Re: [PATCH v2] drm/amdgpu: register a dirty framebuffer callback for fbcon
On 8/23/23 16:51, Alex Deucher wrote:
@Mahfooz, Hamza
can you respin with the NULL check?
sure.
Alex
On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 10:25 AM Christian König
wrote:
Am 16.08.23 um 15:41 schrieb Hamza Mahfooz:
On 8/16/23 01:55, Christian König wrote:
Am 15.08.23 um 19:26 schrieb Hamza Mahfooz:
fbcon requires that we implement &drm_framebuffer_funcs.dirty.
Otherwise, the framebuffer might take a while to flush (which would
manifest as noticeable lag). However, we can't enable this callback for
non-fbcon cases since it might cause too many atomic commits to be made
at once. So, implement amdgpu_dirtyfb() and only enable it for fbcon
framebuffers on devices that support atomic KMS.
Cc: Aurabindo Pillai
Cc: Mario Limonciello
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/2519
Signed-off-by: Hamza Mahfooz
---
v2: update variable names
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_display.c | 26
-
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_display.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_display.c
index d20dd3f852fc..d3b59f99cb7c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_display.c
@@ -38,6 +38,8 @@
#include
#include
#include
+#include
+#include
#include
#include
#include
@@ -532,11 +534,29 @@ bool amdgpu_display_ddc_probe(struct
amdgpu_connector *amdgpu_connector,
return true;
}
+static int amdgpu_dirtyfb(struct drm_framebuffer *fb, struct
drm_file *file,
+ unsigned int flags, unsigned int color,
+ struct drm_clip_rect *clips, unsigned int num_clips)
+{
+
+if (strcmp(fb->comm, "[fbcon]"))
+return -ENOSYS;
Once more to the v2 of this patch: Tests like those are a pretty big
NO-GO for upstreaming.
On closer inspection it is actually sufficient to check if `file` is
NULL here (since it means that the request isn't from userspace). So, do
you think that would be palatable for upstream?
That's certainly better than doing a string compare, but I'm not sure if
that's sufficient.
In general drivers shouldn't have any special handling for fdcon.
You should probably have Thomas Zimmermann take a
look at this.
Regards,
Christian.
Regards,
Christian.
+
+return drm_atomic_helper_dirtyfb(fb, file, flags, color, clips,
+ num_clips);
+}
+
static const struct drm_framebuffer_funcs amdgpu_fb_funcs = {
.destroy = drm_gem_fb_destroy,
.create_handle = drm_gem_fb_create_handle,
};
+static const struct drm_framebuffer_funcs amdgpu_fb_funcs_atomic = {
+.destroy = drm_gem_fb_destroy,
+.create_handle = drm_gem_fb_create_handle,
+.dirty = amdgpu_dirtyfb
+};
+
uint32_t amdgpu_display_supported_domains(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
uint64_t bo_flags)
{
@@ -1139,7 +1159,11 @@ static int
amdgpu_display_gem_fb_verify_and_init(struct drm_device *dev,
if (ret)
goto err;
-ret = drm_framebuffer_init(dev, &rfb->base, &amdgpu_fb_funcs);
+if (drm_drv_uses_atomic_modeset(dev))
+ret = drm_framebuffer_init(dev, &rfb->base,
+ &amdgpu_fb_funcs_atomic);
+else
+ret = drm_framebuffer_init(dev, &rfb->base, &amdgpu_fb_funcs);
if (ret)
goto err;
--
Hamza
Re: [PATCH v2] drm/amdgpu: register a dirty framebuffer callback for fbcon
@Mahfooz, Hamza
can you respin with the NULL check?
Alex
On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 10:25 AM Christian König
wrote:
>
> Am 16.08.23 um 15:41 schrieb Hamza Mahfooz:
> >
> > On 8/16/23 01:55, Christian König wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Am 15.08.23 um 19:26 schrieb Hamza Mahfooz:
> >>> fbcon requires that we implement &drm_framebuffer_funcs.dirty.
> >>> Otherwise, the framebuffer might take a while to flush (which would
> >>> manifest as noticeable lag). However, we can't enable this callback for
> >>> non-fbcon cases since it might cause too many atomic commits to be made
> >>> at once. So, implement amdgpu_dirtyfb() and only enable it for fbcon
> >>> framebuffers on devices that support atomic KMS.
> >>>
> >>> Cc: Aurabindo Pillai
> >>> Cc: Mario Limonciello
> >>> Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
> >>> Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/2519
> >>> Signed-off-by: Hamza Mahfooz
> >>> ---
> >>> v2: update variable names
> >>> ---
> >>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_display.c | 26
> >>> -
> >>> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_display.c
> >>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_display.c
> >>> index d20dd3f852fc..d3b59f99cb7c 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_display.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_display.c
> >>> @@ -38,6 +38,8 @@
> >>> #include
> >>> #include
> >>> #include
> >>> +#include
> >>> +#include
> >>> #include
> >>> #include
> >>> #include
> >>> @@ -532,11 +534,29 @@ bool amdgpu_display_ddc_probe(struct
> >>> amdgpu_connector *amdgpu_connector,
> >>> return true;
> >>> }
> >>> +static int amdgpu_dirtyfb(struct drm_framebuffer *fb, struct
> >>> drm_file *file,
> >>> + unsigned int flags, unsigned int color,
> >>> + struct drm_clip_rect *clips, unsigned int num_clips)
> >>> +{
> >>> +
> >>> +if (strcmp(fb->comm, "[fbcon]"))
> >>> +return -ENOSYS;
> >>
> >> Once more to the v2 of this patch: Tests like those are a pretty big
> >> NO-GO for upstreaming.
> >
> > On closer inspection it is actually sufficient to check if `file` is
> > NULL here (since it means that the request isn't from userspace). So, do
> > you think that would be palatable for upstream?
>
> That's certainly better than doing a string compare, but I'm not sure if
> that's sufficient.
>
> In general drivers shouldn't have any special handling for fdcon.
>
> You should probably have Thomas Zimmermann take a
> look at this.
>
> Regards,
> Christian.
>
> >
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Christian.
> >>
> >>> +
> >>> +return drm_atomic_helper_dirtyfb(fb, file, flags, color, clips,
> >>> + num_clips);
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> static const struct drm_framebuffer_funcs amdgpu_fb_funcs = {
> >>> .destroy = drm_gem_fb_destroy,
> >>> .create_handle = drm_gem_fb_create_handle,
> >>> };
> >>> +static const struct drm_framebuffer_funcs amdgpu_fb_funcs_atomic = {
> >>> +.destroy = drm_gem_fb_destroy,
> >>> +.create_handle = drm_gem_fb_create_handle,
> >>> +.dirty = amdgpu_dirtyfb
> >>> +};
> >>> +
> >>> uint32_t amdgpu_display_supported_domains(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
> >>> uint64_t bo_flags)
> >>> {
> >>> @@ -1139,7 +1159,11 @@ static int
> >>> amdgpu_display_gem_fb_verify_and_init(struct drm_device *dev,
> >>> if (ret)
> >>> goto err;
> >>> -ret = drm_framebuffer_init(dev, &rfb->base, &amdgpu_fb_funcs);
> >>> +if (drm_drv_uses_atomic_modeset(dev))
> >>> +ret = drm_framebuffer_init(dev, &rfb->base,
> >>> + &amdgpu_fb_funcs_atomic);
> >>> +else
> >>> +ret = drm_framebuffer_init(dev, &rfb->base, &amdgpu_fb_funcs);
> >>> if (ret)
> >>> goto err;
> >>
>
Re: [PATCH v2] drm/amdgpu: register a dirty framebuffer callback for fbcon
Am 16.08.23 um 15:41 schrieb Hamza Mahfooz:
On 8/16/23 01:55, Christian König wrote:
Am 15.08.23 um 19:26 schrieb Hamza Mahfooz:
fbcon requires that we implement &drm_framebuffer_funcs.dirty.
Otherwise, the framebuffer might take a while to flush (which would
manifest as noticeable lag). However, we can't enable this callback for
non-fbcon cases since it might cause too many atomic commits to be made
at once. So, implement amdgpu_dirtyfb() and only enable it for fbcon
framebuffers on devices that support atomic KMS.
Cc: Aurabindo Pillai
Cc: Mario Limonciello
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/2519
Signed-off-by: Hamza Mahfooz
---
v2: update variable names
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_display.c | 26
-
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_display.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_display.c
index d20dd3f852fc..d3b59f99cb7c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_display.c
@@ -38,6 +38,8 @@
#include
#include
#include
+#include
+#include
#include
#include
#include
@@ -532,11 +534,29 @@ bool amdgpu_display_ddc_probe(struct
amdgpu_connector *amdgpu_connector,
return true;
}
+static int amdgpu_dirtyfb(struct drm_framebuffer *fb, struct
drm_file *file,
+ unsigned int flags, unsigned int color,
+ struct drm_clip_rect *clips, unsigned int num_clips)
+{
+
+ if (strcmp(fb->comm, "[fbcon]"))
+ return -ENOSYS;
Once more to the v2 of this patch: Tests like those are a pretty big
NO-GO for upstreaming.
On closer inspection it is actually sufficient to check if `file` is
NULL here (since it means that the request isn't from userspace). So, do
you think that would be palatable for upstream?
That's certainly better than doing a string compare, but I'm not sure if
that's sufficient.
In general drivers shouldn't have any special handling for fdcon.
You should probably have Thomas Zimmermann take a
look at this.
Regards,
Christian.
Regards,
Christian.
+
+ return drm_atomic_helper_dirtyfb(fb, file, flags, color, clips,
+ num_clips);
+}
+
static const struct drm_framebuffer_funcs amdgpu_fb_funcs = {
.destroy = drm_gem_fb_destroy,
.create_handle = drm_gem_fb_create_handle,
};
+static const struct drm_framebuffer_funcs amdgpu_fb_funcs_atomic = {
+ .destroy = drm_gem_fb_destroy,
+ .create_handle = drm_gem_fb_create_handle,
+ .dirty = amdgpu_dirtyfb
+};
+
uint32_t amdgpu_display_supported_domains(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
uint64_t bo_flags)
{
@@ -1139,7 +1159,11 @@ static int
amdgpu_display_gem_fb_verify_and_init(struct drm_device *dev,
if (ret)
goto err;
- ret = drm_framebuffer_init(dev, &rfb->base, &amdgpu_fb_funcs);
+ if (drm_drv_uses_atomic_modeset(dev))
+ ret = drm_framebuffer_init(dev, &rfb->base,
+ &amdgpu_fb_funcs_atomic);
+ else
+ ret = drm_framebuffer_init(dev, &rfb->base, &amdgpu_fb_funcs);
if (ret)
goto err;
Re: [PATCH v2] drm/amdgpu: register a dirty framebuffer callback for fbcon
On 8/16/23 01:55, Christian König wrote:
Am 15.08.23 um 19:26 schrieb Hamza Mahfooz:
fbcon requires that we implement &drm_framebuffer_funcs.dirty.
Otherwise, the framebuffer might take a while to flush (which would
manifest as noticeable lag). However, we can't enable this callback for
non-fbcon cases since it might cause too many atomic commits to be made
at once. So, implement amdgpu_dirtyfb() and only enable it for fbcon
framebuffers on devices that support atomic KMS.
Cc: Aurabindo Pillai
Cc: Mario Limonciello
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/2519
Signed-off-by: Hamza Mahfooz
---
v2: update variable names
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_display.c | 26 -
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_display.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_display.c
index d20dd3f852fc..d3b59f99cb7c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_display.c
@@ -38,6 +38,8 @@
#include
#include
#include
+#include
+#include
#include
#include
#include
@@ -532,11 +534,29 @@ bool amdgpu_display_ddc_probe(struct
amdgpu_connector *amdgpu_connector,
return true;
}
+static int amdgpu_dirtyfb(struct drm_framebuffer *fb, struct drm_file
*file,
+ unsigned int flags, unsigned int color,
+ struct drm_clip_rect *clips, unsigned int num_clips)
+{
+
+ if (strcmp(fb->comm, "[fbcon]"))
+ return -ENOSYS;
Once more to the v2 of this patch: Tests like those are a pretty big
NO-GO for upstreaming.
On closer inspection it is actually sufficient to check if `file` is
NULL here (since it means that the request isn't from userspace). So, do
you think that would be palatable for upstream?
Regards,
Christian.
+
+ return drm_atomic_helper_dirtyfb(fb, file, flags, color, clips,
+ num_clips);
+}
+
static const struct drm_framebuffer_funcs amdgpu_fb_funcs = {
.destroy = drm_gem_fb_destroy,
.create_handle = drm_gem_fb_create_handle,
};
+static const struct drm_framebuffer_funcs amdgpu_fb_funcs_atomic = {
+ .destroy = drm_gem_fb_destroy,
+ .create_handle = drm_gem_fb_create_handle,
+ .dirty = amdgpu_dirtyfb
+};
+
uint32_t amdgpu_display_supported_domains(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
uint64_t bo_flags)
{
@@ -1139,7 +1159,11 @@ static int
amdgpu_display_gem_fb_verify_and_init(struct drm_device *dev,
if (ret)
goto err;
- ret = drm_framebuffer_init(dev, &rfb->base, &amdgpu_fb_funcs);
+ if (drm_drv_uses_atomic_modeset(dev))
+ ret = drm_framebuffer_init(dev, &rfb->base,
+ &amdgpu_fb_funcs_atomic);
+ else
+ ret = drm_framebuffer_init(dev, &rfb->base, &amdgpu_fb_funcs);
if (ret)
goto err;
--
Hamza
Re: [PATCH v2] drm/amdgpu: register a dirty framebuffer callback for fbcon
Am 15.08.23 um 19:26 schrieb Hamza Mahfooz:
fbcon requires that we implement &drm_framebuffer_funcs.dirty.
Otherwise, the framebuffer might take a while to flush (which would
manifest as noticeable lag). However, we can't enable this callback for
non-fbcon cases since it might cause too many atomic commits to be made
at once. So, implement amdgpu_dirtyfb() and only enable it for fbcon
framebuffers on devices that support atomic KMS.
Cc: Aurabindo Pillai
Cc: Mario Limonciello
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/2519
Signed-off-by: Hamza Mahfooz
---
v2: update variable names
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_display.c | 26 -
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_display.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_display.c
index d20dd3f852fc..d3b59f99cb7c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_display.c
@@ -38,6 +38,8 @@
#include
#include
#include
+#include
+#include
#include
#include
#include
@@ -532,11 +534,29 @@ bool amdgpu_display_ddc_probe(struct amdgpu_connector
*amdgpu_connector,
return true;
}
+static int amdgpu_dirtyfb(struct drm_framebuffer *fb, struct drm_file *file,
+ unsigned int flags, unsigned int color,
+ struct drm_clip_rect *clips, unsigned int num_clips)
+{
+
+ if (strcmp(fb->comm, "[fbcon]"))
+ return -ENOSYS;
Once more to the v2 of this patch: Tests like those are a pretty big
NO-GO for upstreaming.
Regards,
Christian.
+
+ return drm_atomic_helper_dirtyfb(fb, file, flags, color, clips,
+num_clips);
+}
+
static const struct drm_framebuffer_funcs amdgpu_fb_funcs = {
.destroy = drm_gem_fb_destroy,
.create_handle = drm_gem_fb_create_handle,
};
+static const struct drm_framebuffer_funcs amdgpu_fb_funcs_atomic = {
+ .destroy = drm_gem_fb_destroy,
+ .create_handle = drm_gem_fb_create_handle,
+ .dirty = amdgpu_dirtyfb
+};
+
uint32_t amdgpu_display_supported_domains(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
uint64_t bo_flags)
{
@@ -1139,7 +1159,11 @@ static int amdgpu_display_gem_fb_verify_and_init(struct
drm_device *dev,
if (ret)
goto err;
- ret = drm_framebuffer_init(dev, &rfb->base, &amdgpu_fb_funcs);
+ if (drm_drv_uses_atomic_modeset(dev))
+ ret = drm_framebuffer_init(dev, &rfb->base,
+ &amdgpu_fb_funcs_atomic);
+ else
+ ret = drm_framebuffer_init(dev, &rfb->base, &amdgpu_fb_funcs);
if (ret)
goto err;
Re: [PATCH v2] drm/amdgpu: register a dirty framebuffer callback for fbcon
On 8/15/2023 12:26, Hamza Mahfooz wrote:
fbcon requires that we implement &drm_framebuffer_funcs.dirty.
Otherwise, the framebuffer might take a while to flush (which would
manifest as noticeable lag). However, we can't enable this callback for
non-fbcon cases since it might cause too many atomic commits to be made
at once. So, implement amdgpu_dirtyfb() and only enable it for fbcon
framebuffers on devices that support atomic KMS.
Cc: Aurabindo Pillai
Cc: Mario Limonciello
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
This is safe specifically because other things like FB_DAMAGE_CLIPS have
come back to 6.1.y as well via f1edb2f58adb ("drm/amd/display: add
FB_DAMAGE_CLIPS support") and fixups to that.
Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/2519
Signed-off-by: Hamza Mahfooz
Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello
---
v2: update variable names
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_display.c | 26 -
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_display.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_display.c
index d20dd3f852fc..d3b59f99cb7c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_display.c
@@ -38,6 +38,8 @@
#include
#include
#include
+#include
+#include
#include
#include
#include
@@ -532,11 +534,29 @@ bool amdgpu_display_ddc_probe(struct amdgpu_connector
*amdgpu_connector,
return true;
}
+static int amdgpu_dirtyfb(struct drm_framebuffer *fb, struct drm_file *file,
+ unsigned int flags, unsigned int color,
+ struct drm_clip_rect *clips, unsigned int num_clips)
+{
+
+ if (strcmp(fb->comm, "[fbcon]"))
+ return -ENOSYS;
+
+ return drm_atomic_helper_dirtyfb(fb, file, flags, color, clips,
+num_clips);
+}
+
static const struct drm_framebuffer_funcs amdgpu_fb_funcs = {
.destroy = drm_gem_fb_destroy,
.create_handle = drm_gem_fb_create_handle,
};
+static const struct drm_framebuffer_funcs amdgpu_fb_funcs_atomic = {
+ .destroy = drm_gem_fb_destroy,
+ .create_handle = drm_gem_fb_create_handle,
+ .dirty = amdgpu_dirtyfb
+};
+
uint32_t amdgpu_display_supported_domains(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
uint64_t bo_flags)
{
@@ -1139,7 +1159,11 @@ static int amdgpu_display_gem_fb_verify_and_init(struct
drm_device *dev,
if (ret)
goto err;
- ret = drm_framebuffer_init(dev, &rfb->base, &amdgpu_fb_funcs);
+ if (drm_drv_uses_atomic_modeset(dev))
+ ret = drm_framebuffer_init(dev, &rfb->base,
+ &amdgpu_fb_funcs_atomic);
+ else
+ ret = drm_framebuffer_init(dev, &rfb->base, &amdgpu_fb_funcs);
if (ret)
goto err;
[PATCH v2] drm/amdgpu: register a dirty framebuffer callback for fbcon
fbcon requires that we implement &drm_framebuffer_funcs.dirty.
Otherwise, the framebuffer might take a while to flush (which would
manifest as noticeable lag). However, we can't enable this callback for
non-fbcon cases since it might cause too many atomic commits to be made
at once. So, implement amdgpu_dirtyfb() and only enable it for fbcon
framebuffers on devices that support atomic KMS.
Cc: Aurabindo Pillai
Cc: Mario Limonciello
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/2519
Signed-off-by: Hamza Mahfooz
---
v2: update variable names
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_display.c | 26 -
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_display.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_display.c
index d20dd3f852fc..d3b59f99cb7c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_display.c
@@ -38,6 +38,8 @@
#include
#include
#include
+#include
+#include
#include
#include
#include
@@ -532,11 +534,29 @@ bool amdgpu_display_ddc_probe(struct amdgpu_connector
*amdgpu_connector,
return true;
}
+static int amdgpu_dirtyfb(struct drm_framebuffer *fb, struct drm_file *file,
+ unsigned int flags, unsigned int color,
+ struct drm_clip_rect *clips, unsigned int num_clips)
+{
+
+ if (strcmp(fb->comm, "[fbcon]"))
+ return -ENOSYS;
+
+ return drm_atomic_helper_dirtyfb(fb, file, flags, color, clips,
+num_clips);
+}
+
static const struct drm_framebuffer_funcs amdgpu_fb_funcs = {
.destroy = drm_gem_fb_destroy,
.create_handle = drm_gem_fb_create_handle,
};
+static const struct drm_framebuffer_funcs amdgpu_fb_funcs_atomic = {
+ .destroy = drm_gem_fb_destroy,
+ .create_handle = drm_gem_fb_create_handle,
+ .dirty = amdgpu_dirtyfb
+};
+
uint32_t amdgpu_display_supported_domains(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
uint64_t bo_flags)
{
@@ -1139,7 +1159,11 @@ static int amdgpu_display_gem_fb_verify_and_init(struct
drm_device *dev,
if (ret)
goto err;
- ret = drm_framebuffer_init(dev, &rfb->base, &amdgpu_fb_funcs);
+ if (drm_drv_uses_atomic_modeset(dev))
+ ret = drm_framebuffer_init(dev, &rfb->base,
+ &amdgpu_fb_funcs_atomic);
+ else
+ ret = drm_framebuffer_init(dev, &rfb->base, &amdgpu_fb_funcs);
if (ret)
goto err;
--
2.41.0
