Re: [Dri-devel] Mach64 Tuxracer doesn't work
Ok, I just downloaded a fresh build of the mach64 driver and TuxRacer works flawlessly. Here is my report on a few 3D apps I have on my system (a Compaq Armada E500 with a ATI Rage Mobility P/M AGP 2x (rev.100) TuxRacer: perfect GLTron: perfect Quake II: perfect Foobillard: perfect GL ScreenSavers: perfect Very good job ! What is the current plan for the driver ? DMA support ? What about integration with XFree86's driver for 2D acceleration ? Thanks again. Tristan I had problems with restoring using the install script because there is nothing in the GL directory, so you probably want to do the restore manually for now. BTW, I downloaded the package from Jose's site, but the one on dri.sf.net should be the same. --Leif On 25 Mar 2002, Tristan Tarrant wrote: I used mach64-20020325-0822-i386-Linux.tar.bz2 I have reverted to mach64-20020322-1223-i386-Linux.tar.bz2 Tristan Il lun, 2002-03-25 alle 16:42, Leif Delgass ha scritto: That sounds like what we were seeing before Jose's fix for depth scaling. Which snapshot are you using? -- Leif Delgass http://www.retinalburn.net ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [Dri-devel] Mach64 Tuxracer doesn't work
Quake II: perfect Wow! What is your resolution? What are fps? How much memory does your card have? Half-Life in 640x480 (under Wine though) is really unplayable for me...:( Cheers, Sergey ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [Dri-devel] Mach64 Tuxracer doesn't work
That sounds like what we were seeing before Jose's fix for depth scaling. Which snapshot are you using? On 25 Mar 2002, Tristan Tarrant wrote: Leif, I downloaded the mach64 snapshot this morning and Tuxracer looks very strange. It looks like it's only redrawing certain parts of the display (the mountains), but the rest is just a mangle of pixels, which sort-of look like Tux... Tristan ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel -- Leif Delgass http://www.retinalburn.net ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [Dri-devel] Mach64 Tuxracer doesn't work
I used mach64-20020325-0822-i386-Linux.tar.bz2 I have reverted to mach64-20020322-1223-i386-Linux.tar.bz2 Tristan Il lun, 2002-03-25 alle 16:42, Leif Delgass ha scritto: That sounds like what we were seeing before Jose's fix for depth scaling. Which snapshot are you using? ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
Re: [Dri-devel] Mach64 Tuxracer doesn't work
I just tried that package and it worked for me. Could you try manually installing the modules? Make backups of the modules first and then copy them over your X installation: from dripkg/core: cp libdrm.a /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/linux/ from dripkg/mach64: cp ati* /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/ cp mach64_dri.so /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/ from dripkg/drm: logout to a text console rmmod mach64 cd drm Make -f Makefile.linux mach64.o cp mach64.o /lib/modules/`uname -r`/kernel/drivers/char/drm/ make sure /usr/lib/libGL* points to /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL* restart X I had problems with restoring using the install script because there is nothing in the GL directory, so you probably want to do the restore manually for now. BTW, I downloaded the package from Jose's site, but the one on dri.sf.net should be the same. --Leif On 25 Mar 2002, Tristan Tarrant wrote: I used mach64-20020325-0822-i386-Linux.tar.bz2 I have reverted to mach64-20020322-1223-i386-Linux.tar.bz2 Tristan Il lun, 2002-03-25 alle 16:42, Leif Delgass ha scritto: That sounds like what we were seeing before Jose's fix for depth scaling. Which snapshot are you using? -- Leif Delgass http://www.retinalburn.net ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
