Re: [PATCH resend 4/5] video: fbdev: ssd1307fb: Optimize screen updates

2021-07-20 Thread Sam Ravnborg
On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 11:16:27AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Sam,
> 
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 9:56 AM Geert Uytterhoeven  
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 9:21 PM Sam Ravnborg  wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 04:58:03PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > > Currently, each screen update triggers an I2C transfer of all screen
> > > > data, up to 1 KiB of data for a 128x64 display, which takes at least 20
> > > > ms in Fast mode.
> > > >
> > > > Reduce the amount of transferred data by only updating the rectangle
> > > > that changed.  Remove the call to ssd1307fb_set_address_range() during
> > > > initialization, as ssd1307fb_update_rect() now takes care of that.
> > > >
> > > > Note that for now the optimized operation is only used for fillrect,
> > > > copyarea, and imageblit, which are used by fbcon.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven 
> >
> > > > --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c
> > > > @@ -184,16 +184,18 @@ static int ssd1307fb_set_address_range(struct 
> > > > ssd1307fb_par *par, u8 col_start,
> > > >   return ssd1307fb_write_cmd(par->client, page_end);
> > > >  }
> > > >
> > > > -static int ssd1307fb_update_display(struct ssd1307fb_par *par)
> > > > +static int ssd1307fb_update_rect(struct ssd1307fb_par *par, unsigned 
> > > > int x,
> > > > +  unsigned int y, unsigned int width,
> > > > +  unsigned int height)
> > > >  {
> > > >   struct ssd1307fb_array *array;
> > > >   u8 *vmem = par->info->screen_buffer;
> > > >   unsigned int line_length = par->info->fix.line_length;
> > > > - unsigned int pages = DIV_ROUND_UP(par->height, 8);
> > > > + unsigned int pages = DIV_ROUND_UP(height + y % 8, 8);
> > >
> > > Add () like this - at least it helps me:
> > > > + unsigned int pages = DIV_ROUND_UP((height + y) % 8, 8);
> >
> > Thanks, that's actually a genuine bug.
> 
> No it's not "(height + y) % 8" is wrong.
> 
> Better if I reorder the operands like below?
> 
> unsigned int pages = DIV_ROUND_UP(y % 8 + height, 8);

Yep, then I would not be fooled so easy.

Sam


Re: [PATCH resend 4/5] video: fbdev: ssd1307fb: Optimize screen updates

2021-07-20 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
Hi Sam,

On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 9:56 AM Geert Uytterhoeven  wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 9:21 PM Sam Ravnborg  wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 04:58:03PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > Currently, each screen update triggers an I2C transfer of all screen
> > > data, up to 1 KiB of data for a 128x64 display, which takes at least 20
> > > ms in Fast mode.
> > >
> > > Reduce the amount of transferred data by only updating the rectangle
> > > that changed.  Remove the call to ssd1307fb_set_address_range() during
> > > initialization, as ssd1307fb_update_rect() now takes care of that.
> > >
> > > Note that for now the optimized operation is only used for fillrect,
> > > copyarea, and imageblit, which are used by fbcon.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven 
>
> > > --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c
> > > @@ -184,16 +184,18 @@ static int ssd1307fb_set_address_range(struct 
> > > ssd1307fb_par *par, u8 col_start,
> > >   return ssd1307fb_write_cmd(par->client, page_end);
> > >  }
> > >
> > > -static int ssd1307fb_update_display(struct ssd1307fb_par *par)
> > > +static int ssd1307fb_update_rect(struct ssd1307fb_par *par, unsigned int 
> > > x,
> > > +  unsigned int y, unsigned int width,
> > > +  unsigned int height)
> > >  {
> > >   struct ssd1307fb_array *array;
> > >   u8 *vmem = par->info->screen_buffer;
> > >   unsigned int line_length = par->info->fix.line_length;
> > > - unsigned int pages = DIV_ROUND_UP(par->height, 8);
> > > + unsigned int pages = DIV_ROUND_UP(height + y % 8, 8);
> >
> > Add () like this - at least it helps me:
> > > + unsigned int pages = DIV_ROUND_UP((height + y) % 8, 8);
>
> Thanks, that's actually a genuine bug.

No it's not "(height + y) % 8" is wrong.

Better if I reorder the operands like below?

unsigned int pages = DIV_ROUND_UP(y % 8 + height, 8);

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds


Re: [PATCH resend 4/5] video: fbdev: ssd1307fb: Optimize screen updates

2021-07-20 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
Hi Sam,

On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 9:21 PM Sam Ravnborg  wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 04:58:03PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > Currently, each screen update triggers an I2C transfer of all screen
> > data, up to 1 KiB of data for a 128x64 display, which takes at least 20
> > ms in Fast mode.
> >
> > Reduce the amount of transferred data by only updating the rectangle
> > that changed.  Remove the call to ssd1307fb_set_address_range() during
> > initialization, as ssd1307fb_update_rect() now takes care of that.
> >
> > Note that for now the optimized operation is only used for fillrect,
> > copyarea, and imageblit, which are used by fbcon.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven 

> > --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c
> > +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c
> > @@ -184,16 +184,18 @@ static int ssd1307fb_set_address_range(struct 
> > ssd1307fb_par *par, u8 col_start,
> >   return ssd1307fb_write_cmd(par->client, page_end);
> >  }
> >
> > -static int ssd1307fb_update_display(struct ssd1307fb_par *par)
> > +static int ssd1307fb_update_rect(struct ssd1307fb_par *par, unsigned int x,
> > +  unsigned int y, unsigned int width,
> > +  unsigned int height)
> >  {
> >   struct ssd1307fb_array *array;
> >   u8 *vmem = par->info->screen_buffer;
> >   unsigned int line_length = par->info->fix.line_length;
> > - unsigned int pages = DIV_ROUND_UP(par->height, 8);
> > + unsigned int pages = DIV_ROUND_UP(height + y % 8, 8);
>
> Add () like this - at least it helps me:
> > + unsigned int pages = DIV_ROUND_UP((height + y) % 8, 8);

Thanks, that's actually a genuine bug.

> > @@ -226,13 +228,18 @@ static int ssd1307fb_update_display(struct 
> > ssd1307fb_par *par)
> >*  (5) A4 B4 C4 D4 E4 F4 G4 H4
> >*/
> >
> > - for (i = 0; i < pages; i++) {
> > + ret = ssd1307fb_set_address_range(par, par->col_offset + x, width,
> > +   par->page_offset + y / 8, pages);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + goto out_free;
> > +
> > + for (i = y / 8; i < y / 8 + pages; i++) {
> >   int m = 8;
> >
> >   /* Last page may be partial */
> > - if (i + 1 == pages && par->height % 8)
> > + if (8 * (i + 1) > par->height)
> >   m = par->height % 8;
> As before, this looks wrong to me.

Let's sort that out in the other thread...

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds


Re: [PATCH resend 4/5] video: fbdev: ssd1307fb: Optimize screen updates

2021-07-19 Thread Sam Ravnborg
Hi Geert,

On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 04:58:03PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Currently, each screen update triggers an I2C transfer of all screen
> data, up to 1 KiB of data for a 128x64 display, which takes at least 20
> ms in Fast mode.
> 
> Reduce the amount of transferred data by only updating the rectangle
> that changed.  Remove the call to ssd1307fb_set_address_range() during
> initialization, as ssd1307fb_update_rect() now takes care of that.
> 
> Note that for now the optimized operation is only used for fillrect,
> copyarea, and imageblit, which are used by fbcon.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven 
> ---
>  drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c | 43 -
>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c
> index cfa27ea0feab4f01..8e3d4be74723b9bf 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c
> @@ -184,16 +184,18 @@ static int ssd1307fb_set_address_range(struct 
> ssd1307fb_par *par, u8 col_start,
>   return ssd1307fb_write_cmd(par->client, page_end);
>  }
>  
> -static int ssd1307fb_update_display(struct ssd1307fb_par *par)
> +static int ssd1307fb_update_rect(struct ssd1307fb_par *par, unsigned int x,
> +  unsigned int y, unsigned int width,
> +  unsigned int height)
>  {
>   struct ssd1307fb_array *array;
>   u8 *vmem = par->info->screen_buffer;
>   unsigned int line_length = par->info->fix.line_length;
> - unsigned int pages = DIV_ROUND_UP(par->height, 8);
> + unsigned int pages = DIV_ROUND_UP(height + y % 8, 8);

Add () like this - at least it helps me:
> + unsigned int pages = DIV_ROUND_UP((height + y) % 8, 8);


>   u32 array_idx = 0;
>   int ret, i, j, k;
>  
> - array = ssd1307fb_alloc_array(par->width * pages, SSD1307FB_DATA);
> + array = ssd1307fb_alloc_array(width * pages, SSD1307FB_DATA);
>   if (!array)
>   return -ENOMEM;
>  
> @@ -226,13 +228,18 @@ static int ssd1307fb_update_display(struct 
> ssd1307fb_par *par)
>*  (5) A4 B4 C4 D4 E4 F4 G4 H4
>*/
>  
> - for (i = 0; i < pages; i++) {
> + ret = ssd1307fb_set_address_range(par, par->col_offset + x, width,
> +   par->page_offset + y / 8, pages);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto out_free;
> +
> + for (i = y / 8; i < y / 8 + pages; i++) {
>   int m = 8;
>  
>   /* Last page may be partial */
> - if (i + 1 == pages && par->height % 8)
> + if (8 * (i + 1) > par->height)
>   m = par->height % 8;
As before, this looks wrong to me.

Sam

> - for (j = 0; j < par->width; j++) {
> + for (j = x; j < x + width; j++) {
>   u8 data = 0;
>  
>   for (k = 0; k < m; k++) {
> @@ -245,11 +252,17 @@ static int ssd1307fb_update_display(struct 
> ssd1307fb_par *par)
>   }
>   }
>  
> - ret = ssd1307fb_write_array(par->client, array, par->width * pages);
> + ret = ssd1307fb_write_array(par->client, array, width * pages);
> +
> +out_free:
>   kfree(array);
>   return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static int ssd1307fb_update_display(struct ssd1307fb_par *par)
> +{
> + return ssd1307fb_update_rect(par, 0, 0, par->width, par->height);
> +}
>  
>  static ssize_t ssd1307fb_write(struct fb_info *info, const char __user *buf,
>   size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
> @@ -299,21 +312,24 @@ static void ssd1307fb_fillrect(struct fb_info *info, 
> const struct fb_fillrect *r
>  {
>   struct ssd1307fb_par *par = info->par;
>   sys_fillrect(info, rect);
> - ssd1307fb_update_display(par);
> + ssd1307fb_update_rect(par, rect->dx, rect->dy, rect->width,
> +   rect->height);
>  }
>  
>  static void ssd1307fb_copyarea(struct fb_info *info, const struct 
> fb_copyarea *area)
>  {
>   struct ssd1307fb_par *par = info->par;
>   sys_copyarea(info, area);
> - ssd1307fb_update_display(par);
> + ssd1307fb_update_rect(par, area->dx, area->dy, area->width,
> +   area->height);
>  }
>  
>  static void ssd1307fb_imageblit(struct fb_info *info, const struct fb_image 
> *image)
>  {
>   struct ssd1307fb_par *par = info->par;
>   sys_imageblit(info, image);
> - ssd1307fb_update_display(par);
> + ssd1307fb_update_rect(par, image->dx, image->dy, image->width,
> +   image->height);
>  }
>  
>  static const struct fb_ops ssd1307fb_ops = {
> @@ -493,13 +509,6 @@ static int ssd1307fb_init(struct ssd1307fb_par *par)
>   if (ret < 0)
>   return ret;
>  
> - /* Set column and page range */
> - ret = ssd1307fb_set_address_range(par, par->col_offset, par->width,
> -   par->page_offset,
> - 

[PATCH resend 4/5] video: fbdev: ssd1307fb: Optimize screen updates

2021-07-14 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
Currently, each screen update triggers an I2C transfer of all screen
data, up to 1 KiB of data for a 128x64 display, which takes at least 20
ms in Fast mode.

Reduce the amount of transferred data by only updating the rectangle
that changed.  Remove the call to ssd1307fb_set_address_range() during
initialization, as ssd1307fb_update_rect() now takes care of that.

Note that for now the optimized operation is only used for fillrect,
copyarea, and imageblit, which are used by fbcon.

Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven 
---
 drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c | 43 -
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c
index cfa27ea0feab4f01..8e3d4be74723b9bf 100644
--- a/drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c
+++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c
@@ -184,16 +184,18 @@ static int ssd1307fb_set_address_range(struct 
ssd1307fb_par *par, u8 col_start,
return ssd1307fb_write_cmd(par->client, page_end);
 }
 
-static int ssd1307fb_update_display(struct ssd1307fb_par *par)
+static int ssd1307fb_update_rect(struct ssd1307fb_par *par, unsigned int x,
+unsigned int y, unsigned int width,
+unsigned int height)
 {
struct ssd1307fb_array *array;
u8 *vmem = par->info->screen_buffer;
unsigned int line_length = par->info->fix.line_length;
-   unsigned int pages = DIV_ROUND_UP(par->height, 8);
+   unsigned int pages = DIV_ROUND_UP(height + y % 8, 8);
u32 array_idx = 0;
int ret, i, j, k;
 
-   array = ssd1307fb_alloc_array(par->width * pages, SSD1307FB_DATA);
+   array = ssd1307fb_alloc_array(width * pages, SSD1307FB_DATA);
if (!array)
return -ENOMEM;
 
@@ -226,13 +228,18 @@ static int ssd1307fb_update_display(struct ssd1307fb_par 
*par)
 *  (5) A4 B4 C4 D4 E4 F4 G4 H4
 */
 
-   for (i = 0; i < pages; i++) {
+   ret = ssd1307fb_set_address_range(par, par->col_offset + x, width,
+ par->page_offset + y / 8, pages);
+   if (ret < 0)
+   goto out_free;
+
+   for (i = y / 8; i < y / 8 + pages; i++) {
int m = 8;
 
/* Last page may be partial */
-   if (i + 1 == pages && par->height % 8)
+   if (8 * (i + 1) > par->height)
m = par->height % 8;
-   for (j = 0; j < par->width; j++) {
+   for (j = x; j < x + width; j++) {
u8 data = 0;
 
for (k = 0; k < m; k++) {
@@ -245,11 +252,17 @@ static int ssd1307fb_update_display(struct ssd1307fb_par 
*par)
}
}
 
-   ret = ssd1307fb_write_array(par->client, array, par->width * pages);
+   ret = ssd1307fb_write_array(par->client, array, width * pages);
+
+out_free:
kfree(array);
return ret;
 }
 
+static int ssd1307fb_update_display(struct ssd1307fb_par *par)
+{
+   return ssd1307fb_update_rect(par, 0, 0, par->width, par->height);
+}
 
 static ssize_t ssd1307fb_write(struct fb_info *info, const char __user *buf,
size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
@@ -299,21 +312,24 @@ static void ssd1307fb_fillrect(struct fb_info *info, 
const struct fb_fillrect *r
 {
struct ssd1307fb_par *par = info->par;
sys_fillrect(info, rect);
-   ssd1307fb_update_display(par);
+   ssd1307fb_update_rect(par, rect->dx, rect->dy, rect->width,
+ rect->height);
 }
 
 static void ssd1307fb_copyarea(struct fb_info *info, const struct fb_copyarea 
*area)
 {
struct ssd1307fb_par *par = info->par;
sys_copyarea(info, area);
-   ssd1307fb_update_display(par);
+   ssd1307fb_update_rect(par, area->dx, area->dy, area->width,
+ area->height);
 }
 
 static void ssd1307fb_imageblit(struct fb_info *info, const struct fb_image 
*image)
 {
struct ssd1307fb_par *par = info->par;
sys_imageblit(info, image);
-   ssd1307fb_update_display(par);
+   ssd1307fb_update_rect(par, image->dx, image->dy, image->width,
+ image->height);
 }
 
 static const struct fb_ops ssd1307fb_ops = {
@@ -493,13 +509,6 @@ static int ssd1307fb_init(struct ssd1307fb_par *par)
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
 
-   /* Set column and page range */
-   ret = ssd1307fb_set_address_range(par, par->col_offset, par->width,
- par->page_offset,
- DIV_ROUND_UP(par->height, 8));
-   if (ret < 0)
-   return ret;
-
/* Clear the screen */
ret = ssd1307fb_update_display(par);
if (ret < 0)
-- 
2.25.1