[PATCH] staging:bcm:DDRinit.c:coding style:line over 80 char

[Sudip Mukherjee]

---
 drivers/staging/bcm/DDRInit.c | 59 ---
 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/bcm/DDRInit.c b/drivers/staging/bcm/DDRInit.c
index 4564f40..4226c93 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/bcm/DDRInit.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/bcm/DDRInit.c
@@ -7,7 +7,8 @@
 
 /* DDR INIT-133Mhz */
 #define T3_SKIP_CLOCK_PROGRAM_DUMP_133MHZ 12  /* index for 0x0F007000 */
-static struct bcm_ddr_setting asT3_DDRSetting133MHz[] = {  /* DPLL Clock 
Setting */
+static struct bcm_ddr_setting asT3_DDRSetting133MHz[] = {
+   /* DPLL Clock Setting */
{0x0F000800, 0x7212},
{0x0f000820, 0x07F13FFF},
{0x0f000810, 0x0F95},
@@ -65,7 +66,8 @@ static struct bcm_ddr_setting asT3_DDRSetting133MHz[] = {  /* 
DPLL Clock Setting
 };
 /* 80Mhz */
 #define T3_SKIP_CLOCK_PROGRAM_DUMP_80MHZ 10  /* index for 0x0F007000 */
-static struct bcm_ddr_setting asT3_DDRSetting80MHz[] = {  /* DPLL Clock 
Setting */
+static struct bcm_ddr_setting asT3_DDRSetting80MHz[] = {
+  /* DPLL Clock Setting */
{0x0f000810, 0x0F95},
{0x0f000820, 0x07f1},
{0x0f000860, 0x},
@@ -117,7 +119,8 @@ static struct bcm_ddr_setting asT3_DDRSetting80MHz[] = {  
/* DPLL Clock Setting
 };
 /* 100Mhz */
 #define T3_SKIP_CLOCK_PROGRAM_DUMP_100MHZ 13  /* index for 0x0F007000 */
-static struct bcm_ddr_setting asT3_DDRSetting100MHz[] = {  /* DPLL Clock 
Setting */
+static struct bcm_ddr_setting asT3_DDRSetting100MHz[] = {
+  /* DPLL Clock Setting */
{0x0F000800, 0x7008},
{0x0f000810, 0x0F95},
{0x0f000820, 0x07F13E3F},
@@ -189,7 +192,8 @@ static struct bcm_ddr_setting asDPLL_266MHZ[] = {
 };
 
 #define T3B_SKIP_CLOCK_PROGRAM_DUMP_133MHZ 11  /* index for 0x0F007000 */
-static struct bcm_ddr_setting asT3B_DDRSetting133MHz[] = {  /* DPLL Clock 
Setting */
+static struct bcm_ddr_setting asT3B_DDRSetting133MHz[] = {
+  /* DPLL Clock Setting */
{0x0f000810, 0x0F95},
{0x0f000810, 0x0F95},
{0x0f000810, 0x0F95},
@@ -247,7 +251,8 @@ static struct bcm_ddr_setting asT3B_DDRSetting133MHz[] = {  
/* DPLL Clock Settin
};
 
 #define T3B_SKIP_CLOCK_PROGRAM_DUMP_80MHZ 9  /* index for 0x0F007000 */
-static struct bcm_ddr_setting asT3B_DDRSetting80MHz[] = {  /* DPLL Clock 
Setting */
+static struct bcm_ddr_setting asT3B_DDRSetting80MHz[] = {
+  /* DPLL Clock Setting */
{0x0f000810, 0x0F95},
{0x0f000820, 0x07F13FFF},
{0x0f000840, 0x0FFF1F00},
@@ -301,7 +306,8 @@ static struct bcm_ddr_setting asT3B_DDRSetting80MHz[] = {  
/* DPLL Clock Setting
 
 /* 100Mhz */
 #define T3B_SKIP_CLOCK_PROGRAM_DUMP_100MHZ 9  /* index for 0x0F007000 */
-static struct bcm_ddr_setting asT3B_DDRSetting100MHz[] = {  /* DPLL Clock 
Setting */
+static struct bcm_ddr_setting asT3B_DDRSetting100MHz[] = {
+  /* DPLL Clock Setting */
{0x0f000810, 0x0F95},
{0x0f000820, 0x07F1369B},
{0x0f000840, 0x0FFF0800},
@@ -356,7 +362,8 @@ static struct bcm_ddr_setting asT3B_DDRSetting100MHz[] = {  
/* DPLL Clock Settin
 
 
 #define T3LP_SKIP_CLOCK_PROGRAM_DUMP_133MHZ 9  /* index for 0x0F007000 */
-static struct bcm_ddr_setting asT3LP_DDRSetting133MHz[] = {  /* DPLL Clock 
Setting */
+static struct bcm_ddr_setting asT3LP_DDRSetting133MHz[] = {
+  /* DPLL Clock Setting */
{0x0f000820, 0x03F1365B},
{0x0f000810, 0x2F95},
{0x0f000880, 0x03DD},
@@ -416,7 +423,8 @@ static struct bcm_ddr_setting asT3LP_DDRSetting133MHz[] = { 
 /* DPLL Clock Setti
 };
 
 #define T3LP_SKIP_CLOCK_PROGRAM_DUMP_100MHZ 11  /* index for 0x0F007000 */
-static struct bcm_ddr_setting asT3LP_DDRSetting100MHz[] = {  /* DPLL Clock 
Setting */
+static struct bcm_ddr_setting asT3LP_DDRSetting100MHz[] = {
+  /* DPLL Clock Setting */
{0x0f000810, 0x2F95},
{0x0f000820, 0x03F1369B},
{0x0f000840, 0x0fff},
@@ -476,7 +484,8 @@ static struct bcm_ddr_setting asT3LP_DDRSetting100MHz[] = { 
 /* DPLL Clock Setti
 };
 
 #define T3LP_SKIP_CLOCK_PROGRAM_DUMP_80MHZ 9  /* index for 0x0F007000 */
-static struct bcm_ddr_setting asT3LP_DDRSetting80MHz[] = {  /* DPLL Clock 
Setting */
+static struct bcm_ddr_setting asT3LP_DDRSetting80MHz[] = {
+  /* DPLL Clock Setting */
{0x0f000820, 0x07F13FFF},
{0x0f000810, 0x2F95},
{0x0f000860, 0x},
@@ -536,7 +545,8 @@ static struct bcm_ddr_setting asT3LP_DDRSetting80MHz[] = {  
/* DPLL Clock Settin
 /* T3 LP-B (UMA-B) */
 
 #define T3LPB_SKIP_CLOCK_PROGRAM_DUMP_160MHZ 7  /* index for 0x0F007000 */
-static struct bcm_ddr_setting asT3LPB_DDRSetting160MHz[] = {  /* DPLL Clock 
Setting */
+static struct bcm_ddr_setting asT3LPB_DDRSetting160MHz[] = {
+  /* DPLL Clock Setting */
{0x0f000820, 0x03F137DB},
{0x0f000810, 0x01842795},
{0x0f000860, 0x},
@@ -544,7 +554,8 @@ static struct bcm_ddr_setting asT3LPB_DDRSetting160MHz[] = 
{  /* DPLL Clock S

Re: [PATCH] staging:bcm:DDRinit.c:coding style:line over 80 char

[Greg KH]

On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 06:19:46PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> ---
>  drivers/staging/bcm/DDRInit.c | 59 
> ---
>  1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 

Hi,

This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.  You have sent him
a patch that has triggered this response.  He used to manually respond
to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept
writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was
created.  Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem
in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux
kernel tree.

You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s)
as indicated below:

- Your patch does not have a Signed-off-by: line.  Please read the
  kernel file, Documentation/SubmittingPatches and resend it after
  adding that line.  Note, the line needs to be in the body of the
  email, before the patch, not at the bottom of the patch or in the
  email signature.

- You did not specify a description of why the patch is needed, or
  possibly, any description at all, in the email body.  Please read the
  section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file,
  Documentation/SubmittingPatches for what is needed in order to
  properly describe the change.

- You did not write a descriptive Subject: for the patch, allowing Greg,
  and everyone else, to know what this patch is all about.  Please read
  the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file,
  Documentation/SubmittingPatches for what a proper Subject: line should
  look like.

If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about
how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and
Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received
from other developers.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot
___
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel