[STLinux Kernel] [PATCH 1/1] drm/sti: use new Reset API

2016-07-26 Thread Sean Paul
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 6:40 AM, Lee Jones  wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jul 2016, Peter Griffin wrote:
>> On Mon, 25 Jul 2016, Lee Jones wrote:
>>
>> > Since 0b52297f228 ("reset: Add support for shared reset controls") the
>> > new Reset API now demands consumers choose either an *_exclusive or a
>> > *_shared line when requesting reset lines.
>> >
>> > This issue was found when running a kernel containing the aforementioned
>> > patch  which includes an informitive WARN().  It implies that one or
>> > more used reset lines are in fact shared.  This is why we're using the
>> > *_shared variant.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones 
>> > ---
>> >  drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_compositor.c | 4 ++--
>> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> Your missing a changelog on the v2 version.
>
> This isn't really a v2, hence the lack if [PATCH vX] increment.
>
> This is v1 with a more verbose changelog.
>
>> Apart from that:
>>  Acked-by: Peter Griffin 
>
> Ta.

Applied to drm-misc, thanks for revising.

>
> --
> Lee Jones
> Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
> Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog


[STLinux Kernel] [PATCH 1/1] drm/sti: use new Reset API

2016-07-25 Thread Lee Jones
On Mon, 25 Jul 2016, Peter Griffin wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jul 2016, Lee Jones wrote:
> 
> > Since 0b52297f228 ("reset: Add support for shared reset controls") the
> > new Reset API now demands consumers choose either an *_exclusive or a
> > *_shared line when requesting reset lines.
> > 
> > This issue was found when running a kernel containing the aforementioned
> > patch  which includes an informitive WARN().  It implies that one or
> > more used reset lines are in fact shared.  This is why we're using the
> > *_shared variant.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones 
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_compositor.c | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> Your missing a changelog on the v2 version.

This isn't really a v2, hence the lack if [PATCH vX] increment.

This is v1 with a more verbose changelog.

> Apart from that:
>  Acked-by: Peter Griffin 

Ta.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog


[STLinux Kernel] [PATCH 1/1] drm/sti: use new Reset API

2016-07-25 Thread Peter Griffin
Hi Lee,

On Mon, 25 Jul 2016, Lee Jones wrote:

> Since 0b52297f228 ("reset: Add support for shared reset controls") the
> new Reset API now demands consumers choose either an *_exclusive or a
> *_shared line when requesting reset lines.
> 
> This issue was found when running a kernel containing the aforementioned
> patch  which includes an informitive WARN().  It implies that one or
> more used reset lines are in fact shared.  This is why we're using the
> *_shared variant.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones 
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_compositor.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Your missing a changelog on the v2 version.

Apart from that:
 Acked-by: Peter Griffin 

regards,

Peter.


[PATCH 1/1] drm/sti: use new Reset API

2016-07-25 Thread Lee Jones
Since 0b52297f228 ("reset: Add support for shared reset controls") the
new Reset API now demands consumers choose either an *_exclusive or a
*_shared line when requesting reset lines.

This issue was found when running a kernel containing the aforementioned
patch  which includes an informitive WARN().  It implies that one or
more used reset lines are in fact shared.  This is why we're using the
*_shared variant.

Signed-off-by: Lee Jones 
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_compositor.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_compositor.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_compositor.c
index 3d2fa3a..c2ace02 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_compositor.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_compositor.c
@@ -234,12 +234,12 @@ static int sti_compositor_probe(struct platform_device 
*pdev)
}

/* Get reset resources */
-   compo->rst_main = devm_reset_control_get(dev, "compo-main");
+   compo->rst_main = devm_reset_control_get_shared(dev, "compo-main");
/* Take compo main out of reset */
if (!IS_ERR(compo->rst_main))
reset_control_deassert(compo->rst_main);

-   compo->rst_aux = devm_reset_control_get(dev, "compo-aux");
+   compo->rst_aux = devm_reset_control_get_shared(dev, "compo-aux");
/* Take compo aux out of reset */
if (!IS_ERR(compo->rst_aux))
reset_control_deassert(compo->rst_aux);
-- 
2.9.0



[PATCH 1/1] drm/sti: use new Reset API

2016-07-22 Thread Lee Jones
On Fri, 22 Jul 2016, Sean Paul wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 3:22 AM, Lee Jones  wrote:
> > Since 0b52297f228 ("reset: Add support for shared reset controls") the
> > new Reset API now demands consumers choose either an *_exclusive or
> > a *_shared line when requesting reset lines.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones 
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_compositor.c | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_compositor.c 
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_compositor.c
> > index 3d2fa3a..c2ace02 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_compositor.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_compositor.c
> > @@ -234,12 +234,12 @@ static int sti_compositor_probe(struct 
> > platform_device *pdev)
> > }
> >
> > /* Get reset resources */
> > -   compo->rst_main = devm_reset_control_get(dev, "compo-main");
> > +   compo->rst_main = devm_reset_control_get_shared(dev, "compo-main");
> 
> Seems like this patch also changes the behavior from being exclusively
> managed to shared. Is this intentional? If so, it's probably worth
> changing you commit message to be a little less innocuous.

Interesting turn of phrase.  You would like the commit message to be
more "harmful or offensive".  I'm sure I can rustle something up to
suit!

... or I could just mention why I'm changing the behaviour? ;)

v2 to follow.

> > /* Take compo main out of reset */
> > if (!IS_ERR(compo->rst_main))
> > reset_control_deassert(compo->rst_main);
> >
> > -   compo->rst_aux = devm_reset_control_get(dev, "compo-aux");
> > +   compo->rst_aux = devm_reset_control_get_shared(dev, "compo-aux");
> > /* Take compo aux out of reset */
> > if (!IS_ERR(compo->rst_aux))
> > reset_control_deassert(compo->rst_aux);
> >
> > ___
> > dri-devel mailing list
> > dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog


[PATCH 1/1] drm/sti: use new Reset API

2016-07-22 Thread Sean Paul
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 3:22 AM, Lee Jones  wrote:
> Since 0b52297f228 ("reset: Add support for shared reset controls") the
> new Reset API now demands consumers choose either an *_exclusive or
> a *_shared line when requesting reset lines.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones 
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_compositor.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_compositor.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_compositor.c
> index 3d2fa3a..c2ace02 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_compositor.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_compositor.c
> @@ -234,12 +234,12 @@ static int sti_compositor_probe(struct platform_device 
> *pdev)
> }
>
> /* Get reset resources */
> -   compo->rst_main = devm_reset_control_get(dev, "compo-main");
> +   compo->rst_main = devm_reset_control_get_shared(dev, "compo-main");

Seems like this patch also changes the behavior from being exclusively
managed to shared. Is this intentional? If so, it's probably worth
changing you commit message to be a little less innocuous.

> /* Take compo main out of reset */
> if (!IS_ERR(compo->rst_main))
> reset_control_deassert(compo->rst_main);
>
> -   compo->rst_aux = devm_reset_control_get(dev, "compo-aux");
> +   compo->rst_aux = devm_reset_control_get_shared(dev, "compo-aux");
> /* Take compo aux out of reset */
> if (!IS_ERR(compo->rst_aux))
> reset_control_deassert(compo->rst_aux);
> --
> 2.9.0
>
> ___
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel


[PATCH 1/1] drm/sti: use new Reset API

2016-07-22 Thread Lee Jones
Since 0b52297f228 ("reset: Add support for shared reset controls") the
new Reset API now demands consumers choose either an *_exclusive or
a *_shared line when requesting reset lines.

Signed-off-by: Lee Jones 
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_compositor.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_compositor.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_compositor.c
index 3d2fa3a..c2ace02 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_compositor.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_compositor.c
@@ -234,12 +234,12 @@ static int sti_compositor_probe(struct platform_device 
*pdev)
}

/* Get reset resources */
-   compo->rst_main = devm_reset_control_get(dev, "compo-main");
+   compo->rst_main = devm_reset_control_get_shared(dev, "compo-main");
/* Take compo main out of reset */
if (!IS_ERR(compo->rst_main))
reset_control_deassert(compo->rst_main);

-   compo->rst_aux = devm_reset_control_get(dev, "compo-aux");
+   compo->rst_aux = devm_reset_control_get_shared(dev, "compo-aux");
/* Take compo aux out of reset */
if (!IS_ERR(compo->rst_aux))
reset_control_deassert(compo->rst_aux);
-- 
2.9.0