Re: [Dspace-tech] Edit Submitters button disappeared after upgrade to 1.4.1
Hi Maike, this is due to see bug: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1638565group_id=19984atid=119984 Here is a patch: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1638569group_id=19984atid=319984 hope that helps Claudia Jürgen University of Dortmund Maike Dulk schrieb: Hi, after an upgrade from 1.2.2, via 1.3.2 to 1.4.1 the Edit Submitters in the sidebar of the Collection page has disappeared. The rest of the upgrade seems to have gone fine. I'm looking deep into the servlet code but - until now - it is completely dark to me what could have caused this and how to repair it. Does anyone have a clue? TIA Maike Dulk Programmer / Analyst McPherson Library University of Victoria [EMAIL PROTECTED] - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ ___ DSpace-tech mailing list DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ ___ DSpace-tech mailing list DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech
Re: [Dspace-tech] srb/s3/etc and lucene
Hi Cory: Not sure about the limits of Lucene, but I think the larger point is that the back-ends are expected only to hold the real content or assets. Everything else (full-text indices and the like) are *artifacts* (can be recreated from the assets) that we don't need to manage in the same way. If for performance reasons we want to put them where the assets are we can, but there is really no connection between the two that the system imposes. Does this get at your question, or did I miss the point? Thanks, Richard R On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 12:13 -0400, Cory Snavely wrote: (Apologies if this has been discussed to resolution; after a few attempts to search the archives, I concluded they are really broken. 500 errors, bad links, etc.) For those using, interested in, or knowledgeable about using API-based storage (SRB, S3) as a backend for DSpace: how does doing so affect full-text indexing? Can anyone describe how, in such a setup, full text is stored and indexed? My uneducated impression is that Lucene would want to work only against a filesystem. Thanks, Cory Snavely University of Michigan Library IT Core Services - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ ___ DSpace-tech mailing list DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ ___ DSpace-tech mailing list DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech
Re: [Dspace-tech] Edit Submitters button disappeared after upgrade to 1.4.1
Dear Claudia, works like a charm - you just saved me a whole lot of work and frustration :-) Many thanks! Maike On 3-May-07, at 12:02 AM, Claudia Jürgen wrote: Hi Maike, this is due to see bug: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php? func=detailaid=1638565group_id=19984atid=119984 Here is a patch: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php? func=detailaid=1638569group_id=19984atid=319984 hope that helps Claudia Jürgen University of Dortmund Maike Dulk schrieb: Hi, after an upgrade from 1.2.2, via 1.3.2 to 1.4.1 the Edit Submitters in the sidebar of the Collection page has disappeared. The rest of the upgrade seems to have gone fine. I'm looking deep into the servlet code but - until now - it is completely dark to me what could have caused this and how to repair it. Does anyone have a clue? TIA Maike Dulk Programmer / Analyst McPherson Library University of Victoria [EMAIL PROTECTED] - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ ___ DSpace-tech mailing list DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ ___ DSpace-tech mailing list DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech
Re: [Dspace-tech] srb/s3/etc and lucene
Well, I'm just wondering, in specific terms, if we use an object-based storage system as an assetstore rather than a filesystem, where the files that Lucene indexes actually sit. It's my understanding that in a filesystem-based assetstore, for example, text is extracted from PDFs and stored in a separate file *within the assetstore directory* that Lucene crawls. I just don't know how that sort of thing is handled when using object-based storage. On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 13:28 -0400, Richard Rodgers wrote: Hi Cory: Not sure about the limits of Lucene, but I think the larger point is that the back-ends are expected only to hold the real content or assets. Everything else (full-text indices and the like) are *artifacts* (can be recreated from the assets) that we don't need to manage in the same way. If for performance reasons we want to put them where the assets are we can, but there is really no connection between the two that the system imposes. Does this get at your question, or did I miss the point? Thanks, Richard R On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 12:13 -0400, Cory Snavely wrote: (Apologies if this has been discussed to resolution; after a few attempts to search the archives, I concluded they are really broken. 500 errors, bad links, etc.) For those using, interested in, or knowledgeable about using API-based storage (SRB, S3) as a backend for DSpace: how does doing so affect full-text indexing? Can anyone describe how, in such a setup, full text is stored and indexed? My uneducated impression is that Lucene would want to work only against a filesystem. Thanks, Cory Snavely University of Michigan Library IT Core Services - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ ___ DSpace-tech mailing list DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ ___ DSpace-tech mailing list DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech
Re: [Dspace-tech] srb/s3/etc and lucene
On 5/4/07, Cory Snavely [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, I'm just wondering, in specific terms, if we use an object-based storage system as an assetstore rather than a filesystem, where the files that Lucene indexes actually sit. Its tricky, this is what FilterMedia is for, it actually extracts the text and places it as a bitstream in the assetstore. Lucene full text indexing is done against the assetstore bitstreams in all cases (well accept for the metadata table in the database). So ultimately your pushing the text bitstreams into the assetstore (s3) in FilterMedia and pulling it back out on Lucene indexing, a double-whammy. Cheers, Mark It's my understanding that in a filesystem-based assetstore, for example, text is extracted from PDFs and stored in a separate file *within the assetstore directory* that Lucene crawls. I just don't know how that sort of thing is handled when using object-based storage. On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 13:28 -0400, Richard Rodgers wrote: Hi Cory: Not sure about the limits of Lucene, but I think the larger point is that the back-ends are expected only to hold the real content or assets. Everything else (full-text indices and the like) are *artifacts* (can be recreated from the assets) that we don't need to manage in the same way. If for performance reasons we want to put them where the assets are we can, but there is really no connection between the two that the system imposes. Does this get at your question, or did I miss the point? Thanks, Richard R On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 12:13 -0400, Cory Snavely wrote: (Apologies if this has been discussed to resolution; after a few attempts to search the archives, I concluded they are really broken. 500 errors, bad links, etc.) For those using, interested in, or knowledgeable about using API-based storage (SRB, S3) as a backend for DSpace: how does doing so affect full-text indexing? Can anyone describe how, in such a setup, full text is stored and indexed? My uneducated impression is that Lucene would want to work only against a filesystem. Thanks, Cory Snavely University of Michigan Library IT Core Services -- --- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ ___ DSpace-tech mailing list DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech -- --- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ ___ DSpace-tech mailing list DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech -- --- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ ___ DSpace-tech mailing list DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech ~ Mark R. Diggory - DSpace Systems Manager MIT Libraries, Systems and Technology Services Massachusetts Institute of Technology - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/___ DSpace-tech mailing list DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech
