Re: [Dri-devel] Ann: gcc-2.96 compiled snapshots available
I just uploaded a set of binary snapshots built from the CVS head using RedHat's compat-gcc-7.3-2.96.110 package (which produces code compatible with the gcc bundled with the RedHat 7.3 and is the same which was producing the snapshots before). Unfortunately this appears to be not very helpful for those of us who test-run the snapshots on a regular basis against known OpenGL programs. This is from the radeon-20020930 binary snapshot: libGL: OpenDriver: trying /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/radeon_dri.so libGL error: dlopen failed: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.3' not found (required by /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/radeon_dri.so) _I_ don't have glibc-2.3 on my system and I believe, others don't either. So this _might_ render the binary snapshots pretty useless. Cheers, Martin. -- Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are ! -- --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [Dri-devel] Ann: gcc-2.96 compiled snapshots available
On Mon, 2002-09-30 at 13:28, Martin Spott wrote: I just uploaded a set of binary snapshots built from the CVS head using RedHat's compat-gcc-7.3-2.96.110 package (which produces code compatible with the gcc bundled with the RedHat 7.3 and is the same which was producing the snapshots before). Unfortunately this appears to be not very helpful for those of us who test-run the snapshots on a regular basis against known OpenGL programs. This is from the radeon-20020930 binary snapshot: libGL: OpenDriver: trying /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/radeon_dri.so libGL error: dlopen failed: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.3' not found (required by /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/radeon_dri.so) _I_ don't have glibc-2.3 on my system and I believe, others don't either. So this _might_ render the binary snapshots pretty useless. But so the 2D driver from that snapshot works for you? -- Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer XFree86 and DRI project member / CS student, Free Software enthusiast --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [Dri-devel] Ann: gcc-2.96 compiled snapshots available
On 29 Sep 2002 01:58:16 +0200 Michel Dänzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sam, 2002-09-28 at 19:59, Felix Kühling wrote: On Sat, 28 Sep 2002 18:02:08 +0100 José Fonseca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just uploaded a set of binary snapshots built from the CVS head using RedHat's compat-gcc-7.3-2.96.110 package (which produces code compatible with the gcc bundled with the RedHat 7.3 and is the same which was producing the snapshots before). Thanks José! The files are the *-linux-gcc296.i386.tar.bz2 available from http://dri.sourceforge.net/snapshots/ . In case your web browser gives you a hard time to distinguish they are half size of the ones generated by gcc-3.2 (!) as someone already had notice. I have no idea why is that. As of gcc-3.1 the default debug info format has changed to dwarf-2. Maybe that's at least part of the problem. All of you which have been experiencing problems with the latest snapshots please test and report back to the dri-devel mailing list. If there is a difference then I'll make them available on a regular basis. I don't use binary snapshots. But I am compiling DRI with gcc-3.2 since yesterday myself. There are problems with the radeon driver which I didn't have with gcc-2.95.4, though it never crashes my machine. What problems then? They disappeared ... probably after a recent cvs update. It was that the glxgears window went black when I moved it around. Moving it a bit more brought the gears back sometimes. Opaque moving made them flicker. There were more problems with other apps. Some xscreensaver hacks just showed a black window. Now they work all right. Felix P.S. I wrote about the same reply before, but it didn't get sent, I think (managed to crash my machine, old problem). If you get this twice, ignore one of them ;) __\|/_____ ___ ___ __Tschüß___\_6 6_/___/__ \___/__ \___/___\___You can do anything,___ _Felix___\Ä/\ \_\ \_\ \__U___just not everything [EMAIL PROTECTED]o__/ \___/ \___/at the same time! --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
[Dri-devel] Ann: gcc-2.96 compiled snapshots available
I just uploaded a set of binary snapshots built from the CVS head using RedHat's compat-gcc-7.3-2.96.110 package (which produces code compatible with the gcc bundled with the RedHat 7.3 and is the same which was producing the snapshots before). The files are the *-linux-gcc296.i386.tar.bz2 available from http://dri.sourceforge.net/snapshots/ . In case your web browser gives you a hard time to distinguish they are half size of the ones generated by gcc-3.2 (!) as someone already had notice. I have no idea why is that. All of you which have been experiencing problems with the latest snapshots please test and report back to the dri-devel mailing list. If there is a difference then I'll make them available on a regular basis. José Fonseca --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [Dri-devel] Ann: gcc-2.96 compiled snapshots available
On Sam, 2002-09-28 at 19:59, Felix Kühling wrote: On Sat, 28 Sep 2002 18:02:08 +0100 José Fonseca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just uploaded a set of binary snapshots built from the CVS head using RedHat's compat-gcc-7.3-2.96.110 package (which produces code compatible with the gcc bundled with the RedHat 7.3 and is the same which was producing the snapshots before). Thanks José! The files are the *-linux-gcc296.i386.tar.bz2 available from http://dri.sourceforge.net/snapshots/ . In case your web browser gives you a hard time to distinguish they are half size of the ones generated by gcc-3.2 (!) as someone already had notice. I have no idea why is that. As of gcc-3.1 the default debug info format has changed to dwarf-2. Maybe that's at least part of the problem. All of you which have been experiencing problems with the latest snapshots please test and report back to the dri-devel mailing list. If there is a difference then I'll make them available on a regular basis. I don't use binary snapshots. But I am compiling DRI with gcc-3.2 since yesterday myself. There are problems with the radeon driver which I didn't have with gcc-2.95.4, though it never crashes my machine. What problems then? -- Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer XFree86 and DRI project member / CS student, Free Software enthusiast --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
