Re: TLS support (finally!)
Am Sonntag, 11. Juli 2004 21:10 schrieb Ian Romanick: > These two patches cooperate to enable TLS support. For now you much > manually add "#define GlxUseThreadLocalStorage YES" to your host.def to > enable TLS support. Apply the Mesa patch to the Mesa tree and the DRI > patch to the DRI tree. > > Right now libGL will try for a TLS driver first, and fallback to the > non-TLS driver if tls/*_dri.so does not exist. I am considering adding > an env variable to make libGL ignore the TLS drivers altogether. The > only catch with this would be that using the env var would not disable > libGL's use of TLS. > > There are a couple gaps in my understanding of TLS. I hope that someone > on the list can fill me in. I've seen that a few apps require > 'LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.19' to disable TLS. Doing that with, for example, > glxgears doesn't seem to make any difference. It still uses the TLS > libGL.so and the TLS driver. What is this option /really/ supposed to do? It works fine on SuSE 9.0 _plus_ updated glibc-2.3.3-73 (taken from SuSE 9.0.42, 9.1 beta). Cuts 1/9 of the relocs. /opt/Mesa> objdump -R /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1.2 | wc -l 8074 Was 90xx before. Greetings, Dieter --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [Xorg] future of DRI DDX
Alex Deucher wrote: Is it worth continuing to support a separate DDX tree for the DRI? In my opinion, it would be easier for the DRI to just use XORG for DDX. Any thoughts/opinions one way or another? I know idr may have some issues with a different tree. That shouldn't be a problem. I can't even remember when the last time I made a change to a DDX driver was. I was more concerned about the GLX code (both client and server). Although I haven't done anything for the past few weeks, I do a fair amount of work in that area. --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: i830 driver status..
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004, Alex Deucher wrote: >Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 09:06:26 -0400 >From: Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: Dave Airlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII >X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: i830 driver status.. > >On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 08:22:42 +0100 (IST), Dave Airlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Is the i830 driver considered to be dead, should any future work go >> towards the i915 one? >> >> just like to get a semi-official idea? if so we need to import the up to >> date DDX into the DRI tree and start releasing the snapshots for the i915 >> driver.. > >Sounds good to me. At this point perhaps we should just not worry >about updating the DRI tree and just switch to using the XORG tree for >DDX. it's a lot of hassle to have to maintain both trees and then >moves changes back and forth. New dri DDX related work can happen on >a branch maybe. Just a thought... I think it is a great idea if the DRI CVS tree moves into X.org, either on Xorg CVS head, or on a branch - either would be better than having so many different repositories to track, and merging would probably be much smoother also, and could possibly be done more often as well. Please bring this up on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list if it hasn't already (haven't checked my xorg folder). The new release is looming on the near horizon for late August or thereabouts, so it would be nice if this change could occur before then. TTYL --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
future of DRI DDX
Is it worth continuing to support a separate DDX tree for the DRI? In my opinion, it would be easier for the DRI to just use XORG for DDX. Any thoughts/opinions one way or another? I know idr may have some issues with a different tree. Alex --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: i830 driver status..
On Fri, 2004-07-16 at 06:06, Alex Deucher wrote: > On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 08:22:42 +0100 (IST), Dave Airlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Is the i830 driver considered to be dead, should any future work go > > towards the i915 one? > > > > just like to get a semi-official idea? if so we need to import the up to > > date DDX into the DRI tree and start releasing the snapshots for the i915 > > driver.. > > Sounds good to me. At this point perhaps we should just not worry > about updating the DRI tree and just switch to using the XORG tree for > DDX. it's a lot of hassle to have to maintain both trees and then > moves changes back and forth. New dri DDX related work can happen on > a branch maybe. Just a thought... > > Alex There would certainly be access for all current DRI developers to the XOrg tree, at least from our end. I remember there were concerns with idr being able to commit to the new tree due to IBM policy, though. Any updates on that? -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: i830 driver status..
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 08:22:42 +0100 (IST), Dave Airlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is the i830 driver considered to be dead, should any future work go > towards the i915 one? > > just like to get a semi-official idea? if so we need to import the up to > date DDX into the DRI tree and start releasing the snapshots for the i915 > driver.. Sounds good to me. At this point perhaps we should just not worry about updating the DRI tree and just switch to using the XORG tree for DDX. it's a lot of hassle to have to maintain both trees and then moves changes back and forth. New dri DDX related work can happen on a branch maybe. Just a thought... Alex > > I'm bringing over some fixes for the i915 from the i830 tree that I made > and I'm going to try and get texture compression working on it also.. > > Dave. > > -- > David Airlie, Software Engineer > http://www.skynet.ie/~airlied / airlied at skynet.ie > pam_smb / Linux DECstation / Linux VAX / ILUG person > > --- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop > FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! > Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click > -- > ___ > Dri-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel > --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
[Bug 872]
OpenGL applications do not draw or draw strangely when using SiS DRI X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there. http://freedesktop.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=872 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|dri-|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Severity|major |normal --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-07-16 01:59 --- I believe this is fixed in X.Org CVS. Please update and try again, or use the binary snapshots from http://dri.sf.net/ (which should be the same code, SiS-wise). -- Configure bugmail: http://freedesktop.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: i830 driver status..
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 08:22:42AM +0100, Dave Airlie wrote: > Is the i830 driver considered to be dead, should any future work go > towards the i915 one? I think you can deem the i830 driver dead, and the i915 superceeds it. All future work should go to the i915 driver. Alan. --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
[Bug 872]
OpenGL applications do not draw or draw strangely when using SiS DRI X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there. http://freedesktop.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=872 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |major -- Configure bugmail: http://freedesktop.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
i830 driver status..
Is the i830 driver considered to be dead, should any future work go towards the i915 one? just like to get a semi-official idea? if so we need to import the up to date DDX into the DRI tree and start releasing the snapshots for the i915 driver.. I'm bringing over some fixes for the i915 from the i830 tree that I made and I'm going to try and get texture compression working on it also.. Dave. -- David Airlie, Software Engineer http://www.skynet.ie/~airlied / airlied at skynet.ie pam_smb / Linux DECstation / Linux VAX / ILUG person --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
