Re: 2.6.34-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.33

2010-04-21 Thread Ben Gamari
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 05:15:57 +0200 (CEST), Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl 
wrote:
 This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.33,
 for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
 If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
 
 If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.33, please let us
 know either and we'll add them to the list.  Also, please let us know
 if any of the entries below are invalid.
 

I have recently reported this suspend regression on my Dell laptop hardware.

References: http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/4/18/20
Bug-report: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15820

Thanks,

- Ben

--
--
___
Dri-devel mailing list
Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel


Re: 2.6.34-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.33

2010-04-21 Thread Jerome Glisse
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 07:15:38AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
 On Tuesday 20 April 2010, Nick Bowler wrote:
  On 05:15 Tue 20 Apr , Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
   If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.33, please let us
   know either and we'll add them to the list.  Also, please let us know
   if any of the entries below are invalid.
  
  Please list these two similar regressions from 2.6.33 in the r600 DRM:
  
   * r600 CS checker rejects GL_DEPTH_TEST w/o depth buffer:
 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27571
  
   * r600 CS checker rejects narrow FBO renderbuffers:
 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27609
 
 Do you want to me to add them as one entry or as two separate bugs?
 
 Rafael
 

First one is userspace bug, i need to look into the second one.
ie we were lucky the hw didn't lockup without depth buffer and
depth test enabled.

Cheers,
Jerome

--
--
___
Dri-devel mailing list
Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel


Re: 2.6.34-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.33

2010-04-21 Thread Nick Bowler
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 07:15:38AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
 On Tuesday 20 April 2010, Nick Bowler wrote:
  Please list these two similar regressions from 2.6.33 in the r600 DRM:
  
   * r600 CS checker rejects GL_DEPTH_TEST w/o depth buffer:
 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27571
  
   * r600 CS checker rejects narrow FBO renderbuffers:
 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27609
 
 Do you want to me to add them as one entry or as two separate bugs?

As upstream doesn't consider the first to be a kernel issue, I guess you
should just list the second.

On 10:57 Wed 21 Apr , Jerome Glisse wrote:
 First one is userspace bug, i need to look into the second one.
 ie we were lucky the hw didn't lockup without depth buffer and
 depth test enabled.

OK, if the failure is due to userspace is doing Very Bad Things(tm),
catching that seems reasonable.

Nevertheless, even if it happened by luck, the result was (ostensibly)
working programs that suddenly break once one upgrades to the latest
kernel.  If userspace can't be fixed before 2.6.34 is released, perhaps
a less cryptic log message would be appropriate?

-- 
Nick Bowler, Elliptic Technologies (http://www.elliptictech.com/)

--
--
___
Dri-devel mailing list
Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel


Re: 2.6.34-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.33

2010-04-20 Thread Nick Bowler
On 05:15 Tue 20 Apr , Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
 If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.33, please let us
 know either and we'll add them to the list.  Also, please let us know
 if any of the entries below are invalid.

Please list these two similar regressions from 2.6.33 in the r600 DRM:

 * r600 CS checker rejects GL_DEPTH_TEST w/o depth buffer:
   https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27571

 * r600 CS checker rejects narrow FBO renderbuffers:
   https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27609

Thanks.

-- 
Nick Bowler, Elliptic Technologies (http://www.elliptictech.com/)

--
Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
--
___
Dri-devel mailing list
Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel


Re: 2.6.34-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.33

2010-04-20 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wednesday 21 April 2010, Ben Gamari wrote:
 On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 05:15:57 +0200 (CEST), Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl 
 wrote:
  This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.33,
  for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
  If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
  
  If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.33, please let us
  know either and we'll add them to the list.  Also, please let us know
  if any of the entries below are invalid.
  
 
 I have recently reported this suspend regression on my Dell laptop hardware.
 
 References: http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/4/18/20
 Bug-report: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15820

This has been added to the list now.  Please check my comment in the Bugzilla
entry.

Rafael

--
--
___
Dri-devel mailing list
Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel


Re: 2.6.34-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.33

2010-04-20 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday 20 April 2010, Nick Bowler wrote:
 On 05:15 Tue 20 Apr , Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
  If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.33, please let us
  know either and we'll add them to the list.  Also, please let us know
  if any of the entries below are invalid.
 
 Please list these two similar regressions from 2.6.33 in the r600 DRM:
 
  * r600 CS checker rejects GL_DEPTH_TEST w/o depth buffer:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27571
 
  * r600 CS checker rejects narrow FBO renderbuffers:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27609

Do you want to me to add them as one entry or as two separate bugs?

Rafael

--
--
___
Dri-devel mailing list
Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel


2.6.34-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.33

2010-04-19 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.33,
for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.

If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.33, please let us
know either and we'll add them to the list.  Also, please let us know
if any of the entries below are invalid.

Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply
to this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling
the issue.


Listed regressions statistics:

  Date  Total  Pending  Unresolved
  
  2010-04-20   64   35  34
  2010-04-07   48   35  33
  2010-03-21   15   13  10


Unresolved regressions
--

Bug-Entry   : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15812
Subject : utsname.domainname not set in x86_32 processes (causing 
YPBINDPROC_DOMAIN: domain not bound errors)
Submitter   :  a...@hexapodia.org
Date: 2010-04-19 21:28 (1 days old)


Bug-Entry   : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15805
Subject : reiserfs locking
Submitter   : Alexander Beregalov a.berega...@gmail.com
Date: 2010-04-15 21:02 (5 days old)
Message-ID  : 
t2ka4423d671004151402n7b2dc425mdc9c6bb9640d6...@mail.gmail.com
References  : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=127136535323933w=2


Bug-Entry   : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15796
Subject : [REGRESSION bisected] Sound goes too fast due to commit 
7b3a177b0
Submitter   : Éric Piel eric.p...@tremplin-utc.net
Date: 2010-04-13 21:54 (7 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: 
http://kernel.org/git/linus/7b3a177b0d4f92b3431b8dca777313a07533a710
Message-ID  : 4bc4e812.6050...@tremplin-utc.net
References  : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=127119569009790w=2
Handled-By  : Takashi Iwai ti...@suse.de


Bug-Entry   : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15795
Subject : 2.6.34-rc4 : OOPS in unmap_vma
Submitter   : Parag Warudkar parag.l...@gmail.com
Date: 2010-04-14 (6 days old)
Message-ID  : alpine.deb.2.00.1004132147260.1...@parag-laptop
References  : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=127121006625429w=2


Bug-Entry   : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15790
Subject : Meta-Bug: Regressions
Submitter   : Florian Mickler fmick...@gmx.de
Date: 2010-04-15 18:21 (5 days old)


Bug-Entry   : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15788
Subject : external usb sound card doesn't work after resume
Submitter   : François Valenduc francois.valen...@tvcablenet.be
Date: 2010-04-15 10:16 (5 days old)


Bug-Entry   : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15774
Subject : 2.6.34-rc3: eth0 (8139too): transmit queue 0 timed out
Submitter   : Németh Márton nm...@freemail.hu
Date: 2010-04-10 12:33 (10 days old)
Message-ID  : 4bc07022.6000...@freemail.hu
References  : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=127090287021976w=2


Bug-Entry   : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15768
Subject : Incorrectly calculated free blocks result in ENOSPC from 
writepage
Submitter   : Dmitry Monakhov dmonak...@openvz.org
Date: 2010-04-12 11:24 (8 days old)


Bug-Entry   : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15744
Subject : [2.6.34-rc1 REGRESSION] ahci :00:1f.2: controller reset 
failed (0x)
Submitter   : Andy Isaacson a...@hexapodia.org
Date: 2010-04-06 22:54 (14 days old)
Message-ID  : 4bc51312.6080...@oracle.com/desc
References  : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=127059449031511w=2


Bug-Entry   : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15730
Subject : Ugly rmap NULL ptr deref oopsie on hibernate (was Linux 
2.6.34-rc3)
Submitter   : Borislav Petkov b...@alien8.de
Date: 2010-04-02 17:59 (18 days old)
Message-ID  : 20100402175937.ga19...@liondog.tnic
References  : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=127023173329741w=2


Bug-Entry   : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15729
Subject : BUG: physmap modprobe  rmmod
Submitter   : Randy Dunlap randy.dun...@oracle.com
Date: 2010-04-02 20:40 (18 days old)
Message-ID  : 20100402134058.c4682716.randy.dun...@oracle.com
References  : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=127024096210230w=2


Bug-Entry   : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15719
Subject : virtio_net causing kernel BUG when running under VirtualBox
Submitter   : Thomas Müller tho...@mathtm.de
Date: 2010-03-27 14:32 (24 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: 
http://kernel.org/git/linus/9ab86bbcf8be755256f0a5e994e0b38af6b4d399
Message-ID  : 4bae1707.2050...@mathtm.de
References  : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=126970039227740w=4

Re: 2.6.34-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.33

2010-04-19 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 05:15:57 +0200 (CEST) Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl 
wrote:

 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15812
 Subject   : utsname.domainname not set in x86_32 processes 
 (causing YPBINDPROC_DOMAIN: domain not bound errors)
 Submitter :  a...@hexapodia.org
 Date  : 2010-04-19 21:28 (1 days old)

I merged hch's fix for this twelve seconds ago.

--
Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
--
___
Dri-devel mailing list
Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel


Re: 2.6.34-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.33

2010-04-19 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday 20 April 2010, Andrew Morton wrote:
 On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 05:15:57 +0200 (CEST) Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl 
 wrote:
 
  Bug-Entry   : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15812
  Subject : utsname.domainname not set in x86_32 processes 
  (causing YPBINDPROC_DOMAIN: domain not bound errors)
  Submitter   :  a...@hexapodia.org
  Date: 2010-04-19 21:28 (1 days old)
 
 I merged hch's fix for this twelve seconds ago.

I updated the entry.

--
Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
--
___
Dri-devel mailing list
Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel