Hey,
ATI has not been very cooperative with letting the documentation out,
but they may be now, it took them a month to get the documentation to
me, and by then School had started :-( There is a cvs branch for mach64
almost a year old which I have used with limited succes (some gl demos
worked, but were corrupted - q3a unplayable), and a new patch which
Manuel Teria and Frank C Earl have been working on, but it's over a
month old by now. Daryll Strauss wants to see a little more before
he'll add a new mach64 cvs branch, and it seems like the DRI project
doesn't know how to handle volunteers. Of course people could mess up a
cvs tree, but right now there's nothing to mess up.
Daryll, could you explain your views on Mach64 again?
Carl Busjahn
Alex de Landgraaf wrote:
Hey all,
I too am interested (but my guess is a lot of people are, this mailing
list is probably getting flooded with requests) in the Mach64 DRI. I
checked the CVS but couldnt find a trace of it. Heard some rumors a few
people where developing it in their spare time, but i don't know if
their code has been submitted into the CVS yet. My question is if there
is any code available, and if people are actively developing it.
Cheers,
Alex
Ps. my guess is that this would be quite some work, as there are many
chips based on it, all with different levels of acceleration. But who
said it would be easy? ;)
On Mon, 2001-10-01 at 11:31, Jens-Peter Konrath wrote:
Hi,
I'm interested in the mach64 driver work and would like to help.
Utah-GLX and Xfree 3.3.6 never worked on my machine, so I decided to
upgrade to Xf 4.1.0.
At the moment, I know just very little about video hardware, but if
someone could point me in the right direction...
Jens
___
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
___
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
___
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
