Re: [PATCH 1/6] dt-bindings: display/msm: document the SM8550 DSI PHY
On 09/01/2023 00:09, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: On 06/01/2023 17:41, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: On 04/01/2023 10:08, Neil Armstrong wrote: Document the SM8550 DSI PHY which is very close from the 7nm and 5nm DSI PHYs found in earlier platforms. Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml index bffd161fedfd..f72727f81076 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ allOf: properties: compatible: enum: + - qcom,dsi-phy-4nm-8550 - qcom,dsi-phy-5nm-8350 - qcom,dsi-phy-5nm-8450 Poor patterns once allowed like to keep growing... I commented here: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ccbb47e4-d780-0b1d-814e-27e86b6c3...@linaro.org/ so let's wait for response about other compatibles. I have fixed 8350 & 8450 while applying. Please rebase on top of msm-next-lumag-next with fixed compatibles. Ack Thanks, Neil Note: the DPU changes are not yet part of the msm-lumag-next. - qcom,dsi-phy-7nm Best regards, Krzysztof
Re: [PATCH 1/6] dt-bindings: display/msm: document the SM8550 DSI PHY
On 06/01/2023 17:41, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: On 04/01/2023 10:08, Neil Armstrong wrote: Document the SM8550 DSI PHY which is very close from the 7nm and 5nm DSI PHYs found in earlier platforms. Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml index bffd161fedfd..f72727f81076 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ allOf: properties: compatible: enum: + - qcom,dsi-phy-4nm-8550 - qcom,dsi-phy-5nm-8350 - qcom,dsi-phy-5nm-8450 Poor patterns once allowed like to keep growing... I commented here: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ccbb47e4-d780-0b1d-814e-27e86b6c3...@linaro.org/ so let's wait for response about other compatibles. I have fixed 8350 & 8450 while applying. Please rebase on top of msm-next-lumag-next with fixed compatibles. Note: the DPU changes are not yet part of the msm-lumag-next. - qcom,dsi-phy-7nm Best regards, Krzysztof -- With best wishes Dmitry
Re: [PATCH 1/6] dt-bindings: display/msm: document the SM8550 DSI PHY
On 04/01/2023 10:08, Neil Armstrong wrote: > Document the SM8550 DSI PHY which is very close from the 7nm > and 5nm DSI PHYs found in earlier platforms. > > Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml > index bffd161fedfd..f72727f81076 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml > @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ allOf: > properties: >compatible: > enum: > + - qcom,dsi-phy-4nm-8550 >- qcom,dsi-phy-5nm-8350 >- qcom,dsi-phy-5nm-8450 Poor patterns once allowed like to keep growing... I commented here: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ccbb47e4-d780-0b1d-814e-27e86b6c3...@linaro.org/ so let's wait for response about other compatibles. >- qcom,dsi-phy-7nm > Best regards, Krzysztof
