[PATCH 0/8] drm/bochs: convert bochs to atomic mode-setting

[Gerd Hoffmann]

  Hi,

> > Digged the mails up in the archive.
> >
> Silly me assumed that the MUA will bring up the the whole thread.

If your mbox goes back that far ...

I usually have a few months history in my mailbox folders which is
enough in the vast majority of the cases where I have to check some past
mail, but wasn't in this case.

> Pretty sure that's intentional since only the first patch has changed.
> Up-to recently that was the more commonly used approach on dri-devel.

Ah, ok.  That explains it.

> > John pointed me to
> > https://github.com/zhjwpku/gsoc/commits/20150720_no_gpu_addr which I've
> > used to test things.
> >
> > Second, page flipping failed in testing.

> If you can share some tips about the testing procedure and/or actual
> issue that would be beneficial.

Simple: wayland breaks.  kmscon uses pageflips too and can also be used
for testing (and this is alot easier in case your distro hasn't packaged
up wayland).

cheers,
  Gerd

[PATCH 0/8] drm/bochs: convert bochs to atomic mode-setting

[John Hunter]

Hi Gerd,

Sorry about that, but I am now busy with my master's degree stuffs.

Really can't spare any time on this until maybe July.

On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 5:28 PM, Gerd Hoffmann  wrote:

>   Hi,
>
> > > Did testing a while back & reported back to John (not sure this was in
> > > public on the list as we had some ping-ping emails beforehand due to
> > > some problems of applying the patches).  No new version of the series
> > > since.
> > >
> > The only comment that I can see is this one [1] which was addressed a
> > couple of days later [2].
> > If you have any other comments please bring them up publicly.
>
> Digged the mails up in the archive.
>
> First, v2 posting was apparently incomplete, only one of the 8 patches
> landed in my inbox.
>
> John pointed me to
> https://github.com/zhjwpku/gsoc/commits/20150720_no_gpu_addr which I've
> used to test things.
>
> Second, page flipping failed in testing.
>
> cheers,
>   Gerd
>
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 

[PATCH 0/8] drm/bochs: convert bochs to atomic mode-setting

[Emil Velikov]

On 3 March 2016 at 09:28, Gerd Hoffmann  wrote:
>   Hi,
>
>> > Did testing a while back & reported back to John (not sure this was in
>> > public on the list as we had some ping-ping emails beforehand due to
>> > some problems of applying the patches).  No new version of the series
>> > since.
>> >
>> The only comment that I can see is this one [1] which was addressed a
>> couple of days later [2].
>> If you have any other comments please bring them up publicly.
>
> Digged the mails up in the archive.
>
Silly me assumed that the MUA will bring up the the whole thread. Will
assume less and post links for the future.

> First, v2 posting was apparently incomplete, only one of the 8 patches
> landed in my inbox.
>
Pretty sure that's intentional since only the first patch has changed.
Up-to recently that was the more commonly used approach on dri-devel.

> John pointed me to
> https://github.com/zhjwpku/gsoc/commits/20150720_no_gpu_addr which I've
> used to test things.
>
> Second, page flipping failed in testing.
>
Thank you for this missing piece of the puzzle. You have to admit that
without it, things looked as if the patches fell through the cracks.

If you can share some tips about the testing procedure and/or actual
issue that would be beneficial. I'm not personally aiming to tackle
this, although the information will be appreciated.

Regards,
Emil

[PATCH 0/8] drm/bochs: convert bochs to atomic mode-setting

[Gerd Hoffmann]

  Hi,

> > Did testing a while back & reported back to John (not sure this was in
> > public on the list as we had some ping-ping emails beforehand due to
> > some problems of applying the patches).  No new version of the series
> > since.
> >
> The only comment that I can see is this one [1] which was addressed a
> couple of days later [2].
> If you have any other comments please bring them up publicly.

Digged the mails up in the archive.

First, v2 posting was apparently incomplete, only one of the 8 patches
landed in my inbox.

John pointed me to
https://github.com/zhjwpku/gsoc/commits/20150720_no_gpu_addr which I've
used to test things.

Second, page flipping failed in testing.

cheers,
  Gerd

[PATCH 0/8] drm/bochs: convert bochs to atomic mode-setting

[Emil Velikov]

On 2 March 2016 at 15:38, Gerd Hoffmann  wrote:
> On Mi, 2016-03-02 at 10:13 +, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> [+Dave, +Gerd]
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Just noticed that this old(ish) series never hit master.
>>
>> On 16 July 2015 at 13:20, John Hunter  wrote:
>> > From: Zhao Junwang 
>> >
>> > This patch series aim to convert DRM_BOCHS to atomic mode-setting.
>> > I did this mostly reference Gustavo Padovan's patch series on
>> > drm/exynos conversion.
>> >
>> Dave, Gerd, being the authors/maintainers of this driver can you guys
>> take a look/test.
>> Ackes, review and testing will be greatly appreciated.
>
> Did testing a while back & reported back to John (not sure this was in
> public on the list as we had some ping-ping emails beforehand due to
> some problems of applying the patches).  No new version of the series
> since.
>
The only comment that I can see is this one [1] which was addressed a
couple of days later [2].
If you have any other comments please bring them up publicly.

Thanks
Emil

[1] https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2015-July/086651.html
[2] https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2015-July/086776.html

[PATCH 0/8] drm/bochs: convert bochs to atomic mode-setting

[Gerd Hoffmann]

On Mi, 2016-03-02 at 10:13 +, Emil Velikov wrote:
> [+Dave, +Gerd]
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Just noticed that this old(ish) series never hit master.
> 
> On 16 July 2015 at 13:20, John Hunter  wrote:
> > From: Zhao Junwang 
> >
> > This patch series aim to convert DRM_BOCHS to atomic mode-setting.
> > I did this mostly reference Gustavo Padovan's patch series on
> > drm/exynos conversion.
> >
> Dave, Gerd, being the authors/maintainers of this driver can you guys
> take a look/test.
> Ackes, review and testing will be greatly appreciated.

Did testing a while back & reported back to John (not sure this was in
public on the list as we had some ping-ping emails beforehand due to
some problems of applying the patches).  No new version of the series
since.

cheers,
  Gerd

[PATCH 0/8] drm/bochs: convert bochs to atomic mode-setting

[Emil Velikov]

[+Dave, +Gerd]

Hi all,

Just noticed that this old(ish) series never hit master.

On 16 July 2015 at 13:20, John Hunter  wrote:
> From: Zhao Junwang 
>
> This patch series aim to convert DRM_BOCHS to atomic mode-setting.
> I did this mostly reference Gustavo Padovan's patch series on
> drm/exynos conversion.
>
Dave, Gerd, being the authors/maintainers of this driver can you guys
take a look/test.
Ackes, review and testing will be greatly appreciated.

Thanks
Emil

[PATCH 0/8] drm/bochs: convert bochs to atomic mode-setting

[John Hunter]

From: Zhao Junwang 

This patch series aim to convert DRM_BOCHS to atomic mode-setting.
I did this mostly reference Gustavo Padovan's patch series on
drm/exynos conversion.

Zhao Junwang (8):
  drm/bochs: phase 1 - use the transitional helpers
  drm/bochs: phase 2: wire up state reset(), duplicate() and destroy
  drm/bochs: stop looking at legacy state
  drm/bochs: phase 3: for plane updates: switch to atomic helper
internally
  drm/bochs: phase 3: use atomic .set_config helper
  drm/bochs: phase 3: provide a custom ->atomic_commit implementation
  drm/bochs: phase 3: switch to drm_atomic_helper_page_flip
  drm/bochs: atomic dpms support

 drivers/gpu/drm/bochs/bochs.h |2 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/bochs/bochs_drv.c |2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/bochs/bochs_kms.c |  221 +++--
 drivers/gpu/drm/bochs/bochs_mm.c  |9 ++
 4 files changed, 148 insertions(+), 86 deletions(-)

-- 
1.7.10.4