RE: [PATCH 1/2 v4] pci-hyperv: properly handle pci bus remove

2017-03-22 Thread Long Li


> -Original Message-
> From: Bjorn Helgaas [mailto:helg...@kernel.org]
> Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2017 1:07 PM
> To: Long Li 
> Cc: KY Srinivasan ; Haiyang Zhang
> ; Bjorn Helgaas ;
> de...@linuxdriverproject.org; linux-...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> ker...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v4] pci-hyperv: properly handle pci bus remove
> 
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 02:19:45AM +, Long Li wrote:
> > hv_pci_devices_present is called in hv_pci_remove when we remove a PCI
> > device from host (e.g. by disabling SRIOV on a device). In
> > hv_pci_remove, the bus is already removed before the call, so we don't
> > need to rescan the bus in the workqueue scheduled from
> > hv_pci_devices_present. By introducing status hv_pcibus_removed, we
> can avoid this situation.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Long Li 
> > Reported-by: Xiaofeng Wang 
> > Acked-by: K. Y. Srinivasan 
> 
> This didn't apply for me because saving it to a file resulted in some encoded
> file with "=3D" instead of "=".  I see that mutt is smart enough to deal with
> that in this reply, so there's probably a way for it to decode it when saving 
> to
> a file, but I don't know it.
> 
> I tried to apply it by hand, but the hunk in hv_pci_remove() doesn't match
> the context.  I think your patch is based on something previous to
> 17978524a636 ("PCI: hv: Fix hv_pci_remove() for hot-remove").  Please
> refresh the patch so it applies to my "master" branch (currently v4.11-rc1).
> 
> Also, the "default: break;" case below is redundant and can be removed.
> 
> So I'll wait for your updated versions of both these patches.
> 
> > ---
> >  drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c | 20 +---
> >  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c
> > b/drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c index a8deeca..4a37598 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c
> > @@ -348,6 +348,7 @@ enum hv_pcibus_state {
> > hv_pcibus_init = 0,
> > hv_pcibus_probed,
> > hv_pcibus_installed,
> > +   hv_pcibus_removed,
> > hv_pcibus_maximum
> >  };
> >
> > @@ -1481,13 +1482,24 @@ static void pci_devices_present_work(struct
> work_struct *work)
> > put_pcichild(hpdev, hv_pcidev_ref_initial);
> > }
> >
> > -   /* Tell the core to rescan bus because there may have been changes.
> */
> > -   if (hbus->state == hv_pcibus_installed) {
> > +   switch (hbus->state) {
> > +   case hv_pcibus_installed:
> > +   /*
> > +* Tell the core to rescan bus
> > +* because there may have been changes.
> > +*/
> > pci_lock_rescan_remove();
> > pci_scan_child_bus(hbus->pci_bus);
> > pci_unlock_rescan_remove();
> > -   } else {
> > +   break;
> > +
> > +   case hv_pcibus_init:
> > +   case hv_pcibus_probed:
> > survey_child_resources(hbus);
> > +   break;
> > +
> > +   default:
> > +   break;
> 
> ^ This is redundant.

I found it still needs "default:break", or it will give a compiler warning:

drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c: In function 'pci_devices_present_work':
drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c:1510:2: warning: enumeration value 
'hv_pcibus_removed' not handled in switch [-Wswitch]
  switch(hbus->state) {
  ^
drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c:1510:2: warning: enumeration value 
'hv_pcibus_maximum' not handled in switch [-Wswitch]

> 
> > }
> >
> > up(&hbus->enum_sem);
> > @@ -2163,6 +2175,7 @@ static int hv_pci_probe(struct hv_device *hdev,
> > hbus = kzalloc(sizeof(*hbus), GFP_KERNEL);
> > if (!hbus)
> > return -ENOMEM;
> > +   hbus->state = hv_pcibus_init;
> >
> > /*
> >  * The PCI bus "domain" is what is called "segment" in ACPI and @@
> > -2305,6 +2318,7 @@ static int hv_pci_remove(struct hv_device *hdev)
> > pci_stop_root_bus(hbus->pci_bus);
> > pci_remove_root_bus(hbus->pci_bus);
> > pci_unlock_rescan_remove();
> > +   hbus->state = hv_pcibus_removed;
> > }
> >
> > ret = hv_send_resources_released(hdev);
> > --
> > 1.8.5.6
___
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel


RE: [PATCH 1/2 v4] pci-hyperv: properly handle pci bus remove

2017-03-16 Thread Long Li
> -Original Message-
> From: Bjorn Helgaas [mailto:helg...@kernel.org]
> Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2017 1:07 PM
> To: Long Li 
> Cc: KY Srinivasan ; Haiyang Zhang
> ; Bjorn Helgaas ;
> de...@linuxdriverproject.org; linux-...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> ker...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v4] pci-hyperv: properly handle pci bus remove
> 
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 02:19:45AM +, Long Li wrote:
> > hv_pci_devices_present is called in hv_pci_remove when we remove a PCI
> > device from host (e.g. by disabling SRIOV on a device). In
> > hv_pci_remove, the bus is already removed before the call, so we don't
> > need to rescan the bus in the workqueue scheduled from
> > hv_pci_devices_present. By introducing status hv_pcibus_removed, we
> can avoid this situation.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Long Li 
> > Reported-by: Xiaofeng Wang 
> > Acked-by: K. Y. Srinivasan 
> 
> This didn't apply for me because saving it to a file resulted in some encoded
> file with "=3D" instead of "=".  I see that mutt is smart enough to deal with
> that in this reply, so there's probably a way for it to decode it when saving 
> to
> a file, but I don't know it.
> 
> I tried to apply it by hand, but the hunk in hv_pci_remove() doesn't match
> the context.  I think your patch is based on something previous to
> 17978524a636 ("PCI: hv: Fix hv_pci_remove() for hot-remove").  Please
> refresh the patch so it applies to my "master" branch (currently v4.11-rc1).
> 
> Also, the "default: break;" case below is redundant and can be removed.
> 
> So I'll wait for your updated versions of both these patches.

Thanks, I'll address those issues and resend the patch.

> 
> > ---
> >  drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c | 20 +---
> >  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c
> > b/drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c index a8deeca..4a37598 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c
> > @@ -348,6 +348,7 @@ enum hv_pcibus_state {
> > hv_pcibus_init = 0,
> > hv_pcibus_probed,
> > hv_pcibus_installed,
> > +   hv_pcibus_removed,
> > hv_pcibus_maximum
> >  };
> >
> > @@ -1481,13 +1482,24 @@ static void pci_devices_present_work(struct
> work_struct *work)
> > put_pcichild(hpdev, hv_pcidev_ref_initial);
> > }
> >
> > -   /* Tell the core to rescan bus because there may have been changes.
> */
> > -   if (hbus->state == hv_pcibus_installed) {
> > +   switch (hbus->state) {
> > +   case hv_pcibus_installed:
> > +   /*
> > +* Tell the core to rescan bus
> > +* because there may have been changes.
> > +*/
> > pci_lock_rescan_remove();
> > pci_scan_child_bus(hbus->pci_bus);
> > pci_unlock_rescan_remove();
> > -   } else {
> > +   break;
> > +
> > +   case hv_pcibus_init:
> > +   case hv_pcibus_probed:
> > survey_child_resources(hbus);
> > +   break;
> > +
> > +   default:
> > +   break;
> 
> ^ This is redundant.
> 
> > }
> >
> > up(&hbus->enum_sem);
> > @@ -2163,6 +2175,7 @@ static int hv_pci_probe(struct hv_device *hdev,
> > hbus = kzalloc(sizeof(*hbus), GFP_KERNEL);
> > if (!hbus)
> > return -ENOMEM;
> > +   hbus->state = hv_pcibus_init;
> >
> > /*
> >  * The PCI bus "domain" is what is called "segment" in ACPI and @@
> > -2305,6 +2318,7 @@ static int hv_pci_remove(struct hv_device *hdev)
> > pci_stop_root_bus(hbus->pci_bus);
> > pci_remove_root_bus(hbus->pci_bus);
> > pci_unlock_rescan_remove();
> > +   hbus->state = hv_pcibus_removed;
> > }
> >
> > ret = hv_send_resources_released(hdev);
> > --
> > 1.8.5.6
___
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel


Re: [PATCH 1/2 v4] pci-hyperv: properly handle pci bus remove

2017-03-16 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 02:19:45AM +, Long Li wrote:
> hv_pci_devices_present is called in hv_pci_remove when we remove a PCI
> device from host (e.g. by disabling SRIOV on a device). In hv_pci_remove,
> the bus is already removed before the call, so we don't need to rescan 
> the bus in the workqueue scheduled from hv_pci_devices_present. By 
> introducing status hv_pcibus_removed, we can avoid this situation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Long Li 
> Reported-by: Xiaofeng Wang 
> Acked-by: K. Y. Srinivasan 

This didn't apply for me because saving it to a file resulted in some
encoded file with "=3D" instead of "=".  I see that mutt is smart enough to
deal with that in this reply, so there's probably a way for it to decode it
when saving to a file, but I don't know it.

I tried to apply it by hand, but the hunk in hv_pci_remove() doesn't match
the context.  I think your patch is based on something previous to
17978524a636 ("PCI: hv: Fix hv_pci_remove() for hot-remove").  Please
refresh the patch so it applies to my "master" branch (currently
v4.11-rc1).

Also, the "default: break;" case below is redundant and can be removed.

So I'll wait for your updated versions of both these patches.

> ---
>  drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c | 20 +---
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c
> index a8deeca..4a37598 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c
> @@ -348,6 +348,7 @@ enum hv_pcibus_state {
>   hv_pcibus_init = 0,
>   hv_pcibus_probed,
>   hv_pcibus_installed,
> + hv_pcibus_removed,
>   hv_pcibus_maximum
>  };
>  
> @@ -1481,13 +1482,24 @@ static void pci_devices_present_work(struct 
> work_struct *work)
>   put_pcichild(hpdev, hv_pcidev_ref_initial);
>   }
>  
> - /* Tell the core to rescan bus because there may have been changes. */
> - if (hbus->state == hv_pcibus_installed) {
> + switch (hbus->state) {
> + case hv_pcibus_installed:
> + /*
> +  * Tell the core to rescan bus
> +  * because there may have been changes.
> +  */
>   pci_lock_rescan_remove();
>   pci_scan_child_bus(hbus->pci_bus);
>   pci_unlock_rescan_remove();
> - } else {
> + break;
> +
> + case hv_pcibus_init:
> + case hv_pcibus_probed:
>   survey_child_resources(hbus);
> + break;
> +
> + default:
> + break;

^ This is redundant.

>   }
>  
>   up(&hbus->enum_sem);
> @@ -2163,6 +2175,7 @@ static int hv_pci_probe(struct hv_device *hdev,
>   hbus = kzalloc(sizeof(*hbus), GFP_KERNEL);
>   if (!hbus)
>   return -ENOMEM;
> + hbus->state = hv_pcibus_init;
>  
>   /*
>* The PCI bus "domain" is what is called "segment" in ACPI and
> @@ -2305,6 +2318,7 @@ static int hv_pci_remove(struct hv_device *hdev)
>   pci_stop_root_bus(hbus->pci_bus);
>   pci_remove_root_bus(hbus->pci_bus);
>   pci_unlock_rescan_remove();
> + hbus->state = hv_pcibus_removed;
>   }
>  
>   ret = hv_send_resources_released(hdev);
> -- 
> 1.8.5.6
___
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel