Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] drm: sun4i: set proper TCON0 DCLK rate in DSI mode

2023-05-10 Thread Jernej Škrabec
Dne ponedeljek, 08. maj 2023 ob 16:08:32 CEST je Frank Oltmanns napisal(a):
> Hello again,
> 
> On 2023-05-08 at 08:54:28 +0200, Frank Oltmanns  wrote:
> > Hello Roman,
> > 
> > On 2023-05-03 at 16:22:32 +0200, "Roman Beranek"  wrote:
> >> Hello everyone,
> >> 
> >> I apologize for my absence from the discussion during past week, I got
> >> hit with tonsillitis.
> > 
> > I hope you feel better!
> > 
> >> On Mon May 1, 2023 at 3:40 PM CEST, Frank Oltmanns wrote:
> >>> Looking at ccu_nkm_determine_rate(), we've found our culprit because it
> >>> does not try parent clock rates other than the current one. The same
> >>> applies to all other ccu_nkm_* functions.
> >> 
> >> Yes, that's why I dropped CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT from pll-mipi in v3.
> >> 
> >>>  b. Add functionality to ccu_nkm_* to also update the parent clock rate.
> >>> 
> >>> I'm actually interested in tackling b, but I can't make any promises as
> >>> to if and when I'll be able to solve it. I'm not certain about any side
> >>> effects this might have.
> >> 
> >> It sounds like an interesting exercise. But what if HDMI is then added
> >> to the mix?
> > 
> > Thanks for interest in this discussion! I really appreciate it!
> > 
> > First of all, let me admit that I'm no expert on this. But nobody else
> > has replied so far, and I want to keep this conversation going, so let
> > me share my view.
> > 
> > My understanding is that pll-mipi being able to set pll-video0's rate
> > should not have an impact on HDMI, neither positive nor negative. If I'm
> > not mistaken those two things are orthogonal.
> > 
> > The relevant part of the clk_summary with your v4 [1] patch on top of
> > 
> > drm-next looks like this:
> >  enable  protect  hardware
> >
> >clock  countcountrateenable
> > 
> > --
> > 
> > pll-video011   29400 Y
> > 
> >hdmi   00   29400 N
> >tcon1  00   29400 N
> >pll-mipi   11   43120 Y
> >
> >   tcon0   21   43120 Y
> >   
> >  tcon-data-clock  11   10780 Y
> >
> >pll-video0-2x  00   58800 Y
> > 
> > Note, that pll-video0 is protected.
> > 
> > I don't own any boards that support HDMI in mainline. For the pinephone
> > this support is added e.g. in megi's kernel, where connecting an HDMI
> > output results in pll-video0's rate being set to 297MHz, even though it
> > is 294MHz after boot.
> > 
> > So, for reference, this is the same part of the clk_summary with megi's
> > 
> > 6.3.0 kernel, USB-C dock unplugged:
> >  enable  protect  hardware
> >
> >clock  countcountrateenable
> > 
> > --
> > 
> > pll-video030   29400 Y
> > 
> >hdmi-phy-clk   107350 Y
> >hdmi   10   29400 Y
> >tcon1  00   29400 N
> >pll-mipi   10   43120 Y
> >
> >   tcon0   20   43120 Y
> >   
> >  tcon-pixel-clock 10   10780 Y
> >
> >pll-video0-2x  00   58800 Y
> > 
> > pll-video0 is not protected. When plugging in the USB-C dock with an HDMI
> 
> > monitor connected, the situation looks like this:
> Just for reference, the protection count is disabled by this commit [1]
> in megi's kernel.
> 
> In the commit message Icenowy Zheng refers to "the ability to keep TCON0
> clock stable when HDMI changes its parent's clock." She implemented this
> in these two previous commits [2] [3]. None of this is in mainline.

Those commits are good follow up series to this, if anyone wants to improve 
things further.

Best regards,
Jernej

> 
> Best regards,
>   Frank
> 
> [1]:
> https://github.com/megous/linux/commit/039f7ee3f44adfbe4c6b7c2f1798b9a70c9f
> b9ee [2]:
> https://github.com/megous/linux/commit/a927843932f16e5a7f5ff57fbfd2d5f11c71
> 2b67 [3]:
> https://github.com/megous/linux/commit/0e305371eaa49128856acce9830e6af07944
> 2ad6
> >  enable  protect  hardware
> >
> >clock  countcountrateenable
> > 
> > --
> > 
> > pll-video04   

Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] drm: sun4i: set proper TCON0 DCLK rate in DSI mode

2023-05-08 Thread Frank Oltmanns
Hello again,

On 2023-05-08 at 08:54:28 +0200, Frank Oltmanns  wrote:
> Hello Roman,
>
> On 2023-05-03 at 16:22:32 +0200, "Roman Beranek"  wrote:
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> I apologize for my absence from the discussion during past week, I got
>> hit with tonsillitis.
>
> I hope you feel better!
>
>> On Mon May 1, 2023 at 3:40 PM CEST, Frank Oltmanns wrote:
>>> Looking at ccu_nkm_determine_rate(), we've found our culprit because it
>>> does not try parent clock rates other than the current one. The same
>>> applies to all other ccu_nkm_* functions.
>>
>> Yes, that's why I dropped CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT from pll-mipi in v3.
>>
>>>  b. Add functionality to ccu_nkm_* to also update the parent clock rate.
>>>
>>> I'm actually interested in tackling b, but I can't make any promises as
>>> to if and when I'll be able to solve it. I'm not certain about any side
>>> effects this might have.
>>
>> It sounds like an interesting exercise. But what if HDMI is then added
>> to the mix?
>
> Thanks for interest in this discussion! I really appreciate it!
>
> First of all, let me admit that I'm no expert on this. But nobody else
> has replied so far, and I want to keep this conversation going, so let
> me share my view.
>
> My understanding is that pll-mipi being able to set pll-video0's rate
> should not have an impact on HDMI, neither positive nor negative. If I'm
> not mistaken those two things are orthogonal.
>
> The relevant part of the clk_summary with your v4 [1] patch on top of
> drm-next looks like this:
>
>  enable  protect  hardware
>clock  countcountrateenable
> --
> pll-video011   29400 Y
>hdmi   00   29400 N
>tcon1  00   29400 N
>pll-mipi   11   43120 Y
>   tcon0   21   43120 Y
>  tcon-data-clock  11   10780 Y
>pll-video0-2x  00   58800 Y
>
> Note, that pll-video0 is protected.
>
> I don't own any boards that support HDMI in mainline. For the pinephone
> this support is added e.g. in megi's kernel, where connecting an HDMI
> output results in pll-video0's rate being set to 297MHz, even though it
> is 294MHz after boot.
>
> So, for reference, this is the same part of the clk_summary with megi's
> 6.3.0 kernel, USB-C dock unplugged:
>
>  enable  protect  hardware
>clock  countcountrateenable
> --
> pll-video030   29400 Y
>hdmi-phy-clk   107350 Y
>hdmi   10   29400 Y
>tcon1  00   29400 N
>pll-mipi   10   43120 Y
>   tcon0   20   43120 Y
>  tcon-pixel-clock 10   10780 Y
>pll-video0-2x  00   58800 Y
>
> pll-video0 is not protected. When plugging in the USB-C dock with an HDMI
> monitor connected, the situation looks like this:

Just for reference, the protection count is disabled by this commit [1]
in megi's kernel.

In the commit message Icenowy Zheng refers to "the ability to keep TCON0
clock stable when HDMI changes its parent's clock." She implemented this
in these two previous commits [2] [3]. None of this is in mainline.

Best regards,
  Frank

[1]: 
https://github.com/megous/linux/commit/039f7ee3f44adfbe4c6b7c2f1798b9a70c9fb9ee
[2]: 
https://github.com/megous/linux/commit/a927843932f16e5a7f5ff57fbfd2d5f11c712b67
[3]: 
https://github.com/megous/linux/commit/0e305371eaa49128856acce9830e6af079442ad6

>
>  enable  protect  hardware
>clock  countcountrateenable
> --
> pll-video041   29700 Y
>hdmi-phy-clk   10   14850 Y
>hdmi   10   14850 Y
>tcon1  11   14850 Y
>pll-mipi   10   424285714 Y
>   tcon0   20   424285714 Y
>  tcon-pixel-clock 10   106071428 Y
>pll-video0-2x  00   59400 Y
>
> As you can see, 

Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] drm: sun4i: set proper TCON0 DCLK rate in DSI mode

2023-05-08 Thread Frank Oltmanns
Hello Roman,

On 2023-05-03 at 16:22:32 +0200, "Roman Beranek"  wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I apologize for my absence from the discussion during past week, I got
> hit with tonsillitis.

I hope you feel better!

> On Mon May 1, 2023 at 3:40 PM CEST, Frank Oltmanns wrote:
>> Looking at ccu_nkm_determine_rate(), we've found our culprit because it
>> does not try parent clock rates other than the current one. The same
>> applies to all other ccu_nkm_* functions.
>
> Yes, that's why I dropped CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT from pll-mipi in v3.
>
>>  b. Add functionality to ccu_nkm_* to also update the parent clock rate.
>>
>> I'm actually interested in tackling b, but I can't make any promises as
>> to if and when I'll be able to solve it. I'm not certain about any side
>> effects this might have.
>
> It sounds like an interesting exercise. But what if HDMI is then added
> to the mix?

Thanks for interest in this discussion! I really appreciate it!

First of all, let me admit that I'm no expert on this. But nobody else
has replied so far, and I want to keep this conversation going, so let
me share my view.

My understanding is that pll-mipi being able to set pll-video0's rate
should not have an impact on HDMI, neither positive nor negative. If I'm
not mistaken those two things are orthogonal.

The relevant part of the clk_summary with your v4 [1] patch on top of
drm-next looks like this:

 enable  protect  hardware
   clock  countcountrateenable
--
pll-video011   29400 Y
   hdmi   00   29400 N
   tcon1  00   29400 N
   pll-mipi   11   43120 Y
  tcon0   21   43120 Y
 tcon-data-clock  11   10780 Y
   pll-video0-2x  00   58800 Y

Note, that pll-video0 is protected.

I don't own any boards that support HDMI in mainline. For the pinephone
this support is added e.g. in megi's kernel, where connecting an HDMI
output results in pll-video0's rate being set to 297MHz, even though it
is 294MHz after boot.

So, for reference, this is the same part of the clk_summary with megi's
6.3.0 kernel, USB-C dock unplugged:

 enable  protect  hardware
   clock  countcountrateenable
--
pll-video030   29400 Y
   hdmi-phy-clk   107350 Y
   hdmi   10   29400 Y
   tcon1  00   29400 N
   pll-mipi   10   43120 Y
  tcon0   20   43120 Y
 tcon-pixel-clock 10   10780 Y
   pll-video0-2x  00   58800 Y

pll-video0 is not protected. When plugging in the USB-C dock with an HDMI
monitor connected, the situation looks like this:

 enable  protect  hardware
   clock  countcountrateenable
--
pll-video041   29700 Y
   hdmi-phy-clk   10   14850 Y
   hdmi   10   14850 Y
   tcon1  11   14850 Y
   pll-mipi   10   424285714 Y
  tcon0   20   424285714 Y
 tcon-pixel-clock 10   106071428 Y
   pll-video0-2x  00   59400 Y

As you can see, pll-video0 is updated to 297 MHz. My understanding is
(again: not an expert here) this is only possible due to the missing
protection.

What I'm trying to say is that I don't see a connection between HDMI and
having the functionality in ccu_nkm_* to update the parent clock rate.

But I do think it would be preferable to have pll-video0 at 297 MHz
after boot on the pinephone. We could achieve this with my two previous
proposals:

 a) Set pll-video0 to 297 MHz on boot
 b) Add functionality to ccu_nkm_* to also update the parent clock rate.

If solution b is viable, the goal for the pinephone (and any other
boards supporting HDMI) would then be to select a pixel-data-clock so
that the rate for pll-video0 is set to 297 MHz (by selecting an
appropriate clock speed for the internal panel).


Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] drm: sun4i: set proper TCON0 DCLK rate in DSI mode

2023-05-04 Thread Roman Beranek
Hello everyone,

I apologize for my absence from the discussion during past week, I got
hit with tonsillitis.

On Mon May 1, 2023 at 3:40 PM CEST, Frank Oltmanns wrote:
> Looking at ccu_nkm_determine_rate(), we've found our culprit because it
> does not try parent clock rates other than the current one. The same
> applies to all other ccu_nkm_* functions.

Yes, that's why I dropped CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT from pll-mipi in v3.

>  b. Add functionality to ccu_nkm_* to also update the parent clock rate.
>
> I'm actually interested in tackling b, but I can't make any promises as
> to if and when I'll be able to solve it. I'm not certain about any side
> effects this might have.

It sounds like an interesting exercise. But what if HDMI is then added
to the mix?

Best regards
Roman


Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] drm: sun4i: set proper TCON0 DCLK rate in DSI mode

2023-05-01 Thread Frank Oltmanns
Maxime, Jernej, I was trying to understand why pll-video0 is not updated
and I tracked down the culprit to ccu_nkm.c.

On 2023-04-23 at 15:24:33 +0200, Frank Oltmanns  wrote:
> On 2023-04-18 at 09:40:01 +0200, Roman Beranek  wrote:
>> According to Allwinner's BSP code, in DSI mode, TCON0 clock needs to be
>> running at what's effectively the per-lane datarate of the DSI link.
>> Given that the TCON DCLK divider is fixed to 4 (SUN6I_DSI_TCON_DIV),
>> DCLK can't be set equal to the dotclock. Therefore labeling TCON DCLK
>> as sun4i_dotclock or tcon-pixel-clock shall be avoided.
>>
>> With bpp bits per pixel transmitted over n DSI lanes, the target DCLK
>> rate for a given pixel clock is obtained as follows:
>>
>> DCLK rate = 1/4 * bpp / n * pixel clock
>>
>> Effect of this change can be observed through the rate of Vblank IRQs
>> which should now match refresh rate implied by set display mode. It
>> was verified to do so on a A64 board with a 2-lane and a 4-lane panel.
[...]
> I've tried your patches on my pinephone. I also set the panel's clock to
> 72 MHz, so at 24 bpp and 4 lanes that should result in a data clock of
> 108 MHz. This should be possible when pll-video0 is at 297 MHz.
>
> Unfortunately, pll-video0 is not set and therefore the relevant part of
> the clk_summary looks like this:
>
>   enable  prepare  protect  hardware
> clock  countcountcountrateenable
> 
>  pll-video0111   29400 Y
> hdmi   000   29400 N
> tcon1  000   29400 N
> pll-mipi   111   43120 Y
>tcon0   221   43120 Y
>   tcon-data-clock  111   10780 Y
> pll-video0-2x  000   58800 Y
>
> Note, I've cut the columns accuracy, phase, and duty cycle, because they
> show the same values for all clocks (0, 0, 5).
>
> My understanding was that with this patchset setting the parent clock
> should be possible. Do you have any idea why it doesn't work on the
> pinephone? Or maybe it does work on yours and I'm making some kind of
> mistake?

To better understand what's going on I've extended the clk_rate_request
class to also output the requested rate. The relevant output is this
(leading line numbers by me for referencing the lines below):
line  1: kworker/u8:2-49  [002] . 1.850141: 
clk_rate_request_start: tcon-data-clock rate 10800 min 0 max 
18446744073709551615, parent tcon0 (58800)
line  2: kworker/u8:2-49  [002] . 1.850149: 
clk_rate_request_start: tcon0 rate 43200 min 0 max 18446744073709551615, 
parent pll-mipi (58800)
line  3: kworker/u8:2-49  [002] . 1.850154: 
clk_rate_request_start: pll-mipi rate 43200 min 0 max 18446744073709551615, 
parent pll-video0 (29400)
line  4: kworker/u8:2-49  [002] . 1.850168: 
clk_rate_request_done: pll-mipi rate 43120 min 0 max 18446744073709551615, 
parent pll-video0 (29400)
line  5: kworker/u8:2-49  [002] . 1.850169: 
clk_rate_request_done: tcon0 rate 43120 min 0 max 18446744073709551615, 
parent pll-mipi (43120)
line  6: kworker/u8:2-49  [002] . 1.850171: 
clk_rate_request_done: tcon-data-clock rate 10780 min 0 max 
18446744073709551615, parent tcon0 (43120)
line  7: kworker/u8:2-49  [002] . 1.850172: 
clk_rate_request_start: tcon-data-clock rate 10800 min 0 max 
18446744073709551615, parent tcon0 (58800)
line  8: kworker/u8:2-49  [002] . 1.850174: 
clk_rate_request_start: tcon0 rate 43200 min 0 max 18446744073709551615, 
parent pll-mipi (58800)
line  9: kworker/u8:2-49  [002] . 1.850179: 
clk_rate_request_start: pll-mipi rate 43200 min 0 max 18446744073709551615, 
parent pll-video0 (29400)
line 10: kworker/u8:2-49  [002] . 1.850190: 
clk_rate_request_done: pll-mipi rate 43120 min 0 max 18446744073709551615, 
parent pll-video0 (29400)
line 11: kworker/u8:2-49  [002] . 1.850191: 
clk_rate_request_done: tcon0 rate 43120 min 0 max 18446744073709551615, 
parent pll-mipi (43120)
line 12: kworker/u8:2-49  [002] . 1.850192: 
clk_rate_request_done: tcon-data-clock rate 10780 min 0 max 
18446744073709551615, parent tcon0 (43120)
line 13: kworker/u8:2-49  [002] . 1.850193: 
clk_rate_request_start: tcon0 rate 43120 min 0 max 18446744073709551615, 
parent pll-mipi (58800)
line 14: kworker/u8:2-49  [002] . 1.850195: 
clk_rate_request_start: pll-mipi rate 43120 min 0 max 18446744073709551615, 
parent pll-video0 

Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] drm: sun4i: set proper TCON0 DCLK rate in DSI mode

2023-04-23 Thread Frank Oltmanns
Hi Roman,

On 2023-04-18 at 09:40:01 +0200, Roman Beranek  wrote:
> According to Allwinner's BSP code, in DSI mode, TCON0 clock needs to be
> running at what's effectively the per-lane datarate of the DSI link.
> Given that the TCON DCLK divider is fixed to 4 (SUN6I_DSI_TCON_DIV),
> DCLK can't be set equal to the dotclock. Therefore labeling TCON DCLK
> as sun4i_dotclock or tcon-pixel-clock shall be avoided.
>
> With bpp bits per pixel transmitted over n DSI lanes, the target DCLK
> rate for a given pixel clock is obtained as follows:
>
> DCLK rate = 1/4 * bpp / n * pixel clock
>
> Effect of this change can be observed through the rate of Vblank IRQs
> which should now match refresh rate implied by set display mode. It
> was verified to do so on a A64 board with a 2-lane and a 4-lane panel.
>
> v2:
> 1. prevent reparent of tcon0 to pll-video0-2x
> 2. include pll-video0 in setting TCON0 DCLK rate
> 3. tested the whole thing also on a PinePhone
>
> Roman Beranek (7):
>   clk: sunxi-ng: a64: propagate rate change from pll-mipi
>   clk: sunxi-ng: a64: export PLL_MIPI
>   clk: sunxi-ng: a64: prevent CLK_TCON0 being reparented
>   arm64: dts: allwinner: a64: assign PLL_MIPI to CLK_TCON0
>   ARM: dts: sunxi: rename tcon's clock output
>   drm: sun4i: rename sun4i_dotclock to sun4i_tcon_dclk
>   drm: sun4i: calculate proper DCLK rate for DSI
>
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/sun5i.dtsi  |  2 +-
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a23-a33.dtsi  |  2 +-
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t.dtsi |  2 +-
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-v3s.dtsi  |  2 +-
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi |  4 +-
>  drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun50i-a64.c |  6 ++-
>  drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun50i-a64.h |  4 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/Makefile|  2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.c| 46 +++
>  .../{sun4i_dotclock.c => sun4i_tcon_dclk.c}   |  2 +-
>  .../{sun4i_dotclock.h => sun4i_tcon_dclk.h}   |  0
>  include/dt-bindings/clock/sun50i-a64-ccu.h|  1 +
>  12 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>  rename drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/{sun4i_dotclock.c => sun4i_tcon_dclk.c} (99%)
>  rename drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/{sun4i_dotclock.h => sun4i_tcon_dclk.h} (100%)
>
>
> base-commit: 4aa35a0130d6b8afbefc9ef530a521fb0fb9b8e1


I've tried your patches on my pinephone. I also set the panel's clock to
72 MHz, so at 24 bpp and 4 lanes that should result in a data clock of
108 MHz. This should be possible when pll-video0 is at 297 MHz.

Unfortunately, pll-video0 is not set and therefore the relevant part of
the clk_summary looks like this:

  enable  prepare  protect  hardware
clock  countcountcountrateenable

 pll-video0111   29400 Y
hdmi   000   29400 N
tcon1  000   29400 N
pll-mipi   111   43120 Y
   tcon0   221   43120 Y
  tcon-data-clock  111   10780 Y
pll-video0-2x  000   58800 Y

Note, I've cut the columns accuracy, phase, and duty cycle, because they
show the same values for all clocks (0, 0, 5).

My understanding was that with this patchset setting the parent clock
should be possible. Do you have any idea why it doesn't work on the
pinephone? Or maybe it does work on yours and I'm making some kind of
mistake?

On a brighter note, when I initialize pll-video0 to 297 MHz in
sunxi-ng/ccu-sun50i-a64.c:sun50i_a64_ccu_probe() I get an even 108 Mhz
for the data clock. The patch is:

writel(0x515, reg + SUN50I_A64_PLL_MIPI_REG);

+   /*
+* Initialize PLL VIDEO0 to default values (297 MHz)
+* to clean up any changes made by bootloader
+*/
+   writel(0x03006207, reg + 0x10);
+
ret = devm_sunxi_ccu_probe(>dev, reg, _a64_ccu_desc);
if (ret)
return ret;

Best,
  Frank


[PATCH v2 0/7] drm: sun4i: set proper TCON0 DCLK rate in DSI mode

2023-04-20 Thread Roman Beranek
According to Allwinner's BSP code, in DSI mode, TCON0 clock needs to be
running at what's effectively the per-lane datarate of the DSI link.
Given that the TCON DCLK divider is fixed to 4 (SUN6I_DSI_TCON_DIV),
DCLK can't be set equal to the dotclock. Therefore labeling TCON DCLK
as sun4i_dotclock or tcon-pixel-clock shall be avoided.

With bpp bits per pixel transmitted over n DSI lanes, the target DCLK
rate for a given pixel clock is obtained as follows:

DCLK rate = 1/4 * bpp / n * pixel clock

Effect of this change can be observed through the rate of Vblank IRQs
which should now match refresh rate implied by set display mode. It
was verified to do so on a A64 board with a 2-lane and a 4-lane panel.

v2:
1. prevent reparent of tcon0 to pll-video0-2x
2. include pll-video0 in setting TCON0 DCLK rate
3. tested the whole thing also on a PinePhone 

Roman Beranek (7):
  clk: sunxi-ng: a64: propagate rate change from pll-mipi
  clk: sunxi-ng: a64: export PLL_MIPI
  clk: sunxi-ng: a64: prevent CLK_TCON0 being reparented
  arm64: dts: allwinner: a64: assign PLL_MIPI to CLK_TCON0
  ARM: dts: sunxi: rename tcon's clock output
  drm: sun4i: rename sun4i_dotclock to sun4i_tcon_dclk
  drm: sun4i: calculate proper DCLK rate for DSI

 arch/arm/boot/dts/sun5i.dtsi  |  2 +-
 arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a23-a33.dtsi  |  2 +-
 arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t.dtsi |  2 +-
 arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-v3s.dtsi  |  2 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi |  4 +-
 drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun50i-a64.c |  6 ++-
 drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun50i-a64.h |  4 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/Makefile|  2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.c| 46 +++
 .../{sun4i_dotclock.c => sun4i_tcon_dclk.c}   |  2 +-
 .../{sun4i_dotclock.h => sun4i_tcon_dclk.h}   |  0
 include/dt-bindings/clock/sun50i-a64-ccu.h|  1 +
 12 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
 rename drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/{sun4i_dotclock.c => sun4i_tcon_dclk.c} (99%)
 rename drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/{sun4i_dotclock.h => sun4i_tcon_dclk.h} (100%)


base-commit: 4aa35a0130d6b8afbefc9ef530a521fb0fb9b8e1
-- 
2.34.1