Re: [PATCH v2 09/12] mm: Remove the now unused mem_encrypt_active() function
On 8/17/21 5:24 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 12:22:33PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: >> This one wants to be part of the previous patch. > > ... and the three following patches too - the treewide patch does a > single atomic :) replacement and that's it. Ok, I'll squash those all together. Thanks, Tom >
Re: [PATCH v2 09/12] mm: Remove the now unused mem_encrypt_active() function
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 12:22:33PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > This one wants to be part of the previous patch. ... and the three following patches too - the treewide patch does a single atomic :) replacement and that's it. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Re: [PATCH v2 09/12] mm: Remove the now unused mem_encrypt_active() function
On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 11:59:28AM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote: > The mem_encrypt_active() function has been replaced by prot_guest_has(), > so remove the implementation. > > Reviewed-by: Joerg Roedel > Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky > --- > include/linux/mem_encrypt.h | 4 > 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/mem_encrypt.h b/include/linux/mem_encrypt.h > index 5c4a18a91f89..ae4526389261 100644 > --- a/include/linux/mem_encrypt.h > +++ b/include/linux/mem_encrypt.h > @@ -16,10 +16,6 @@ > > #include > > -#else/* !CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT */ > - > -static inline bool mem_encrypt_active(void) { return false; } > - > #endif /* CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT */ > > #ifdef CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT > -- This one wants to be part of the previous patch. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette