ttm: merge ttm_backend & ttm_tt, introduce ttm dma allocator V7

2011-12-03 Thread Jerome Glisse
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Jerome Glisse  wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 9:52 AM, David Airlie  wrote:
>>
>>
>> - Original Message -
>>> From: "Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" 
>>> To: "Jerome Glisse" , dri-devel at 
>>> lists.freedesktop.org, "konrad wilk" ,
>>> thellstrom at vmware.com, airlied at gmail.com, "Jerome Glisse" >> redhat.com>
>>> Sent: Friday, 2 December, 2011 2:19:01 PM
>>> Subject: Re: ttm: merge ttm_backend & ttm_tt, introduce ttm dma allocator V7
>>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 08:08:36PM -0500, Jerome Glisse wrote:
>>> > On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 08:04:47PM -0500, j.glisse at gmail.com
>>> > wrote:
>>> > > Important fix to patch 14, fix accounting of ghost bo. When
>>> > > creating a
>>> > > ghost bo we don't account it, so set its acc_size to 0 so that
>>> > > when
>>> > > ghost is release we don't overfree.
>>> > >
>>> > > I wonder how i didn't run into this before.
>>> > >
>>> > > Patch are also at
>>> > >
>>> > > http://people.freedesktop.org/~glisse/ttmdma/
>>> > >
>>> > > Cheers,
>>> > > Jerome
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> > Oh i forgot to add some of the reviewed by, i updated patches on
>>> > fdo,
>>> > i don't resend to the ml.
>>>
>>> Great! How should we ask Dave to pull them? Does he prefer to do it
>>> via git
>>> tree? In which I can create a branch with those patches and send him
>>> a GIT PULL
>>> email? Or is there a more convient way?
>>
>> If someone could suck them all into a git tree + all the Reviewed-by tags 
>> from the people who reviewed them it would make it a lot easier,
>>
>> I lost track of where this ended up as Jerome had a few balls in the air and 
>> I know Thomas wasn't liking some of them.
>>
>> So please send me a git url and I'll go review that next week.
>>
>> Dave.
>
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~glisse/linux/log/
>
> I need to add last reviewed by from Thomas. Note this tree also has
> other patches (multi ring lastest patchset) which we want for next too
> i believe.
>
> I will update this tree on monday with all the missing reviewed by
>
> Cheers,
> Jerome

Just to be extra informative my tree has:

drm/ttm: callback move_notify any time bo placement change v4
Got the reviewed by recently from Thomas

drm/ttm: simplify memory accounting for ttm user v2
Thomas reviewed version1, version2 only fix a bug so i think it's safe
to assume i have reviewed by Thomas for v2.

Cheers,
Jerome


ttm: merge ttm_backend & ttm_tt, introduce ttm dma allocator V7

2011-12-03 Thread Jerome Glisse
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 9:52 AM, David Airlie  wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" 
>> To: "Jerome Glisse" , dri-devel at 
>> lists.freedesktop.org, "konrad wilk" ,
>> thellstrom at vmware.com, airlied at gmail.com, "Jerome Glisse" > redhat.com>
>> Sent: Friday, 2 December, 2011 2:19:01 PM
>> Subject: Re: ttm: merge ttm_backend & ttm_tt, introduce ttm dma allocator V7
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 08:08:36PM -0500, Jerome Glisse wrote:
>> > On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 08:04:47PM -0500, j.glisse at gmail.com
>> > wrote:
>> > > Important fix to patch 14, fix accounting of ghost bo. When
>> > > creating a
>> > > ghost bo we don't account it, so set its acc_size to 0 so that
>> > > when
>> > > ghost is release we don't overfree.
>> > >
>> > > I wonder how i didn't run into this before.
>> > >
>> > > Patch are also at
>> > >
>> > > http://people.freedesktop.org/~glisse/ttmdma/
>> > >
>> > > Cheers,
>> > > Jerome
>> > >
>> >
>> > Oh i forgot to add some of the reviewed by, i updated patches on
>> > fdo,
>> > i don't resend to the ml.
>>
>> Great! How should we ask Dave to pull them? Does he prefer to do it
>> via git
>> tree? In which I can create a branch with those patches and send him
>> a GIT PULL
>> email? Or is there a more convient way?
>
> If someone could suck them all into a git tree + all the Reviewed-by tags 
> from the people who reviewed them it would make it a lot easier,
>
> I lost track of where this ended up as Jerome had a few balls in the air and 
> I know Thomas wasn't liking some of them.
>
> So please send me a git url and I'll go review that next week.
>
> Dave.

http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~glisse/linux/log/

I need to add last reviewed by from Thomas. Note this tree also has
other patches (multi ring lastest patchset) which we want for next too
i believe.

I will update this tree on monday with all the missing reviewed by

Cheers,
Jerome


ttm: merge ttm_backend & ttm_tt, introduce ttm dma allocator V7

2011-12-03 Thread David Airlie


- Original Message -
> From: "Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" 
> To: "Jerome Glisse" , dri-devel at 
> lists.freedesktop.org, "konrad wilk" ,
> thellstrom at vmware.com, airlied at gmail.com, "Jerome Glisse"  redhat.com>
> Sent: Friday, 2 December, 2011 2:19:01 PM
> Subject: Re: ttm: merge ttm_backend & ttm_tt, introduce ttm dma allocator V7
> 
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 08:08:36PM -0500, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 08:04:47PM -0500, j.glisse at gmail.com
> > wrote:
> > > Important fix to patch 14, fix accounting of ghost bo. When
> > > creating a
> > > ghost bo we don't account it, so set its acc_size to 0 so that
> > > when
> > > ghost is release we don't overfree.
> > > 
> > > I wonder how i didn't run into this before.
> > > 
> > > Patch are also at
> > > 
> > > http://people.freedesktop.org/~glisse/ttmdma/
> > > 
> > > Cheers,
> > > Jerome
> > > 
> > 
> > Oh i forgot to add some of the reviewed by, i updated patches on
> > fdo,
> > i don't resend to the ml.
> 
> Great! How should we ask Dave to pull them? Does he prefer to do it
> via git
> tree? In which I can create a branch with those patches and send him
> a GIT PULL
> email? Or is there a more convient way?

If someone could suck them all into a git tree + all the Reviewed-by tags from 
the people who reviewed them it would make it a lot easier,

I lost track of where this ended up as Jerome had a few balls in the air and I 
know Thomas wasn't liking some of them.

So please send me a git url and I'll go review that next week.

Dave.


Re: ttm: merge ttm_backend ttm_tt, introduce ttm dma allocator V7

2011-12-03 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 08:08:36PM -0500, Jerome Glisse wrote:
 On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 08:04:47PM -0500, j.glisse at gmail.com wrote:
  Important fix to patch 14, fix accounting of ghost bo. When creating a
  ghost bo we don't account it, so set its acc_size to 0 so that when
  ghost is release we don't overfree.
  
  I wonder how i didn't run into this before.
  
  Patch are also at
  
  http://people.freedesktop.org/~glisse/ttmdma/
  
  Cheers,
  Jerome
  
 
 Oh i forgot to add some of the reviewed by, i updated patches on fdo,
 i don't resend to the ml.

Great! How should we ask Dave to pull them? Does he prefer to do it via git
tree? In which I can create a branch with those patches and send him a GIT PULL
email? Or is there a more convient way?

 Cheers,
 Jerome
___
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel


Re: ttm: merge ttm_backend ttm_tt, introduce ttm dma allocator V7

2011-12-03 Thread Jerome Glisse
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 9:52 AM, David Airlie airl...@redhat.com wrote:


 - Original Message -
 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk konrad.w...@oracle.com
 To: Jerome Glisse j.gli...@gmail.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, 
 konrad wilk konrad.w...@oracle.com,
 thellst...@vmware.com, airl...@gmail.com, Jerome Glisse 
 jgli...@redhat.com
 Sent: Friday, 2 December, 2011 2:19:01 PM
 Subject: Re: ttm: merge ttm_backend  ttm_tt, introduce ttm dma allocator V7

 On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 08:08:36PM -0500, Jerome Glisse wrote:
  On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 08:04:47PM -0500, j.glisse at gmail.com
  wrote:
   Important fix to patch 14, fix accounting of ghost bo. When
   creating a
   ghost bo we don't account it, so set its acc_size to 0 so that
   when
   ghost is release we don't overfree.
  
   I wonder how i didn't run into this before.
  
   Patch are also at
  
   http://people.freedesktop.org/~glisse/ttmdma/
  
   Cheers,
   Jerome
  
 
  Oh i forgot to add some of the reviewed by, i updated patches on
  fdo,
  i don't resend to the ml.

 Great! How should we ask Dave to pull them? Does he prefer to do it
 via git
 tree? In which I can create a branch with those patches and send him
 a GIT PULL
 email? Or is there a more convient way?

 If someone could suck them all into a git tree + all the Reviewed-by tags 
 from the people who reviewed them it would make it a lot easier,

 I lost track of where this ended up as Jerome had a few balls in the air and 
 I know Thomas wasn't liking some of them.

 So please send me a git url and I'll go review that next week.

 Dave.

http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~glisse/linux/log/

I need to add last reviewed by from Thomas. Note this tree also has
other patches (multi ring lastest patchset) which we want for next too
i believe.

I will update this tree on monday with all the missing reviewed by

Cheers,
Jerome
___
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel


ttm: merge ttm_backend & ttm_tt, introduce ttm dma allocator V7

2011-12-02 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 08:08:36PM -0500, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 08:04:47PM -0500, j.glisse at gmail.com wrote:
> > Important fix to patch 14, fix accounting of ghost bo. When creating a
> > ghost bo we don't account it, so set its acc_size to 0 so that when
> > ghost is release we don't overfree.
> > 
> > I wonder how i didn't run into this before.
> > 
> > Patch are also at
> > 
> > http://people.freedesktop.org/~glisse/ttmdma/
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Jerome
> > 
> 
> Oh i forgot to add some of the reviewed by, i updated patches on fdo,
> i don't resend to the ml.

Great! How should we ask Dave to pull them? Does he prefer to do it via git
tree? In which I can create a branch with those patches and send him a GIT PULL
email? Or is there a more convient way?

> Cheers,
> Jerome


ttm: merge ttm_backend & ttm_tt, introduce ttm dma allocator V7

2011-11-18 Thread Jerome Glisse
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 08:04:47PM -0500, j.glisse at gmail.com wrote:
> Important fix to patch 14, fix accounting of ghost bo. When creating a
> ghost bo we don't account it, so set its acc_size to 0 so that when
> ghost is release we don't overfree.
> 
> I wonder how i didn't run into this before.
> 
> Patch are also at
> 
> http://people.freedesktop.org/~glisse/ttmdma/
> 
> Cheers,
> Jerome
> 

Oh i forgot to add some of the reviewed by, i updated patches on fdo,
i don't resend to the ml.

Cheers,
Jerome


ttm: merge ttm_backend & ttm_tt, introduce ttm dma allocator V7

2011-11-18 Thread j.gli...@gmail.com
Important fix to patch 14, fix accounting of ghost bo. When creating a
ghost bo we don't account it, so set its acc_size to 0 so that when
ghost is release we don't overfree.

I wonder how i didn't run into this before.

Patch are also at

http://people.freedesktop.org/~glisse/ttmdma/

Cheers,
Jerome



ttm: merge ttm_backend ttm_tt, introduce ttm dma allocator V7

2011-11-18 Thread j . glisse
Important fix to patch 14, fix accounting of ghost bo. When creating a
ghost bo we don't account it, so set its acc_size to 0 so that when
ghost is release we don't overfree.

I wonder how i didn't run into this before.

Patch are also at

http://people.freedesktop.org/~glisse/ttmdma/

Cheers,
Jerome

___
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel