Re: GLX_EXT_texture_from_pixmap + radeon
Michel Dänzer wrote: The hardware can do it, it's just not implemented yet. It requires using the TTM memory manager, which Dave Airlie started adding support for to the radeon DRM. I can see this has started few days ago. It seems the translation table maps enable several interesting things. my rv250 is yours for testing. thanks - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
GLX_EXT_texture_from_pixmap + radeon
Hello, I have a feature related question. I have an rv250 and I know the GLX_EXT_texture_from_pixmap extension is not supported under direct rendering. As you know this is a prerequisite for the composite managers compiz/beryl. Another important feature missing is the GLX_SGIX_pbuffer. Are these part of DRI project's responsibilities? If yes, is there a rough time-frame when these will be included? Is there any open-source driver that supports them? thanks - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: GLX_EXT_texture_from_pixmap + radeon
Michel Dänzer wrote: On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 09:41 +0100, Ioannis Nousias wrote: I have a feature related question. I have an rv250 and I know the GLX_EXT_texture_from_pixmap extension is not supported under direct rendering. As you know this is a prerequisite for the composite managers compiz/beryl. Note that direct rendering isn't strictly a requirement for good GLX_EXT_texture_from_pixmap performance; see http://people.freedesktop.org/~daenzer/aiglx-zero-copy-tfp/ , the 3D driver specific parts of which should be relatively easy to port to r200. Another important feature missing is the GLX_SGIX_pbuffer. Do you really need that instead of GL_EXT_framebuffer_object? Are these part of DRI project's responsibilities? If yes, is there a rough time-frame when these will be included? There's http://dri.freedesktop.org/wiki/DirectRenderingToRedirectedWindows but I don't know of any timeframe. Is there any open-source driver that supports them? I don't know of any that support GLX_SGIX_pbuffer, but the i915tex driver supports GL_EXT_framebuffer_object. thanks. The r200 driver doesn't support that extension either (or might be the hardware I don't know) - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
