[Dri-devel] Re: [Mesa3d-dev] miniglx and DDX version checking
I don't think they are necessary so the _SOLO defines could be extended. Keith wrote the code so I'm not sure what he intentions were. --- Dave Airlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The current miniglx fakes up some DDX version numbers but these only work > for the radeon drivers, (4.0) is used, but the i810 drivers is only on > version 1.0, > > Is there any need for this to be checked at all should the _SOLO defines > in utils.c:driCheckDriDdxDrmVersions be extended to cover the DDX check? > > Dave. > > -- > David Airlie, Software Engineer > http://www.skynet.ie/~airlied / airlied at skynet.ie > pam_smb / Linux DECstation / Linux VAX / ILUG person > > > > --- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials > Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of > GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system > administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click > ___ > Mesa3d-dev mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa3d-dev = Jon Smirl [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam http://mail.yahoo.com --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
[Dri-devel] Re: [Mesa3d-dev] miniglx and DDX version checking
Jon Smirl wrote: I don't think they are necessary so the _SOLO defines could be extended. Keith wrote the code so I'm not sure what he intentions were. --- Dave Airlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The current miniglx fakes up some DDX version numbers but these only work for the radeon drivers, (4.0) is used, but the i810 drivers is only on version 1.0, Is there any need for this to be checked at all should the _SOLO defines in utils.c:driCheckDriDdxDrmVersions be extended to cover the DDX check? There's no need to check the faked up numbers. Feel free to patch them out of existence, if possible. Keith --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
[Dri-devel] Re: [Mesa3d-dev] miniglx and DDX version checking
Hi! Yep, I had the same problems, trying to get the TDFX/solo work. Keith? >I don't think they are necessary so the _SOLO defines >could be extended. Keith wrote the code so I'm not >sure what he intentions were. > >--- Dave Airlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> The current miniglx fakes up some DDX version >> numbers but these only work >> for the radeon drivers, (4.0) is used, but the i810 >> drivers is only on >> version 1.0, >> >> Is there any need for this to be checked at all >> should the _SOLO defines >> in utils.c:driCheckDriDdxDrmVersions be extended to >> cover the DDX check? >> >> Dave. >> >> -- >> David Airlie, Software Engineer >> http://www.skynet.ie/~airlied / airlied at skynet.ie >> pam_smb / Linux DECstation / Linux VAX / ILUG person = Regards, Borca Daniel http://www.geocities.com/dborca/ __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam http://mail.yahoo.com --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click -- ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
