Re: Coverity: dm_dmub_sw_init(): Incorrect expression

2023-01-12 Thread Kees Cook
On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 10:39:20PM +, Limonciello, Mario wrote:
> This particular one was fixed already in 
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/518050/ which got applied today.

Ah-ha; thanks!

-- 
Kees Cook


RE: Coverity: dm_dmub_sw_init(): Incorrect expression

2023-01-12 Thread Limonciello, Mario
[AMD Official Use Only - General]

This particular one was fixed already in 
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/518050/ which got applied today.

> -Original Message-
> From: coverity-bot 
> Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2023 16:25
> To: Limonciello, Mario 
> Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; amd-...@lists.freedesktop.org; Siqueira,
> Rodrigo ; Li, Sun peng (Leo)
> ; Li, Roman ; Zuo, Jerry
> ; Wu, Hersen ; dri-
> de...@lists.freedesktop.org; Koenig, Christian ;
> Lazar, Lijo ; Pillai, Aurabindo
> ; Wentland, Harry ;
> Deucher, Alexander ; Daniel Vetter
> ; David Airlie ; Pan, Xinhui
> ; Wheeler, Daniel ;
> Gustavo A. R. Silva ; linux-n...@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-harden...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Coverity: dm_dmub_sw_init(): Incorrect expression
> 
> Hello!
> 
> This is an experimental semi-automated report about issues detected by
> Coverity from a scan of next-20230111 as part of the linux-next scan project:
> https://scan.coverity.com/projects/linux-next-weekly-scan
> 
> You're getting this email because you were associated with the identified
> lines of code (noted below) that were touched by commits:
> 
>   Tue Jan 10 14:32:57 2023 -0500
> a7ab345149b8 ("drm/amd/display: Load DMUB microcode during early_init")
> 
> Coverity reported the following:
> 
> *** CID 1530544:  Incorrect expression  (IDENTICAL_BRANCHES)
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c:1951 in
> dm_dmub_sw_init()
> 1945
> 1946  switch (adev->ip_versions[DCE_HWIP][0]) {
> 1947  case IP_VERSION(2, 1, 0):
> 1948  dmub_asic = DMUB_ASIC_DCN21;
> 1949  break;
> 1950  case IP_VERSION(3, 0, 0):
> vvv CID 1530544:  Incorrect expression  (IDENTICAL_BRANCHES)
> vvv The same code is executed regardless of whether "adev-
> >ip_versions[GC_HWIP][0] == 656128U" is true, because the 'then' and 'else'
> branches are identical. Should one of the branches be modified, or the entire 
> 'if'
> statement replaced?
> 1951  if (adev->ip_versions[GC_HWIP][0] == IP_VERSION(10, 3, 
> 0))
> 1952  dmub_asic = DMUB_ASIC_DCN30;
> 1953  else
> 1954  dmub_asic = DMUB_ASIC_DCN30;
> 1955  break;
> 1956  case IP_VERSION(3, 0, 1):
> 
> If this is a false positive, please let us know so we can mark it as
> such, or teach the Coverity rules to be smarter. If not, please make
> sure fixes get into linux-next. :) For patches fixing this, please
> include these lines (but double-check the "Fixes" first):
> 
> Reported-by: coverity-bot 
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1530544 ("Incorrect expression")
> Fixes: a7ab345149b8 ("drm/amd/display: Load DMUB microcode during
> early_init")
> 
> Thanks for your attention!
> 
> --
> Coverity-bot