future of DRI DDX

2004-07-16 Thread Alex Deucher
Is it worth continuing to support a separate DDX tree for the DRI?  In
my opinion, it would be easier for the DRI to just use XORG for DDX. 
Any thoughts/opinions one way or another?  I know idr may have some
issues with a different tree.

Alex


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click
--
___
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel


Re: [Xorg] future of DRI DDX

2004-07-16 Thread Ian Romanick
Alex Deucher wrote:
Is it worth continuing to support a separate DDX tree for the DRI?  In
my opinion, it would be easier for the DRI to just use XORG for DDX. 
Any thoughts/opinions one way or another?  I know idr may have some
issues with a different tree.
That shouldn't be a problem.  I can't even remember when the last time I 
made a change to a DDX driver was.  I was more concerned about the GLX 
code (both client and server).  Although I haven't done anything for the 
past few weeks, I do a fair amount of work in that area.


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click
--
___
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel