Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/ttm/tests: Add tests for ttm_bo functions
On 1.09.2023 15:50, Christian König wrote: Am 01.09.23 um 15:30 schrieb Karolina Stolarek: On 1.09.2023 15:19, Christian König wrote: Am 01.09.23 um 14:37 schrieb Karolina Stolarek: On 1.09.2023 14:04, kernel test robot wrote: Hi Karolina, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: It's a problem of building TTM KUnit tests as a module, the issue is not tied to a specific arch -- the subtests use unexported definitions. While it would be possible to add EXPORT_SYMBOL to the TTM functions, we don't want to do it with do_send_sig_info. Christian, two questions here: 1) Shall we export ttm_resource_alloc, ttm_tt_create and ttm_tt_destroy? Or is there a reason why they are "hidden"? Yeah, those are not supposed to be touched by drivers directly. Right, makes sense If you can't find a cleaner way exporting them conditionally on CONFIG_DRM_TTM_KUNIT_TEST might be a way to go. In the end, I hacked TTM's Makefile to switch on CONFIG_DRM_TTM_KUNIT_TEST=m. I'm not sure if it's a clean approach, but thanks to that change I don't need to modify core TTM files. The only ifdef I had to add was the one for ttm_bo_reserve_interrupted subtest, but I think that's an acceptable compromise. Let's hope the kernel test bot agrees :) Will send the series soon. I'm still sorting things out after coming from a sick leave. All the best, Karolina 2) If we decide to keep ttm_bo_reserve_interrupted subtest as it is, should I make CONFIG_DRM_TTM_KUNIT_TEST a boolean, instead of a tristate? DRM KUnit tests are tristate, but I think they don't use non-exported functions. Another option would be to build them together with TTM into one module, but I'm not sure if the KUNIT tests can do this. While I can imagine doing it with TTM, I'm not so sure about coupling it with signal.o. Still, I'll take a look. I have a high level understanding what you are trying to to, but that is absolutely not my field of expertise :) Regards, Christian. All the best, Karolina Regards, Christian. Many thanks, Karolina [auto build test ERROR on drm-misc/drm-misc-next] [also build test ERROR on drm/drm-next drm-exynos/exynos-drm-next drm-intel/for-linux-next drm-tip/drm-tip linus/master next-20230831] [cannot apply to drm-intel/for-linux-next-fixes v6.5] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Karolina-Stolarek/drm-ttm-tests-Add-tests-for-ttm_resource-and-ttm_sys_man/20230831-185954 base: git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-misc drm-misc-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/d914169aee773ee20c0b730b38d42a1fd7613bb6.1693479161.git.karolina.stolarek%40intel.com patch subject: [PATCH 3/3] drm/ttm/tests: Add tests for ttm_bo functions config: openrisc-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230901/202309011935.bbpezbuq-...@intel.com/config) compiler: or1k-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230901/202309011935.bbpezbuq-...@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309011935.bbpezbuq-...@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>, old ones prefixed by <<): WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_wlc.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_fo.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ovf.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_lblc.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_lblcr.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_dh.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sh.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sed.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_nq.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_twos.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ftp.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_pe_sip.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_defrag_ipv4.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv4.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/netfilter/iptable_nat.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/netfilter/iptable_raw.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.o WARNING: modpost: missing
Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/ttm/tests: Add tests for ttm_bo functions
Am 01.09.23 um 15:30 schrieb Karolina Stolarek: On 1.09.2023 15:19, Christian König wrote: Am 01.09.23 um 14:37 schrieb Karolina Stolarek: On 1.09.2023 14:04, kernel test robot wrote: Hi Karolina, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: It's a problem of building TTM KUnit tests as a module, the issue is not tied to a specific arch -- the subtests use unexported definitions. While it would be possible to add EXPORT_SYMBOL to the TTM functions, we don't want to do it with do_send_sig_info. Christian, two questions here: 1) Shall we export ttm_resource_alloc, ttm_tt_create and ttm_tt_destroy? Or is there a reason why they are "hidden"? Yeah, those are not supposed to be touched by drivers directly. Right, makes sense If you can't find a cleaner way exporting them conditionally on CONFIG_DRM_TTM_KUNIT_TEST might be a way to go. 2) If we decide to keep ttm_bo_reserve_interrupted subtest as it is, should I make CONFIG_DRM_TTM_KUNIT_TEST a boolean, instead of a tristate? DRM KUnit tests are tristate, but I think they don't use non-exported functions. Another option would be to build them together with TTM into one module, but I'm not sure if the KUNIT tests can do this. While I can imagine doing it with TTM, I'm not so sure about coupling it with signal.o. Still, I'll take a look. I have a high level understanding what you are trying to to, but that is absolutely not my field of expertise :) Regards, Christian. All the best, Karolina Regards, Christian. Many thanks, Karolina [auto build test ERROR on drm-misc/drm-misc-next] [also build test ERROR on drm/drm-next drm-exynos/exynos-drm-next drm-intel/for-linux-next drm-tip/drm-tip linus/master next-20230831] [cannot apply to drm-intel/for-linux-next-fixes v6.5] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Karolina-Stolarek/drm-ttm-tests-Add-tests-for-ttm_resource-and-ttm_sys_man/20230831-185954 base: git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-misc drm-misc-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/d914169aee773ee20c0b730b38d42a1fd7613bb6.1693479161.git.karolina.stolarek%40intel.com patch subject: [PATCH 3/3] drm/ttm/tests: Add tests for ttm_bo functions config: openrisc-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230901/202309011935.bbpezbuq-...@intel.com/config) compiler: or1k-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230901/202309011935.bbpezbuq-...@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309011935.bbpezbuq-...@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>, old ones prefixed by <<): WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_wlc.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_fo.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ovf.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_lblc.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_lblcr.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_dh.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sh.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sed.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_nq.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_twos.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ftp.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_pe_sip.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_defrag_ipv4.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv4.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/netfilter/iptable_nat.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/netfilter/iptable_raw.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/ipip.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/ip_gre.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/udp_tunnel.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/ip_vti.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/ah4.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/esp4.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/xfrm4_tunnel.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/tunnel4.o
Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/ttm/tests: Add tests for ttm_bo functions
On 1.09.2023 15:19, Christian König wrote: Am 01.09.23 um 14:37 schrieb Karolina Stolarek: On 1.09.2023 14:04, kernel test robot wrote: Hi Karolina, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: It's a problem of building TTM KUnit tests as a module, the issue is not tied to a specific arch -- the subtests use unexported definitions. While it would be possible to add EXPORT_SYMBOL to the TTM functions, we don't want to do it with do_send_sig_info. Christian, two questions here: 1) Shall we export ttm_resource_alloc, ttm_tt_create and ttm_tt_destroy? Or is there a reason why they are "hidden"? Yeah, those are not supposed to be touched by drivers directly. Right, makes sense 2) If we decide to keep ttm_bo_reserve_interrupted subtest as it is, should I make CONFIG_DRM_TTM_KUNIT_TEST a boolean, instead of a tristate? DRM KUnit tests are tristate, but I think they don't use non-exported functions. Another option would be to build them together with TTM into one module, but I'm not sure if the KUNIT tests can do this. While I can imagine doing it with TTM, I'm not so sure about coupling it with signal.o. Still, I'll take a look. All the best, Karolina Regards, Christian. Many thanks, Karolina [auto build test ERROR on drm-misc/drm-misc-next] [also build test ERROR on drm/drm-next drm-exynos/exynos-drm-next drm-intel/for-linux-next drm-tip/drm-tip linus/master next-20230831] [cannot apply to drm-intel/for-linux-next-fixes v6.5] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Karolina-Stolarek/drm-ttm-tests-Add-tests-for-ttm_resource-and-ttm_sys_man/20230831-185954 base: git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-misc drm-misc-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/d914169aee773ee20c0b730b38d42a1fd7613bb6.1693479161.git.karolina.stolarek%40intel.com patch subject: [PATCH 3/3] drm/ttm/tests: Add tests for ttm_bo functions config: openrisc-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230901/202309011935.bbpezbuq-...@intel.com/config) compiler: or1k-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230901/202309011935.bbpezbuq-...@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309011935.bbpezbuq-...@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>, old ones prefixed by <<): WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_wlc.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_fo.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ovf.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_lblc.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_lblcr.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_dh.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sh.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sed.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_nq.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_twos.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ftp.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_pe_sip.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_defrag_ipv4.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv4.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/netfilter/iptable_nat.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/netfilter/iptable_raw.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/ipip.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/ip_gre.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/udp_tunnel.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/ip_vti.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/ah4.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/esp4.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/xfrm4_tunnel.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/tunnel4.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/inet_diag.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/tcp_diag.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/udp_diag.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/raw_diag.o WARNING: modpost: missing
Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/ttm/tests: Add tests for ttm_bo functions
Am 01.09.23 um 14:37 schrieb Karolina Stolarek: On 1.09.2023 14:04, kernel test robot wrote: Hi Karolina, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: It's a problem of building TTM KUnit tests as a module, the issue is not tied to a specific arch -- the subtests use unexported definitions. While it would be possible to add EXPORT_SYMBOL to the TTM functions, we don't want to do it with do_send_sig_info. Christian, two questions here: 1) Shall we export ttm_resource_alloc, ttm_tt_create and ttm_tt_destroy? Or is there a reason why they are "hidden"? Yeah, those are not supposed to be touched by drivers directly. 2) If we decide to keep ttm_bo_reserve_interrupted subtest as it is, should I make CONFIG_DRM_TTM_KUNIT_TEST a boolean, instead of a tristate? DRM KUnit tests are tristate, but I think they don't use non-exported functions. Another option would be to build them together with TTM into one module, but I'm not sure if the KUNIT tests can do this. Regards, Christian. Many thanks, Karolina [auto build test ERROR on drm-misc/drm-misc-next] [also build test ERROR on drm/drm-next drm-exynos/exynos-drm-next drm-intel/for-linux-next drm-tip/drm-tip linus/master next-20230831] [cannot apply to drm-intel/for-linux-next-fixes v6.5] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Karolina-Stolarek/drm-ttm-tests-Add-tests-for-ttm_resource-and-ttm_sys_man/20230831-185954 base: git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-misc drm-misc-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/d914169aee773ee20c0b730b38d42a1fd7613bb6.1693479161.git.karolina.stolarek%40intel.com patch subject: [PATCH 3/3] drm/ttm/tests: Add tests for ttm_bo functions config: openrisc-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230901/202309011935.bbpezbuq-...@intel.com/config) compiler: or1k-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230901/202309011935.bbpezbuq-...@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309011935.bbpezbuq-...@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>, old ones prefixed by <<): WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_wlc.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_fo.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ovf.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_lblc.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_lblcr.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_dh.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sh.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sed.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_nq.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_twos.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ftp.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_pe_sip.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_defrag_ipv4.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv4.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/netfilter/iptable_nat.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/netfilter/iptable_raw.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/ipip.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/ip_gre.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/udp_tunnel.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/ip_vti.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/ah4.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/esp4.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/xfrm4_tunnel.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/tunnel4.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/inet_diag.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/tcp_diag.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/udp_diag.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/raw_diag.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/xfrm/xfrm_algo.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/xfrm/xfrm_user.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/unix/unix_diag.o WARNING: modpost: missing
Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/ttm/tests: Add tests for ttm_bo functions
On 1.09.2023 14:04, kernel test robot wrote: Hi Karolina, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: It's a problem of building TTM KUnit tests as a module, the issue is not tied to a specific arch -- the subtests use unexported definitions. While it would be possible to add EXPORT_SYMBOL to the TTM functions, we don't want to do it with do_send_sig_info. Christian, two questions here: 1) Shall we export ttm_resource_alloc, ttm_tt_create and ttm_tt_destroy? Or is there a reason why they are "hidden"? 2) If we decide to keep ttm_bo_reserve_interrupted subtest as it is, should I make CONFIG_DRM_TTM_KUNIT_TEST a boolean, instead of a tristate? DRM KUnit tests are tristate, but I think they don't use non-exported functions. Many thanks, Karolina [auto build test ERROR on drm-misc/drm-misc-next] [also build test ERROR on drm/drm-next drm-exynos/exynos-drm-next drm-intel/for-linux-next drm-tip/drm-tip linus/master next-20230831] [cannot apply to drm-intel/for-linux-next-fixes v6.5] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Karolina-Stolarek/drm-ttm-tests-Add-tests-for-ttm_resource-and-ttm_sys_man/20230831-185954 base: git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-misc drm-misc-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/d914169aee773ee20c0b730b38d42a1fd7613bb6.1693479161.git.karolina.stolarek%40intel.com patch subject: [PATCH 3/3] drm/ttm/tests: Add tests for ttm_bo functions config: openrisc-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230901/202309011935.bbpezbuq-...@intel.com/config) compiler: or1k-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230901/202309011935.bbpezbuq-...@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309011935.bbpezbuq-...@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>, old ones prefixed by <<): WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_wlc.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_fo.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ovf.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_lblc.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_lblcr.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_dh.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sh.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sed.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_nq.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_twos.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ftp.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_pe_sip.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_defrag_ipv4.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv4.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/netfilter/iptable_nat.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/netfilter/iptable_raw.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/ipip.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/ip_gre.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/udp_tunnel.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/ip_vti.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/ah4.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/esp4.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/xfrm4_tunnel.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/tunnel4.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/inet_diag.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/tcp_diag.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/udp_diag.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/raw_diag.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/xfrm/xfrm_algo.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/xfrm/xfrm_user.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/unix/unix_diag.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6table_raw.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6table_nat.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_defrag_ipv6.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in
Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/ttm/tests: Add tests for ttm_bo functions
Hi Karolina, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on drm-misc/drm-misc-next] [also build test ERROR on drm/drm-next drm-exynos/exynos-drm-next drm-intel/for-linux-next drm-tip/drm-tip linus/master next-20230831] [cannot apply to drm-intel/for-linux-next-fixes v6.5] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Karolina-Stolarek/drm-ttm-tests-Add-tests-for-ttm_resource-and-ttm_sys_man/20230831-185954 base: git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-misc drm-misc-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/d914169aee773ee20c0b730b38d42a1fd7613bb6.1693479161.git.karolina.stolarek%40intel.com patch subject: [PATCH 3/3] drm/ttm/tests: Add tests for ttm_bo functions config: openrisc-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230901/202309011935.bbpezbuq-...@intel.com/config) compiler: or1k-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230901/202309011935.bbpezbuq-...@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309011935.bbpezbuq-...@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>, old ones prefixed by <<): WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_wlc.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_fo.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ovf.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_lblc.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_lblcr.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_dh.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sh.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sed.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_nq.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_twos.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ftp.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_pe_sip.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_defrag_ipv4.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv4.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/netfilter/iptable_nat.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/netfilter/iptable_raw.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/ip_tunnel.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/ipip.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/ip_gre.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/udp_tunnel.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/ip_vti.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/ah4.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/esp4.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/xfrm4_tunnel.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/tunnel4.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/inet_diag.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/tcp_diag.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/udp_diag.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv4/raw_diag.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/xfrm/xfrm_algo.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/xfrm/xfrm_user.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/unix/unix_diag.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6table_raw.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6table_nat.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_defrag_ipv6.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv6.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv6/ah6.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv6/esp6.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv6/xfrm6_tunnel.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv6/tunnel6.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv6/mip6.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv6/sit.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/ipv6/ip6_udp_tunnel.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/dsa/tag_ar9331.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in net/dsa/tag_brcm.o WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in
