Re: [Dri-devel] Rage128 and VIA KT133
I have had the absolute worst luck getting any Rage128 or Radeon-based ATI card to work on my Asus A7V (Via Apollo Pro KT133 chipset), but the unofficial FAQ on bork-DCC in #dri on OpenProjects notes that there are tremendous problems with "early Via chipsets," which I guess the KT133 falls under. This past weekend I spent 30+ hours straight trying to get four different Radeon cards to even start X 4.1.0 without locking (thank some deity for Alt+SysRq+r/s/u/b). I've scoured the dri-* archives and Google search returns all in naught... Hope you have better luck. =) Cheers, dtc --- Dan Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG key: www.cs.unc.edu/~chenda/pubkey.gpg.asc On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, Alexander Strohmaier wrote: > Does the combination > Rage128 RF chipset and the VIA KT133 (VT8363) work > for DRI ? > > I have such a combination and it does not work, whereas > with the same Graphics card and a Pentium bord > DRI works with the same configuration. > > Any ideas what I could do to make it work? ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
[Dri-devel] Need assistance compiling mesa-4-0-branch
Hi folks, I'm attempting to incorporate DRI's mesa-4-0-branch into my current X 4.1.0.1 (Debian sid from X 4_1 branch) setup but am running into difficulties. I checked out the mesa-4-0-branch and created the build tree as the DRI compilation guide instructed (which btw is rather !current, so when I get all this working correctly, I'll submit some changes to the documentation), and I cp -R /usr/X11R6/lib into xc/exports/. . make World is still failing with being unable to link against libXau.a, however. I've checked dri-user and -devel archives, but no viable solution was listed. Would someone with a cluebat lend me a hand and point out where I'm failing miserably? Thanks! --- Dan Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG key: www.cs.unc.edu/~chenda/pubkey.gpg.asc ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [Dri-devel] Need assistance compiling mesa-4-0-branch
Actually I just bypassed it by putting in a #define in host.def (thanks [EMAIL PROTECTED]) and a few extra twiddles, and it compiled and installed just fine. Thanks. --- Dan Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG key: www.cs.unc.edu/~chenda/pubkey.gpg.asc On 25 Oct 2001, Michel [ISO-8859-1] Dänzer wrote: > Have you tried copying it to $ProjectRoot/lib instead? ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re:[Dri-devel] CVS XFree and StarOffice 6.0
The StarOffice 6.0 beta works just fine here on X 4.1.0[.1, it's a Debian sid package, 4.1.0-9]. --- Dan Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG key: www.cs.unc.edu/~chenda/pubkey.gpg.asc On Sun, 28 Oct 2001, Papadakos Panagiotis wrote: > There are problems with Xfree-4.1.0 and after.I don't know what,but if you > want tou use Openoffice-Staroffice 6.0 you will have to work with > Xfree-4.0.3. ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [Dri-devel] CVS XFree and StarOffice 6.0
This has occurred quite often for me as well in running the setup program. I suspected a corrupt download (?!) and kept re-downloading a fresh copy until one version finally worked. Didn't dig deep to find the root of the problem, though. --- Dan Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG key: www.cs.unc.edu/~chenda/pubkey.gpg.asc On Sun, 28 Oct 2001, Papadakos Panagiotis wrote: > I try to run setup from openoffice 638C and all I get is the message: > glibc version: 2.2.3 and then I get back to the shell.I am using the > latest CVS from Xfree and I am using a G400 Dualheaded.Also many other > people have the same problem,but nobody has explained why this is > happening. ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [Dri-devel] Q: ATI Radeon 7500/8500
I believe Mike Harris said he has 2D working, but 3D's up in the air...? --- Dan Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG key: www.cs.unc.edu/~chenda/pubkey.gpg.asc On Tue, 16 Oct 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have not seen these cards yet, so I don't know for sure. However, I was > told by ATI that, at least in TV-in/out respects Radeon All-in-Wonder 8500 > is similar to existing All-in-Wonders. I would reasonably expect 2d and > overlay to function and, perhaps, even dri although they did have some > chagnes to the graphics pipeline so we can't know for certain until > someone tries ;) ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [Dri-devel] DRI CVS mesa-4-0-branch doesn't compile
You need to compile DRI mesa-4-0-branch alongside mesa_4_0_branch from Mesa3d. You'll also need to specify your current X libs. Add this to your host.def: #define LdPreLib -L$(BUILDLIBDIR) -L$(USRLIBDIR) -L/usr/X11R6/lib/ --- Dan Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG key: www.cs.unc.edu/~chenda/pubkey.gpg.asc On Sat, 8 Dec 2001, Zilvinas Valinskas wrote: > Have anyone got any luck compiling DRI CVS mesa-4-0-branch ? > > It compiles fine (it looks so), but during link step complains - -lXext > not found ... ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [Dri-devel] DRI CVS mesa-4-0-branch doesn't compile
On Sat, 8 Dec 2001, Zilvinas Valinskas wrote: > What do you mean along side ? > > Get the Mesa 4.0 (mesa_4_0_branch from mesa3d.sf.net ?) and > modify host.def with > > #define MesaSrcDir $MESA_SRC/Mesa4.0 ??? Yep, that's what I was referring to, but apparently 4.0.1 has been merged (as was pointed out earlier), so it's not necessary currently. --- Dan Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG key: www.cs.unc.edu/~chenda/pubkey.gpg.asc ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
