Re: [PATCH v7 05/24] wfx: add main.c/main.h

2021-11-10 Thread Kalle Valo
Jérôme Pouiller  writes:

> On Thursday 7 October 2021 12:49:47 CEST Kalle Valo wrote:
>> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do
>> not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender
>> and know the content is safe.
>> 
>> 
>> Kalle Valo  writes:
>> 
>> > Jérôme Pouiller  writes:
>> >
>> >>> >> >> I'm not really fond of having this kind of ASCII based parser in 
>> >>> >> >> the
>> >>> >> >> kernel. Do you have an example compressed file somewhere?
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > An example of uncompressed configuration file can be found here[1]. 
>> >>> >> > Once
>> >>> >> > compressed with [2], you get:
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > 
>> >>> >> > {a:{a:4,b:1},b:{a:{a:4,b:0,c:0,d:0,e:A},b:{a:4,b:0,c:0,d:0,e:B},c:{a:4,b:0,c:0,d:0,e:C},d:{a:4,b:0,c:0,d:0,e:D},e:{a:4,b:0,c:0,d:0,e:E},f:{a:4,b:0,c:0,d:0,e:F},g:{a:4,b:0,c:0,d:0,e:G},h:{a:4,b:0,c:0,d:0,e:H},i:{a:4,b:0,c:0,d:0,e:I},j:{a:4,b:0,c:0,d:0,e:J},k:{a:4,b:0,c:0,d:0,e:K},l:{a:4,b:0,c:0,d:1,e:L},m:{a:4,b:0,c:0,d:1,e:M}},c:{a:{a:4},b:{a:6},c:{a:6,c:0},d:{a:6},e:{a:6},f:{a:6}},e:{b:0,c:1},h:{e:0,a:50,b:0,d:0,c:[{a:1,b:[0,0,0,0,0,0]},{a:2,b:[0,0,0,0,0,0]},{a:[3,9],b:[0,0,0,0,0,0]},{a:A,b:[0,0,0,0,0,0]},{a:B,b:[0,0,0,0,0,0]},{a:[C,D],b:[0,0,0,0,0,0]},{a:E,b:[0,0,0,0,0,0]}]},j:{a:0,b:0}}
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> So what's the grand idea with this braces format? I'm not getting it.
>> >>> >
>> >>> >   - It allows to describe a tree structure
>> >>> >   - It is ascii (easy to dump, easy to copy-paste)
>> >>> >   - It is small (as I explain below, size matters)
>> >>> >   - Since it is similar to JSON, the structure is obvious to many 
>> >>> > people
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Anyway, I am not the author of that and I have to deal with it.
>> >>>
>> >>> I'm a supported for JSON like formats, flexibility and all that. But
>> >>> they belong to user space, not kernel.
>> >>>
>> >>> >> Usually the drivers just consider this kind of firmware configuration
>> >>> >> data as a binary blob and dump it to the firmware, without knowing 
>> >>> >> what
>> >>> >> the data contains. Can't you do the same?
>> >>> >
>> >>> > [I didn't had received this mail :( ]
>> >>> >
>> >>> > The idea was also to send it as a binary blob. However, the firmware 
>> >>> > use
>> >>> > a limited buffer (1500 bytes) to parse it. In most of case the PDS 
>> >>> > exceeds
>> >>> > this size. So, we have to split the PDS before to send it.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Unfortunately, we can't split it anywhere. The PDS is a tree structure 
>> >>> > and
>> >>> > the firmware expects to receive a well formatted tree.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > So, the easiest way to send it to the firmware is to split the tree
>> >>> > between each root nodes and send each subtree separately (see also the
>> >>> > comment above wfx_send_pds()).
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Anyway, someone has to cook this configuration before to send it to the
>> >>> > firmware. This could be done by a script outside of the kernel. Then we
>> >>> > could change the input format to simplify a bit the processing in the
>> >>> > kernel.
>> >>>
>> >>> I think a binary file with TLV format would be much better, but I'm sure
>> >>> there also other good choises.
>> >>>
>> >>> > However, the driver has already some users and I worry that changing
>> >>> > the input format would lead to a mess.
>> >>>
>> >>> You can implement a script which converts the old format to the new
>> >>> format. And you can use different naming scheme in the new format so
>> >>> that we don't accidentally load the old format. And even better if you
>> >>> add a some kind of signature in the new format and give a proper error
>> >>> from the driver if it doesn't match.
>> >>
>> >> Ok. I am going to change the input format. I think the new function is
>> >> going to look like:
>> >>
>> >> int wfx_send_pds(struct wfx_dev *wdev, u8 *buf, size_t buf_len)
>> >> {
>> >>  int ret;
>> >>  int start = 0;
>> >>
>> >>  if (buf[start] != '{') {
>> >>  dev_err(wdev->dev, "valid PDS start with '{'. Did you forget 
>> >> to compress it?\n");
>> >>  return -EINVAL;
>> >>  }
>> >>  while (start < buf_len) {
>> >>  len = strnlen(buf + start, buf_len - start);
>> >>  if (len > WFX_PDS_MAX_SIZE) {
>> >>  dev_err(wdev->dev, "PDS chunk is too big (legacy 
>> >> format?)\n");
>> >>  return -EINVAL;
>> >>  }
>> >>  dev_dbg(wdev->dev, "send PDS '%s'\n", buf + start);
>> >>  ret = wfx_hif_configuration(wdev, buf + start, len);
>> >>  /* FIXME: Add error handling here */
>> >>  start += len;
>> >>  }
>> >>  return 0;
>> >
>> > Did you read at all what I wrote above? Please ditch the ASCII format
>> > completely.
>> 
>> Sorry, I read this too hastily. I just saw "buf[start] != '{'" and
>> assumed this is the same ASCII format, but not sure anymore. Can you
>> explain what changes you made now?
>
> The script I am going to write

Re: [PATCH v7 05/24] wfx: add main.c/main.h

2021-11-10 Thread Jérôme Pouiller
On Wednesday 10 November 2021 10:58:41 CET Kalle Valo wrote:
> Jérôme Pouiller  writes:
> > On Thursday 7 October 2021 12:49:47 CEST Kalle Valo wrote:
> >> Kalle Valo  writes:
> >> > Jérôme Pouiller  writes:
> >> >>> >> >> I'm not really fond of having this kind of ASCII based parser in 
> >> >>> >> >> the
> >> >>> >> >> kernel. Do you have an example compressed file somewhere?
> >> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >> > An example of uncompressed configuration file can be found 
> >> >>> >> > here[1]. Once
> >> >>> >> > compressed with [2], you get:
> >> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >> > 
> >> >>> >> > {a:{a:4,b:1},b:{a:{a:4,b:0,c:0,d:0,e:A},b:{a:4,b:0,c:0,d:0,e:B},c:{a:4,b:0,c:0,d:0,e:C},d:{a:4,b:0,c:0,d:0,e:D},e:{a:4,b:0,c:0,d:0,e:E},f:{a:4,b:0,c:0,d:0,e:F},g:{a:4,b:0,c:0,d:0,e:G},h:{a:4,b:0,c:0,d:0,e:H},i:{a:4,b:0,c:0,d:0,e:I},j:{a:4,b:0,c:0,d:0,e:J},k:{a:4,b:0,c:0,d:0,e:K},l:{a:4,b:0,c:0,d:1,e:L},m:{a:4,b:0,c:0,d:1,e:M}},c:{a:{a:4},b:{a:6},c:{a:6,c:0},d:{a:6},e:{a:6},f:{a:6}},e:{b:0,c:1},h:{e:0,a:50,b:0,d:0,c:[{a:1,b:[0,0,0,0,0,0]},{a:2,b:[0,0,0,0,0,0]},{a:[3,9],b:[0,0,0,0,0,0]},{a:A,b:[0,0,0,0,0,0]},{a:B,b:[0,0,0,0,0,0]},{a:[C,D],b:[0,0,0,0,0,0]},{a:E,b:[0,0,0,0,0,0]}]},j:{a:0,b:0}}
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> So what's the grand idea with this braces format? I'm not getting 
> >> >>> >> it.
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >   - It allows to describe a tree structure
> >> >>> >   - It is ascii (easy to dump, easy to copy-paste)
> >> >>> >   - It is small (as I explain below, size matters)
> >> >>> >   - Since it is similar to JSON, the structure is obvious to many 
> >> >>> > people
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > Anyway, I am not the author of that and I have to deal with it.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I'm a supported for JSON like formats, flexibility and all that. But
> >> >>> they belong to user space, not kernel.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> >> Usually the drivers just consider this kind of firmware 
> >> >>> >> configuration
> >> >>> >> data as a binary blob and dump it to the firmware, without knowing 
> >> >>> >> what
> >> >>> >> the data contains. Can't you do the same?
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > [I didn't had received this mail :( ]
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > The idea was also to send it as a binary blob. However, the firmware 
> >> >>> > use
> >> >>> > a limited buffer (1500 bytes) to parse it. In most of case the PDS 
> >> >>> > exceeds
> >> >>> > this size. So, we have to split the PDS before to send it.
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > Unfortunately, we can't split it anywhere. The PDS is a tree 
> >> >>> > structure and
> >> >>> > the firmware expects to receive a well formatted tree.
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > So, the easiest way to send it to the firmware is to split the tree
> >> >>> > between each root nodes and send each subtree separately (see also 
> >> >>> > the
> >> >>> > comment above wfx_send_pds()).
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > Anyway, someone has to cook this configuration before to send it to 
> >> >>> > the
> >> >>> > firmware. This could be done by a script outside of the kernel. Then 
> >> >>> > we
> >> >>> > could change the input format to simplify a bit the processing in the
> >> >>> > kernel.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I think a binary file with TLV format would be much better, but I'm 
> >> >>> sure
> >> >>> there also other good choises.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> > However, the driver has already some users and I worry that changing
> >> >>> > the input format would lead to a mess.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> You can implement a script which converts the old format to the new
> >> >>> format. And you can use different naming scheme in the new format so
> >> >>> that we don't accidentally load the old format. And even better if you
> >> >>> add a some kind of signature in the new format and give a proper error
> >> >>> from the driver if it doesn't match.
> >> >>
> >> >> Ok. I am going to change the input format. I think the new function is
> >> >> going to look like:
> >> >>
> >> >> int wfx_send_pds(struct wfx_dev *wdev, u8 *buf, size_t buf_len)
> >> >> {
> >> >>  int ret;
> >> >>  int start = 0;
> >> >>
> >> >>  if (buf[start] != '{') {
> >> >>  dev_err(wdev->dev, "valid PDS start with '{'. Did you 
> >> >> forget to compress it?\n");
> >> >>  return -EINVAL;
> >> >>  }
> >> >>  while (start < buf_len) {
> >> >>  len = strnlen(buf + start, buf_len - start);
> >> >>  if (len > WFX_PDS_MAX_SIZE) {
> >> >>  dev_err(wdev->dev, "PDS chunk is too big (legacy 
> >> >> format?)\n");
> >> >>  return -EINVAL;
> >> >>  }
> >> >>  dev_dbg(wdev->dev, "send PDS '%s'\n", buf + start);
> >> >>  ret = wfx_hif_configuration(wdev, buf + start, len);
> >> >>  /* FIXME: Add error handling here */
> >> >>  start += len;
> >> >>  }
> >> >>  return 0;
> >> >
> >> > Did you read at all what I wrote above? Please ditch the ASCII format
> >> > completely.
> >>
> >> Sorry, I read this too hastily. I just saw "buf[start] != '{'" and
> >> assume

[staging:staging-testing] BUILD REGRESSION fcb65bbc671b25259d0c382593a62bc86472bad3

2021-11-10 Thread kernel test robot
tree/branch: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/staging.git 
staging-testing
branch HEAD: fcb65bbc671b25259d0c382593a62bc86472bad3  staging: rtl8192u: 
remove the if condition without effect

possible Error/Warning in current branch (please contact us if interested):

drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c:458:5: error: no 
previous prototype for 'vchiq_platform_init' [-Werror=missing-prototypes]
drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c:586:1: error: no 
previous prototype for 'vchiq_platform_get_arm_state' 
[-Werror=missing-prototypes]

Error/Warning ids grouped by kconfigs:

gcc_recent_errors
|-- arc-allyesconfig
|   |-- 
drivers-staging-vc04_services-interface-vchiq_arm-vchiq_arm.c:error:no-previous-prototype-for-vchiq_platform_get_arm_state
|   `-- 
drivers-staging-vc04_services-interface-vchiq_arm-vchiq_arm.c:error:no-previous-prototype-for-vchiq_platform_init
|-- arm-allmodconfig
|   |-- 
drivers-staging-vc04_services-interface-vchiq_arm-vchiq_arm.c:error:no-previous-prototype-for-vchiq_platform_get_arm_state
|   `-- 
drivers-staging-vc04_services-interface-vchiq_arm-vchiq_arm.c:error:no-previous-prototype-for-vchiq_platform_init
|-- arm-allyesconfig
|   |-- 
drivers-staging-vc04_services-interface-vchiq_arm-vchiq_arm.c:error:no-previous-prototype-for-vchiq_platform_get_arm_state
|   `-- 
drivers-staging-vc04_services-interface-vchiq_arm-vchiq_arm.c:error:no-previous-prototype-for-vchiq_platform_init
|-- h8300-allyesconfig
|   |-- 
drivers-staging-vc04_services-interface-vchiq_arm-vchiq_arm.c:error:no-previous-prototype-for-vchiq_platform_get_arm_state
|   `-- 
drivers-staging-vc04_services-interface-vchiq_arm-vchiq_arm.c:error:no-previous-prototype-for-vchiq_platform_init
|-- m68k-allmodconfig
|   |-- 
drivers-staging-vc04_services-interface-vchiq_arm-vchiq_arm.c:error:no-previous-prototype-for-vchiq_platform_get_arm_state
|   `-- 
drivers-staging-vc04_services-interface-vchiq_arm-vchiq_arm.c:error:no-previous-prototype-for-vchiq_platform_init
|-- m68k-allyesconfig
|   |-- 
drivers-staging-vc04_services-interface-vchiq_arm-vchiq_arm.c:error:no-previous-prototype-for-vchiq_platform_get_arm_state
|   `-- 
drivers-staging-vc04_services-interface-vchiq_arm-vchiq_arm.c:error:no-previous-prototype-for-vchiq_platform_init
|-- nios2-allyesconfig
|   |-- 
drivers-staging-vc04_services-interface-vchiq_arm-vchiq_arm.c:error:no-previous-prototype-for-vchiq_platform_get_arm_state
|   `-- 
drivers-staging-vc04_services-interface-vchiq_arm-vchiq_arm.c:error:no-previous-prototype-for-vchiq_platform_init
|-- parisc-allyesconfig
|   |-- 
drivers-staging-vc04_services-interface-vchiq_arm-vchiq_arm.c:error:no-previous-prototype-for-vchiq_platform_get_arm_state
|   `-- 
drivers-staging-vc04_services-interface-vchiq_arm-vchiq_arm.c:error:no-previous-prototype-for-vchiq_platform_init
|-- powerpc-allmodconfig
|   |-- 
drivers-staging-vc04_services-interface-vchiq_arm-vchiq_arm.c:error:no-previous-prototype-for-vchiq_platform_get_arm_state
|   `-- 
drivers-staging-vc04_services-interface-vchiq_arm-vchiq_arm.c:error:no-previous-prototype-for-vchiq_platform_init
|-- powerpc-allyesconfig
|   |-- 
drivers-staging-vc04_services-interface-vchiq_arm-vchiq_arm.c:error:no-previous-prototype-for-vchiq_platform_get_arm_state
|   `-- 
drivers-staging-vc04_services-interface-vchiq_arm-vchiq_arm.c:error:no-previous-prototype-for-vchiq_platform_init
|-- riscv-allmodconfig
|   |-- 
drivers-staging-vc04_services-interface-vchiq_arm-vchiq_arm.c:error:no-previous-prototype-for-vchiq_platform_get_arm_state
|   `-- 
drivers-staging-vc04_services-interface-vchiq_arm-vchiq_arm.c:error:no-previous-prototype-for-vchiq_platform_init
|-- riscv-allyesconfig
|   |-- 
drivers-staging-vc04_services-interface-vchiq_arm-vchiq_arm.c:error:no-previous-prototype-for-vchiq_platform_get_arm_state
|   `-- 
drivers-staging-vc04_services-interface-vchiq_arm-vchiq_arm.c:error:no-previous-prototype-for-vchiq_platform_init
|-- s390-allyesconfig
|   |-- 
drivers-staging-vc04_services-interface-vchiq_arm-vchiq_arm.c:error:no-previous-prototype-for-vchiq_platform_get_arm_state
|   `-- 
drivers-staging-vc04_services-interface-vchiq_arm-vchiq_arm.c:error:no-previous-prototype-for-vchiq_platform_init
|-- sh-allmodconfig
|   |-- 
drivers-staging-vc04_services-interface-vchiq_arm-vchiq_arm.c:error:no-previous-prototype-for-vchiq_platform_get_arm_state
|   `-- 
drivers-staging-vc04_services-interface-vchiq_arm-vchiq_arm.c:error:no-previous-prototype-for-vchiq_platform_init
`-- xtensa-allyesconfig
|-- 
drivers-staging-vc04_services-interface-vchiq_arm-vchiq_arm.c:error:no-previous-prototype-for-vchiq_platform_get_arm_state
`-- 
drivers-staging-vc04_services-interface-vchiq_arm-vchiq_arm.c:error:no-previous-prototype-for-vchiq_platform_init

elapsed time: 1032m

configs tested: 53
configs skipped: 3

gcc tested configs:
arm defconfig
arm64allyescon