works too 
>>> in my testing and is IMO better than nothing.
>>>
>>> Finally, let me add some tags below:
>>>
>>> On 17/01/2023 17:52, Nirmoy Das wrote:
 drm_vma_node_allow() and drm_vma_node_revoke() should be called in
 balanced pairs. We call drm_vma_node_allow() once per-file everytime a
 user calls mmap_offset, but only call drm_vma_node_revoke once per-file
 on each mmap_offset. As the mmap_offset is reused by the client, the
 per-file vm_count may remain non-zero and the rbtree leaked.

 Call drm_vma_node_allow_once() instead to prevent that memory leak.

 Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin 
 Cc: Andi Shyti 
>>>
>>> Fixes: 786555987207 ("drm/i915/gem: Store mmap_offsets in an rbtree rather 
>>> than a plain list")
>>> Reported-by: Chuansheng Liu 
>>> Reported-by: Mirsad Todorovac 
>>> Cc:  # v5.7+
>>> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin 
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Tvrtko
>>>

 Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das 
 ---
   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c | 2 +-
   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

 diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c 
 b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c
 index 4f69bff63068..2aac6bf78740 100644
 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c
 +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c
 @@ -697,7 +697,7 @@ mmap_offset_attach(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
   GEM_BUG_ON(lookup_mmo(obj, mmap_type) != mmo);
   out:
   if (file)
 -    drm_vma_node_allow(&mmo->vma_node, file);
 +    drm_vma_node_allow_once(&mmo->vma_node, file);
   return mmo;
   err:
>>
>> The drm/i915 patch seems OK and there are currently no memory leaks as of
>> reported by /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak under the same Chrome load that 
>> triggered
>> the initial bug ...
> 
> 
> Thanks, Mirsad for quickly checking this!

P.S.

Dear Nirmoy,

To let me explain, as I work on the Academy of Fine Arts and the Faculty of 
Graphic Arts,
video and multimedia drivers are of my special interest, so I kinda enjoyed 
this one.

No need to thank. ;-)

In case of more bugs discovered, I will be glad to test on my available 
platforms,
considering it a part of my research. I can justify time spent on graphic and 
multimedia
drivers, so it is not a big deal.

Regards,
Mirsad

-- 
Mirsad Goran Todorovac
Sistem inženjer
Grafički fakultet | Akademija likovnih umjetnosti
Sveučilište u Zagrebu
 
System engineer
Faculty of Graphic Arts | Academy of Fine Arts
University of Zagreb, Republic of Croatia
The European Union



Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Fix a memory leak with reused mmap_offset

2023-01-18 Thread Mirsad Todorovac

Hi,

On 1/18/23 11:39, Das, Nirmoy wrote:


On 1/18/2023 11:26 AM, Mirsad Todorovac wrote:

Hi,

On 1/18/23 10:19, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:


Thanks for working on this, it looks good to me and it aligns with how i915 
uses the facility.

Copying Mirsad who reported the issue in case he is still happy to give it a quick test. Mirsad, I don't know if you are 
subscribed to one of the two mailing lists where series was posted. In case not, you can grab both patches from 
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/112952/.


Nirmoy - we also have an IGT written by Chuansheng - https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/515720/?series=101035&rev=4. A more 
generic one could be placed in gem_mmap_offset test but this one works too in my testing and is IMO better than nothing.


Finally, let me add some tags below:

On 17/01/2023 17:52, Nirmoy Das wrote:

drm_vma_node_allow() and drm_vma_node_revoke() should be called in
balanced pairs. We call drm_vma_node_allow() once per-file everytime a
user calls mmap_offset, but only call drm_vma_node_revoke once per-file
on each mmap_offset. As the mmap_offset is reused by the client, the
per-file vm_count may remain non-zero and the rbtree leaked.

Call drm_vma_node_allow_once() instead to prevent that memory leak.

Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin 
Cc: Andi Shyti 


Fixes: 786555987207 ("drm/i915/gem: Store mmap_offsets in an rbtree rather than a 
plain list")
Reported-by: Chuansheng Liu 
Reported-by: Mirsad Todorovac 
Cc:  # v5.7+
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin 

Regards,

Tvrtko



Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das 
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c
index 4f69bff63068..2aac6bf78740 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c
@@ -697,7 +697,7 @@ mmap_offset_attach(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
  GEM_BUG_ON(lookup_mmo(obj, mmap_type) != mmo);
  out:
  if (file)
-    drm_vma_node_allow(&mmo->vma_node, file);
+    drm_vma_node_allow_once(&mmo->vma_node, file);
  return mmo;
  err:


The drm/i915 patch seems OK and there are currently no memory leaks as of
reported by /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak under the same Chrome load that triggered
the initial bug ...



Thanks, Mirsad for quickly checking this!


There was no problem, Nirmoy, everything applied neatly :)

Regards,
Mirsad

--
Mirsad Goran Todorovac
Sistem inženjer
Grafički fakultet | Akademija likovnih umjetnosti
Sveučilište u Zagrebu

System engineer
Faculty of Graphic Arts | Academy of Fine Arts
University of Zagreb, Republic of Croatia


Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Fix a memory leak with reused mmap_offset

2023-01-18 Thread Das, Nirmoy



On 1/18/2023 11:26 AM, Mirsad Todorovac wrote:

Hi,

On 1/18/23 10:19, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:

Thanks for working on this, it looks good to me and it aligns with 
how i915 uses the facility.


Copying Mirsad who reported the issue in case he is still happy to 
give it a quick test. Mirsad, I don't know if you are subscribed to 
one of the two mailing lists where series was posted. In case not, 
you can grab both patches from 
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/112952/.


Nirmoy - we also have an IGT written by Chuansheng - 
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/515720/?series=101035&rev=4. 
A more generic one could be placed in gem_mmap_offset test but this 
one works too in my testing and is IMO better than nothing.


Finally, let me add some tags below:

On 17/01/2023 17:52, Nirmoy Das wrote:

drm_vma_node_allow() and drm_vma_node_revoke() should be called in
balanced pairs. We call drm_vma_node_allow() once per-file everytime a
user calls mmap_offset, but only call drm_vma_node_revoke once per-file
on each mmap_offset. As the mmap_offset is reused by the client, the
per-file vm_count may remain non-zero and the rbtree leaked.

Call drm_vma_node_allow_once() instead to prevent that memory leak.

Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin 
Cc: Andi Shyti 


Fixes: 786555987207 ("drm/i915/gem: Store mmap_offsets in an rbtree 
rather than a plain list")

Reported-by: Chuansheng Liu 
Reported-by: Mirsad Todorovac 
Cc:  # v5.7+
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin 

Regards,

Tvrtko



Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das 
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c

index 4f69bff63068..2aac6bf78740 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c
@@ -697,7 +697,7 @@ mmap_offset_attach(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
  GEM_BUG_ON(lookup_mmo(obj, mmap_type) != mmo);
  out:
  if (file)
-    drm_vma_node_allow(&mmo->vma_node, file);
+    drm_vma_node_allow_once(&mmo->vma_node, file);
  return mmo;
  err:


The drm/i915 patch seems OK and there are currently no memory leaks as of
reported by /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak under the same Chrome load that 
triggered

the initial bug ...



Thanks, Mirsad for quickly checking this!


Nirmoy



Will post you if there are any changes.

Regards,
Mirsad