RE: [dspam-users] Dspam Project still active?

2008-10-28 Thread Julien Valroff
Le mardi 28 octobre 2008 à 17:17 +0200, Jani Partanen a écrit :
 Well I have been here a few years and this is now a 4th time I think when
 people speak about fork. I have said it before and say it again. Fork is
 only solution if dspam gonna survive. SN just don't do anything to support
 this fine program.
 
 Every time when there is fork talk, they will pop up here and tell you that
 We will do this and that but they never do it.

+1 - I am not a developer, hence cannot initiate the fork - but as
others have already said, I am ready to help for other things (testing,
translations, documentation, project management, website, etc.).

IMHO, we would need at least 2 core developers to lead the project - as
this would mean working a lot on dspam, people might de frightened...

Moreover, I am not sure all possibly interested developers read this
list. I hence propose we all rely this query on our personal
blogs/websites so that the information might have a larger audience (and
will hopefully been published on major opensource websites).

As I guess we are all from different countries, it might also be
interesting to relay the information on local websites.

Could someone try and sum up what would be the required competences to
set up such a fork?

Cheers,
Julien


!DSPAM:1011,49074ab8150922051512830!




[dspam-users] Re: Dspam Project still active?

2008-10-28 Thread Felix Schwarz

Julien Valroff schrieb:

Could someone try and sum up what would be the required competences to
set up such a fork?


The same as always: Developers which are willing to work. As Jani I'm on 
this list since several years. For every fork talk, something is 
missing: People saying I will do.


Please stop offering hosting etc. This doesn't matter imho. What is 
missing (and it was missing for every single fork thread in the past) is 
developers. So if you are no developer, there is not much you can do.


Any successful fork will need developers which do the hard work without 
immediate gains. So I think a successful fork will 'just happen' by 
someone who develops for his own and send patches. If there are enough 
patches floating around, someone will set up more infrastructure.


And don't bet on the hope that 'maybe not everyone is informed'. Getting 
real developers (and not 'web developers') which can code C with high 
quality is extremly hard. So either there are people on this list which 
do just start or DSPAM will be frozen like the last years.


fs

PS: Don't get me wrong - I would really like to see more development 
activities. But don't be naive: A successful fork is very hard and as a 
non-developer you probably underestimate the effort needed by a factor 
of 10.


!DSPAM:1011,49074dcf150922100047616!




AW: [dspam-users] Re: Dspam Project still active?

2008-10-28 Thread Imposit.com - Webmaster
Felix is right, in fiorst line developers are needed
What about the apache foundation and spamassasin maybe we should talk with them 
to bring out an hybrid fork whatever :-)


-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Felix Schwarz
Gesendet: Dienstag, 28. Oktober 2008 18:37
An: Julien Valroff
Cc: Jani Partanen; dspam-users@lists.nuclearelephant.com
Betreff: [dspam-users] Re: Dspam Project still active?

Julien Valroff schrieb:
 Could someone try and sum up what would be the required competences to
 set up such a fork?

The same as always: Developers which are willing to work. As Jani I'm on 
this list since several years. For every fork talk, something is 
missing: People saying I will do.

Please stop offering hosting etc. This doesn't matter imho. What is 
missing (and it was missing for every single fork thread in the past) is 
developers. So if you are no developer, there is not much you can do.

Any successful fork will need developers which do the hard work without 
immediate gains. So I think a successful fork will 'just happen' by 
someone who develops for his own and send patches. If there are enough 
patches floating around, someone will set up more infrastructure.

And don't bet on the hope that 'maybe not everyone is informed'. Getting 
real developers (and not 'web developers') which can code C with high 
quality is extremly hard. So either there are people on this list which 
do just start or DSPAM will be frozen like the last years.

fs

PS: Don't get me wrong - I would really like to see more development 
activities. But don't be naive: A successful fork is very hard and as a 
non-developer you probably underestimate the effort needed by a factor 
of 10.








!DSPAM:1011,49075255150925852358820!




Re: [dspam-users] Re: Dspam Project still active?

2008-10-28 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount

--On October 28, 2008 6:37:12 PM +0100 Felix Schwarz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:


Julien Valroff schrieb:

Could someone try and sum up what would be the required competences to
set up such a fork?


The same as always: Developers which are willing to work. As Jani I'm on
this list since several years. For every fork talk, something is missing:
People saying I will do.


If those were present, then there would be no need to fork, as SN has made
it quite clear that they'd be happy to allow other developers access the
code and commit fixes, do releases, etc.

The real problem here is a lack of developers, either from SN or the
community.  Forking doesn't solve either.

--Quanah

!DSPAM:1011,490788de150921006924847!