Re: [PATCH 1/6] drm/tests/drm_buddy: fix 32b build

2024-02-28 Thread Matthew Auld

On 28/02/2024 07:20, Christian König wrote:

Am 26.02.24 um 10:58 schrieb Matthew Auld:

On 19/02/2024 12:24, Matthew Auld wrote:

On 19/02/2024 10:48, Matthew Auld wrote:

On 19/02/2024 10:30, Christian König wrote:

Am 19.02.24 um 11:28 schrieb Matthew Auld:

On 19/02/2024 09:53, Christian König wrote:

Am 19.02.24 um 10:42 schrieb Matthew Auld:

On 15/02/2024 17:44, Matthew Auld wrote:
Doesn't seem to compile on 32b, presumably due to u64 
mod/division.
Simplest is to just switch over to u32 here. Also make print 
modifiers

consistent with that.

Fixes: a64056bb5a32 ("drm/tests/drm_buddy: add alloc_contiguous 
test")

Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven 
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld 
Cc: Arunpravin Paneer Selvam 
Cc: Christian König 
Cc: Maxime Ripard 


Any chance someone can push just this single patch here, since 
it fixes 32b build? It already has an r-b from Arun.


Already working on this. Just give me a few more minutes.


Thanks.


No, problem. I would have pushed this earlier, but my build server 
doesn't want to work any more. Looks like the SSD has passed its 
warranty :(


Should I push the other three patches to drm-misc-fixes as well? I 
currently can't even build test them.


Need to send a v2 for that. One minor change in the test just to be 
consistent with using u32. Thanks.


Sent v2. If you could push that when you get a chance. Thanks.

https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/130075/


Gentle ping on merging v2.


Pushed all three to drm-misc-fixes.


Thanks.



Regards,
Christian.









Thanks,
Christian.





Thanks,
Christian.




---
  drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c | 16 
  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c

index fee6bec757d1..edacc1adb28f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ static inline u64 get_size(int order, u64 
chunk_size)
    static void drm_test_buddy_alloc_contiguous(struct kunit 
*test)

  {
-    u64 mm_size, ps = SZ_4K, i, n_pages, total;
+    u32 mm_size, ps = SZ_4K, i, n_pages, total;
  struct drm_buddy_block *block;
  struct drm_buddy mm;
  LIST_HEAD(left);
@@ -56,30 +56,30 @@ static void 
drm_test_buddy_alloc_contiguous(struct kunit *test)

  KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE_MSG(test,
drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, mm_size,
    ps, ps, list, 0),
-   "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%d\n",
+   "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%u\n",
 ps);
  } while (++i < n_pages);
    KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 
0, mm_size,

 3 * ps, ps, &allocated,
DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
-   "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%d\n", 3 * ps);
+   "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%u\n", 3 * ps);
    drm_buddy_free_list(&mm, &middle);
  KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 
0, mm_size,

 3 * ps, ps, &allocated,
DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
-   "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%llu\n", 3 * 
ps);

+   "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%u\n", 3 * ps);
  KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 
0, mm_size,

 2 * ps, ps, &allocated,
DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
-   "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%llu\n", 2 * 
ps);

+   "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%u\n", 2 * ps);
    drm_buddy_free_list(&mm, &right);
  KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 
0, mm_size,

 3 * ps, ps, &allocated,
DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
-   "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%llu\n", 3 * 
ps);

+   "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%u\n", 3 * ps);
  /*
   * At this point we should have enough contiguous space 
for 2 blocks,
   * however they are never buddies (since we freed middle 
and right) so
@@ -88,13 +88,13 @@ static void 
drm_test_buddy_alloc_contiguous(struct kunit *test)
  KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 
0, mm_size,

  2 * ps, ps, &allocated,
DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
-   "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%d\n", 2 * ps);
+   "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%u\n", 2 * ps);
    drm_buddy_free_list(&mm, &left);
  KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 
0, mm_size,

  3 * ps, ps, &allocated,
DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
-   "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%d\n", 3 * ps);
+   "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%u\n", 3 * ps);
    total = 0;
  list_for_each_entry(block, &allocated, link)








Re: [PATCH 1/6] drm/tests/drm_buddy: fix 32b build

2024-02-27 Thread Christian König

Am 26.02.24 um 10:58 schrieb Matthew Auld:

On 19/02/2024 12:24, Matthew Auld wrote:

On 19/02/2024 10:48, Matthew Auld wrote:

On 19/02/2024 10:30, Christian König wrote:

Am 19.02.24 um 11:28 schrieb Matthew Auld:

On 19/02/2024 09:53, Christian König wrote:

Am 19.02.24 um 10:42 schrieb Matthew Auld:

On 15/02/2024 17:44, Matthew Auld wrote:
Doesn't seem to compile on 32b, presumably due to u64 
mod/division.
Simplest is to just switch over to u32 here. Also make print 
modifiers

consistent with that.

Fixes: a64056bb5a32 ("drm/tests/drm_buddy: add alloc_contiguous 
test")

Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven 
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld 
Cc: Arunpravin Paneer Selvam 
Cc: Christian König 
Cc: Maxime Ripard 


Any chance someone can push just this single patch here, since 
it fixes 32b build? It already has an r-b from Arun.


Already working on this. Just give me a few more minutes.


Thanks.


No, problem. I would have pushed this earlier, but my build server 
doesn't want to work any more. Looks like the SSD has passed its 
warranty :(


Should I push the other three patches to drm-misc-fixes as well? I 
currently can't even build test them.


Need to send a v2 for that. One minor change in the test just to be 
consistent with using u32. Thanks.


Sent v2. If you could push that when you get a chance. Thanks.

https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/130075/


Gentle ping on merging v2.


Pushed all three to drm-misc-fixes.

Regards,
Christian.









Thanks,
Christian.





Thanks,
Christian.




---
  drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c | 16 
  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c

index fee6bec757d1..edacc1adb28f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ static inline u64 get_size(int order, u64 
chunk_size)
    static void drm_test_buddy_alloc_contiguous(struct kunit 
*test)

  {
-    u64 mm_size, ps = SZ_4K, i, n_pages, total;
+    u32 mm_size, ps = SZ_4K, i, n_pages, total;
  struct drm_buddy_block *block;
  struct drm_buddy mm;
  LIST_HEAD(left);
@@ -56,30 +56,30 @@ static void 
drm_test_buddy_alloc_contiguous(struct kunit *test)

  KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE_MSG(test,
drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, mm_size,
    ps, ps, list, 0),
-   "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%d\n",
+   "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%u\n",
 ps);
  } while (++i < n_pages);
    KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 
0, mm_size,

 3 * ps, ps, &allocated,
DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
-   "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%d\n", 3 * ps);
+   "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%u\n", 3 * ps);
    drm_buddy_free_list(&mm, &middle);
  KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 
0, mm_size,

 3 * ps, ps, &allocated,
DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
-   "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%llu\n", 3 * 
ps);

+   "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%u\n", 3 * ps);
  KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 
0, mm_size,

 2 * ps, ps, &allocated,
DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
-   "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%llu\n", 2 * 
ps);

+   "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%u\n", 2 * ps);
    drm_buddy_free_list(&mm, &right);
  KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 
0, mm_size,

 3 * ps, ps, &allocated,
DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
-   "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%llu\n", 3 * 
ps);

+   "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%u\n", 3 * ps);
  /*
   * At this point we should have enough contiguous space 
for 2 blocks,
   * however they are never buddies (since we freed middle 
and right) so
@@ -88,13 +88,13 @@ static void 
drm_test_buddy_alloc_contiguous(struct kunit *test)
  KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 
0, mm_size,

  2 * ps, ps, &allocated,
DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
-   "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%d\n", 2 * ps);
+   "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%u\n", 2 * ps);
    drm_buddy_free_list(&mm, &left);
  KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 
0, mm_size,

  3 * ps, ps, &allocated,
DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
-   "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%d\n", 3 * ps);
+   "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%u\n", 3 * ps);
    total = 0;
  list_for_each_entry(block, &allocated, link)








Re: [PATCH 1/6] drm/tests/drm_buddy: fix 32b build

2024-02-26 Thread Matthew Auld

Hi,

On 26/02/2024 10:38, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:

Hi Matthew,

On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 10:58 AM Matthew Auld  wrote:

On 19/02/2024 12:24, Matthew Auld wrote:

On 19/02/2024 10:48, Matthew Auld wrote:

On 19/02/2024 10:30, Christian König wrote:

Am 19.02.24 um 11:28 schrieb Matthew Auld:

On 19/02/2024 09:53, Christian König wrote:

Am 19.02.24 um 10:42 schrieb Matthew Auld:

On 15/02/2024 17:44, Matthew Auld wrote:

Doesn't seem to compile on 32b, presumably due to u64 mod/division.
Simplest is to just switch over to u32 here. Also make print
modifiers
consistent with that.

Fixes: a64056bb5a32 ("drm/tests/drm_buddy: add alloc_contiguous
test")
Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven 
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld 
Cc: Arunpravin Paneer Selvam 
Cc: Christian König 
Cc: Maxime Ripard 


Any chance someone can push just this single patch here, since it
fixes 32b build? It already has an r-b from Arun.


Already working on this. Just give me a few more minutes.


Thanks.


No, problem. I would have pushed this earlier, but my build server
doesn't want to work any more. Looks like the SSD has passed its
warranty :(

Should I push the other three patches to drm-misc-fixes as well? I
currently can't even build test them.


Need to send a v2 for that. One minor change in the test just to be
consistent with using u32. Thanks.


Sent v2. If you could push that when you get a chance. Thanks.

https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/130075/


Gentle ping on merging v2.


Your v1 and a fix from Linus already made it upstream:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/log/drivers/gpu/drm/tests?h=v6.8-rc6


Ah, right. I meant v2 for the remaining drm_buddy patches in this series:
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/130075/



Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

 Geert



Re: [PATCH 1/6] drm/tests/drm_buddy: fix 32b build

2024-02-26 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
Hi Matthew,

On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 10:58 AM Matthew Auld  wrote:
> On 19/02/2024 12:24, Matthew Auld wrote:
> > On 19/02/2024 10:48, Matthew Auld wrote:
> >> On 19/02/2024 10:30, Christian König wrote:
> >>> Am 19.02.24 um 11:28 schrieb Matthew Auld:
>  On 19/02/2024 09:53, Christian König wrote:
> > Am 19.02.24 um 10:42 schrieb Matthew Auld:
> >> On 15/02/2024 17:44, Matthew Auld wrote:
> >>> Doesn't seem to compile on 32b, presumably due to u64 mod/division.
> >>> Simplest is to just switch over to u32 here. Also make print
> >>> modifiers
> >>> consistent with that.
> >>>
> >>> Fixes: a64056bb5a32 ("drm/tests/drm_buddy: add alloc_contiguous
> >>> test")
> >>> Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven 
> >>> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld 
> >>> Cc: Arunpravin Paneer Selvam 
> >>> Cc: Christian König 
> >>> Cc: Maxime Ripard 
> >>
> >> Any chance someone can push just this single patch here, since it
> >> fixes 32b build? It already has an r-b from Arun.
> >
> > Already working on this. Just give me a few more minutes.
> 
>  Thanks.
> >>>
> >>> No, problem. I would have pushed this earlier, but my build server
> >>> doesn't want to work any more. Looks like the SSD has passed its
> >>> warranty :(
> >>>
> >>> Should I push the other three patches to drm-misc-fixes as well? I
> >>> currently can't even build test them.
> >>
> >> Need to send a v2 for that. One minor change in the test just to be
> >> consistent with using u32. Thanks.
> >
> > Sent v2. If you could push that when you get a chance. Thanks.
> >
> > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/130075/
>
> Gentle ping on merging v2.

Your v1 and a fix from Linus already made it upstream:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/log/drivers/gpu/drm/tests?h=v6.8-rc6

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds


Re: [PATCH 1/6] drm/tests/drm_buddy: fix 32b build

2024-02-26 Thread Matthew Auld

On 19/02/2024 12:24, Matthew Auld wrote:

On 19/02/2024 10:48, Matthew Auld wrote:

On 19/02/2024 10:30, Christian König wrote:

Am 19.02.24 um 11:28 schrieb Matthew Auld:

On 19/02/2024 09:53, Christian König wrote:

Am 19.02.24 um 10:42 schrieb Matthew Auld:

On 15/02/2024 17:44, Matthew Auld wrote:

Doesn't seem to compile on 32b, presumably due to u64 mod/division.
Simplest is to just switch over to u32 here. Also make print 
modifiers

consistent with that.

Fixes: a64056bb5a32 ("drm/tests/drm_buddy: add alloc_contiguous 
test")

Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven 
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld 
Cc: Arunpravin Paneer Selvam 
Cc: Christian König 
Cc: Maxime Ripard 


Any chance someone can push just this single patch here, since it 
fixes 32b build? It already has an r-b from Arun.


Already working on this. Just give me a few more minutes.


Thanks.


No, problem. I would have pushed this earlier, but my build server 
doesn't want to work any more. Looks like the SSD has passed its 
warranty :(


Should I push the other three patches to drm-misc-fixes as well? I 
currently can't even build test them.


Need to send a v2 for that. One minor change in the test just to be 
consistent with using u32. Thanks.


Sent v2. If you could push that when you get a chance. Thanks.

https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/130075/


Gentle ping on merging v2.







Thanks,
Christian.





Thanks,
Christian.




---
  drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c | 16 
  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c

index fee6bec757d1..edacc1adb28f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ static inline u64 get_size(int order, u64 
chunk_size)

    static void drm_test_buddy_alloc_contiguous(struct kunit *test)
  {
-    u64 mm_size, ps = SZ_4K, i, n_pages, total;
+    u32 mm_size, ps = SZ_4K, i, n_pages, total;
  struct drm_buddy_block *block;
  struct drm_buddy mm;
  LIST_HEAD(left);
@@ -56,30 +56,30 @@ static void 
drm_test_buddy_alloc_contiguous(struct kunit *test)

  KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE_MSG(test,
 drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, mm_size,
    ps, ps, list, 0),
-   "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%d\n",
+   "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%u\n",
 ps);
  } while (++i < n_pages);
    KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 
0, mm_size,

 3 * ps, ps, &allocated,
DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
-   "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%d\n", 3 * ps);
+   "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%u\n", 3 * ps);
    drm_buddy_free_list(&mm, &middle);
  KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, 
mm_size,

 3 * ps, ps, &allocated,
DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
-   "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%llu\n", 3 * ps);
+   "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%u\n", 3 * ps);
  KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, 
mm_size,

 2 * ps, ps, &allocated,
DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
-   "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%llu\n", 2 * ps);
+   "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%u\n", 2 * ps);
    drm_buddy_free_list(&mm, &right);
  KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, 
mm_size,

 3 * ps, ps, &allocated,
DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
-   "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%llu\n", 3 * ps);
+   "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%u\n", 3 * ps);
  /*
   * At this point we should have enough contiguous space for 
2 blocks,
   * however they are never buddies (since we freed middle 
and right) so
@@ -88,13 +88,13 @@ static void 
drm_test_buddy_alloc_contiguous(struct kunit *test)
  KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, 
mm_size,

  2 * ps, ps, &allocated,
DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
-   "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%d\n", 2 * ps);
+   "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%u\n", 2 * ps);
    drm_buddy_free_list(&mm, &left);
  KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, 
mm_size,

  3 * ps, ps, &allocated,
DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
-   "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%d\n", 3 * ps);
+   "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%u\n", 3 * ps);
    total = 0;
  list_for_each_entry(block, &allocated, link)






Re: [PATCH 1/6] drm/tests/drm_buddy: fix 32b build

2024-02-19 Thread Matthew Auld

On 19/02/2024 10:48, Matthew Auld wrote:

On 19/02/2024 10:30, Christian König wrote:

Am 19.02.24 um 11:28 schrieb Matthew Auld:

On 19/02/2024 09:53, Christian König wrote:

Am 19.02.24 um 10:42 schrieb Matthew Auld:

On 15/02/2024 17:44, Matthew Auld wrote:

Doesn't seem to compile on 32b, presumably due to u64 mod/division.
Simplest is to just switch over to u32 here. Also make print 
modifiers

consistent with that.

Fixes: a64056bb5a32 ("drm/tests/drm_buddy: add alloc_contiguous 
test")

Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven 
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld 
Cc: Arunpravin Paneer Selvam 
Cc: Christian König 
Cc: Maxime Ripard 


Any chance someone can push just this single patch here, since it 
fixes 32b build? It already has an r-b from Arun.


Already working on this. Just give me a few more minutes.


Thanks.


No, problem. I would have pushed this earlier, but my build server 
doesn't want to work any more. Looks like the SSD has passed its 
warranty :(


Should I push the other three patches to drm-misc-fixes as well? I 
currently can't even build test them.


Need to send a v2 for that. One minor change in the test just to be 
consistent with using u32. Thanks.


Sent v2. If you could push that when you get a chance. Thanks.

https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/130075/





Thanks,
Christian.





Thanks,
Christian.




---
  drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c | 16 
  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c

index fee6bec757d1..edacc1adb28f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ static inline u64 get_size(int order, u64 
chunk_size)

    static void drm_test_buddy_alloc_contiguous(struct kunit *test)
  {
-    u64 mm_size, ps = SZ_4K, i, n_pages, total;
+    u32 mm_size, ps = SZ_4K, i, n_pages, total;
  struct drm_buddy_block *block;
  struct drm_buddy mm;
  LIST_HEAD(left);
@@ -56,30 +56,30 @@ static void 
drm_test_buddy_alloc_contiguous(struct kunit *test)

  KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE_MSG(test,
 drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, mm_size,
    ps, ps, list, 0),
-   "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%d\n",
+   "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%u\n",
 ps);
  } while (++i < n_pages);
    KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, 
mm_size,

 3 * ps, ps, &allocated,
DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
-   "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%d\n", 3 * ps);
+   "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%u\n", 3 * ps);
    drm_buddy_free_list(&mm, &middle);
  KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, 
mm_size,

 3 * ps, ps, &allocated,
DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
-   "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%llu\n", 3 * ps);
+   "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%u\n", 3 * ps);
  KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, 
mm_size,

 2 * ps, ps, &allocated,
DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
-   "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%llu\n", 2 * ps);
+   "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%u\n", 2 * ps);
    drm_buddy_free_list(&mm, &right);
  KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, 
mm_size,

 3 * ps, ps, &allocated,
DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
-   "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%llu\n", 3 * ps);
+   "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%u\n", 3 * ps);
  /*
   * At this point we should have enough contiguous space for 
2 blocks,
   * however they are never buddies (since we freed middle and 
right) so
@@ -88,13 +88,13 @@ static void 
drm_test_buddy_alloc_contiguous(struct kunit *test)
  KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, 
mm_size,

  2 * ps, ps, &allocated,
DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
-   "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%d\n", 2 * ps);
+   "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%u\n", 2 * ps);
    drm_buddy_free_list(&mm, &left);
  KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, 
mm_size,

  3 * ps, ps, &allocated,
DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
-   "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%d\n", 3 * ps);
+   "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%u\n", 3 * ps);
    total = 0;
  list_for_each_entry(block, &allocated, link)






Re: [PATCH 1/6] drm/tests/drm_buddy: fix 32b build

2024-02-19 Thread Matthew Auld

On 19/02/2024 10:30, Christian König wrote:

Am 19.02.24 um 11:28 schrieb Matthew Auld:

On 19/02/2024 09:53, Christian König wrote:

Am 19.02.24 um 10:42 schrieb Matthew Auld:

On 15/02/2024 17:44, Matthew Auld wrote:

Doesn't seem to compile on 32b, presumably due to u64 mod/division.
Simplest is to just switch over to u32 here. Also make print modifiers
consistent with that.

Fixes: a64056bb5a32 ("drm/tests/drm_buddy: add alloc_contiguous test")
Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven 
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld 
Cc: Arunpravin Paneer Selvam 
Cc: Christian König 
Cc: Maxime Ripard 


Any chance someone can push just this single patch here, since it 
fixes 32b build? It already has an r-b from Arun.


Already working on this. Just give me a few more minutes.


Thanks.


No, problem. I would have pushed this earlier, but my build server 
doesn't want to work any more. Looks like the SSD has passed its 
warranty :(


Should I push the other three patches to drm-misc-fixes as well? I 
currently can't even build test them.


Need to send a v2 for that. One minor change in the test just to be 
consistent with using u32. Thanks.




Thanks,
Christian.





Thanks,
Christian.




---
  drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c | 16 
  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c

index fee6bec757d1..edacc1adb28f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ static inline u64 get_size(int order, u64 
chunk_size)

    static void drm_test_buddy_alloc_contiguous(struct kunit *test)
  {
-    u64 mm_size, ps = SZ_4K, i, n_pages, total;
+    u32 mm_size, ps = SZ_4K, i, n_pages, total;
  struct drm_buddy_block *block;
  struct drm_buddy mm;
  LIST_HEAD(left);
@@ -56,30 +56,30 @@ static void 
drm_test_buddy_alloc_contiguous(struct kunit *test)

  KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE_MSG(test,
 drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, mm_size,
    ps, ps, list, 0),
-   "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%d\n",
+   "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%u\n",
 ps);
  } while (++i < n_pages);
    KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, 
mm_size,

 3 * ps, ps, &allocated,
DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
-   "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%d\n", 3 * ps);
+   "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%u\n", 3 * ps);
    drm_buddy_free_list(&mm, &middle);
  KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, 
mm_size,

 3 * ps, ps, &allocated,
DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
-   "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%llu\n", 3 * ps);
+   "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%u\n", 3 * ps);
  KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, 
mm_size,

 2 * ps, ps, &allocated,
DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
-   "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%llu\n", 2 * ps);
+   "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%u\n", 2 * ps);
    drm_buddy_free_list(&mm, &right);
  KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, 
mm_size,

 3 * ps, ps, &allocated,
DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
-   "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%llu\n", 3 * ps);
+   "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%u\n", 3 * ps);
  /*
   * At this point we should have enough contiguous space for 2 
blocks,
   * however they are never buddies (since we freed middle and 
right) so
@@ -88,13 +88,13 @@ static void 
drm_test_buddy_alloc_contiguous(struct kunit *test)
  KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, 
mm_size,

  2 * ps, ps, &allocated,
DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
-   "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%d\n", 2 * ps);
+   "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%u\n", 2 * ps);
    drm_buddy_free_list(&mm, &left);
  KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, 
mm_size,

  3 * ps, ps, &allocated,
DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
-   "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%d\n", 3 * ps);
+   "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%u\n", 3 * ps);
    total = 0;
  list_for_each_entry(block, &allocated, link)






Re: [PATCH 1/6] drm/tests/drm_buddy: fix 32b build

2024-02-19 Thread Christian König

Am 19.02.24 um 11:28 schrieb Matthew Auld:

On 19/02/2024 09:53, Christian König wrote:

Am 19.02.24 um 10:42 schrieb Matthew Auld:

On 15/02/2024 17:44, Matthew Auld wrote:

Doesn't seem to compile on 32b, presumably due to u64 mod/division.
Simplest is to just switch over to u32 here. Also make print modifiers
consistent with that.

Fixes: a64056bb5a32 ("drm/tests/drm_buddy: add alloc_contiguous test")
Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven 
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld 
Cc: Arunpravin Paneer Selvam 
Cc: Christian König 
Cc: Maxime Ripard 


Any chance someone can push just this single patch here, since it 
fixes 32b build? It already has an r-b from Arun.


Already working on this. Just give me a few more minutes.


Thanks.


No, problem. I would have pushed this earlier, but my build server 
doesn't want to work any more. Looks like the SSD has passed its warranty :(


Should I push the other three patches to drm-misc-fixes as well? I 
currently can't even build test them.


Thanks,
Christian.





Thanks,
Christian.




---
  drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c | 16 
  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c

index fee6bec757d1..edacc1adb28f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ static inline u64 get_size(int order, u64 
chunk_size)

    static void drm_test_buddy_alloc_contiguous(struct kunit *test)
  {
-    u64 mm_size, ps = SZ_4K, i, n_pages, total;
+    u32 mm_size, ps = SZ_4K, i, n_pages, total;
  struct drm_buddy_block *block;
  struct drm_buddy mm;
  LIST_HEAD(left);
@@ -56,30 +56,30 @@ static void 
drm_test_buddy_alloc_contiguous(struct kunit *test)

  KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE_MSG(test,
 drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, mm_size,
    ps, ps, list, 0),
-   "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%d\n",
+   "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%u\n",
 ps);
  } while (++i < n_pages);
    KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, 
mm_size,

 3 * ps, ps, &allocated,
DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
-   "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%d\n", 3 * ps);
+   "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%u\n", 3 * ps);
    drm_buddy_free_list(&mm, &middle);
  KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, 
mm_size,

 3 * ps, ps, &allocated,
DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
-   "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%llu\n", 3 * ps);
+   "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%u\n", 3 * ps);
  KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, 
mm_size,

 2 * ps, ps, &allocated,
DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
-   "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%llu\n", 2 * ps);
+   "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%u\n", 2 * ps);
    drm_buddy_free_list(&mm, &right);
  KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, 
mm_size,

 3 * ps, ps, &allocated,
DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
-   "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%llu\n", 3 * ps);
+   "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%u\n", 3 * ps);
  /*
   * At this point we should have enough contiguous space for 2 
blocks,
   * however they are never buddies (since we freed middle and 
right) so
@@ -88,13 +88,13 @@ static void 
drm_test_buddy_alloc_contiguous(struct kunit *test)
  KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, 
mm_size,

  2 * ps, ps, &allocated,
DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
-   "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%d\n", 2 * ps);
+   "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%u\n", 2 * ps);
    drm_buddy_free_list(&mm, &left);
  KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, 
mm_size,

  3 * ps, ps, &allocated,
DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
-   "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%d\n", 3 * ps);
+   "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%u\n", 3 * ps);
    total = 0;
  list_for_each_entry(block, &allocated, link)






Re: [PATCH 1/6] drm/tests/drm_buddy: fix 32b build

2024-02-19 Thread Matthew Auld

On 19/02/2024 09:53, Christian König wrote:

Am 19.02.24 um 10:42 schrieb Matthew Auld:

On 15/02/2024 17:44, Matthew Auld wrote:

Doesn't seem to compile on 32b, presumably due to u64 mod/division.
Simplest is to just switch over to u32 here. Also make print modifiers
consistent with that.

Fixes: a64056bb5a32 ("drm/tests/drm_buddy: add alloc_contiguous test")
Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven 
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld 
Cc: Arunpravin Paneer Selvam 
Cc: Christian König 
Cc: Maxime Ripard 


Any chance someone can push just this single patch here, since it 
fixes 32b build? It already has an r-b from Arun.


Already working on this. Just give me a few more minutes.


Thanks.



Thanks,
Christian.




---
  drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c | 16 
  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c

index fee6bec757d1..edacc1adb28f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ static inline u64 get_size(int order, u64 chunk_size)
    static void drm_test_buddy_alloc_contiguous(struct kunit *test)
  {
-    u64 mm_size, ps = SZ_4K, i, n_pages, total;
+    u32 mm_size, ps = SZ_4K, i, n_pages, total;
  struct drm_buddy_block *block;
  struct drm_buddy mm;
  LIST_HEAD(left);
@@ -56,30 +56,30 @@ static void 
drm_test_buddy_alloc_contiguous(struct kunit *test)

  KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE_MSG(test,
 drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, mm_size,
    ps, ps, list, 0),
-   "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%d\n",
+   "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%u\n",
 ps);
  } while (++i < n_pages);
    KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, 
mm_size,

 3 * ps, ps, &allocated,
DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
-   "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%d\n", 3 * ps);
+   "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%u\n", 3 * ps);
    drm_buddy_free_list(&mm, &middle);
  KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, 
mm_size,

 3 * ps, ps, &allocated,
DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
-   "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%llu\n", 3 * ps);
+   "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%u\n", 3 * ps);
  KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, 
mm_size,

 2 * ps, ps, &allocated,
DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
-   "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%llu\n", 2 * ps);
+   "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%u\n", 2 * ps);
    drm_buddy_free_list(&mm, &right);
  KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, 
mm_size,

 3 * ps, ps, &allocated,
DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
-   "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%llu\n", 3 * ps);
+   "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%u\n", 3 * ps);
  /*
   * At this point we should have enough contiguous space for 2 
blocks,
   * however they are never buddies (since we freed middle and 
right) so
@@ -88,13 +88,13 @@ static void 
drm_test_buddy_alloc_contiguous(struct kunit *test)
  KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, 
mm_size,

  2 * ps, ps, &allocated,
DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
-   "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%d\n", 2 * ps);
+   "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%u\n", 2 * ps);
    drm_buddy_free_list(&mm, &left);
  KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, 
mm_size,

  3 * ps, ps, &allocated,
DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
-   "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%d\n", 3 * ps);
+   "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%u\n", 3 * ps);
    total = 0;
  list_for_each_entry(block, &allocated, link)




Re: [PATCH 1/6] drm/tests/drm_buddy: fix 32b build

2024-02-19 Thread Christian König

Am 19.02.24 um 10:42 schrieb Matthew Auld:

On 15/02/2024 17:44, Matthew Auld wrote:

Doesn't seem to compile on 32b, presumably due to u64 mod/division.
Simplest is to just switch over to u32 here. Also make print modifiers
consistent with that.

Fixes: a64056bb5a32 ("drm/tests/drm_buddy: add alloc_contiguous test")
Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven 
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld 
Cc: Arunpravin Paneer Selvam 
Cc: Christian König 
Cc: Maxime Ripard 


Any chance someone can push just this single patch here, since it 
fixes 32b build? It already has an r-b from Arun.


Already working on this. Just give me a few more minutes.

Thanks,
Christian.




---
  drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c | 16 
  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c

index fee6bec757d1..edacc1adb28f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ static inline u64 get_size(int order, u64 chunk_size)
    static void drm_test_buddy_alloc_contiguous(struct kunit *test)
  {
-    u64 mm_size, ps = SZ_4K, i, n_pages, total;
+    u32 mm_size, ps = SZ_4K, i, n_pages, total;
  struct drm_buddy_block *block;
  struct drm_buddy mm;
  LIST_HEAD(left);
@@ -56,30 +56,30 @@ static void 
drm_test_buddy_alloc_contiguous(struct kunit *test)

  KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE_MSG(test,
 drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, mm_size,
    ps, ps, list, 0),
-   "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%d\n",
+   "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%u\n",
 ps);
  } while (++i < n_pages);
    KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, 
mm_size,

 3 * ps, ps, &allocated,
DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
-   "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%d\n", 3 * ps);
+   "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%u\n", 3 * ps);
    drm_buddy_free_list(&mm, &middle);
  KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, 
mm_size,

 3 * ps, ps, &allocated,
DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
-   "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%llu\n", 3 * ps);
+   "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%u\n", 3 * ps);
  KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, 
mm_size,

 2 * ps, ps, &allocated,
DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
-   "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%llu\n", 2 * ps);
+   "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%u\n", 2 * ps);
    drm_buddy_free_list(&mm, &right);
  KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, 
mm_size,

 3 * ps, ps, &allocated,
DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
-   "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%llu\n", 3 * ps);
+   "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%u\n", 3 * ps);
  /*
   * At this point we should have enough contiguous space for 2 
blocks,
   * however they are never buddies (since we freed middle and 
right) so
@@ -88,13 +88,13 @@ static void 
drm_test_buddy_alloc_contiguous(struct kunit *test)
  KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, 
mm_size,

  2 * ps, ps, &allocated,
DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
-   "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%d\n", 2 * ps);
+   "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%u\n", 2 * ps);
    drm_buddy_free_list(&mm, &left);
  KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, 
mm_size,

  3 * ps, ps, &allocated,
DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
-   "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%d\n", 3 * ps);
+   "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%u\n", 3 * ps);
    total = 0;
  list_for_each_entry(block, &allocated, link)




Re: [PATCH 1/6] drm/tests/drm_buddy: fix 32b build

2024-02-19 Thread Matthew Auld

On 15/02/2024 17:44, Matthew Auld wrote:

Doesn't seem to compile on 32b, presumably due to u64 mod/division.
Simplest is to just switch over to u32 here. Also make print modifiers
consistent with that.

Fixes: a64056bb5a32 ("drm/tests/drm_buddy: add alloc_contiguous test")
Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven 
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld 
Cc: Arunpravin Paneer Selvam 
Cc: Christian König 
Cc: Maxime Ripard 


Any chance someone can push just this single patch here, since it fixes 
32b build? It already has an r-b from Arun.



---
  drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c | 16 
  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c
index fee6bec757d1..edacc1adb28f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ static inline u64 get_size(int order, u64 chunk_size)
  
  static void drm_test_buddy_alloc_contiguous(struct kunit *test)

  {
-   u64 mm_size, ps = SZ_4K, i, n_pages, total;
+   u32 mm_size, ps = SZ_4K, i, n_pages, total;
struct drm_buddy_block *block;
struct drm_buddy mm;
LIST_HEAD(left);
@@ -56,30 +56,30 @@ static void drm_test_buddy_alloc_contiguous(struct kunit 
*test)
KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE_MSG(test,
   drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, mm_size,
  ps, ps, list, 0),
-  "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%d\n",
+  "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%u\n",
   ps);
} while (++i < n_pages);
  
  	KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, mm_size,

   3 * ps, ps, 
&allocated,
   
DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
-  "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%d\n", 3 * ps);
+  "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%u\n", 3 * ps);
  
  	drm_buddy_free_list(&mm, &middle);

KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, mm_size,
   3 * ps, ps, 
&allocated,
   
DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
-  "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%llu\n", 3 * ps);
+  "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%u\n", 3 * ps);
KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, mm_size,
   2 * ps, ps, 
&allocated,
   
DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
-  "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%llu\n", 2 * ps);
+  "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%u\n", 2 * ps);
  
  	drm_buddy_free_list(&mm, &right);

KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, mm_size,
   3 * ps, ps, 
&allocated,
   
DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
-  "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%llu\n", 3 * ps);
+  "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%u\n", 3 * ps);
/*
 * At this point we should have enough contiguous space for 2 blocks,
 * however they are never buddies (since we freed middle and right) so
@@ -88,13 +88,13 @@ static void drm_test_buddy_alloc_contiguous(struct kunit 
*test)
KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, mm_size,
2 * ps, ps, 
&allocated,

DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
-  "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%d\n", 2 * ps);
+  "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%u\n", 2 * ps);
  
  	drm_buddy_free_list(&mm, &left);

KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, mm_size,
3 * ps, ps, 
&allocated,

DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
-  "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%d\n", 3 * ps);
+  "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%u\n", 3 * ps);
  
  	total = 0;

list_for_each_entry(block, &allocated, link)


Re: [PATCH 1/6] drm/tests/drm_buddy: fix 32b build

2024-02-16 Thread Arunpravin Paneer Selvam

Reviewed-by: Arunpravin Paneer Selvam 



On 2/15/2024 11:14 PM, Matthew Auld wrote:

Doesn't seem to compile on 32b, presumably due to u64 mod/division.
Simplest is to just switch over to u32 here. Also make print modifiers
consistent with that.

Fixes: a64056bb5a32 ("drm/tests/drm_buddy: add alloc_contiguous test")
Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld
Cc: Arunpravin Paneer Selvam
Cc: Christian König
Cc: Maxime Ripard
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c | 16 
  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c
index fee6bec757d1..edacc1adb28f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ static inline u64 get_size(int order, u64 chunk_size)
  
  static void drm_test_buddy_alloc_contiguous(struct kunit *test)

  {
-   u64 mm_size, ps = SZ_4K, i, n_pages, total;
+   u32 mm_size, ps = SZ_4K, i, n_pages, total;
struct drm_buddy_block *block;
struct drm_buddy mm;
LIST_HEAD(left);
@@ -56,30 +56,30 @@ static void drm_test_buddy_alloc_contiguous(struct kunit 
*test)
KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE_MSG(test,
   drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, mm_size,
  ps, ps, list, 0),
-  "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%d\n",
+  "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%u\n",
   ps);
} while (++i < n_pages);
  
  	KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, mm_size,

   3 * ps, ps, 
&allocated,
   
DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
-  "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%d\n", 3 * ps);
+  "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%u\n", 3 * ps);
  
  	drm_buddy_free_list(&mm, &middle);

KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, mm_size,
   3 * ps, ps, 
&allocated,
   
DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
-  "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%llu\n", 3 * ps);
+  "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%u\n", 3 * ps);
KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, mm_size,
   2 * ps, ps, 
&allocated,
   
DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
-  "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%llu\n", 2 * ps);
+  "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%u\n", 2 * ps);
  
  	drm_buddy_free_list(&mm, &right);

KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, mm_size,
   3 * ps, ps, 
&allocated,
   
DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
-  "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%llu\n", 3 * ps);
+  "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%u\n", 3 * ps);
/*
 * At this point we should have enough contiguous space for 2 blocks,
 * however they are never buddies (since we freed middle and right) so
@@ -88,13 +88,13 @@ static void drm_test_buddy_alloc_contiguous(struct kunit 
*test)
KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, mm_size,
2 * ps, ps, 
&allocated,

DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
-  "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%d\n", 2 * ps);
+  "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%u\n", 2 * ps);
  
  	drm_buddy_free_list(&mm, &left);

KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, mm_size,
3 * ps, ps, 
&allocated,

DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
-  "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%d\n", 3 * ps);
+  "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%u\n", 3 * ps);
  
  	total = 0;

list_for_each_entry(block, &allocated, link)


[PATCH 1/6] drm/tests/drm_buddy: fix 32b build

2024-02-15 Thread Matthew Auld
Doesn't seem to compile on 32b, presumably due to u64 mod/division.
Simplest is to just switch over to u32 here. Also make print modifiers
consistent with that.

Fixes: a64056bb5a32 ("drm/tests/drm_buddy: add alloc_contiguous test")
Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven 
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld 
Cc: Arunpravin Paneer Selvam 
Cc: Christian König 
Cc: Maxime Ripard 
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c | 16 
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c
index fee6bec757d1..edacc1adb28f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ static inline u64 get_size(int order, u64 chunk_size)
 
 static void drm_test_buddy_alloc_contiguous(struct kunit *test)
 {
-   u64 mm_size, ps = SZ_4K, i, n_pages, total;
+   u32 mm_size, ps = SZ_4K, i, n_pages, total;
struct drm_buddy_block *block;
struct drm_buddy mm;
LIST_HEAD(left);
@@ -56,30 +56,30 @@ static void drm_test_buddy_alloc_contiguous(struct kunit 
*test)
KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE_MSG(test,
   drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, mm_size,
  ps, ps, list, 0),
-  "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%d\n",
+  "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%u\n",
   ps);
} while (++i < n_pages);
 
KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, mm_size,
   3 * ps, ps, 
&allocated,
   
DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
-  "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%d\n", 3 * ps);
+  "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%u\n", 3 * ps);
 
drm_buddy_free_list(&mm, &middle);
KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, mm_size,
   3 * ps, ps, 
&allocated,
   
DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
-  "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%llu\n", 3 * ps);
+  "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%u\n", 3 * ps);
KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, mm_size,
   2 * ps, ps, 
&allocated,
   
DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
-  "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%llu\n", 2 * ps);
+  "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%u\n", 2 * ps);
 
drm_buddy_free_list(&mm, &right);
KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, mm_size,
   3 * ps, ps, 
&allocated,
   
DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
-  "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%llu\n", 3 * ps);
+  "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%u\n", 3 * ps);
/*
 * At this point we should have enough contiguous space for 2 blocks,
 * however they are never buddies (since we freed middle and right) so
@@ -88,13 +88,13 @@ static void drm_test_buddy_alloc_contiguous(struct kunit 
*test)
KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, mm_size,
2 * ps, ps, 
&allocated,

DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
-  "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%d\n", 2 * ps);
+  "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%u\n", 2 * ps);
 
drm_buddy_free_list(&mm, &left);
KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, mm_size,
3 * ps, ps, 
&allocated,

DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
-  "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%d\n", 3 * ps);
+  "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%u\n", 3 * ps);
 
total = 0;
list_for_each_entry(block, &allocated, link)
-- 
2.43.0