[PATCH 2/3] drm/i915: Don't try to tear down the stolen drm_mm if it's not there
Every other place properly checks whether we've managed to set up the stolen allocator at boot-up properly, with the exception of the cleanup code. Which results in an ugly *ERROR* Memory manager not clean. Delaying takedown at module unload time since the drm_mm isn't initialized at all. v2: While at it check whether the stolen drm_mm is initialized instead of the more obscure stolen_base == 0 check. Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65953 Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c | 9 ++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c index 8e02344..32e63a8 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c @@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ int i915_gem_stolen_setup_compression(struct drm_device *dev, int size) { struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; - if (dev_priv->mm.stolen_base == 0) + if (drm_mm_initialized(_priv->mm.stolen)) return -ENODEV; if (size < dev_priv->fbc.size) @@ -179,6 +179,9 @@ void i915_gem_cleanup_stolen(struct drm_device *dev) { struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; + if (drm_mm_initialized(_priv->mm.stolen)) + return; + i915_gem_stolen_cleanup_compression(dev); drm_mm_takedown(_priv->mm.stolen); } @@ -300,7 +303,7 @@ i915_gem_object_create_stolen(struct drm_device *dev, u32 size) struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj; struct drm_mm_node *stolen; - if (dev_priv->mm.stolen_base == 0) + if (drm_mm_initialized(_priv->mm.stolen)) return NULL; DRM_DEBUG_KMS("creating stolen object: size=%x\n", size); @@ -331,7 +334,7 @@ i915_gem_object_create_stolen_for_preallocated(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj; struct drm_mm_node *stolen; - if (dev_priv->mm.stolen_base == 0) + if (drm_mm_initialized(_priv->mm.stolen)) return NULL; DRM_DEBUG_KMS("creating preallocated stolen object: stolen_offset=%x, gtt_offset=%x, size=%x\n", -- 1.8.3.1
[PATCH 2/3] drm/i915: Don't try to tear down the stolen drm_mm if it's not there
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 10:01:03PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Every other place properly checks whether we've managed to set > up the stolen allocator at boot-up properly, with the exception > of the cleanup code. Which results in an ugly > > *ERROR* Memory manager not clean. Delaying takedown > > at module unload time since the drm_mm isn't initialized at all. > > v2: While at it check whether the stolen drm_mm is initialized instead > of the more obscure stolen_base == 0 check. > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65953 > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c | 9 ++--- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c > index 8e02344..32e63a8 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c > @@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ int i915_gem_stolen_setup_compression(struct drm_device > *dev, int size) > { > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; > > - if (dev_priv->mm.stolen_base == 0) > + if (drm_mm_initialized(_priv->mm.stolen)) Logically reversed? Which is more obscure now :-p -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
[PATCH 2/3] drm/i915: Don't try to tear down the stolen drm_mm if it's not there
Every other place properly checks whether we've managed to set up the stolen allocator at boot-up properly, with the exception of the cleanup code. Which results in an ugly *ERROR* Memory manager not clean. Delaying takedown at module unload time since the drm_mm isn't initialized at all. v2: While at it check whether the stolen drm_mm is initialized instead of the more obscure stolen_base == 0 check. Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65953 Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c | 9 ++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c index 8e02344..32e63a8 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c @@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ int i915_gem_stolen_setup_compression(struct drm_device *dev, int size) { struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev-dev_private; - if (dev_priv-mm.stolen_base == 0) + if (drm_mm_initialized(dev_priv-mm.stolen)) return -ENODEV; if (size dev_priv-fbc.size) @@ -179,6 +179,9 @@ void i915_gem_cleanup_stolen(struct drm_device *dev) { struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev-dev_private; + if (drm_mm_initialized(dev_priv-mm.stolen)) + return; + i915_gem_stolen_cleanup_compression(dev); drm_mm_takedown(dev_priv-mm.stolen); } @@ -300,7 +303,7 @@ i915_gem_object_create_stolen(struct drm_device *dev, u32 size) struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj; struct drm_mm_node *stolen; - if (dev_priv-mm.stolen_base == 0) + if (drm_mm_initialized(dev_priv-mm.stolen)) return NULL; DRM_DEBUG_KMS(creating stolen object: size=%x\n, size); @@ -331,7 +334,7 @@ i915_gem_object_create_stolen_for_preallocated(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj; struct drm_mm_node *stolen; - if (dev_priv-mm.stolen_base == 0) + if (drm_mm_initialized(dev_priv-mm.stolen)) return NULL; DRM_DEBUG_KMS(creating preallocated stolen object: stolen_offset=%x, gtt_offset=%x, size=%x\n, -- 1.8.3.1 ___ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915: Don't try to tear down the stolen drm_mm if it's not there
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 10:01:03PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: Every other place properly checks whether we've managed to set up the stolen allocator at boot-up properly, with the exception of the cleanup code. Which results in an ugly *ERROR* Memory manager not clean. Delaying takedown at module unload time since the drm_mm isn't initialized at all. v2: While at it check whether the stolen drm_mm is initialized instead of the more obscure stolen_base == 0 check. Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65953 Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c | 9 ++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c index 8e02344..32e63a8 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c @@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ int i915_gem_stolen_setup_compression(struct drm_device *dev, int size) { struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev-dev_private; - if (dev_priv-mm.stolen_base == 0) + if (drm_mm_initialized(dev_priv-mm.stolen)) Logically reversed? Which is more obscure now :-p -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre ___ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel