On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 10:19:21AM -0300, Maíra Canal wrote:
> Remove legacy PWM interface (pwm_config, pwm_enable, pwm_disable) and
> replace it for the atomic PWM API.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maíra Canal
> ---
> V1 -> V2: Initialize variable and simply conditional loop
> V2 -> V3: Fix assignment of NULL variable
> V3 -> V4: Replace division for pwm_set_relative_duty_cycle
> ---
> drivers/video/backlight/lp855x_bl.c | 20
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/lp855x_bl.c
> b/drivers/video/backlight/lp855x_bl.c
> index e94932c69f54..bbf24564082a 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/backlight/lp855x_bl.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/lp855x_bl.c
> @@ -233,9 +233,8 @@ static int lp855x_configure(struct lp855x *lp)
>
> static void lp855x_pwm_ctrl(struct lp855x *lp, int br, int max_br)
> {
> - unsigned int period = lp->pdata->period_ns;
> - unsigned int duty = br * period / max_br;
> struct pwm_device *pwm;
> + struct pwm_state state;
>
> /* request pwm device with the consumer name */
> if (!lp->pwm) {
> @@ -245,18 +244,15 @@ static void lp855x_pwm_ctrl(struct lp855x *lp, int br,
> int max_br)
>
> lp->pwm = pwm;
>
> - /*
> - * FIXME: pwm_apply_args() should be removed when switching to
> - * the atomic PWM API.
> - */
> - pwm_apply_args(pwm);
> + pwm_init_state(lp->pwm, );
> + state.period = lp->pdata->period_ns;
> }
>
> - pwm_config(lp->pwm, duty, period);
> - if (duty)
> - pwm_enable(lp->pwm);
> - else
> - pwm_disable(lp->pwm);
> + pwm_get_state(lp->pwm, );
Should this be:
} else {
pwm_get_state(lp->pwm, );
}
As currently written this will clobber the state.period that was set
above.
Daniel.
> + pwm_set_relative_duty_cycle(, br, max_br);
> + state.enabled = state.duty_cycle;
> +
> + pwm_apply_state(lp->pwm, );
> }
>
> static int lp855x_bl_update_status(struct backlight_device *bl)
> --
> 2.31.1
>
