Re: drm: Branch 'master'
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 11:26:59 +0200, Zdenek Kabelac wrote: Why keeping different name for C++ and C ? Because changing the name for C means breaking API for existing users, which is not a nice thing to do. Cheers, Julien -- Sell apps to millions through the Intel(R) Atom(Tm) Developer Program Be part of this innovative community and reach millions of netbook users worldwide. Take advantage of special opportunities to increase revenue and speed time-to-market. Join now, and jumpstart your future. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-atom-d2d -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [PATCH] tests/ programs need -lrt too since they use clock_gettime.
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 16:46:46 +0300, Török Edwin wrote: When using the binutils gold linker, even if libdrm.so is already linked against -lrt you still need to link your app against -lrt if your app needs symbols from it. Signed-off-by: Török Edwin edwinto...@gmail.com --- tests/Makefile.am |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/Makefile.am b/tests/Makefile.am index 3e74705..81006ab 100644 --- a/tests/Makefile.am +++ b/tests/Makefile.am @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ AM_CPPFLAGS = \ -I $(top_srcdir)/include/drm \ -I $(top_srcdir) -LDADD = $(top_builddir)/libdrm.la +LDADD = $(top_builddir)/libdrm.la @CLOCK_LIB@ noinst_PROGRAMS = \ dristat \ The tests don't use librt afaict, the uses of clock_gettime() are in libdrm and libdrm_intel. So your explanation doesn't seem to make sense... Cheers, Julien -- Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] libdrm: Move intel_atomic.h to libdrm core for sharing.
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Pauli Nieminen suok...@gmail.com wrote:
intel_atomic.h includes very usefull atomic operations for
lock free parrallel access of variables. Moving these to
core libdrm for code sharing with radeon.
Signed-off-by: Pauli Nieminen suok...@gmail.com
---
Makefile.am | 2 +-
configure.ac | 2 +-
intel/intel_atomic.h | 56 +-
xf86atomic.h | 93
++
4 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 xf86atomic.h
diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am
index ee3ccc7..295121f 100644
--- a/Makefile.am
+++ b/Makefile.am
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ libdrm_la_SOURCES = \
libdrm_lists.h
libdrmincludedir = ${includedir}
-libdrminclude_HEADERS = xf86drm.h xf86drmMode.h
+libdrminclude_HEADERS = xf86drm.h xf86drmMode.h xf86atomic.h
Should this really get installed? I'm not sure this should be public
libdrm interface.
Cheers,
Julien
--
Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
--
___
Dri-devel mailing list
Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [PATCH 3/3] Install headers to $(includedir)/libdrm
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 19:07:24 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: Avoids conflicts with kernel headers. Signed-off-by: Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org --- This was suggested by Eric so distros can let the kernel install drm headers, but provide updated headers from libdrm so we can build new drivers regardless of the kernel version. any comments on this? Cheers, Julien -- Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [PATCH] DRM: fix headers_check warnings
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 14:57:36 +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
Fixed following headers_check warnings:
CHECK include/drm (14 files)
include/drm/drm_mode.h:84: found __[us]{8,16,32,64} type without #include
linux/types.h
include/drm/i915_drm.h:119: found __[us]{8,16,32,64} type without #include
linux/types.h
include/drm/mga_drm.h:260: found __[us]{8,16,32,64} type without #include
linux/types.h
include/drm/radeon_drm.h:758: found __[us]{8,16,32,64} type without #include
linux/types.h
include/drm/via_drm.h:117: found __[us]{8,16,32,64} type without #include
linux/types.h
These files are shared with BSD, afaik, and they get the linux/types.h
include from drm.h.
Cheers,
Julien
--
Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
--
___
Dri-devel mailing list
Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
[PATCH 1/3] libdrm_intel.pc: don't include ${includedir}/drm
intel_bufmgr.h is installed in ${includedir} directly, and the other
headers are taken care of by libdrm.pc's Cflags.
Signed-off-by: Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org
---
intel/libdrm_intel.pc.in |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/intel/libdrm_intel.pc.in b/intel/libdrm_intel.pc.in
index b93f1c6..e8080d9 100644
--- a/intel/libdrm_intel.pc.in
+++ b/intel/libdrm_intel.pc.in
@@ -8,4 +8,4 @@ Description: Userspace interface to kernel DRM services
Version: @PACKAGE_VERSION@
Requires: libdrm
Libs: -L${libdir} -ldrm_intel
-Cflags: -I${includedir} -I${includedir}/drm
+Cflags: -I${includedir}
--
1.6.6.1
--
Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
--
___
Dri-devel mailing list
Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [PATCH 2/3] libdrm_nouveau requires libdrm
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 13:38:59 -0500, Kristian Høgsberg wrote: On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: nouveau_drmif.h includes xf86drm.h. If it's a source level dependency it should be a regular Requires: in the .pc. Requires.private: is only for private libraries you link to but don't expose their API in your header files. The idea is (AFAIK) that you can ask pkg-config to list all libraries to link to for static linking, in which case pkg-config needs a way to find all needed libraries. It even looks like Requires.private has been obsoleted by Libs.private in recent pkg-config. That's not what the pkg-config maintainer says... http://err.no/personal/blog/2008/Mar/25 Using Requires.private lets us get the necessary cflags, but avoids linking to the library if not using --static. Cheers, Julien -- Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
[PATCH 2/3] libdrm_nouveau requires libdrm
nouveau_drmif.h includes xf86drm.h.
Signed-off-by: Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org
---
nouveau/libdrm_nouveau.pc.in |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/nouveau/libdrm_nouveau.pc.in b/nouveau/libdrm_nouveau.pc.in
index 7ef49e5..6ae6287 100644
--- a/nouveau/libdrm_nouveau.pc.in
+++ b/nouveau/libdrm_nouveau.pc.in
@@ -8,3 +8,4 @@ Description: Userspace interface to nouveau kernel DRM services
Version: 0.6
Libs: -L${libdir} -ldrm_nouveau
Cflags: -I${includedir} -I${includedir}/drm -I${includedir}/nouveau
+Requires.private: libdrm
--
1.6.6.1
--
Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
--
___
Dri-devel mailing list
Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
[PATCH 3/3] Install headers to $(includedir)/libdrm
Avoids conflicts with kernel headers.
Signed-off-by: Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org
---
This was suggested by Eric so distros can let the kernel install drm
headers, but provide updated headers from libdrm so we can build new
drivers regardless of the kernel version.
include/drm/Makefile.am |2 +-
libdrm.pc.in |2 +-
nouveau/Makefile.am |2 +-
nouveau/libdrm_nouveau.pc.in |2 +-
radeon/Makefile.am |2 +-
radeon/libdrm_radeon.pc.in |2 +-
6 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/drm/Makefile.am b/include/drm/Makefile.am
index 9046955..43695bd 100644
--- a/include/drm/Makefile.am
+++ b/include/drm/Makefile.am
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
# however, r300 and via need their reg headers installed in order to build.
# better solutions are welcome.
-klibdrmincludedir = ${includedir}/drm
+klibdrmincludedir = ${includedir}/libdrm
klibdrminclude_HEADERS = \
drm.h \
drm_mode.h \
diff --git a/libdrm.pc.in b/libdrm.pc.in
index 6e00597..b46e2a6 100644
--- a/libdrm.pc.in
+++ b/libdrm.pc.in
@@ -7,4 +7,4 @@ Name: libdrm
Description: Userspace interface to kernel DRM services
Version: @PACKAGE_VERSION@
Libs: -L${libdir} -ldrm
-Cflags: -I${includedir} -I${includedir}/drm
+Cflags: -I${includedir} -I${includedir}/libdrm
diff --git a/nouveau/Makefile.am b/nouveau/Makefile.am
index 5d759c5..b6d214a 100644
--- a/nouveau/Makefile.am
+++ b/nouveau/Makefile.am
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ libdrm_nouveaucommoninclude_HEADERS = \
nouveau_reloc.h
-libdrm_nouveauincludedir = ${includedir}/drm
+libdrm_nouveauincludedir = ${includedir}/libdrm
libdrm_nouveauinclude_HEADERS = \
nouveau_drmif.h
diff --git a/nouveau/libdrm_nouveau.pc.in b/nouveau/libdrm_nouveau.pc.in
index 6ae6287..c78a28a 100644
--- a/nouveau/libdrm_nouveau.pc.in
+++ b/nouveau/libdrm_nouveau.pc.in
@@ -7,5 +7,5 @@ Name: libdrm_nouveau
Description: Userspace interface to nouveau kernel DRM services
Version: 0.6
Libs: -L${libdir} -ldrm_nouveau
-Cflags: -I${includedir} -I${includedir}/drm -I${includedir}/nouveau
+Cflags: -I${includedir} -I${includedir}/libdrm -I${includedir}/nouveau
Requires.private: libdrm
diff --git a/radeon/Makefile.am b/radeon/Makefile.am
index 29af1df..de78232 100644
--- a/radeon/Makefile.am
+++ b/radeon/Makefile.am
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ libdrm_radeon_la_SOURCES = \
radeon_bo.c \
radeon_cs.c
-libdrm_radeonincludedir = ${includedir}/drm
+libdrm_radeonincludedir = ${includedir}/libdrm
libdrm_radeoninclude_HEADERS = \
radeon_bo.h \
radeon_cs.h \
diff --git a/radeon/libdrm_radeon.pc.in b/radeon/libdrm_radeon.pc.in
index ab703e1..68ef0ab 100644
--- a/radeon/libdrm_radeon.pc.in
+++ b/radeon/libdrm_radeon.pc.in
@@ -7,4 +7,4 @@ Name: libdrm_radeon
Description: Userspace interface to kernel DRM services for radeon
Version: @PACKAGE_VERSION@
Libs: -L${libdir} -ldrm_radeon
-Cflags: -I${includedir} -I${includedir}/drm
+Cflags: -I${includedir} -I${includedir}/libdrm
--
1.6.6.1
--
Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
--
___
Dri-devel mailing list
Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [PATCH] DRM / i915: Fix resume regression on MSI Wind U100 w/o KMS
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 22:04:36 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: Hmm, are you trying to say radeon is better at that? My experience is quite the opposite to be honest. radeon kms is in staging, doesn't pretend to be stable and force all users to the experimental paths. So yes, I would say radeon is better at that. Cheers, Julien -- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: drivers/gpu/drm/radeon: move a dereference below a NULL test
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 23:44:30 +1100, Darren Jenkins wrote: If a NULL value is possible, the dereference should only occur after the NULL test. Signed-off-by: Darren Jenkins darrenrjenk...@gmail.com diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_irq.c index b79ecc4..2f349a3 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_irq.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_irq.c @@ -289,16 +289,16 @@ int radeon_irq_emit(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file_pr Looks like your patches are whitespace-damaged. You'll need to fix your MUA... Cheers, Julien -- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [PATCH 3/5] drm/edid: Add DMT modes to the pool if the monitor is GTF-capable
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 17:36:19 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
index e655916..ee84ffe 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
@@ -481,16 +481,17 @@ static struct drm_display_mode drm_dmt_modes[] = {
3048, 3536, 0, 1600, 1603, 1609, 1682, 0,
DRM_MODE_FLAG_NHSYNC | DRM_MODE_FLAG_PVSYNC) },
};
+static const int drm_num_dmt_modes =
+ sizeof(drm_dmt_modes) / sizeof(struct drm_display_mode);
ARRAY_SIZE(drm_dmt_modes)?
Cheers,
Julien
--
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
--
___
Dri-devel mailing list
Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: RFC: libdrm repo
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 18:54:40 +0100, Stephane Marchesin wrote: Yes, but the positive side is that distros using a standard/old (about a year) kernel don't need to crawl the old libdrm repo and find the right version (in your case they have to do this ° backport stuff) ... I think that plus the fact that it makes development and merging simpler is just a reason to do it. Why would they have to do that? Newer libdrms should stay compatible with older kernels... Cheers, Julien -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: RFC: libdrm repo
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 22:23:46 +0100, Jerome Glisse wrote: I think Joe user will install the kernel-header package of its distribution, and libdrm should detect at configure time kernel header version and people should take care to only enable new libdrm stuff when libdrm find the proper header. This imply that we are studious coder and don't forget about that when adding new features needing new headers :) For instance if it detects header with no KMS stuff it should loudly print at end of configure that it disable KMS support. That would lead to a hell of ifdefs in libdrm. I think keeping copies of the latest kernel drm headers in the libdrm repo and tarballs would be best. Cheers, Julien -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
[PATCH] Only install libdrm_intel.pc if we build libdrm_intel
---
Makefile.am |4 ++--
configure.ac|4 ++--
libdrm/intel/Makefile.am|2 ++
libdrm/intel/libdrm_intel.pc.in | 10 ++
libdrm_intel.pc.in | 10 --
5 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 libdrm/intel/libdrm_intel.pc.in
delete mode 100644 libdrm_intel.pc.in
diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am
index e105edd..5b1ae60 100644
--- a/Makefile.am
+++ b/Makefile.am
@@ -25,6 +25,6 @@ AUTOMAKE_OPTIONS = foreign
SUBDIRS = libdrm shared-core tests
pkgconfigdir = @pkgconfigdir@
-pkgconfig_DATA = libdrm.pc libdrm_intel.pc
+pkgconfig_DATA = libdrm.pc
-EXTRA_DIST = libdrm.pc.in libdrm_intel.pc.in
+EXTRA_DIST = libdrm.pc.in
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index 7efc4d4..410a359 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -194,6 +194,7 @@ AC_OUTPUT([
Makefile
libdrm/Makefile
libdrm/intel/Makefile
+ libdrm/intel/libdrm_intel.pc
libdrm/radeon/Makefile
libdrm/radeon/libdrm_radeon.pc
libdrm/nouveau/Makefile
@@ -202,5 +203,4 @@ AC_OUTPUT([
tests/Makefile
tests/modeprint/Makefile
tests/modetest/Makefile
- libdrm.pc
- libdrm_intel.pc])
+ libdrm.pc])
diff --git a/libdrm/intel/Makefile.am b/libdrm/intel/Makefile.am
index 28f8952..0faa10d 100644
--- a/libdrm/intel/Makefile.am
+++ b/libdrm/intel/Makefile.am
@@ -46,3 +46,5 @@ libdrm_intel_la_SOURCES = \
libdrm_intelincludedir = ${includedir}
libdrm_intelinclude_HEADERS = intel_bufmgr.h
+
+pkgconfig_DATA = libdrm_intel.pc
diff --git a/libdrm/intel/libdrm_intel.pc.in b/libdrm/intel/libdrm_intel.pc.in
new file mode 100644
index 000..ea71cc3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/libdrm/intel/libdrm_intel.pc.in
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+pref...@prefix@
+exec_pref...@exec_prefix@
+libd...@libdir@
+included...@includedir@
+
+Name: libdrm
+Description: Userspace interface to kernel DRM services
+Version: @PACKAGE_VERSION@
+Libs: -L${libdir} -ldrm -ldrm_intel
+Cflags: -I${includedir} -I${includedir}/drm
diff --git a/libdrm_intel.pc.in b/libdrm_intel.pc.in
deleted file mode 100644
index ea71cc3..000
--- a/libdrm_intel.pc.in
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,10 +0,0 @@
-pref...@prefix@
-exec_pref...@exec_prefix@
-libd...@libdir@
-included...@includedir@
-
-Name: libdrm
-Description: Userspace interface to kernel DRM services
-Version: @PACKAGE_VERSION@
-Libs: -L${libdir} -ldrm -ldrm_intel
-Cflags: -I${includedir} -I${includedir}/drm
--
1.6.5
--
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference
--
___
Dri-devel mailing list
Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: libdrm: Fixing compilers warnings
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 19:17:01 +0300, Pauli Nieminen wrote:
From b7e77b71d1f2d8ff6741e534911e09f10e3f3d4e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pauli Nieminen suok...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 14:39:57 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 01/15] libdrm: Add function attribute for debug
functions to let gcc check parameter correctness.
---
libdrm/xf86drm.c |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libdrm/xf86drm.c b/libdrm/xf86drm.c
index 26dd812..4214b91 100644
--- a/libdrm/xf86drm.c
+++ b/libdrm/xf86drm.c
@@ -107,13 +107,16 @@ void drmSetServerInfo(drmServerInfoPtr info)
* \internal
* This function is a wrapper around vfprintf().
*/
+static int drmDebugPrint(const char *format, va_list ap)
__attribute__((format(printf,1,0)));
why add a forward declaration instead of adding the attribute to the
function definition? also your patches are whitespace damaged.
static int drmDebugPrint(const char *format, va_list ap)
{
return vfprintf(stderr, format, ap);
}
-static int (*drm_debug_print)(const char *format, va_list ap) =
drmDebugPrint;
+static int (*drm_debug_print)(const char *format, va_list ap)
__attribute__((format(printf,1,0))) = drmDebugPrint;
+
+void drmMsg(const char *format, ...) __attribute__((format(printf,1,2)));
void
drmMsg(const char *format, ...)
Cheers,
Julien
--
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time,
vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have
the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize
details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge
--
___
Dri-devel mailing list
Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] Make xorg.conf NoAccel/DRI options work under KMS
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 09:36:21 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: I wonder if fbdev could fill the get something on the screen when the driver is busted hole. Is it good enough to rely on for that? IIRC that won't currently work well, because probe_devices_from_device_sections will claim the pci device for the intel driver, at which point fbdev's xf86ClaimFbSlot will fail and it will be disabled before intel has a chance to run its init stuff (so before we know if it's busted). So you need to either uninstall intel, or know the magic xorg.conf incantation to use fbdev. Cheers, Julien -- Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] Make xorg.conf NoAccel/DRI options work under KMS
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 12:04:44 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 11:50:38 -0700 Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com wrote: KMS mode does not call I830AccelMethodInit as that does a ton of random device initialization, but that means that the NoAccel and DRI options were ignored. Split out the option parsing from I830AccelMethodInit and have both KMS and UMS invoke it. Signed-off-by: Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com --- Ugg more configurations... Assuming this is for fallback when something bad happens or for debugging couldn't users just use the fbdev driver instead? I'd rather KMS just be a single everything works case... DRI2 init can fail for various reasons, and it's easier to test if you don't have to hack the driver. No particular opinion on kms without uxa, though. Cheers, Julien -- Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [PATCH 4/6] libdrm: Request for _XOPEN_SOURCE to get full posix headers including extensions (XSH: mknod)
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 09:46:40 -0700, Ian Romanick wrote: Here's an alterate patch the puts _XOPEN_SOURCE and _GNU_SOURCE in config.h via configure.ac. Comments? maybe use AC_USE_SYSTEM_EXTENSIONS instead? Cheers, Julien -- -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [PATCH 2/6] libdrm: Add missing string.h include
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 02:18:50 +0300, Pauli Nieminen wrote: --- libdrm/xf86drm.h |1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/libdrm/xf86drm.h b/libdrm/xf86drm.h index c1d173c..a7f9763 100644 --- a/libdrm/xf86drm.h +++ b/libdrm/xf86drm.h @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ #include stdarg.h #include sys/types.h #include stdint.h +#include strings.h #include drm.h /* Defaults, if nothing set in xf86config */ commit message says string.h, patch has strings.h. Which is it? Cheers, Julien -- -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [PATCH] radeon_cp: use request_firmware
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 20:58:28 +, Dave Airlie wrote: Is available at http://git.infradead.org/users/jaswinder/firm-jsr-2.6.git?a=commit;h=3a911a216742e4ab998f3281409d46a62f252716 Please let me know, should I need to resend this patch for : 1. git kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/airlied/drm-2.6.git OR 2. git kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git How much testing has this seen on what range of cards and on what architectures? I'd like some success stories from people using this patch. Is Debian shipping it? Not at this time. AFAIK Ben Hutchings has tested that patch, although I don't know on what hardware, and if he got other testers. Ben? Its do think firmware patches are stupid (I do), but I'm not against applying them if they are proven working. Cheers, Julien -- -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: intel text mode restore problem
On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 20:14 +0100, Norbert Preining wrote: Where can I get this intel_reg_dumper from? Is there a tree to check out, or a ready made binary from x86_64 (Debian/unstable)? you can install the xserver-xorg-video-intel-dbg package, or build the reg dumper from the xf86-video-intel source tree. Cheers, Julien -- SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada. The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/ -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [Mesa3d-dev] Mesa 7.1 rc 4
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 10:20:12 -0600, Brian Paul wrote: Yet another Mesa 7.1 release candidate is at http://www.mesa3d.org/beta/ This includes the latest GLSL fixes/features plus other assorted fixes from the past 2-3 weeks. This also includes the drm-gem merge, which means that it now has a dependency on an unreleased libdrm for the intel dri drivers. Cheers, Julien - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100url=/ -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
