[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm: Check CRTC compatibility in setplane

2014-04-23 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 11:26:04AM -0700, Matt Roper wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 08:03:50PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:03:59AM -0700, Matt Roper wrote:
> > > The DRM core setplane code should check that the plane is usable on the
> > > specified CRTC before calling into the driver.
> > > 
> > > Prior to this patch, a plane's possible_crtcs field was purely
> > > informational for userspace and was never actually verified at the
> > > kernel level (aside from the primary plane helper).
> > > 
> > > Cc: dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> > > Signed-off-by: Matt Roper 
> > 
> > Do you have a nasty igt somewhere which tries to use a plane on the wrong
> > crtc? Especially useful since our i915 code and hw relies on this.
> > -Daniel
> 
> Not yet; I'll add/modify a test to include that.  I'm still working on
> some other i-g-t test updates for the primary plane stuff based on your
> previous feedback.
> 
> Speaking of i-g-t testing, what is the expected behavior if someone
> issues a pageflip ioctl while the primary plane is disabled?  I'd expect
> it to return an error, but the -EBUSY currently returned by the DRM core
> seems a bit confusing/misleading in my opinion.  The comments indicate
> that the existing assumption is that crtc->primary->fb == NULL indicates 
> a hotplug event that userspace hasn't noticed yet, although now we
> clearly have other ways to hit that error, so I'm not sure EBUSY is
> really the right response.

That comment is outdated since nowadays the kernel doesn't randomly kill a
crtc if its outputs gets unplugged. I think a simple -EINVAL should be
good. We'd need to update kms_flip with that new value though.

A quick grep through the intel ddx shows that we don't really depend on
this either way. -EBUSY for a disabled primary plane (whether the crtc is
on or not doesn't matter imo) really makes no sense.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch


[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm: Check CRTC compatibility in setplane

2014-04-23 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:03:59AM -0700, Matt Roper wrote:
> The DRM core setplane code should check that the plane is usable on the
> specified CRTC before calling into the driver.
> 
> Prior to this patch, a plane's possible_crtcs field was purely
> informational for userspace and was never actually verified at the
> kernel level (aside from the primary plane helper).
> 
> Cc: dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper 

Do you have a nasty igt somewhere which tries to use a plane on the wrong
crtc? Especially useful since our i915 code and hw relies on this.
-Daniel

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c | 7 +++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane_helper.c | 6 --
>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c
> index 461d19b..b6d6c04 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c
> @@ -2140,6 +2140,13 @@ int drm_mode_setplane(struct drm_device *dev, void 
> *data,
>   }
>   crtc = obj_to_crtc(obj);
>  
> + /* Check whether this plane is usable on this CRTC */
> + if (!(plane->possible_crtcs & drm_crtc_mask(crtc))) {
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Invalid crtc for plane\n");
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
>   fb = drm_framebuffer_lookup(dev, plane_req->fb_id);
>   if (!fb) {
>   DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Unknown framebuffer ID %d\n",
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane_helper.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane_helper.c
> index b72736d..65c4a00 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane_helper.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane_helper.c
> @@ -137,12 +137,6 @@ int drm_primary_helper_update(struct drm_plane *plane, 
> struct drm_crtc *crtc,
>   return -EINVAL;
>   }
>  
> - /* Primary planes are locked to their owning CRTC */
> - if (plane->possible_crtcs != drm_crtc_mask(crtc)) {
> - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Cannot change primary plane CRTC\n");
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
> -
>   /* Disallow scaling */
>   src_w >>= 16;
>   src_h >>= 16;
> -- 
> 1.8.5.1
> 
> ___
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch


[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm: Check CRTC compatibility in setplane

2014-04-23 Thread Matt Roper
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 08:03:50PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:03:59AM -0700, Matt Roper wrote:
> > The DRM core setplane code should check that the plane is usable on the
> > specified CRTC before calling into the driver.
> > 
> > Prior to this patch, a plane's possible_crtcs field was purely
> > informational for userspace and was never actually verified at the
> > kernel level (aside from the primary plane helper).
> > 
> > Cc: dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> > Signed-off-by: Matt Roper 
> 
> Do you have a nasty igt somewhere which tries to use a plane on the wrong
> crtc? Especially useful since our i915 code and hw relies on this.
> -Daniel

Not yet; I'll add/modify a test to include that.  I'm still working on
some other i-g-t test updates for the primary plane stuff based on your
previous feedback.

Speaking of i-g-t testing, what is the expected behavior if someone
issues a pageflip ioctl while the primary plane is disabled?  I'd expect
it to return an error, but the -EBUSY currently returned by the DRM core
seems a bit confusing/misleading in my opinion.  The comments indicate
that the existing assumption is that crtc->primary->fb == NULL indicates 
a hotplug event that userspace hasn't noticed yet, although now we
clearly have other ways to hit that error, so I'm not sure EBUSY is
really the right response.


Matt

> 
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c | 7 +++
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane_helper.c | 6 --
> >  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c
> > index 461d19b..b6d6c04 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c
> > @@ -2140,6 +2140,13 @@ int drm_mode_setplane(struct drm_device *dev, void 
> > *data,
> > }
> > crtc = obj_to_crtc(obj);
> >  
> > +   /* Check whether this plane is usable on this CRTC */
> > +   if (!(plane->possible_crtcs & drm_crtc_mask(crtc))) {
> > +   DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Invalid crtc for plane\n");
> > +   ret = -EINVAL;
> > +   goto out;
> > +   }
> > +
> > fb = drm_framebuffer_lookup(dev, plane_req->fb_id);
> > if (!fb) {
> > DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Unknown framebuffer ID %d\n",
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane_helper.c 
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane_helper.c
> > index b72736d..65c4a00 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane_helper.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane_helper.c
> > @@ -137,12 +137,6 @@ int drm_primary_helper_update(struct drm_plane *plane, 
> > struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> >  
> > -   /* Primary planes are locked to their owning CRTC */
> > -   if (plane->possible_crtcs != drm_crtc_mask(crtc)) {
> > -   DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Cannot change primary plane CRTC\n");
> > -   return -EINVAL;
> > -   }
> > -
> > /* Disallow scaling */
> > src_w >>= 16;
> > src_h >>= 16;
> > -- 
> > 1.8.5.1
> > 
> > ___
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
> 
> -- 
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch

-- 
Matt Roper
Graphics Software Engineer
IoTG Platform Enabling & Development
Intel Corporation
(916) 356-2795


[PATCH 1/3] drm: Check CRTC compatibility in setplane

2014-04-23 Thread Matt Roper
The DRM core setplane code should check that the plane is usable on the
specified CRTC before calling into the driver.

Prior to this patch, a plane's possible_crtcs field was purely
informational for userspace and was never actually verified at the
kernel level (aside from the primary plane helper).

Cc: dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper 
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c | 7 +++
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane_helper.c | 6 --
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c
index 461d19b..b6d6c04 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c
@@ -2140,6 +2140,13 @@ int drm_mode_setplane(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
}
crtc = obj_to_crtc(obj);

+   /* Check whether this plane is usable on this CRTC */
+   if (!(plane->possible_crtcs & drm_crtc_mask(crtc))) {
+   DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Invalid crtc for plane\n");
+   ret = -EINVAL;
+   goto out;
+   }
+
fb = drm_framebuffer_lookup(dev, plane_req->fb_id);
if (!fb) {
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Unknown framebuffer ID %d\n",
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane_helper.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane_helper.c
index b72736d..65c4a00 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane_helper.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_plane_helper.c
@@ -137,12 +137,6 @@ int drm_primary_helper_update(struct drm_plane *plane, 
struct drm_crtc *crtc,
return -EINVAL;
}

-   /* Primary planes are locked to their owning CRTC */
-   if (plane->possible_crtcs != drm_crtc_mask(crtc)) {
-   DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Cannot change primary plane CRTC\n");
-   return -EINVAL;
-   }
-
/* Disallow scaling */
src_w >>= 16;
src_h >>= 16;
-- 
1.8.5.1